• Aucun résultat trouvé

Nausea and vomiting

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Nausea and vomiting"

Copied!
3
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Vol 54: june • juin 2008 Canadian Family PhysicianLe Médecin de famille canadien

861

Current Practice

Pratique courante

Palliative Care Files

Nausea and vomiting

Christopher O’Brien

MD CCFP FCFP

Gregg, a 64-year-old man, has a 40-pack-year smoking history. He presents with a 2-month history of cough and a recent episode of hemoptysis. A chest x-ray film reveals a right lung mass, and computed tomography (CT) of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis confirms a right middle lobe mass with no evidence of metastatic disease. Lung biopsy confirms non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and results of further metastatic workup are negative. The tumour is stage IB (T2N0) NSCLC. After Gregg and his doctor discuss options, Gregg is referred to an oncologist and a chest surgeon. He elects to have a lobectomy and post- operative chemotherapy. Six weeks after the surgery, he is doing well and chemotherapy will commence shortly.

The oncologist informs Gregg of the potential side effects of chemotherapy, including nausea and vomiting.

Chemotherapy-induced  nausea  and  vomiting  (CINV)  is  triggered  by  stimulation  of  the  chemoreceptor  trig- ger zone (CTZ), which is located in the area postrema in  the floor of the 4th ventricle of the brain (Figure 11).* It  is sensitive to chemical stimulation from cerebral spinal  fluid and blood. The dominant receptors in this area are  serotonin type 3 (5-HT3) and dopamine type 2 (D2).1-3 

There are 3 types of CINV4:

  acute emesis, which occurs within 1 to 2 hours of che- motherapy,

  delayed  emesis,  which  occurs  24  hours  or  more  after  chemotherapy, and

  anticipatory nausea and vomiting.

Gregg knows he will cope with hair loss and fatigue, but is anxious about the potential nausea and vomiting everyone talks about. He receives counsel on prophy- laxis of CINV.

Prophylaxis of CINV

Serotonin  receptor  antagonists  are  highly  effective  in  preventing CINV. They should be given on a schedule for  prophylaxis. The following 5-HT3 antagonists and sched- ules are available:

  8 mg of ondansetron by mouth or intravenously every  8 or 12 hours;

  1  to  2  mg  of  granisetron  by  mouth  or  intravenously  once daily; or

  5 mg of tropisetron by mouth or intravenously daily. 

It is important to note that dexamethasone can augment  the effects of 5-HT3 antagonists and other antiemetics.

As chemotherapy is initiated, Gregg uses 8 mg of ondan- setron twice daily for prophylaxis of nausea and vomit- ing. He does well, with only occasional breakthrough nausea, for which he uses diphenhydramine as needed.

Diphenhydramine, however, is unsuccessful in treating the nausea. Why isn’t it effective, and what can be done?

Diphenhydramine in CINV

Diphenhydramine is not the best choice for CINV. It has  both  antihistamine  and  anticholinergic  activity  at  the  level of the vomiting centre, and it is most effective for  treating  motion  sickness.  The  pathophysiology  behind  Gregg’s  nausea  suggests  a  better  choice  would  be  a  medication with both dopamine D2 antagonist and sero- tonin type 4 (5-HT4) agonist qualities,3 such as 10 mg of  metoclopramide 4 times daily or as needed.

Ten mg of metoclopramide 4 times daily as needed is added to Gregg’s scheduled ondansetron. He achieves complete relief of his nausea and vomiting. Starting his fourth round of chemotherapy, Gregg forgets to pre- medicate with ondansetron and he experiences severe nausea and vomiting. Just before his fifth round, he becomes very anxious and nauseated. What is the likely pathophysiology of the nausea and vomiting, and how can it be treated?

Anticipatory nausea and vomiting

Anticipatory nausea and vomiting before chemotherapy  is  often  associated  with  a  memory  of  poorly  controlled  nausea  and  vomiting.4  It  is  a  function  of  higher  brain  centres  (the  cerebral  cortex),  where  meaning  and  emo- tion interface with the vomiting centre. This mechanism  is best managed with a preventive approach, using anx- iolytics  (eg,  lorazepam)  hours  to  days  before  expected  chemotherapy.

Gregg completes his chemotherapy and follows up with the oncologist every 3 months. He feels well and is not using any medication. Eight months later, he presents with a 6-week history of fatigue and anorexia, and a 2-week history of right-sided chest and midback pain.

He describes the pain as an ache—a score of 7 on a 10-point visual analogue scale. He has been using 2 Tylenol No. 3 tablets (left over from his surgery) 4 times daily, on average, along with ibuprofen, and is not get- ting much relief.

*Figure 1 is available at www.cfp.ca. Go to the full text of this article on-line, then click on CFPlus in the menu at the top right-hand side of the page.

CFPlus

GO

(2)

862

Canadian Family PhysicianLe Médecin de famille canadien Vol 54: june • juin 2008

Palliative Care Files

While investigations are arranged, treatment is imme- diately initiated with a stronger opioid (hydromorphone) and naproxen sodium. A chest x-ray film reveals bilat- eral lung masses, and a subsequent CT and bone scan show a recurrence of a lung tumour with bone metas- tases to ribs and thoracic spine. Potential radiotherapy is discussed with the oncologist.

Within a week, hydromorphone is titrated to 3 mg every 4 hours, on schedule, and pain relief is achieved—

a score of 2 on a 10-point scale. Gregg now reports fre- quent nausea, and vomits daily. What are the potential causes of Gregg’s nausea and vomiting, and how should it be managed?

More causes

There  are  several  other  causes  of  nausea  and  vomiting  in palliative care:

Drug induced

Opioid induced:  High  plasma  concentrations  of  emetogenic  substances  (opioids,  selective  serotonin  reuptake  inhibitors,  urea,  and  calcium)  trigger  nau- sea  and  vomiting  by  stimulating  dopamine  D2  recep- tors  located  in  the  CTZ.  The  best  treatment  would  be  a  dopamine  antagonist,  such  as  haloperidol,  which  is  the  most  potent  of  dopamine  receptor  blockers,3  and  metoclopramide.  Because  metoclopramide  has  a  dopamine  D2  antagonist  effect,  muscarinic  activity,  and is a 5-HT4 receptor agonist,3 it stimulates peristal- sis in the upper gut and aids in impaired gastric emp- tying secondary to opioids.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: Nonsteroidal  anti-inflammatory drugs can result in gastritis or ulcer- ation,  causing  nausea  and  vomiting.  They  should  be  either discontinued or a cytoprotective drug, such as a  proton pump inhibitor, should be started.

Constipation.  Constipation  is  common  with  opioids  and often overlooked as a cause of nausea and vomiting. 

Treating constipation requires a preventive approach; a  scheduled  opioid  demands  a  scheduled  bowel  regimen  with few exceptions.

Hypercalcemia.  Hypercalcemia  should  be  anticipated  in  patients  with  bone  metastases.  It  is  a  paraneoplas- tic  syndrome  associated  with  NSCLC.  Hypercalcemia  can be corrected with saline, diuretics, and bisphospho- nates; nausea should be treated while waiting for effects. 

Hypercalcemia affects the CTZ, so the above-mentioned  approach should be used. 

Gregg uses 1 mg of haloperidol by mouth every 12 hours and 0.5 mg of haloperidol every 6 hours as required, for what is expected to be opioid-induced nausea and vomit- ing; the nausea improves. Within days, his nausea flares up and history reveals 6 days with no bowel movements.

On digital rectal examination, a lot of hard stool is found in his rectum. Laboratory test results show normal cal- cium and blood urea nitrogen. The constipation is treated with a bisacodyl suppository and an enema, and a bowel maintenance regimen is followed.

Once his nausea and vomiting is stable, Gregg is advised about the natural history of opioid-induced nausea and vomiting and its self-limiting quality. His scheduled haloperidol use is stopped, but he continues to use the 0.5-mg dose of haloperidol as required. Gregg is aware that opioid-induced constipation is not self- limiting but here for the duration; therefore, he must continue the scheduled bowel regimen. He finishes his radiotherapy for bone and lung metastases, and his opi- oid dose is eventually lowered.

The doctor addresses the palliative prognosis with Gregg and his family, and connects him with a local palliative home care team. A month later, Gregg’s condi- tion deteriorates. The community nurse calls the doctor to inform him that Gregg is suffering from headaches, cognitive impairment, and nausea and vomiting. Brain metastases are suspected and are confirmed on CT. Gregg uses 8 mg of dexamethasone twice daily and his symp- toms improve; the dexamethasone dosage is titrated to 4 mg twice daily. Gregg and his family discuss goals of care with the doctor; however, Gregg declines palliative radio- therapy for brain metastases. He is tired and only wants comfort measures. He is cared for at home and his symp- toms are well managed until his death 7 weeks later.

Nonpharmacologic management of nausea and vomiting

Advise patients to do the following:

  Wear loose-fitting clothing.

  Eat small frequent meals. (If any of your patients prefer not to eat or drink in order to manage nausea and  vomiting, recognize and respect their decision.)

  Avoid certain foods (sweet, fatty, high salt, or spicy food, or food with unpleasant odours). 

  Maintain a relaxed atmosphere.

  Consult a dietitian to assess proper food portions and texture.

  Try complementary therapies (eg, diversion, relaxation, hypnosis, guided imagery, acupuncture)5.

(3)

Vol 54: june • juin 2008 Canadian Family PhysicianLe Médecin de famille canadien

863

Palliative Care Files

Dr O’Brien is the Medical Director of the Palliative Care Program at Saint John Regional Hospital in New Brunswick.

Competing interests None declared References

1. The Pallium Project. Learning Essential Approaches to Palliative and End-of-Life Care (LEAP) facilitator manual version 1.1 [module 2, slide 5; Gastrointestinal  problems in palliative care]. Edmonton, AB: The Pallium Project; 2006.

2. Baines MJ. ABC of palliative care. Nausea, vomiting, and intestinal obstruc- tion. BMJ 1997;315(7116):1148-50.

3. Mannix KA. Palliation of nausea and vomiting. CME Can Med 2002;1(1):18- 22. Available from: http://www.rila.co.uk/issues/full/download/

9fdc0deaedec6e44407de4adebad8bb1405157.pdf. Accessed 2008 Apr 4.

4. Markman M. Progress in preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and  vomiting. Cleve Clin J Med 2002;69(8):609-17.

5. Rhodes VA, McDaniel RW. Nausea, vomiting, and retching: complex prob- lems in palliative care. CA Cancer J Clin 2001;51:232-48. Available from: 

http://caonline.amcancersoc.org/cgi/content/full/51/4/232. Accessed  2008 Apr 4. 

6. MacDonald N, Oneschuk D, Hagen N, Doyle D. Palliative medicine: a case-based manual. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2005. p. 187-200.

Palliative Care Files is a quarterly series in Canadian Family Physician written by members of the Palliative Care Committee of the College of Family Physicians of Canada. The series explores common situa- tions experienced by family physicians doing palliative care as part of their primary care practice. Please send any ideas for future articles to palliative_care@cfpc.ca.

BOTTOM LINE

Nausea and vomiting, which are common and dis- tressing complaints, undermine a patient’s quality of life. Nausea and vomiting affect up to 50% to 70% of patients with advanced cancer.

3,4

The triggers of nausea and vomiting can often be determined by a thorough history, physical exami- nation, a list of current medications, and a limited biochemical profile.

Linking these triggers with our knowledge of the pathophysiology of emesis pathways and the asso- ciated receptors or neurotransmitters helps in tai- loring the antiemetic regimen. This has been shown to be effective in 93% of patients.

6

Multiple causes of nausea and vomiting are often present in patients with advanced illness; manage- ment requires combination drug therapy, as well as general measures. In a few patients, specific causes of nausea and vomiting can be identified and reversed.

POINTs sAILLANTs

Les nausées et les vomissements, sources de maux fréquents et pénibles, nuisent à la qualité de vie des patients. Les nausées et les vomissements affectent jusqu’à 50 à 70% des patients qui souf- frent d’un cancer évolué.

Les déclencheurs des nausées et des vomissements peuvent souvent être expliqués grâce à un his- torique complet, un examen physique, une liste des médicaments actuels et un profil biochimique limité.

En associant ces déclencheurs et nos connais- sances de la pathophysiologie du mécanisme de vomissement et des récepteurs des neurotrans- metteurs associés, on peut concevoir un régime antiémétique. Cela s'est montré efficace chez 93% des patients.

Les patients à un stade avancé de maladie présen- tent souvent de multiples causes de nausées et de vomissements; il faut combiner une pharmaco- thérapie et des mesures générales pour les gérer.

Chez quelques patients, il est possible d'identifier et de contrer les causes spécifiques des nausées et des vomissements.

Further reading

Pharmacy  Specialty  Group  on  Palliative  Care. Care beyond cure. A pharmacotherapeutic guide to palliative care. Montreal, QC: Association des pharmaciens des  établissements de santé du Quebéc; 2000.

Doyle D, Hanks G, Cherny N, Calman N. Oxford text- book of palliative medicine.  3rd  ed.  New  York,  NY: 

Oxford University Press; 2005.

✶ ✶ ✶

Références

Documents relatifs

Thus, depending on the emetogenic potential of the chemotherapy agents, treatment containing a 5-HT 3 serotonin receptor antagonist and dexamethasone might be administered

209 Christian LM, Mitchell AM, Gillespie SL, Palettas M, (2016) Serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor 210 (BDNF) across pregnancy and postpartum: Associations with race,

= number of participants; GA = gestational age; TA = Tricyclic antidepressants; FLX = Fluoxetine; Diff = difference; D = Depression without treatment of SSRI; SSRI = selective

Developmental fluoxetine exposure and prenatal stress alter sexual differentiation of the brain and reproductive behavior in male rat offspring.. Developmental fluoxetine exposure

Tools for Practice articles in Canadian Family Physician (CFP) are adapted from articles published on the Alberta College of Family Physicians (ACFP) website, summarizing medical

Do selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) affect sperm, causing either decreased fertility or increased risk of congenital anomalies.. Answer There is limited

The risks of untreated moderate to severe depression far outweigh the theoretical risks of taking selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.. Discontinuer les inhibiteurs sélectifs

Heartburn, and acid reflux during pregnancy should be treated, as recent studies report that symptoms of GERD have been associated with an increased severity of