• Aucun résultat trouvé

Obama and the CFPC

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Obama and the CFPC"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

448

Canadian Family PhysicianLe Médecin de famille canadien Vol 55: april • aVril 2009

Vital Signs

College

Collège

Obama and the CFPC

Cal Gutkin

MD CCFP(EM) FCFP, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I

n 1997 a College of Family Physicians of Canada (CFPC) think tank examined how we could be more effective as the voice of family medicine in Canada. It concluded that our national College and all our Chapters must deliver our messages and programs in a single voice whenever possible. The key message was “We are one.”

Throughout his campaign, US President Barack Obama emphasized the importance of the jurisdictions in his country acting as truly “united states” rather than autonomous entities. The theme for his inauguration day was “We are one.’’ We are delighted that America’s new leader chose to embrace a CFPC message as his own.

Perhaps in the spirit of Obama, over the past 2 years our national and Chapter presidents, administrators, and executive directors have reviewed the progress we have made in strengthening all parts of our organization and ensuring that we are working as collaboratively and cohesively as possible. They then focused on additional strategies we must now introduce if we are to achieve our objectives in this area. Just as a nation can only achieve its goals if its states or provinces work in har­

mony with the national leadership and with one another (a message which oft bears repeating for Canada’s fed­

eral and provincial governments), so too an organization like ours will only be effective if its constituent parts are strong individually and collectively.

The CFPC was established by federal government char­

ter as a single organization with clearly defined parts, each carrying some jurisdictional autonomy but expected to act as a collective with respect to positions and policies. Our constitution established a national board responsible for the development of policies and programs for the ben­

efit of all members across the country. The national board was given the authority to establish Chapters in prov­

inces where defined criteria were met. Today, we have 10 strong Chapters, each with a mandate to carry out activi­

ties within its own provincial boundaries. Legally, however, each must also be incorporated with its official title indi­

cating that it is a part of the CFPC (eg, by law, the Manitoba Chapter is the Manitoba College of Family Physicians, a Chapter of the CFPC). Chapter bylaws must comply with national College bylaws; if there are differences, national bylaws take precedence. This constitutional framework allows the College to be a strong and unified voice for fam­

ily medicine and family physicians in all parts of Canada.

The national board includes directors elected by mem­

bers of each Chapter. National board directors may also

hold Chapter elected offices but it is not mandatory, and their national board directorships carry fiduciary respon­

sibilities that are separate and distinct. They must have seats on the executives or boards of their Chapters to ensure that Chapter recommendations are brought to the national board and that positions and programs approved by the national board are carried out in each jurisdiction.

While it is important that directors bring perspectives to national board meetings that reflect those shared by their Chapter members, each director is expected to make his or her ultimate recommendations and decisions based on what will be best for all College members.

In the past few decades, the roles and responsibilities of the CFPC and its Chapters have increased substan­

tially. Several strategies have been introduced to further strengthen our capacity to act cohesively and effectively:

• increased transfer payments from the CFPC to the Chapters to build staff and committee infrastructures;

• leadership development for committee and board mem­

bers, including government and media training sessions;

• more national committees that include representa­

tives from every Chapter who together develop poli­

cies and programs for the benefit of all members (eg, the Advisory Committee on Family Practice leads CFPC policy formulation related to the changing practice environments of family physicians; the Membership Advisory Committee establishes and monitors the effectiveness of all College programs and activities; and the Continuing Professional Development Committee oversees Mainpro and lifelong learning requirements);

• representation from every Chapter on the Research and Education Foundation board to help develop awards, grants, and scholarships for members all across Canada;

• Web-based and face-to-face programs to ensure that the standards for CME and CPD accreditation are developed and delivered consistently across Canada;

• Family Medicine Forum and Chapter annual scientific assemblies, which bring family physicians from across Canada together to teach and learn, share professional and personal experiences, and help the College develop policies and positions on an array of important issues.

Our members expect us to act as a single organiza­

tion, with elected and appointed leaders providing strong united messages and activities for family physicians across Canada. We must continue to build and strengthen each part of our organization, but also ensure that we are not acting simply as a number of separate parts. We have helped Obama achieve his objective. Let’s hope he will not have to keep reminding us of ours. We are one.

Cet article se trouve aussi en français à la page 447.

Références

Documents relatifs

1 Al Sayah et al aimed to determine whether there was a relationship between the health advice offered by family physicians and quality of life and the use of health services

More specifically, the goal of our study is to explore the opinions of graduates in family medicine about collaboration with community pharmacists with regard to 3 distinct

This principle states that “family physicians have the responsibility to advo- cate public policy that promotes their patients’ health.” 21 The CanMEDS–Family Medicine role of

2 Fortunately, recent National Physician Survey (NPS) data indicate that Canadian FPs’ involvement in providing nutrition counseling, as well as their collabora-

A good number of family physicians willingly accept that there are lim- its to their medical knowledge and competence?. None of them would take it into their heads to

When all is said and done, even if OSAHS is a fre- quently seen disorder affecting 4% of men and 2% of women between the ages of 30 and 60, and even if sev- eral

The NPS is a collaborative project of the College of Family Physicians of Canada, the Canadian Medical Association, and the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of

A ccording to recent qualitative research by Dr Donna Manca, her colleagues, and the College of Family Physicians of Canada (CFPC), Canadian family physi- cians