HAL Id: jpa-00208492
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00208492
Submitted on 1 Jan 1976
HAL
is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire
HAL, estdestinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
Two Freedericksz transitions in crossed electric and magnetic fields
H.J. Deuling, À. Buka, I. Jànossy
To cite this version:
H.J. Deuling, À. Buka, I. Jànossy. Two Freedericksz transitions in crossed electric and magnetic
fields. Journal de Physique, 1976, 37 (7-8), pp.965-968. �10.1051/jphys:01976003707-8096500�. �jpa-
00208492�
TWO FREEDERICKSZ TRANSITIONS IN CROSSED ELECTRIC AND MAGNETIC FIELDS
H. J.
DEULING (*)
Laboratoire de
Physique
desSolides,
UniversitéParis-Sud,
91405Orsay,
FranceÀ.
BUKA and I.JÀNOSSY
Central Research Institute for
Physics, H-1525, Budapest 114,
P.O.B49, Hungary (Reçu
le20 fevrier 1976, accepté
le 23 mars1976)
Résumé. 2014 Un film nématique planaire présente une transition de Freedericksz dans un champ
électrique perpendiculaire
aux plaques. Si on applique en plus un champmagnétique
parallèlementaux couches (mais
perpendiculairement
au directeur), deux transitions seproduisent
à V = Vs(H)et V = Vt (H). Au-dessous de Vs on n’a qu’une torsion du liquide. Au-dessus de Vs, on trouve en plus une distorsion en éventail
qui
provoque la diminution de la torsion quidisparait
à V =Vt(H).
Nous calculons la distorsion entre Vs et Vt et comparons nos résultats à des expériences sur
p-p-dibu-
tylazoxybenzène.Abstract. 2014 A planar nematic slab shows a Freedericksz transition in a perpendicular electric
field. Applying in addition a magnetic field
parallel
to the slab but perpendicular to the direction ofalignment one finds two transitions at V = Vs and V = Vt. Below Vs one has only a twist deforma- tion. Above Vs splay and bend also appear
causing
the twist to diminish. At V = Vt the twistdisap-
pears. We calculate the distortion between the thresholds and compare our results with data on
p-p-dibutylazoxybenzene.
Classification Physics Abstracts
7.130
A nematic
liquid
enclosed between twoglass plates
can be orientedby
proper treatment of theglass
surfaces such as to form a
liquid monocrystal
withaxis
parallel
to theplates.
Such a nematic slab canbe
deformed
by
external electric ormagnetic
fields.The
resulting
distortion isgoverned by
a balanceof
stabilizing
elastic torques anddestabilizing
torques due to external fields. If amagnetic
field isapplied perpendicular
to the slab asplay
and bend distortion is induced when the field exceeds a threshold[1-3]
Hc1
1 =(Tc/L) (KllXa) .
In thisexpression
L denotesthe thickness of the
slab, K1
is thesplay
elastic cons-tant and Xa = x II
- xl denotes the
anisotropy
of thesusceptibility.
If themagnetic
field isapplied parallel
to the slab but still
perpendicular
to the directionof
alignment,
a twist distortion is induced as soon as H exceeds a thresholdHC2
=(n/L) (K2lXa) 112
whereK2
is the twist elastic constant.
Recently,
these two caseshave been shown to be
only
thelimiting
forms of themore
general
case[4],
when the field forms anoblique angle ql
with the slab but is stillperpendicular
to thedirection of
alignment.
The threshold is thengiven by
the
expression
When H exceeds this threshold
splay,
twist and bendare induced
simultaneously.
One obtains two different thresholds for twist and
splay, however,
ifone’employs
aparallel magnetic
field to induce twist and uses a vertical electric field to induce
splay
and bend. If we turn on themagnetic
field first we start with a pure twist distortion.
Turning
on the
voltage,
we will induce in addition asplay
and bend distortion at some threshold value
YS(H) [5].
If on the other
hand,
we firstapply
thevoltage
westart with a
splay
and bend distortion. Now we turnon the
magnetic
field Hbeyond HC2
butkeep
H stilllow
enough
to induce no twist distortion. If we nowdecrease the
voltage,
a twist distortion will appear at some thresholdVt(Hj.
This
conspicuous
difference between the Freede- ricksz transitions in anoblique magnetic
field and in crossed electric andmagnetic field, respectively,
can be understood as follows : the torques per unit volume
acting
on theliquid
due to amagnetic
fieldArticle published online by EDP Sciences and available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/jphys:01976003707-8096500
966
are
proportional
to(H.n)2. Decomposing
H intoparallel
andperpendicular components,
we get termsproportional
toIn crossed electric and
magnetic fields, however,
we get torque densitiesproportional
to(E . n)2
and(H . n)2
but there is nocoupling
term of the kind2(E . n) (H . n)
as we found for theoblique magnetic field, replacing
Eby Hl
and Hby HII, respectively.
For a
rigorous solution,
we start from the Gibbs free energy G per unit area of thesample.
We takethe
sample
to be in the x-yplane
of a coordinate system with Halong
the x-axis and the direction ofalignment along
they-axis.
We introducepolar angles
T and o-)writing
the director asn =
(cos
T sin w, cos (p cos m, sincp) . (2) ,
The free energy is then of the form
[6, 7]
where V is the
applied voltage
and D the z-component of the dielectricdisplacement
which is a functionalof the
angle
of tilt(p(z).
Minimizing
the freeenergy, G,
we get two differentialequations
of second order for the functionsT(z)
and
w(z).
We measure themagnetic
field in units ofHC2’
thevoltage
in units ofVCl
= 2n3/2(K118a)1/2
and D in units of
Dc1
1 = 81.Vc1/L.
We also introduce parametersThe
equations
forcp(z).
andw(z)
are thenIn the
vicinity
ofV,(H),
theangle 9(z)
is very small.Expanding
theequations
to lowest order in T, we get :The
equation
for T is aneigen-value equation
for theeigen-value (DIDcl)2.
Thethreshold-voltage Vs(H-)
isobtained from
expression (4)
In the
vicinity
ofVt(H),
the twistangle w(z)
is small.Expanding
to lowest order in w, weget
For any
given
value of D, we solve the firstequation
and calculate the
corresponding voltage
from expres- sion(4). Then,
we insert the solutioncp(z)
into theequation
for m and determine theeigen-value (HI HC2)2.
In this way, we obtain that value of H which is a root of V =
vt(H),
Infigure 1,
we show the two thresholdsVS(H)
andVt(H)
for K =0.2,
a = 1.4 and y = 0.24.The parameters were chosen so as to
correspond
top-p-dibutylazoxybenzene
for whichexperimental
dataare
presented
below.FIG. 1. - Thresholds VS and V, as functions of H. The diagram
indicates the types of deformation displayed by the sample.
It is of some interest to look at eqs.
(7)
and(8)
in the limit of H >>
Hc,.
We rewrite eq.(7)
in termsof nz
= sin cp ~ (p. For eq.(8)
we make theapproxi- mation nx
= sin w cos cp ~ m cos cp. For strongmagnetic fields,
we find in thevicinity
ofvs(H)
nearly everywhere
in thesample
except in a thinlayer
near the boundaries wherew(z) rapidly
goes to zero. In thisapproximation,
outside theboundary layer,
eq.(7)
readsnz is
proportional
to sin(rcz/L)
and the thresholdVs(H)
is[5]
This derivation shows that the threshold
Vt(H)
isinfluenced
mainly by
the twist distortion pattern in the middle of thelayer.
In the
vicinity
of the second thresholdVt(H)
wehave over a wide range in the middle of the
sample (p(z)
~ (p. --n/2
and(p’
N 0. Fromexpression (4),
we find
VIVcl (1
+7) - ’ DID,,.
With theseapproxi- mations,
we may rewrite eq.(8)
in the formComparing
thisequation
for nx with thatfor nz (9),
we see that the
expression
incurly
brackets in(11)
is
positive,
which is to say that in the middle of thelayer nx(z)
isproportional
to cosh(c.z),
i.e.nx(z)
hasa minimum at z =
L/2.
This shows that the thresholdVt(H)
is controlledby
thesplay
and bend distortion in thevicinity
of the boundaries.Having
determined the criticalvoltages
we solvethe eq.
(6)
forcp(z)
andw(z)
forvoltages
in the intervalVs,(H)
VVt(H).
The distortion is measuredby monitoring
in the usual way[7, 8]
the shift of bire-fringence
6.À is the
wavelength
of thelight,
ne theextraordinary
index of refraction and . v =
(nelno)’ -
1.On
figure 2,
wegive experimental
data obtainedon
p-p-dibutylazoxybenzene
at 25 °C. The data taken in amagnetic
fieldclearly display
two thresholds.In a
magnetic
field of sufficientstrength,
there is noshift of
birefringence
below a certainvoltage (Vs)
while above another
voltage (V)
the shift of bire-fringence practically equals
that obtained for H = 0.FIG. 2. - Comparison of theoretical calculations of the shift of
birefringence 6 versus voltage with data on p-p-dibutylazoxy-
benzene. For high magnetic fields only the thresholds Vs and V, could
be calculated but not the curve in between. For H = 4.11 l x Hc2
we have therefore connected the thresholds by a dotted line.
To compare the data with the results of numerical calculations based on eq.
(6)
we first consider the data obtained in zeromagnetic field,
whichdepend only on K1
andK3.
From data for the dielectric andoptical anisotropy,
we find y = v = 0.24.Using
thisnumber,
the best fit to the data for H = 0 is obtained with
x =
(K3 - K1)IK1
=0.2,
that isK3
= 1.2K1.
The data taken in a
magnetic
fieldexceeding BC2 depend
notonly
onK3
andKl,
but onK2
as well.We found
good
agreement between the theoreticalcurves and the data
taking
a =(K3 - K2)IK2
=1.4,
or
K3
= 2.4K2, K1 = 2 K2.
The theoretical curvesfor
HIHc2
= 2.11 and 3.07 shown infigure
1 are968
nearly straight
linesconnecting
the twopoints
cor-responding
to thethresholds Vs and Vt, respectively.
The small round-off in the
experimental
data near thethresholds is
likely
to be due to either small misa-lignments
of the director at the boundaries or a smallmisalignment
of themagnetic
field relative to thesample. (For H/Hc2 = 4.11,
we couldonly
calculatethe thresholds but not the curve in between. We have
connected
by
a dotted line the twopoints correspond- ing to Vs
andVt.)
Acknowledgments.
- Two of us(A.
B. and I.J.)
would like to thank Dr. L. Bata for
helpful
discussions and Dr. K.Ritvay
forsynthetizing
the material.H.
Deuling acknowledges
financial support from Deutscher Akademischer Austausch-Dienst.References
[1] FREEDERICKSZ, V., ZOLINA, V., Z. Kristallogr. 79 (1931) 225.
[2] ZOCHER, H., Z. Physik 28 (1927) 790.
[3] PIERANSKI, P., BROCHARD, F. and GUYON, E., J. Physique 33 (1972) 681.
[4] DEULING, H. J., GABAY, M., GUYON, E. and PIERANSKI, P.,
J. Physique 36 (1975) 689.
[5] DEULING, H. J., GUYON, E. and PIERANSKI, P., Solid. State Commun. 15 (1974) 277.
[6] DEULING, H., Mol. Cryst. and Liq. Cryst. 19 (1972) 123.
[7] GRULER, H., SCHEFFER, T. and MEIER, G., Z. Naturforsch. 27A (1972) 966.
[8] SAUPE, A. Z., Z. Naturforsch. 15a (1960) 815.