• Aucun résultat trouvé

Bridgeness: a novel centrality measure to detect global bridges

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Bridgeness: a novel centrality measure to detect global bridges"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-01175702

https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01175702

Submitted on 11 Jul 2015

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution| 4.0 International License

Bridgeness: a novel centrality measure to detect global bridges

Pablo Jensen, Matteo Morini, Tommaso Venturini, Mathieu Jacomy, Jean-Philippe Cointet, Pierre Mercklé, Márton Karsai, Eric Fleury

To cite this version:

Pablo Jensen, Matteo Morini, Tommaso Venturini, Mathieu Jacomy, Jean-Philippe Cointet, et al..

Bridgeness: a novel centrality measure to detect global bridges. ECCS 2014 – European Conference on Complex Systems, Sep 2014, Lucca, Italy. 2014. �hal-01175702�

(2)

BRIDGENESS

A NOVEL CENTRALITY MEASURE TO DETECT GLOBAL BRIDGES

Pablo Jensen

IXXI, ENS Lyon, LabPhys, UMR 5672

Matteo Morini

IXXI, ENS Lyon, LIP, INRIA, UMR 5668

Tommaso Venturini

Médialab, Sciences Po, Paris

Mathieu Jacomy

Médialab, Sciences Po, Paris

Jean-Philippe Cointet

Université Paris-Est, SenS - IFRIS

Pierre Mercklé

Centre Max Weber, UMR 5283, ENS Lyon

Márton Karsai

IXXI, ENS Lyon, LIP, INRIA, UMR 5668

Eric Fleury

IXXI, ENS Lyon, LIP, INRIA, UMR 5668

BRIDGE BRIDGE

BRIDGE BRIDGE

LOCAL BRIDGE LOCAL BRIDGE GLOBAL BRIDGE GLOBAL BRIDGE

International flight Domestic flight

Preponderance of international routes Preponderance of domestic routes

Centrality measure (size)

Node Betweenness Centrality

Node Bridgeness Centrality

The problem with betweenness centrality

• Somewhat captures the centrality of nodes

• Assigns high centrality values for high degree nodes by default

• This definition mixes the global and local bridges

Local bridges:

placed in communities

connects similar nodes

Global bridges:

placed between communities

connects dissimilar nodes

- Shortest-path between s and t

Bridging node centrality - properties

Glo bal br idg es

Local bridges

Centrality of airports

Finding nodes occupying interesting positions in a graph is useful to extract meaningful information from large datasets. While numerous measures have been proposed to evaluate the centrality of nodes, few indica- tors quantify the capacity of nodes to connect different regions of the graph. Usually, betweenness centrality is used for this purpose, but we show here that it gives equal scores to “local” centers (i.e. nodes of high de- gree central to a single region) and to “global” bridges, which connect different regions. This distinction is im- portant because the roles of these nodes are quite di- verse. For example, in networks of scientific collabora- tions, local centers correspond to nodes which are im- portant for a single sub-discipline, while bridges corre- spond to nodes which connect different sub-disciplines, leading to interdisciplinary collaborations. We show that a new measure of network topology, the bridgeness, is able to discriminate between local centers and global bridges, in synthetic and real networks.

Example of the two largest Argentinean airports, Ezeiza (EZE) and Aeroparque (AEP). Both have a similar degree (54 and 45 respectively), but while the first connects Argentina to the rest of the world (85% of international connections, average distance 2.848 miles), Aeroparque is only a local center (18% of international connections, average distance 570 miles). However, as in the simple graph (Figure 1), BC gives the same score to both (BC_EZE =79 000 and BC_AEP = 82,000), while bridgeness clearly distinguishes the local center and the bridge to the rest of the world, by attributing to the global bridge a score 250 times higher (Bri_EZE =46,000 and Bri_AEP = 174).

(a) Betweenness Node Centrality (b) Bridgeness Node Centrality

The figures show the betweenness (a) and bridgeness (b) scores for a simple graph. Betweenness does not distinguish centers from bridges, as it attributes a slightly higher score (Figure a, scores = 27) to high- degree nodes which are local centers, than to the global bridge (Figure a, score = 25). In contrast, bridgeness rightly spots out the node (Figure b, score = 16) that plays the role of a global bridge.

Removed SP Removed SP Allowed SP

Bridgeness removes all shortest-paths which start or end in the neighbourhood of v.

Références

Documents relatifs

CDAIS is implemented in Lao PDR by Agrinatura (represented by CIRAD), FAO Laos and the Laos National Agriculture and Forestry Research Institute (NAFRI), along with other

The French model: The third question of this study aims to understand a reversed relationship be- tween modeled estimates and ground reality: in- stead of an international limnic

Instead, when some bridges have low degrees, while some high-degree nodes act like local centers of their own community, bridgeness is more effective to identify bridges as BC

SCBC can be considered as an evolution of BC capable of detecting central (in the betweenness centrality sense) c-nodes and i-nodes by taking into account that these nodes do not

In Section 3, we give a new similarity measure that characterize the pairs of attributes which can increase the size of the concept lattice after generalizing.. Section 4 exposes

Par contre, nous observons actuellement un changement de paradigme en recherche, alors que de plus en plus de projets sont développés dans un souci d’être engagés socialement et

The heat kernel lower bounds of Cheeger and Yau [6] were proved using a bound on the Ricci curvature in the radial direction and a Laplacian comparison theorem.. These are similar

The coefficients have to be interpreted as follows: For given input levels (Labour and capital), a 10 % increase in financial sector’s value-added induces an output growth of 1.5