• Aucun résultat trouvé

Operator theorems on <span class="mathjax-formula">$L^P$</span>-convergence to zero <span class="mathjax-formula">$(1 \leqslant p < + \infty )$</span>

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Operator theorems on <span class="mathjax-formula">$L^P$</span>-convergence to zero <span class="mathjax-formula">$(1 \leqslant p < + \infty )$</span>"

Copied!
10
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

DE L ’U NIVERSITÉ DE C LERMONT -F ERRAND 2 Série Probabilités et applications

R. Z AHAROPOL

Operator theorems on L

P

-convergence to zero (1 6 p < +∞)

Annales scientifiques de l’Université de Clermont-Ferrand 2, tome 78, série Probabilités et applications, n

o

2 (1984), p. 15-23

<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=ASCFPA_1984__78_2_15_0>

© Université de Clermont-Ferrand 2, 1984, tous droits réservés.

L’accès aux archives de la revue « Annales scientifiques de l’Université de Clermont- Ferrand 2 » implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.

numdam.org/conditions). Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright.

Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques

http://www.numdam.org/

(2)

R.

ZAHAROPOL

1. Introduction.

I

Let (X,Z,m)

be a measure space

(where

m is a

positive,

a-additive

measure)

and let

1 .-

be the usual Banach spaces. A linear bounded operator T: is called a

positive

contraction of

if it transforms

non-negative

functions into

non-negative

functions and

if 1 ..

Our

goal

here is to prove that if T is

simultaneously

a

positive

contraction of

LP(X,E,m)

for every

1 ~ P ~

+0153 and if we consider the

set Q c R ,

then if inf il &#x3E; 0 it follows that for every

For notational conveniences we will recall some definitions from

[1].

By

a

partition

E = of X we mean a finite

partition

of X

such that

E 6 Es

i =

l,2,...,n, 0 m(El) + 0153

and such that

only

the first

k sets

(1

k

n)

have finite non-zero measures. Let 1

(k,p) (1 ~_ P ~ ~ ~)

be the finite dimensional

LP-space

defined

by P, p(fil) = m(E~),

i ~

l,2,...,k

(that

is P k k

p)

where

r - fl,2,...,kl

k and the measure p is

generated by

the

real,

non-zero,

positive

numbers

pit P2’ ... gilk).

The

space 1

(k,p)

will be called the finite dimensional

LP-space generated by

(3)

If E is a

partition

of X we will denote

by TE

the conditional

expectation

operator as defined

by Akcoglu [1].

2. Positive Contractions of

L1

or

Proposition

1. Let T be a

positive

contraction of

I)

The

following

are

equivalent:

a)

There exists p &#x3E; 0 such that if

A,B E E ,

0

m~~) ~ ~~

then

IT)

There exists n &#x3E; 0 such that for every

partition

E of X

II)

If T satisfies

a) (or b))

then

Proof.

I) a) ~b) .

Let be a

partition

of X and let

be the finite dimensional

L 1 -space generated by

the

partition

E .

The operator

TET

as a

positive

contraction of has the matrix

It follows that

(4)

Using a)

we obtain that

and if we we obtain

b) -

2 .

b) ~ a).

Let

A,8 E E ,

4

m(B)

+ - be two

disjoint

sets. We

def ine

the

partition

E ~

(A,B,X , (AUB) }.

It follows that

2 (1 - n)

and we obtain that

-

" L 1

The last

inequality implies

that

and

a)

follows as

p~2n .

II) Suppose

T satisfies

b)

and let f E be such that

(5)

It follows that

We obtain that

I - 2(1 - n) ~

and the

proof

is

completed by using

the

"zero-two"

law for

positive

contractions in

L l-spaces. (Theorem

1.1

from [4]).

Proposition

2. Let T be a

positive contraction

of The

following

are

equivalent :

i)

There exists a &#x3E; 0 such that if

A fl B * ,

0

m (A) , m (B)

+ m then

ii)

There

exists B

&#x3E; 0 such that for every

partition

E of

X,

Proof.

i) ~ ii)

Let E be a

partition

of X and let

1. (k, P)

be the finite

dimensional L"-space generated by

the

partition

E . The

operator TET thought

as

operator

on has the matrix

1 Ej r

i

dm)

i,j. l,..,k

.

Ej

1

It follows that

(6)

Using i)

we obtain that

Taking

8

= a 2

the assertion follows.

ii) - i)

Let

A,B

E E be such that

A Q B = o ,

0

m(A) , m(B)

+ 0153 .

We will def ine the

partition

E =

( A, B,X ~ (A

U

8) } .

Given that

IITET - 2(1 - g)

it f ollows that

and if we note a =

2$

we obtain

i).

3. The Main Results

Theorem 3. Let T be

simultaneously

a

positive

contraction of

Lq ~X, E,m)

for every 1 q + m . If T satisfies condition

a)

of

Proposition

1 and

condition

i)

of

Proposition 2,

then for every

1

p + 0153

Proof . We will 1 + m f or if = 1 we obtain a

special

case of

(7)

For every

partition

E of X we will note

TET . By Proposition

2

it follows that there exists 0 &#x3E; 0 such that for every

partition

E of

X ,

m

2(1 - 8) .

If is the finite dimensional L -space

generated by

the

partition

E then its dual space will be

1- (k, p0) where 0

is the

counting

measure =

1 ,

i =

l,2~...,k) , Using

the

proof

of

the

"zero-two"

law for

positive

contractions in

L l-spaces (Theorem

1.1 from

[4])

it follows that

given

e &#x3E; 0 there exists

n 1

E N

(which depends only

on

6

and

c)

such that for every

partition

E of X and for every

n ~ nl

*

where

SE

E is the dual operator of

SE

&#x26;

x

(SE is a positive

contraction of

11(k,

By Proposition

1 and the

proof

of Theorem 1.1 from

[4]

for the same e &#x3E; 0 there exists

n2

E N

(which depends on 2

and

e)

such that for every

partition

E of X and for every

By

the Riesz

convexity

theorem

(see

for instance

~2~~

it follows that

if, 1 p -t- oo

p 2013 and n &#x3E; 1 2013 1

n21

2 z then f or every

partition E

. of X

If we put

n

= max

f n1, n21

then from the last

inequality

it follows that

for every

partition

E of

Now let f E

Lp(X,E,m)

be such that

)jf)[

1 .

By

lemma 3.1 from

[1]

it

follows that there exists a

partition

E of X such that

°

and

(8)

We obtain tllat

T no lip

E and the theorem follows as (ll

is a

non-increasing

sequence.

p n

Theorem 3 has the

following

consequence:

Corollary 4.

Let T be

simultaneously

a

positive

contraction of for every

1 ~ q ~

+ 0153 0

If there exists 0 Y 1 such that f or every A E

E ,

0

m (A) + ~ , j

T

1. dm 2.. Ym(A)

then f or every

1 ~

P + ~

A "

Proof. It is

enough

to prove that T satisfies condition

a)

of

Proposition

1

and condition

i)

of

Proposition

2.

Let

A,B

E E such that 0

m(A), m(B)

+ 00 and A n B = ~ . It follows that

it follows that condition

a)

of

Proposition

1 is

(9)

On the other hand

(we

used here that T is a

positive

contraction of

L (X,E,m)

and therefore

1B T

Taking

a = Y it follows that condition

i)

of

Proposition

2 is also

satisfied.

Remarks.

1)’

The fact that the existence of Y &#x3E; 0

implies

the existence of

p &#x3E; 0 was noticed

by

Professor

Foguel.

2)

If T as a

positive

contraction of a finite dimensional

L1 -space 11(k,u)

is

generated by

the matrix

(a..).. 1 k

and if

aii 0 0

for every

1 **’ 1J H

i =

1,2,...,k (that

is there exists p &#x3E; 0 such that all the elements of the

diagonal

of

(a .)..

, are greater than

p)

then

by

the "zero-two" law for

positive ij ij

contractions in

L -spaces (Theorem

1.1 from

[4])

we obtain that

If we note that a.. = 1 f T

du

it follows that

Corollary

4 can be

{ i~

f iq

thought

of as an extension of the above observation.

(10)

1.

Akcoglu,

M.A.: "A

pointwise ergodic

theorem in Lp

-spaces."

Canadian J.

of

Math.,

Vol.

XXVII,

no.

5, 1975,

1075-1082.

2.

Dunford, N., Schwartz,

J.T.: "Linear

operators"

Part

I.,

New York:

Interscience 1958.

3. Neveu, J.: "Mathematical foundations of the calculus of

probability",

San

Francisco, London,

Amsterdam:

Holden-Day

1965.

4.

Ornstein D., Sucheston,

L.: "An operator theorem on L convergence to

zero with

applications

to Markov

kernels".

Ann. Math.

Statist. 1970,

vol.

41,

no.

5,

1631-1639.

R. ZAHARAPOL

D6partement

de

Mathématiques

Universite

Hebraïque

GIVAT-RAM J6rusalem Israel

Références

Documents relatifs

Le crit`ere de Nesterenko (cf. [7]) est remplac´e par un crit`ere qui s’applique `a des formes lin´eaires lin´eairement ind´ependantes, comme le crit`ere utilis´e par Siegel dans

Pour presque tout nombre premier/?, décomposé dans X, on donne une construction de la fonction L p-adique à deux variables attachée à la courbe E/F, généralisant celle de Yager

Tout sous-corps fermé E de Cp est l'adhérence d'une extension algé- brique L de Qp, et nous démontrons que, pour que la transformation de Fourier ^ soit injective, il faut et il

Dans ce second Mémoire, j'établis de nouveau pour l'espace à n dimensions les formules démontrées pour le plan, ce qui me permettra, non seulement de retrouver tous les résultats

Ayant rencontré dans ma Thèse de doctorat quelques types de gpm (p premier) caractérisés par cette propriété, j'ai été amené ( 1 ) à chercher tous les gpm (p premier) qui

Si s est modérément ramifiée, elle est induite d’un caractère modérément ramifié Il de l’extension quadratique non ramifiée de F, à. valeurs dans

Soit (n, V) une représentation irréductible de G ayant un caractère central, et de dimension infinie.. Les fonctions de Kirillov

THEOREM: Let X/k be a smooth weakly unirational surface over an algebraically closed field k of characteristic p &amp;#x3E; 0.. Here is Shioda’s example of a