• Aucun résultat trouvé

Homework 2: Subdifferentials, SDP relaxations

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Homework 2: Subdifferentials, SDP relaxations"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

10-801: Advanced Optimization and Randomized Methods

Homework 2: Subdifferentials, SDP relaxations

(Feb 5, 2014)

Instructor: Suvrit Sra Due:Feb 11, 2014

Visit:http://www.cs.cmu.edu/˜suvrit/teach/for academic rules for homeworks.

1. LetC⊂Rnbe closed convex set. Consider the function dC(x) := inf

y∈Ckx−yk,

wherek·kis the Euclidean norm.

(a) Prove thatdCis convex (b) Forx∈C, what is∂dC(x)?

(c) Ifx6∈C, prove thatdCis differentiable and show that

∇dC(x) = x−x kx−xk,

wherexis the nearest point toxinC.

2. Show how to computeonesubgradient for the following convex functions:

(a) f :Rn →R≡x7→PG

i=1kxik, wherexis partitioned into subvectors asx= [x1, . . . , xG] (b) f(X) =P

iσi(X), whereσi(X)denotes thei-th singular value of a matrixX. (Hint: First show that P

iσi(X) = maxkY||2≤1tr(XTY)wherek · k2is the operator norm for matrices.)

(c) f(x) =λmax(ePni=1Aixi), whereλmaxis the maximum eigenvalue andAiare fixedn×nmatrices.

3. LetCbe ann×nsymmetric positive definite matrix. Letsandybe vectors inRnsuch thatsTy >0. Consider the optimization problem

inf{tr(CX)−log det(X)|Xs=y, X0}.

(a) Show that this problem admits a global minimizer.

(b) Prove that for the above problem, the point

X = (y−δs)(y−δs)T sT(y−δs) +δI is feasible for smallδ >0

(c) Use first order (constrained) optimality conditions to find the solution. (Note:This solution furnishes one of the most important substeps in nonlinear programming algorithms.)

4. SDP relaxations

(a) Consider the 2-SAT problem for a collection of binary variables with constraints on pairs of variables.

Provide a procedure to turn a 2-SAT problem into SDP form if this transformation is possible.

(b) Express k-way clustering as a maximum cut problem – maximize the sum of distances for labels not in the same cluster. Now relax this problem into an SDP.

5. Explain why Shingling (selecting the bottom-k entries) is not exactly equivalent to the Jaccard coefficient.

6. [Bonus] Analyze the explicit runtime for reduplication with shingles.

2-1

Références

Documents relatifs

To mitigate this observation, however, notice that other CP models with strong filtering, using the Global Sequencing Con- straint [20], or a conjunction of this constraint and A T

A classical approach to solve the free boundary problem is to penalize one of the boundary conditions in the over- determined system (1)-(4) within a shape optimization approach to

For the numerical algorithm we use a gradient projection method in order to deal with the geometric constraint Ω ⊂ Ê N + ; see the textbooks [20,25] for details on the method.

L'expression clinique est très variable allant d'une sensibilité de l a région glutéale à des douleurs à hauteur des tubérosités ischiatiques ,des troubles sensitifs dans

This paper is devoted to investigate the convergence of vanishing visco- sity approximation to weak solutions, satisfying the entropy inequality, of.. the following,

To achieve this goal, we developed STEREO, a system that offers an expressive formalism for describing Web services and user requests, and implements a logic-based solution

We then reuse learned clauses, assumptions, and models, which are obtained from previously solved SAT problems, to efficiently compute the minimum height.. We at- tempt to solve

Placer, dans un rep`ere orthogonal, le nuage de points et constater que la forme ”allong´ee” du nuage justifie un ajustement