2nd Sino-German workshop on Quantum Engineering, Reisensburg (22-26/9/2007) 1
Femto group - LCAR - Toulouse
Antoine Monmayrant Jean-Christophe Delagnes
Jérôme Degert Sébastien Zamith
Sabine Stock Céline Nicole Emma Sokell Peter Zahariev
Giorgio Turri Arnaud Arbouet
Kevin Rafael Damien Bigourd Jean-Benoît Hamard
Elsa Baynard Valérie Blanchet
Aziz Bouchene Béatrice Chatel LCAR-IRSAMC
CNRS, Univ. P. Sabatier, Région Midi-Pyrénées Fondation Del Duca, Ministère de la Recherche Minist Affaires Etrangères, JSPS, IMS, ANR, IUF
Collaborations:
Ludger Wöste, E. Schreiber (Berlin) Marc Vrakking (Amsterdam)
Noureddine Melikechi (Delaware) Anne L’Huillier (Lund)
Dolorès Gauyacq (Orsay) Gustav Gerber (Würzburg) Thomas Baumert (Kassel)
Matthias Wollenhaupt (Kassel) Marcus Motzkus (MPQ Garching) Kenji Ohmori (IMS, Okazaki) Chris Meier (LCAR, Toulouse) Benjamin Whitaker (Leeds) Wolfgang Schleich (Ulm) Gerhard Paulus ( Texas) Ilya Averbukh (Rehovot) Bertrand Girard
Coherent control in Atoms with
ultrashort laser pulses
Toulouse : Romains’ wall
Femto group - LCAR - Toulouse
Place du Capitole
Le Pont Neuf
Basilique Saint-Sernin
(1180 – 1478)
Place du Capitole
Femto group - LCAR - Toulouse
- Molecules : Gerber, Science 98 - Clusters : Wöste, CP 2001
- Biological systems :Herek, Nature 2002 - Strong field : Levis, Science 2001
- ….
Control using shaped pulses
- 2 ph. transitions : Silberberg, Nature 98 - Small molecules : Leone, JCP 98
- Quantum info: Bucksbaum, Nature 99 - 1 photon transition : Girard PRL 2002 - ….
Pulse shaper Theory
System
Closed-loop Open-loop
System Pulse shaper
Optimization
Algorithm GOAL
- Silberberg, Nature 2002
- Wöste , Science 2003. PRL 2004 - Vrakking PRA 2004
- Dantus Optics Express 2004 - Bucksbaum PRL 2004 …..
In between…
Learning something on the interaction
Coherent control : opening the loop …
Open loop coherent control of simple systems
Meshulach, Silberberg Nature, 396 1998, PRA 99, PRL 01
Show a new effect ?
Simple System
Shaper Theory
Measure Shape
Many results:
2 photons transitions Silberberg, Nature 1998, PRA 99, PRL 01, Dantus JCP 03 …
Raman transitions Silberberg, Nature 02, Faucher 04, Motzkus 06…
Small molecules Leone et al., JCP 1998
1 photon transitions Girard - Motzkus, PRL 2002
Quantum information Bucksbaum-Weinacht, Nature 99, PRL 98, Science 00 ..
…
Femto group - LCAR - Toulouse
Quantum Interferences …
Many different ways to observe, study, control, use Quantum Interferences …
- External degree(s) of freedom : Matter waves (atoms, molecules, clusters, BEC …)
- Internal degree(s) of freedom : Ramsey fringes
In the Ultrashort world:
- Interferences of wave packets created by different laser pulses
- Interferences within the excitation process
Two level system laser pulses
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
0.000 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.010
-400 -200 200 400 600 time
0
0.000 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.010
-400 -200 200 400 600 time
0
Rabi Oscillations Adiabatic transfer
Coherent transients
0 1
τ
Ω >
0 1
τ
Ω <<
( )
( ) t μ E t Ω =
=
" 0
φ = φ " ≠ 0
Back to basics
FT limited Chirped
Strong field
Weak field
In molecular potentials, the effect of chirp is opposite between weak and strong field
Femto group - LCAR - Toulouse
Outline
I. Wave packet Interferences in atoms II. Quantum state holography
III. Interferences within the excitation process IV. Optics as an analog computer: Number
factorization
Interferences between identical time-delayed quantum paths : Ramsey fringes - Theory
τ L
2 π / ω L
τ L
2 π / ω L
t 0 t 0+ τ t
E ( t )
( ) t i a e
−iω te a e
−iω( )
t−τe
Ψ = + +
)weak field regime :
)interference phase oscillates rapidly with τ ª φ cc = ω τ
φ cc = 0 [2π] constructive interferences φ cc = π [2π] destructive interferences
Time delay τ Excited state
population
Period = 2π/ω
( ) t i a e
−iωte
Ψ = +
|i 〉
|e 〉
ω
=
t
0t
0+ τ
0
1 a <<
Φ
CCFemto group - LCAR - Toulouse
Interferences between identical time-delayed quantum paths : Ramsey fringes - Experiment
V. Blanchet et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2716 (1997).
M. A. Bouchene et al, Eur. Phys. J. D 2, 131 (1998).
-3 0 3 6 9 12 15
delay / ps 0
2 4 6 8 10
Cs+ / a.u
1.6 ps
T
opt=2.56 fs T
quant=1.28 fs
35040 35060
-10 0 10
Similar studies by
G. Fleming et al, JCP 93, 856 (1990); 95, 1487 (’91); 96, 4180 (92) R. Jones, P. Bucksbaum
et al, PRL 71, 2575 (1993); 75, 1491 (95)T. Hänsch
et al, Opt Lett 22, 540 (1997)K. Ohmori et al, PRL 91, 243003 (2003), 96, 093002 (2006) S.S. Vianna
et al,PRA 74, 055402 (2006)
Pulse sequence produced by a Michelson interferometer
Beats due to spin-orbit precession
τ
7d
2D
3/2,5/26s
2S
1/2τ=1.6 ps Cs+
(1)
Cs(2)
769 nm 769 nm
τ
Interferences of free electron wavepackets
F. Krausz et al, Attosecond Double-Slit Experiment, PRL 95, 040401 (2005)
M. J. J. Vrakking, A. L'Huillier, et al, "Attosecond electron wave packet interferometry" Nat. Phys. 2, 323 (2006)
Femto group - LCAR - Toulouse
Wp interferences with a pulse shaper
1 ( ) i 2 ( )
E t + e θ E t
High Res. Pulse Shaper:
Phase - Amplitude control with 640 pixels.
shaping window of 35 ps.
high complexity.
high amplitude dynamic (30 dB).
75 % power transmission.
A. Monmayrant, B. Chatel. "A new phase and amplitude High Resolution Pulse Shaper."
Rev. Sci. Inst. 75, 2668 (2004)
|a
e2(t)|
2
(u. arb.)
Test of interferometric stability
0π 1π 2π 3π 4π
0 2 4
|a e2(t)|2 (u. arb.)
Phase θ (rad)
A sequence of 2 FT limited pulses with a relative phase θ …
{ (1) }
( ) 1 e x p ( p ) / 2
H ω = + ⎡ ⎣ i θ + i φ ω − ω ⎤ ⎦
-1 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 1 2 3 4
Delay (ps)
θ=π
Intensit y (u. arb.) θ=0
θ=0
θ=π
Ramsey fringes
1+1 = 0 to 4
Femto group - LCAR - Toulouse
Outline
I. Wave packet Interferences in atoms II. Quantum state holography
Measuring the time evolution of the quantum state and not only the population
III. Interferences within the excitation process IV. Optics as an analog computer: Number
factorization
2 2
2ln 2
( )
c2
t t
t i
a t e e τ e φ dt
⎛ ′ ⎞ ′
− ⎜ ⎟ −
⎝ ⎠ ′′
−∞ ′
∝ ∫
20 ps τ c ≈
t 1 t 2
2 2 " φ
5 2
at resonance 8 10 fs φ ′′ = −
-2 0 2 4 6 8 10
Delay (ps)
6p-5s Fluorescen ce
Application of wave packet interferences to Quantum State Holography
6d, 8s
5p2P1/2
τ
5s
6p
Fluorescence (420 nm)
Rb
Excited state evolution through chirped pulse excitation
Zamith, et al, PRL 87, 033001 (2001) Degert et al, PRL 89, 203003(2002)
e
Im(a (t))
Re(a (t))
-0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2
-0.20 -0.15 -0.10 -0.05 0.00 0.05
Cornu spiral
Femto group - LCAR - Toulouse
Quantum state holography I
6d, 8s
5p2P1/2
τ
5s
6p
Fluorescence (420 nm)
Two level system: 5s- 5p²P1/2 in Rb
Red pump: resonant and chirped
Yellow probe: shorter than pump and CT dynamic
Fluorescence is monitored as function of the pump- probe delay
Rb Principle:
Use a first pulse to create a local oscillator in the atom
The population in 5p (probed in real
time) reflects the beating between this
local oscillator and the wave function
excited by the driving field
Quantum state holography II
( ) ( )
(2)
(1) 2
( )
( ) 1 exp ( ) ( ) / 2
2
O I
p p
E H E
H i i i
ω ω ω
ω θ φ ω ω φ ω ω
=
⎡ ⎡ ⎤ ⎤
= + ⎢ ⎢ + − + − ⎥ ⎥
⎢ ⎣ ⎦ ⎥
⎣ ⎦
6d, 8s
5p2P1/2
τ
5s
6p
Fluorescence (420 nm)
Two level system: 5s- 5p²P1/2 in Rb
Red pump: resonant and chirped
Yellow probe: shorter than pump and CT dynamic
Fluorescence is monitored as function of the pump- probe delay
Rb
NOPA Ti:Sa
Oscillator
CPA
795 nm 1kHz 1 mJ 130 fs
607 nm 1kHz 5 µJ 20 fs
795 nm 1kHz 5 µJ
Delay line Rb
PM
Rb τ E
O( ) ω
( )
E
Iω
Femto group - LCAR - Toulouse
Quantum state holography III
From CT to …
2
1 2
( ) ( ) ( )
A e e
CT t ∝ a t + a t
1 ( ) 2 ( )
E t + E t
A)
2
1 2
( ) ( ) . ( )
B e e
CT t ∝ a t + i a t
1 ( ) 2 ( )
E t + i E t
B)
-1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 0.0
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
Fl uorescence ( a rb. uni ts)
τ (ps) CT
ACT
BBy combination of the two CT…
Quantum state holography IV
…the evolution of the atomic quantum state
By
combination of the two CT…
A. Monmayrant, B. Chatel, B. Girard, PRL, 96 103002 (2006) ; Opt. Lett.
31, 410 (2006) ;, Opt. Comm. 264, 256 (2006)
Femto group - LCAR - Toulouse
Quantum state holography
Principle (Leichtle, Schleich, Averbukh, Shapiro PRL 80 (1998)):
Interference between a reference and an object quantum state.
Several measurements at different delays provide reconstruction of the object state
Two experiments :
- Rydberg state wave packet measurement
(Weinacht, Ahn, Bucksbaum, PRL 80, 5508 (1998) Nature 397, 233 (1999))
- Vibrational wave packet measurement (Walmsley et al, PRL 74, 884 (1995);
J. Phys. B 31 (1998))
Our scheme is a direct measurement of the w.p. during the interaction
See also Ohmori et al, PRL 96 , 093002 (2006)
Outline
I. Wave packet Interferences in atoms II. Quantum state holography
III. Interferences within the excitation process IV. Optics as an analog computer: Number
factorization
Femto group - LCAR - Toulouse
Interferences within the excitation process
Takes advantage of the broad spectrum of ultrashort pulses:
Interferences between several quantum paths associated to different frequency components in multiphoton transitions
With or without intermediate states
Control of interferences by changing the pulse shape (spectral phase)
Many examples
Chirped pulses
Noordam et al, Chatel-Girard et al,
Shaped pulses
Silberberg et al, Dantus et al, Faucher et al
eg
/ 2 ω
g i
e
1 pulse – Two-photon transition
-15000 -10000 -5000 0 5000 10000 0,0
0,5 1,0 1,5 2,0 2,5 3,0
Ex citation probability
φ '' (fs
2)
( ( ) )
direc sequential
2
1 t
Fo 1
( ) ( ) sgn
( ) ( )
2
r : 1
2 ei ig
e
e g
i E E d E
a E ω ω φ δ
δ ω
ω ω ω
φ δ
ω δ
π ω
+∞
−∞ −
⎡ ⎤
′′ >> ⎢ ⎥
∝ ⎢ + ⎥
⎢ − ′′ + ⎥
= − ∫
i
2e φ δ ′′
1 τ c
≈ δ > 0
2 2
d s
e a
a = + a
Two-photon transitions with chirped pulses
2
a d 2
a s
g i e
ω ei
ω ig
Femto group - LCAR - Toulouse
φ ′′ < 0
h ν
, 1 g +
, 0 i
, 1 e −
2 δ δ
-15000 -10000 -5000 0 5000 10000
0,0 0,5 1,0 1,5 2,0 2,5 3,0
Excitation probability
i 2
e φ δ ′′
1 τ c
≈
δ > 0 2
a e
Dressed states
Two-photon transitions
B. Noordam et al PRL 92, PRA 94 Rb
5s Æ 5p Æ 5d
Ladder climbing in Rb
D. J. Maas, C. W. Rella, P. Antoine, E. S. Toma, and L. D. Noordam, Phys. Rev. A 59, 1374 (1999).
Rb atom
Femto group - LCAR - Toulouse
Na cell
Na ladder climbing with chirped pulses
4P
Fluorescence 330 nm
602 nm
3S 3P
1/23P
3/25S 3 , s h ν
1 / 2
3P
3 / 2
3P
5 , S − h ν
φ ′′ < 0
h ν Dressed states
800 nm 1 kHz 1mJ 130 fs
NcOPA
Stretcher
PMT
CPA
Ti:Sa Oscillator605 nm, 30 fs width 25nm
10 µJ
SF58 rod
Variable chirp Fixed chirp
Fluorescence observed
as a function of chirp rate
Na (3s Æ 3p Æ 5s) at 605 nm
J L
S
L
S B. Chatel, et al,
PRA 68, 041402R (2003) PRA, 70, 053414 (2004).
FT limit
Femto group - LCAR - Toulouse
Outline
I. Wave packet Interferences in atoms II. Quantum state holography
III. Interferences within the excitation process IV. Optics as an analog computer: Number
factorization
From Coherent transients and the Fresnel integral …
… to the Gauss sum and the factorization of numbers!
(with Wolfgang P. Schleich (Ulm)) 20 ps
τ c ≈
t 1 t 2
2 2 " φ
5 2
at resonance 8 10 fs φ ′′ = −
-2 0 2 4 6 8 10
Delay (ps)
6p-5s Fluorescen ce
2 2
2ln 2
( )
c2
t t
t i
a t e e τ e φ dt
⎛ ′ ⎞ ′
− ⎜ ⎟ −
⎝ ⎠ ′′
−∞ ′
∝ ∫
Femto group - LCAR - Toulouse
From 2 to many levels : numbers factorization
Goal : Implement the Gauss sum in a physics experiment to factorize numbers
Number to factorize
If l is not a factor of N then the phase oscillates rapidly and the sum is small If l is a factor of N then the phase is a multiple of 2π and the sum is equal to 1
W. Merkel, W. P. Schleich, I. Averbukh, B. Girard, et al, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 20, 1893 (2006).
W. Merkel, I. S. Averbukh, B. Girard, G. G. Paulus and W. P. Schleich, Fortschr Phys. 54, 856 (2006).
Trial number
Expected interferences with 23 levels
Multipath interferences in atoms
W. Merkel, I. S. Averbukh, B. Girard, G. G. Paulus and W. P. Schleich, Fortsch. Phys 54, 856 (2006)
W. Merkel, O. Crasser, F. Haug, E. Lutz, H. Mack, M. Freyberger, W. P. Schleich, I. S. Averbukh,
M. Bienert, B. Girard, H. Maier and G. G. Paulus, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 20, 1893 (2006)
Femto group - LCAR - Toulouse
First successful attempts
- M. Mehring, K. Mueller, I. S. Averbukh, W. Merkel and W. P. Schleich,
"NMR experiment factors numbers with Gauss sums", PRL 98, 120502 (2007).
- T. S. Mahesh, N. Rajendran, X. Peng and D. Suter, "Factorizing numbers with the Gauss sum technique: NMR implementations", Phys. Rev. A 75, 062303 (2007).
- M. Gilowski, T. Wendrich, T. Muller, C. Jentsch, W. Ertmer, E. M. Rasel and W. P.
Schleich, "Gauss sum factorization with cold atoms", submitted.
- D. Bigourd, B. Chatel, B. Girard and W. P. Schleich, "Factorization of Numbers with the temporal Talbot effect: Optical implementation by a sequence of shaped ultrashort pulses", submitted
Each term of the Gauss
sum is « calculated »
separately !
Our experiment with shaped pulses
0 2
( ) exp ( )
2
m
H i im p
m N l
ω θ τ ω ω
θ π
⎡ ⎤
= ⎣ + − ⎦
=
∑
Laser fs Spectrometer
Sequence of shaped pulses with phases equal to the argument of the Gauss sum
( ) 2
( p ) N M ( ) I ω = A l
Hence we have
Femto group - LCAR - Toulouse
First results
N=19043= 137*139 with M=9 pulses
X Theory z Exp.
N=105= 3*5*7 with M=4 pulses
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
0,0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8
1,0 N=105
|A N
(M) (l)|2
l
130 132 134 136 138 140 142 144 146 0,0
0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8
1,0 N=19043
9 pulses
|A N
(M) (l)|2
l
Efficiency as a function of the number of pulses
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
0,0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1,0
130 135 140 145
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
|AN(M) (l)|2
l
|A N
(M) (138)|2
Number of pulses (M+1)
N=19043=137*139
Prediction (Schleich et al 2007) :
To obtain all truncated Gauss sums of Ghost factors below 0.5, one should have
0.7 4 8
M ≥ N ≈
Femto group - LCAR - Toulouse
Conclusion: Interferences, interferences !!!
Observation of the atomic quantum state during the light interaction
Measurement with a reference, but no spectral condition for the reference (unlike conventional interferometric methods)
Extension to multiple states (molecular nuclear wave packets)
Pulse shape measurements (from da
e/dt):
Feasibility of reconstructing the phase and the amplitude using coherent transients
No intrinsic limitation to measure complex shapes
The only temporal limit is the linewidth of the atomic transition!
Requires a resonant bound state as a local oscillator!!
Effect of chirp: hard to draw systematics !
Factorization: Looking for direct schemes to generate the Gauss sum
… More interferences to come !
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
0,0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1,0
130 135 140 145
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
|AN(M)(l)|2
l
|AN (M) (138)|2
Number of pulses (M+1)