HAL Id: jpa-00208295
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00208295
Submitted on 1 Jan 1975
HAL
is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire
HAL, estdestinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
Experimental study of the mercury 4 047 Å line (6 3P 0-7 3S1) absorption profile in the presence of foreign
gases
Z. Ben-Lakhdar-Akrout, J. Butaux, R. Lennuier
To cite this version:
Z. Ben-Lakhdar-Akrout, J. Butaux, R. Lennuier. Experimental study of the mercury 4 047 Å line (6
3P 0-7 3S1) absorption profile in the presence of foreign gases. Journal de Physique, 1975, 36 (7-8),
pp.625-629. �10.1051/jphys:01975003607-8062500�. �jpa-00208295�
EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF THE MERCURY 4 047 Å LINE
(6 3P0-7 3S1) ABSORPTION PROFILE IN THE PRESENCE OF FOREIGN GASES
Z.
BEN-LAKHDAR-AKROUT,
J.BUTAUX,
R. LENNUIERDépartement
de RecherchesPhysiques (*),
Université Pierre et
Marie-Curie, 4, place Jussieu,
Tour22,
75230 Paris Cedex05,
France(Reçu
le 16 décembre1974, accepté
le 7 mars1975)
Résumé. 2014 On étudie par
balayage magnétique
le profil d’absorption de la raie 4 047 Å du mercure.La cuve d’absorption contient soit un
mélange
de mercure et d’azote, soit un mélange de mercureet de gaz noble, avec une petite quantité d’azote.
Abstract. 2014 The absorption profile of the 4 047 Å line of mercury has been studied by means of
the magnetic
scanning
method. Theabsorption
chamber contained either only mercury and nitrogen,or a small amount of nitrogen and a perturbing noble gas.
Classification
Physics Abstracts
5.280
1. Introduction. - The
experiments reported
herewere
performed
in order to measure thebroadening
and the shift of the 4 047
Á
mercury line(6 3pO --+ 7 3S1
transition)
in the presence offoreign
gases(N2, He, Ne, Xe).
We shall see that in order to determine thebroadening,
it is also necessary to obtain thepopula-
tion of the metastable level 6
3P0.
Atoms arebrought
to this level
by
the classicalprocedure :
transition6
1S0 --+
63p, by absorption
of the resonance 2 537Á line,
followedby
the transition 63P1 --+
63Po
inducedby
inelastic collisions between the mercury atoms3P1
andnitrogen
molecules.2.
Experimental arrangement.
- Theexperimental arrangement
is shown onfigure
1.Spectral analysis
of the 4 047
Á
line wasperformed using
themagnetic scanning
method[1, 2].
The source is a
monoisotopic
mercurylamp (Hg 198) [3],
at ultrahigh frequencies (500 MHz) [4].
The
rotating chopper
S is used to send either the referencesignal
or the absorbedsignal
to thephoto- multiplier.
Theabsorption
cell is 200 mmlong,
15 mm in diameter and it is surrounded
by
astrongly
cooled helicoidal
exciting
arc.An
important difficulty
arises from the presence of intense unwantedlight
emittedby
theexciting
arcfor  = 4 047
Á.
In order to reduce thatcontribution,
the
diaphragms D2, D3
andD4,
2 mm indiameter,
are also
included,
as direct lock-in detection of the initialsignal
did notgive good
results.D2
andD3
also
precisely
limit the fraction of the cell in whichabsorption
occurs.(*) Laboratoire associé
au CNRS
no 71.FIG. 1. - Experimental set-up.
As will be mentioned
later,
thisprecaution
isnecessary if the measurements are to be
correctly interpreted.
Article published online by EDP Sciences and available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/jphys:01975003607-8062500
626
3.
Principle
of measurements. - Let us callA(v - vB)
the normalized functiondescribing
thespectral profile
of the Zeemanscanning
component emitted when the source is in amagnetic
field B.For each value
of B,
the measured transmission is :T(v) being
the transmission of the cell forfrequency
v.3.1 THEORETICAL EXPRESSION FOR
T(v).
- Theabsorption
cell is filled with natural mercury. For eachhyperfine component j
of agiven isotope i,
and for each
point
M in the cell which has reacheda
thermodynamical equilibrium
state, it ispossible
to define an
absorption
coefficientkij(v, M) :
Bij being
Einstein’s coefficient :N(M)
is the totalpopulation density
in the 63Po
state,
ai(M)
is the local relative abundance of theisotope i, Fij(v, M)
is the normalizedspectral profile,
92 and gl are the statistical
weights
of the final andthe initial levels between which the transition takes
place.
Some
quantities
have a non-uniform distribution in thecell,
and it is necessary to discuss thispoint.
As a consequence of the reduction of the beam
by
the
diaphragms D2
andD3,
theM-dependent
quan- tities vary little with distancealong
directions per-pendicular
to the cell axis(Oz axis)
butthey
can varystrongly
with distancealong
this axis. This occurs, inparticular,
for(X,ïCM) N(M),
which we shall writeas
(X,i(z).N(z).
However,
a veryimportant point
is that theprofile
Fij(v, M)
can be considered asindependent
of M.For the present
experimental conditions,
it is reaso-nable to
write,
in the examinedspectral region :
Fij(v, M) = Gi(v, M) * Lij(v, M)
G,(v, M)
is the Gaussian function related toDoppler broadening
andLij(v, M)
is a Lorentzian function related to naturaldamping
and collisional relaxation.The temperature does not vary more than a few
degrees
from onepoint
of the cell toanother, parti- cularly along
the Oz axis(mercury
atomsbrought
to the 6
3Po
levelby
an inelastic collision are veryquickly
« thermalised») consequently,
the Gaussian function has the same width at anypoint,
and will be writtenGi(v).
The Lorentzian function has a width
(Avl)ij
whichdepends
on the temperature and thepopulation
density
N’ of theperturbers.
But N’ has the same valuethroughout
the wholecell,
and T has almost the samevalue. So we shall consider that
(AVL)ij
does notdepend
on M.ij
We can therefore write the
absorption
coefficient for the(ij)
component as :and the transmission
T(v)
for the cell(length : 1)
is :with
where
Generally,
for agiven frequency
in theexpression
of
T(v),
we have to take into account allisotopic
andhyperfine
components.However,
forsufficiently
lowperturber densities,
some of the components have a well-isolated
profile.
This will be the case for the
following
components : 199 A,201 a,
201 c.3.2 DETERMINATION OF THE APPARATUS FUNC- TION
A(v - vB).
- The Zeeman-shifted component has aspectral profile A(v - VB),
the width of which is notnegligeably
smallcompared
to that ofT(v).
Itis then necessary to
distinguish T’(vB)
as definedin
(1)
from thetrue-profile T(v).
A considerablesimplification
occurs whenA(v - vB)
does notdepend
on the
magnetic
field B. This is the case for the 2 537A
line
[2]
but not for the 1 850A
line of mercury(6 1S0 , 6 1P1) [5]
where it seems that the fielddependence
is related to the strongself-absorption
of the line. For the 4 047
A line, self-absorption
isvery
weak,
and it seemed reasonable to assume thatA(v - vB)
would beindependent
of B. Thishypo-
thesis has been used for the
interpretation
of themeasurements. Under this
condition,
T’ is a convolu- tionproduct :
This
hypothesis
leads to coherentinterpretations,
such that - when
extrapolated
tohigh perturbers
densities -
they
agree withinterpretations neglect- ing A.
We now have to determine
A(v - vB).
When thenitrogen
pressure is very low(a
few tenths of atorr)
and no other gas is in the
cell,
theprofile
is :LN being
a Lorentzianfunction,
determinedonly by
naturaldamping.
BothLN
andGi
can be calculated.We cannot calculate
T(v),
because we do not knowanything
about the meanpopulations
ai N. But it ispossible
to make a reasonablehypothesis
about theshape
ofA(v - vB).
We
supposed
thatA(v - vB)
was a Gaussianprofile,
with a widthAVD
considered as a parameter, the order ofmagnitude
ofOvD being
known. Wecomputed
families of curves, each onecorresponding
to a set of parameters
AVD,
ai N.Comparison
withexperimental
transmission curves allowed anunique
choice for
AVD
to be obtained(AVD
is about 25mK ;
it
depends
of course on theworking
conditions of thelamp).
3. 3 SHIFT MEASUREMENTS. - The
profile A (v - VB) being symmetrical
and narrowenough,
themagnetic scanning
near the isolated components 199A,
201 a, 201 c, leads toabsorption profiles T’(v)
which arewell isolated and also
symmetrical
forperturber
pressures smaller than about 100 torrs.
It is then
possible
to obtaindirectly
from theseprofiles T’(v)
thepositions
of theabsorption lines,
and hence the
corresponding
shiftsDij.
These measure-ments show that the shifts are the same for the three centers and are
proportional
toperturber density.
In order to determine the shifts for the other -
non isolated - components, it is necessary to compute the whole
profile,
as will beexplained
in the nextsection. The final result is that the shift is found to be the same for all the components at a
given
pressure.Zero-pressure extrapolation
of theplots giving
foreach
perturber
theposition
of the different compo- nents, leads to a determination of theisotopic
andhyperfine
structure of the 4 047A
line. In tableI,
we
give
our results and compare them to those obtainedby
Blaise and Chantrel. These authors useda
Fabry-Perot
interferometer to carry out thespectral analysis
of the emission line from adischarge lamp containing
a small amount of Ne[6].
3.4 DETERMINATION OF
T(v)
ANDFij(v)
PROFILES. -The direct deconvolution of T’ = A * T in order to
obtain T from T’
(since A
isknown)
is a difficulttask. We
prefered
to use a substitution method.Let us suppose that
Fij(v)
is aVoigt profile
and let us suppose also that the Lorentzian width
(AVL)ij
is the same for all the components(this hypo-
thesis was very well verified in the case of the 2 537
A line).
We compute theprofiles
A *T(ai N, OvL)
andcompare them to the
experimental profile T’(v),
inorder to look for the parameters oci N and
wL leading
to a
good
fit.Unfortunatly,
but notsurprisingly,
many sets of parameters
give
similar Tprofiles.
Theremoval of the indetermination is
easily
doneby performing
severalexperiments
with the same pertur- berdensity (same AVL)
but with different 2 537A
excitations.
Then,
the determination ofAvL
andW
is nolonger ambiguous.
Anexample
of thisprocedure
is shown onfigure
2.FIG. 2. - An example of the substitution method. The full lines represent the absorption profiles for two different 2 537 A exciting conditions, but for the same perturber density. The plots represent computed absorption profiles corresponding to two different populations for the metastable 6 3Po level, but to the same lorentzian
width.
It was verified that
wL
isproportional
to the pertur- bersdensity
N’.Of course, we have to be very careful as to the
conclusions,
since the determinations ofAVL
andai N
depend
on the apparatus functionA(v - VB).
But,
as we havealready pointed
out, the method can be checked since the results obtained athigh
densitiesTABLE 1
628
(when
A can beneglected)
show nodiscrepancy
with those at low densities.
4. R esults. - 4.1 POPULATION OF THE 6
3Po
LEVEL.- 4. 1. 1 The
populating
of the3Po
level has pre-viously
been examinedby
several authors[7-10].
First,
let uspoint
out that we did not intend tostudy
thepopulating
of the metastable3Po
levelfrom the
3P1.
Ourexperiments give only
meanpopulations
ce; N for the differentisotopes.
Further-more, these mean values refer to
given
excitationconditions. These conditions are
reproducible,
butdifficult to
analyse.
Transmission measurements were
performed
underconstant excitation
conditions ; only
thenitrogen
pressure in the cell was allowed to vary
(no
otherforeign
gas waspresent).
The meanpopulations a i N
increasenearly linearly
from 0 to 45 torrs(nitrogen pressure) ;
for pressureshigher
than 60 torrs,they
remain constant. Under these
conditions,
for allof the
isotopes,
is about 7 x
1010 at.cm-3 (for
thelS0
levelN ~ 5 x
1013 at.cm-3).
It should be
emphasized
thatabsorption
measure-ments at a
given frequency,
that is withoutspectral analysis
of theprofile,
wouldeasily
lead to incorrectconclusions. This is due to the line
broadening
andthe line shift which occur when the
nitrogen
pressure increases.4.1.2 In the course of this
study,
we have observedan effect that we
interpret
as ametastability
transferbetween
isotopes.
In some of ourexperiments,
theexciting
source(producing
63P1 atoms)
is made of severalmonoisotopic (Hg 198) lamps
so that in thecell, only
the 198 and 201 b components of the 2 537À
line are absorbed
by
natural mercury. After inelastic collisions withnitrogen molecules,
one would expect that the 63po
level would beselectively populated
with the 198 and 201
isotopes.
In this case, the 4 047A absorption
line would be observedonly
for the follow-ing
components :201 a,
201b,
201c, 198.
As a matter offact,
we also observeabsorption corresponding
to the 199 A component which is
quite clear,
as thiscomponent
is well-isolated and alsocorresponding
to the
200, 202,
204 and 199 B components. For these last mentioned components, we have however to obtainT(v)
from ?" in order tointerpret
the results.Taking
into account theisotopic composition
ofmercury, the observed
population
of the63P0
levelfor the
199, 200, 202,
204isotopes
is 0.8 of that of the 198-201isotopes.
Excitation transfers between
isotopes resulting
from collisions between
6 3P1
and 61 S,,
atoms are- according
to Chéron and Saintout[11] ]
of smallimportance.
It seems morelikely
that the observed effect is due to the mechanism :We further note that the addition of a noble gas at pressures up to 0.5 atm to the
nitrogen/mercury
doesnot
significantly change
thepopulation
of the meta-stable state.
However,
the addition of small amounts ofC02,
or CO
(
1torr)
results in astrong
decrease of thepopulation
of the 63Po
state.4.2 RESULTS CONCERNING BROADENING AND SHIFT FOR VARIOUS GASES. - For
partial
pressures ofnitro-
gen up to p = 2 torrs, the
absorption
can be measured undergood conditions,
while thebroadening
andthe shift due to
nitrogen
itself are very small.For this reason, the
experiments
were made witha
nitrogen
noble gas mixture(PN2
= 2 torrs,pgas
150 torrs).
Table II
gives
the values forbroadening B
andshift
S,
obtained asexplained
above. Theproportiona- lity
of thebroadening
and the shift to theperturber density
is well verified.TABLE II
We note
especially
the blue shift in the case ofHg-He
collisions.The collision cross sections
ev :
mean relativevelocity
ofperturbers)
have beencalculated. In table
III,
we compare them to thecross sections obtained for the 6
’SO-6 3P1
transition(Â
= 2 537Â).
TABLE III
We can try to
interpret
the order ofmagnitude
ofthe ratio
’94047/’72-537 (the
case of He will not beconsidered).
Assuming straight
linetrajectories
and a Lennard-Jones
interaction,
Hindmarsh’s results[12]
lead to :(X4047 and a2 537 are obtained from the ratio : broaden-
ing/shift.
We now need to estimateand
In order to calculate this
dipole-dipole
interaction in the case of Ne andXe,
we use a second-orderperturbation theory
and introduce for the energy differences aunique
value AE(the
ratherarbitrary
choice for DE does not matter
here,
since we areonly
concerned with energy
ratios).
For even
isotopes
of mercury, theinteraction
energy can be written in the form
[13]
where
MJ
is theprojection
of J on the interatomic axis.R,
andR2
representrespectively
the meanvalues
of r2
for the 6s electron and for the other external electron of the mercury atom.The
anisotropic
contributionsf (L, S, J, MJ)
areequal
to zero for the 61 S0,
63Po
and 73S1
states.As for the 6
3P1
state, we shall take the mean valueR,
andR2
have been calculatedby
Dr J. Bauche(private communication), using
aHartree-Fock
method [14].
-The results are listed in table IV.
TABLE IV
Using
theseresults,
we find :leading
toapproximately
the same value for the ratio03C34047/03C32537
= 2.3 for both Ne and Xe.This result is in
good agreement
with the observed ratios’74047/U2.537,
but we have toemphasize
thatthe theoretical
development
has beennecessarily simplified.
Acknowledgment.
- We are very much indebted to Dr J. Bauche forcomputing the r2 >
values.References
[1] LAGARDE, D., BUTAUX, J., LENNUIER, R., PREVOT, J. Y.,
J. Physique Colloq. 28 (1967) C 2-243.
[2] BUTAUX, J., Thèse Paris, 1972.
[3] MEGGERS, W. F., WESTFALL, F. O., J. Res. Nat. Bur. Stand 44 (1950)451.
[4] THULIN, A., J. Scient. Instrum. 32 (1955) 257.
[5] LEBOUCHER, E., BOUSQUET, C., BRAS, N., Nouv. Revue Opt.
Appl. 5 (1974) 121.
[6] BLAISE, J., CHANTREL, H., J. Physique 18 (1957) 198.
[7] SCHEER, M. D., FINE, J., J. Chem. Phys. 36 (1961) 15, 1264.
[8] BIGEON, M. C., Thèse Caen, 1966.
[9] BIGEON, M. C., J. Physique 28 (1967) 157.
[10] PITRE, J., HAMMOND, K., KRAUSE, L., Phys. Rev. A 6 (1972) 6, 2101.
[11] CHERON, B., SAINTOUT, L., J. Physique 32 (1971) 751.
[12] HINDMARSH W. R., PETFORD, A. D., SMITH, G., Proc. R. Soc.
(London) A 297 (1967) 298.
[13] BUTAUX, J., SCHULLER, F., LENNUIER, R., J. Physique 33 (1972)
635.
[14] FR0152SE-FISCHER, C., Comput. Phys. Commun 1 (1970) 151.