HAL Id: jpa-00231204
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00231204
Submitted on 1 Jan 1975
HAL
is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire
HAL, estdestinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
Spin-dependent scattering lengths of slow neutrons with nuclei by pseudomagnetic measurements
A. Abragam, G.L. Bacchella, H. Glättli, P. Meriel, J. Piesvaux, M. Pinot
To cite this version:
A. Abragam, G.L. Bacchella, H. Glättli, P. Meriel, J. Piesvaux, et al.. Spin-dependent scattering
lengths of slow neutrons with nuclei by pseudomagnetic measurements. Journal de Physique Lettres,
Edp sciences, 1975, 36 (11), pp.263-265. �10.1051/jphyslet:019750036011026300�. �jpa-00231204�
L-263
SPIN-DEPENDENT SCATTERING LENGTHS OF SLOW NEUTRONS
WITH NUCLEI BY PSEUDOMAGNETIC MEASUREMENTS
A.
ABRAGAM,
G. L.BACCHELLA,
H.GLÄTTLI,
P.MERIEL,
J. PIESVAUX and M. PINOTService de
Physique
du Solide et de RésonanceMagnétique,
Centre d’Etudes Nucléaires de
Saclay,
B.P. n°
2,
91190Gif-sur-Yvette,
FranceRésumé. 2014 En mesurant la
précession
despin
de neutrons en fonction de lapolarisation
nucléaire,on a obtenu les valeurs de la longueur de diffusion
dépendant
duspin
nucléaire pour les noyaux de23Na, 59Co, 63Cu, 65Cu, 195Pt, 197Au
et207Pb,
ainsi qu’une valeur moyenne pour les deux iso- topes du thallium et del’argent
dans l’élément naturel. On donne également une valeur corrigée pour 91Zr. La méthode a été étendue aux matériaux magnétiques. En utilisant du cobalt c.f.c. ethexagonal,
on montre que les mesures pseudomagnétiques peuvent fournir des informations
précises
sur le champ interne vu par les noyaux.Abstract. - The
spin-dependent
scattering length of slow neutrons by the nuclei23Na, 59Co, 63Cu, 65Cu, 195Pt,
197Au and207Pb,
as well as the mean value for the twoisotopes
of Tl and Agin the natural element have been obtained by
measuring
theprecession
of the neutron spins as afunction of nuclear
polarization.
A revised value for 91Zr is also given. The method has been extended for use with magnetic materials. Using f.c.c. and hexagonal cobalt, it is shown that thesepseudo-
magnetic measurements may giveprecise
information on the internal field seen by the nuclei.The
scattering
of thermal neutronsby
nuclei con-tains a
spin-dependent part.
In thepresent
state of nucleartheory,
ingeneral
thisspin-dependent part
does not seem to be accessible to model calculations.However,
its value can be ofpractical importance
inmany thermal neutron
scattering experiments.
A new
method,
calledpseudomagnetic,
has beendescribed
previously [1]
and its usefulness for syste- matic measurements ofspin-dependent scattering lengths
aN has been demonstrated[2].
In the present paper, values of aN for seven more nuclei arereported
and the
problems
connected with the extension of the method tomagnetic
materials are discussed.In
analogy
tomagnetic scattering,
the influenceof the nuclear
spin-dependent scattering
on apola-
rized neutron beam inside a
polarized
target can be describedby
apseudomagnetic
field H* = 4 nM*set up
by
thepseudomagnetic
moments¡t*
charac-teristic of the
nuclei,
such that M * =N ¡t* P,
where N is the number of nuclei per unit volume and P is the nuclearpolarization.
The neutronspins
precess around thispseudomagnetic
field and theresulting precession angle
aN = 7nH*(C/v)
is measured. C is thesample length, v
the neutronvelocity
and yn = 2Pnlh
is thegyromagnetic
ratio of the neutron. Thepseudoma- gnetic
moment is definedby :
/~* = - (/~B II9n ro)
aNwhere
aN =
(a+ - a-) I cm + i)
is the familiar
spin-dependent scattering length,
,uB the Bohr magneton, ro the classical radius of the
electron, and gn
= - 1.913 the measure in nuclearmagnetons
of themagnetic moment ,un
of the neutron.The nuclear
polarization
is obtainedby
bruteforce
in a field of 25 kOe and at
temperatures
down toT = 30 mK. With such
experimental conditions,
the nuclearpolarization
innon-magnetic
substances isgiven by
the Curie law : P =C/T,
and aplot
of theprecession angle
aN versusliT gives
astraight
linewith a
slope proportional
toJ.l*.
The results obtained in this way aregiven
in table I.If there are different nuclei with non-zero
spin
inside the target, a mean value
Article published online by EDP Sciences and available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/jphyslet:019750036011026300
L-264
TABLE I
Values
given
in this table arecorrected for
thermal contraction at low temperatures wheneverpossible (Co,
Zrand Tl
excepted).
The9*/YB
valuesgiven
in column 4 between brackets( for
naturalCu,
Tl andAg)
aremean values
(see text).
is
measured, where
is the abundance of nucleus i.Such a mean value has been obtained for the elements
Ag,
Tl and Cu with their natural abundance of iso-topes.
The contribution of63Cu
has been measuredseparately
on a 99.9% isotopically
enrichedsample.
The
pseudomagnetic
moment of65Cu
has beenobtained
by subtracting
the contribution of63Cu
from the mean value.For
207Pb, only
an upper limit could be obtained.The fact that Pb did not
give
any detectableprecession angle
turned out to be very useful in the cases where thesample
was tooabsorbing
for neutrons(e.g. Au)
or when it was not available in
large
amounts(e.g. 63Cu).
In these cases, lead was a convenientneutral substance to
keep 3He
out of the neutronpath, by filling
theempty
spacealong
thispath
inthe dilution chamber.
The value of the
pseudomagnetic
moment of91 Zr published
in[2]
is erroneous, since ananalysis
of thesample subsequent
topublication
has shown anamount of 27 ± 3 ppm
(by weight)
ofhydrogen.
Later on, the
experiment
has beenrepeated
on asample degassed
in vacuum and which hadonly
8.6
:t 1.0
ppm of H.Knowing
thepseudomagnetic
moment of
1 H (5.4 J-lB)’ it
ispossible
to subtract thehydrogen
contribution in bothexperiments.
Theresult for
91Zr given
in table I is theweighted
meanof the two measurements corrected in this way.
The measurement of nuclear
pseudomagnetic
moments in
ferromagnetic
materials raises two newproblems
connectedrespectively
with thelarge
elec-tronic
magnetization
and theexistence,
within thesample,
of astrong
internal field seenby
the nuclei.At low
temperatures,
where the nuclear neutronprecession
becomesappreciable,
thelarge
electronicmagnetization
does notprevent
a determination of the nuclearpolarization. Although
thecontribution ae
to the neutron
precession angle, resulting
from thehigh
electron induction inside thesample Be
= 4nMe
(ae
= Yn 47TMg(t/~))
is very muchlarger
than thenuclear
precession angle
aN = Yn 47L~* P(Clv),
oneis
tempted
to arguethat,
aslong
as the rate ofchange
with
temperature 1 dae/dT 1
is much smaller than1 daN/dT I,
the effects of the strong electronic induction inside thesample
can bedisregarded.
This would be true if the neutron beam were
strictly monoenergetic. However,
in the presence of avelocity spread bv,
theprecessing
neutronspins
will fan out inthe
plane perpendicular
to themagnetization through
an
angle 1 ðae I
=ae w/v I,
and theirprecessing
vector
polarization
will be decreased. Forexample, assuming
agaussian velocity
distribution of half- widthAv,
the neutronpolarization
is reduced in the ratioActually,
the limitation on the admissible thickness of thesample,
and therefore on themagnitude
of the ’nuclear
precession angle
aN, is less severe. The lines of force of the electronic induction continue outside thesample.
The effect of the electronic inductionL-265
outside the
sample
on the neutronspin precession
is
opposite
to that inside thesample. By choosing
asuitable
geometry
of thetarget,
the totalprecession angle
due to the electronicmagnetization
can bemade small. For
instance,
for a narrow beamarriving
at the center of a
rectangular target
of sides alland al (to
thefield),
it is found that the value of ae is reduced in the ratiowhich may be small if al > a II I
[7].
The second
problem
is the determination of the nuclearpolarization
inside thesample,
whichrequires
the
knowledge
of the internal fieldHi
seenby
thenuclei. This field is
usually
farlarger
than theapplied
field
Ho (a
favourablecircumstance).
It can be brokeninto two
parts : Hi
=Hhfs
+Had. Hhfs
is the sum ofthe fields
produced
at the nucleusby
the electrons(d
orf)
of themagnetic
ion to which the nucleusbelongs
andby
the conduction electrons(if
thesample
is
metallic). Hd
is thedipolar
fieldproduced
at thenucleus
by
all the other ions of thesample.
WhereasHhfs
isindependent
of theshape
of thesample
and ofthe
applied magnetic
field[3], Hd
is not. There aretwo
types
ofexperiments
from which the values ofHi = Hhfs
+Hd
can be extracted :specific
heatmeasurements and N.M.R. It turns out that for most materials
Hd
isonly
a fewpercent
ofHhfs
and withinthis accuracy, the values of
Hi
can be taken from anyspecific
heat or resonance measurement. But if far greater accuracy isrequired,
then the value ofHd
will be
appropriate
to calculate,u* only
if theshape
of the
sample
and themagnitude
of theapplied
fieldin either
type
ofexperiment
are the same as in thepseudomagnetic experiment.
Results of measurements ofspecific
heat or N.M.R. in zeroapplied
field aredifficult to
interpret
because theferromagnetic sample
breaks into domains whose
shape
has an influence.
on the value of
Hd.
For N.M.R.experiments,
a furthercomplication
arises from the fact that the measured N.M.R.frequency
is that of nuclei in domain walls rather than in the bulk.We have measured the neutron
precession angle
asa function of temperature for
single crystals
of bothhexagonal
and cubic cobalt.For
hexagonal cobalt,
aprecise specific
heatmeasurement on a
spherical single crystal
in ahigh magnetic
field gaveHi
= 223 ± 1.5 kOe[3].
Ourmeasurements have been made on a disc of 3 mm
diameter and 0.9 ± 0.02 mm
thickness,
the[001]
direction
being parallel
to theapplied
fieldHo.
Taking
into accountHo
and the difference in dema-gnetizing
factors betweensphere
anddisc,
the effectivefield for
polarizing
the Co nuclei can be estimated to 201+ 3
k0e. Thecorresponding
value forM*
isgiven
in table I.Here,
the accuracy of our measurement is not limitedby
theknowledge
ofHi.
The situation is different for cubic Co. Our measurements were done on 2
single crystals
ofCoo.92Feo.os,
a disc similar to thehexagonal sample,
and a
parallelepiped
16 x 7 x 2.35 mm. Themean value of
J.l*, using
thespecific
heat valueHi
= 220 ± 4 kOe[4]
is shown in table I.Here,
the dominantuncertainty
is due toHi.
This shows thatpseudomagnetic
measurements could be used to obtain reliable information about internal fields inmagnetic samples.
The values obtained compare well with the value 2.06 + 0.02 obtained from scatter-ing
cross-section measurements[5],
but are somewhatlower than that obtained
by Bragg scattering
ofpolarized
neutrons on apolarized single crystal
ofcobalt
[6] (2.3
± 0.2using
the sameHhfs
as for ourresults).
References
[1] ABRAGAM, A., BACCHELLA, G. L., GLÄTTLI, H., MERIEL, P., PINOT, M., PIESVAUX, J., Phys. Rev. Lett. 31 (1973) 776.
[2] ROUBEAU, P., ABRAGAM, A., BACCHELLA, G. L., GLÄTTLI, H., MALINOVSKI, A., MERIEL, P., PIESVAUX, J., PINOT, M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 33 (1974) 102.
[3] LANCHESTER, P. C., WHITEHEAD, N. F., WELLS, P., SCURLOCK, R. G., J. Phys. F 5 (1975) 247.
[4] ARP, V., EDMONDS, D., PETERSEN, R., Phys. Rev. Lett. 3 (1959)
212.
[5] KOESTER, L., KNOPF, K., WASCHKOWSKI, W., Z. Phys. 271 (1974) 201.
[6] ITO, Y., SHULL, C. G., Phys. Rev. 185 (1969) 961.
[7] We are indebted to Dr. M. Goldman who suggested to us this particular sample shape and who did the calculations of 03B1e.