HAL Id: jpa-00208539
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00208539
Submitted on 1 Jan 1976
HAL
is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire
HAL, estdestinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
Synchrotron radiation in the infrared
P. Meyer, P. Lagarde
To cite this version:
P. Meyer, P. Lagarde. Synchrotron radiation in the infrared. Journal de Physique, 1976, 37 (12),
pp.1387-1390. �10.1051/jphys:0197600370120138700�. �jpa-00208539�
SYNCHROTRON RADIATION IN THE INFRARED
P. MEYER and P. LAGARDE
Laboratoire de
Physique
des Solides and L.U.R.E.(*)
Université Paris
Sud,
91405Orsay,
France(Reçu
le 1 erjuin 1976, accepté
le 3 août1976)
Résumé. 2014 Nous avons
entrepris
des mesuresphotométriques
dans lapartie infrarouge
du spectre rayonné par ACO, l’anneau destockage
d’Orsay, pour vérifier la théorie dans ce domaine.Par rapport aux sources
classiques
utilisées en spectroscopie infrarouge uneaugmentation
de l’in-tensité de plus d’un ordre de grandeur peut être espéré en utilisant une ligne
spécialement
conçue.Abstract. 2014
Experimental photometric
measurements have beenperformed
in the infrared part of the spectrum of the radiation emittedby
ACO, the storage ring of Orsay, in view to check the theory in this range. An improvement of more than one order ofmagnitude
in intensitycompared
to classical sources used in infrared spectrometers can be expected with a
specially
designed line.Classification
Physics Abstracts
0.642 - 0.690 - 2.240
1. Introduction.
- Storage rings
andsynchrotrons
are now well-known sources for the ultraviolet and
X-ray
parts of thephoton spectrum.
Thetheory
ofthe
synchrotron
radiationproduction
works very well in these ranges and we may now ask : is thesynchro-
tron radiation as
powerful
at the other end of thespectrum compared
to the best available sources asit is in the ultraviolet or the
X-ray
domains ?A first attempt has been made
by
Stevenson et al.[1]
but
they
use in their calculations somegeometrical
factors which do not seem realistic for infrared spec-
troscopy,
and there is still a lack ofexperimental comparison
between a classical infrared source anda storage
ring.
In this note we
present
the results ofexperiments
done at
ACO,
the storagering
of the linear accelerator ofOrsay,
otherwise used as an ultraviolet source,compared
to a standard Globar source and the theore- ticalexpression
for thesynchrotron
radiation gene- ration in thelong wavelength
limit.2. Theoretical
expressions
for theemission-spectra
of both sources. -
Following Schwinger [2]
or Sokolovand Ternov
[3]
theintensity
of thelight
emittedby
an electron of energy
E,
with rest energymo c2,
ona circular orbit of radius R can be
expressed by, [4]
where P is the power radiated into the part of space defined
by
a verticalangle V/
on both sides of theorbit,
and anangle
(palong
this orbit.e the electron
charge
inCoulombs,
so the dielectric constant,
R the
magnetic radius,
y =E/mo C2,
A the
wavelength
ofinterest,
AA the
spectral
widthconsidered, Âc
the criticalwavelength
KS/3(x)
is the modified Bessel function of order5/3,
Integrating over qf
between 0 andn/2,
we obtain thetotal power emitted
by
oneelectron,
into all the verticalplane
per mrd of orbit.If there are n electrons
circulating
in the storagering, equivalent
to a currentI,
this power isgiven by
or,
by chosing
suitable units forR, I,
E and(*) Service commun C.N.R.S. Universite Paris-Sud.
Article published online by EDP Sciences and available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/jphys:0197600370120138700
1388
In the limit of
long wavelengths
the entireexpression
in
straight
brackets may bereplaced by
anasymptotic
one we shall
give
later. The number ofphotons
emitted may be derived
by using
the relationConventional infrared sources are
commonly
com-pared
to blackbody
emission. Thefollowing
expres- siongives
theintensity
of radiation at thewavelength
emitted
by
a surface of area s of a blackbody
at thetemperature jT into a solid
angle
of 1 steradian around the normal of the surface.or
again
with suitable units forA5l,
5l and s :Eq. (1)
and(3)
are all we need for acomparison
ofboth sources, but the
problem
can besimplified by assuming
that we use the same resolution r in bothcases. We may then write AA = rA and the
quantity
we are interested in is
Synchrotron
radiationA _
( 1
mrad oforbit,
all verticalplane)
.
"
Black
body (1 cm2,1 sr)
°
Or, by replacing K5,3 by
itsasymptotic expression
for x
1,
i.e.A,IA
1and
integrating,
we may write for the term instraight
brackets in
(2)
and obtain
finally
This
expression
can be used if the theoreticalexpression
forsynchrotron
radiation isexperimen- tally
verified in the infrared.3.
Experiments
andcomparison
with thetheory.
- Theexperiments
have been done atACO,
whosebending
radius is R = 1.1 m. The stored currentwas 70 mA at 0.54 GeV. The
experimental
setup is schematized infigure
1. The infraredmonochromator,
a
Coderg
SV type, uses agrating
of 300grooves/mm
and a silicon or
germanium
transmission filter. The detector is aGolay
cell madeby Eppley
with a dia-mond window. In front of the entrance
slit,
we useda
chopper
whosefrequency
was near 10 Hz. Thewhole
apparatus
is in a vacuum better than10-4
torr.FIG. 1. - Experimental setup for intensity measurements on
ACO Mo : splitting mirror, M1 : focusing mirror, C = rotating chopper finger, M. = grating monochromator, D = detector mo-
dule with f = filter and d = Golay-cell detector.
Because of
experimental
limitations on the vacuumline the beam
coming
from ACO isonly
3 mrad hori-zontal and
± 1.5
mrad vertical wide.Therefore,
even if the
geometrical
units used in the ratio A(1 mrad,
1 sr, 1cm’)
arenearly
usual values forinfrared spectrometers and
synchrotron
radiationpipes,
we choose alayout
for theexperiments
donewith the
globar
which is unrealistic but very close to theprevious
one : the source isplaced
1.5 m beforethe mirror
M,
and we use twopin
holes in order to obtain a beamgeometry comparable
to the first case;the solid
angle
of aperture is then limited to 1.07 x10-4
sr and the useful surface to 3.59 mm’.Both
experiments
have been done in the range1.5-3 Jl
since we needonly
onepoint
for an absolutecomparison and,
because of the solidangle used,
wemust work in this domain where the power emitted
by
theglobar
is maximum. We used either a germa- nium or a silicon filter but in thisfrequency
range, thegermanium
cuts all the second order and is moresuitable;
in all cases the slits of the monochromatorwere set to 3 mm, which
gives
a theoretical resolution of about 100.Assuming
that aglobar
is a blackbody
with anemissivity
of85 %
at thiswavelength [5]
and a mea-sured temperature T = 1 300
K,
we obtain the results summarized in table I :I.
Signal (in volts)
measured with theglobar
as asource.
II.
Signal (in volts)
measured with ACO(540 MeV,
70mA).
III.
Expected
theoretical power emittedby
aglobar
in the same conditions from eq.
(3’) using
theright
values of the solid
angle
and theemissivity.
IV. Ratio
I/III :
response of the whole spectro-meter.
V. Ratio
II/IV : experimental
measure of thepower emitted
by
ACO.VI.
Expected
theoretical power emittedby
ACOfrom eq.
(2)
used with the suitable variation versusthe vertical
angle.
Instead ofcalculating
the ratioA, comparison
between columns V and VIgives
thecheck we are
looking for,
and will be discussed in the nextparagraph.
4. Discussion. - From table
I,
we can see that the agreement betweenexpected
andexperimental
results is
satisfactory,
if wekeep
in mind thefollowing
features :
- The power
entering
the monochromator is very low and the poorsignal
to noise ratio makes aprecise knowledge
of thesignals
difficult.- The
experiments
on ACO have been done witha first
splitting
mirror at the entrance of the line whosereflectivity,
because ofprevious experiments
on thisline,
isdefinitely
not 100%
at allwavelengths
and theaperture
may beslightly
different from the values weused.
Nevertheless,
the fit isgood enough
to allow us toassume that the
theory
ofsynchrotron radiation,
which has been checked in the UV-soft
X-ray part
of thespectrum
can be used in the infrared range.Thus, figure
2gives
acomparison
between two com-mon infrared sources and a
planned experiment
on ACO.
1)
Globar source at 1 300K,
0.30cm2
of surface inconjunction
with a monochromator ofaperture f/2.3 [5].
2) High
pressure mercurylamp (HPK 125)
usedwith the same
aperture [6, 7].
’
3)
ACO with a modified vacuum chamber which allows us tointercept
an horizontalangle
of 300 andcollect almost all the useful vertical
angle.
We can seethe
improvement
obtainedby using
ACO as an infrar-ed source versus conventional ones : at least two orders of
magnitude
in thelong wavelength
range, with thepossibility
ofusing
a convergent mirror in order to obtain a verybright
source. This isdue,
toFIG. 2. - Emitted intensity of two classical sources compared
with the synchrotron radiation (1 J.I. band pass). a) Globar source
0.3 cm’ at 1 300 K and an aperture of f/2.3 ; b) HPK-125 high
pressure mercury arc with the same geometrical conditions; c) ACO with 30° of orbital angle and all the vertical plane running at 100 mA,
0.54 GeV.
the fact that ACO is a small
ring,
with a shortbending
radius
( 1.1 m compared
to 12.7 m atSPEAR),
whichpermits
alarge
part of the orbit to beintercepted :
no
comparable setup
can be obtained nearlarger storage rings
as DCI or SPEAR. A futureimprove-
ment
planned
at ACO is an increase of the stored current to the range 200-400mA,
which shouldgive
another factor of 5 in favor of the storage
ring.
5. Conclusion. -
Experimental
checks have been donecarefully
in order to compare a classical infraredsource
(a globar)
withsynchrotron radiation; they
allow us to say that the
Schwinger theory
of thesynchrotron
radiation works in the infrared range.Then, commonly
used sources appear to be 1 or2 orders of
magnitude
lesspowerful
than aspecially designed port
at theOrsay
storagering ACO;
evenif
larger
and morepowerful
storagerings
such asDCI or SPEAR are as
bright
asACO,
the latter appears to be more useful because of thelarge
solidangle
which can beintercepted.
But,
in view ofspectroscopic
work with this source we must answer some otherquestions concerning
1390
stability
and noisefigure.
Fromfigure 2,
the emitted power in a1 J.1
band pass is still very low for conven-tional
detectors;
then the use of a Michelson type interferometer cannot be avoided in a first step. Itseems hard to think also
that,
in the nearfuture,
fartinfrared detectors will be fast
enough
to be monitored with thepulsed
structure of thesynchrotron light (1 pulse
every 77 n.s. in the case ofACO).
Neverthe-less,
the mainadvantage
ofsynchrotron
radiation inthe whole range of
wavelength
is its noise characteris- tics : all measurements show that theonly
noiselimitation is the
photon counting statistics,
whichshows
along,
with the emitted power, the usefulness of this source inspectroscopic
work.Finally,
we mustpoint
out that the lifetime of the electron beam in ACO istypically
10hours, making
the correction of line base deviation in Michelsoninterferometry quite
easy.
References
[1] STEVENSON, J. R., ELLIS, H. and BARTLETT, R., Appl. Opt. 12 (1973) 2884.
[2] SCHWINGER, J., Phys. Rev. 75 (1949) 1912.
[3] SOKOLOV, A. A. and TERNOV, I. M., Akademie Verlag, Berlin (1966).
[4] WUILLEUMIER, F., Le rayonnement synchrotron émis par les
anneaux de stockage d’Orsay Rapport LURE 74/03, Orsay, 1974.
[5] PLYLER, E. K., YATES, D. J. C. and GEBBIE, H. A., J. Opt. Soc.
Am. 52 (1962) 859.
[6] KIMMIT, M. F., Roy. Radar. Estab. Techn. Note n° 716 (1965).
[7] BOHDANSKY, J., Z. Phys. 149 (1957) 383.