• Aucun résultat trouvé

Similar rewards and challenges: Family physicians share views of family medicine

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Similar rewards and challenges: Family physicians share views of family medicine"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

1616

Canadian Family PhysicianLe Médecin de famille canadien Vol 53:  september • septembre 2007

Snapshots

College

Collège

Similar rewards and challenges

Family physicians share views of family medicine

Barbara Kermode-Scott

A

ccording to recent qualitative research by Dr Donna Manca, her colleagues, and the College of Family Physicians of Canada (CFPC), Canadian family physi- cians share very similar views of the positive and negative factors in family practice.

In 2004 and 2005, Dr Manca and her research team undertook a Web-based sur- vey using the Delphi method to identify and describe the important rewards and chal- lenges that affect family physicians in Alberta (http://

www.cfpc.ca/cfp/2007/feb/vol53-feb-research- manca.asp). Twenty-eight participants identified 8 key rewards and 9 key challenges. The 3 priority rewards identified were providing diverse and comprehensive care, providing preventive care, and having relation- ships with patients and their families. The 3 priority challenges identified were as follows:

• workload and time pressures and meeting demands,

• the need to promote the rewards of family practice to those considering joining the profession, and

• overhead and income inequities.

The March issue of Family Practice e-News on the CFPC website asked members what they consider their key rewards and challenges in family practice (http://www.cfpc.ca/English/cfpc/communications/

Web%20newsletter/Vol%2031%20March%2007/

default.asp?s=1#qofm). Members responded that the key rewards were relationships with patients and their families, providing diverse and comprehensive care, and providing continuity of care and receiving ongoing feed- back. According to the respondents, the top 3 challenges in family practice were as follows:

• workload and time pressures, and meeting demands,

• patients’ expectations of medicolegal issues (ie, insur- ance paperwork, medical claims related to motor vehicle accidents), and

• overhead and income inequities (http://www.

c f p c . c a / E n g l i s h / c f p c / c o m m u n i c a t i o n s / Web%20newsletter/Vol%2032%20April%2007/

default.asp?s=1#qofm).

The responses from CFPC members are very interesting and generally fit with Alberta family physicians’ views, says Dr Manca. “The top 3 concerns [listed in the CFPC e-News survey] clearly reso- nate. Workload and inequities were clearly major concerns in the Alberta Delphi sur- vey. Workload really is a big issue. Inequities are also a major issue. Patient expecta- tions were rated lower in the Delphi; however, in the Delphi we had patient expectations, paperwork, and medicolegal issues as separate items. Medicolegal items can be very disturbing and can interfere with our relationships with our patients.”

Dr Manca also points out that the unpublished quali- tative data included a lot of discussion around patient expectations. “I do think that we have a lot of concerns around our patients’ expectations…. Patients are some- times more concerned about convenience than about taking responsibility for their own health. In some ways it’s possibly a societal problem…. We’re seeing a lot of lifestyle ills in our society, where people don’t really want to also get engaged in a process where they’re equally responsible for their health. They’d much rather have a quick fix and maybe have come to expect that.”

Dr Manca stresses another point. “The great news is that all of our rewards are inherent in our practice.…

They are ingrained principles of family medicine. It’s been very hard for many of us in community practice, … but when you look, all of the rewards are right in what we do day to day. The challenges we face don’t come from our work, from our practice. A lot of them are external. They are related to the environment that we’re working in, [to] power and control, and [to] what’s being foisted upon us externally by other groups. I think we maybe need to look at how … we become empowered.

How do we all come to the table in a way that we can collaborate and it can be mutually beneficial?”

Ms Kermode-Scott is a freelance writer based in Calgary, Alta.

Références

Documents relatifs

1 Al Sayah et al aimed to determine whether there was a relationship between the health advice offered by family physicians and quality of life and the use of health services

More specifically, the goal of our study is to explore the opinions of graduates in family medicine about collaboration with community pharmacists with regard to 3 distinct

This principle states that “family physicians have the responsibility to advo- cate public policy that promotes their patients’ health.” 21 The CanMEDS–Family Medicine role of

Given the early state of stem cell sci- ence and the large amount of money involved in the stem cell tourism market, it seems safe to conclude that many

Each of them includes one or more areas of special interest within their practices, including mental health, obstetrics, care of children and adolescents,

Treating all members of a family does not necessarily add much to the fundamental relationship in medicine, which is the relationship between doctor and

If the prin- ciple that family doctors should follow all members of a family is perceived as an obligation, doctors will feel compelled to take on patients they

2 Fortunately, recent National Physician Survey (NPS) data indicate that Canadian FPs’ involvement in providing nutrition counseling, as well as their collabora-