• Aucun résultat trouvé

Prediction of pH changes during immersion of meat proteic matrices in acidic marinades

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Prediction of pH changes during immersion of meat proteic matrices in acidic marinades"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Table I. Dry matter loss and fall in L-lactate content as a function of immersion time of the turkey meat cubes in marinades.

CIDIC

marination is a widespread method of improving the

techno-functional properties of meat. By acting on the pH, it controls several

components relating to the meat’s quality, such as water holding

capacity, tenderness, juiciness and colour. To be able to predict the

pH reached in meat cubes after marination, we have proposed a method based

on the preliminary determination on the buffering capacity of meat homogenates.

T. G

OLI

*

1

, P. B

OHUON

2

,

J. R

ICCI

1

, A. C

OLLIGNAN

2

1 CIRAD, UMR QualiSud, Montpellier, France ; 2 Montpellier SupAgro,

UMR QualiSud, Montpellier, France

*thierry.goli@cirad.fr

The method was based on the determination of the equilibrium between free and bound protons

(name Hb hereafter) brought by a strong acid (hydrochloric) in a meat homogenate (turkey breast). Then a standard acid marination process was implemented by soaking meat cubes in water-acetic acid-NaCl solutions for time up to 360 minutes. Pictures 1 & 2 show the meat cubes before and after marination process.

Although various lean fish and meat show similar protein contents, they can behave differently

upon acidification. In the pH domain of acid marination, this can be linked to the lactate content.

Fig 1 shows buffering capacity and bound protons on turkey breast meat and dab fillet as a function of pH. These meats contain respectively around 92 and 17 mmol kg-1 of L-lactate. Fig 2 shows that

it is possible to calculate the pH of meat homogenates acidified by a weak acid if the buffering capacity of meat is taken into account. However, in the case of meat cubes marination, the calculed pH was by far over-estimated by calculus. The buffering capacity of the meat after marination averages 20% of the initial one, and might be explained by the high loss of proteins and lactate (Table I).

R

esults and discussion

Co n ce p ti o n : CI R AD , Mar t ine D up ort al , Oct o b e r 2012 — p h o to © T . G o li

T

HE

pH prediction of meat cubes after marination by a weak acid was not satisfactory when based on the

buffering capacity of a meat homogenate. The follow up of high buffering capacity molecules –as

lactates- loss after 6 hours marination explained most of the overestimation of the pH obtained by

calculation. With a view to technological implementation of the marination process, one should also take into

consideration the accumulation of buffering compounds for its impact on the regularity of quality of

successive batches if the marinade is reused.

C

onclusion

These data have been extracted from the article

GOLI, T., BOHUON, P., RICCI, J., & COLLIGNAN, A. (2012). Evolution of pH during immersion of meat

protein matrices in acidic marinades. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2011.10.003.

2012 EFFoST Annual Meeting, 20-23 november 2012, Montpellier, France

(a) 3,0 4,0 5,0 6,0 7,0 0 100 200 300 400 CHC Turkey breast (a) 3,0 4,0 5,0 6,0 7,0 0 100 200 CHC pH pH ß ß Dab fillet (c) 0 400 800 1200 3 4 5 6 7 pH [Hb] Dab fillet (c) 0 400 800 1200 3 4 5 6 pH [Hb] Turkey breast (b) 0 100 200 300 400 3 4 5 6 7 pH Dab fillet (b) 0 100 200 300 400 3 4 5 6 pH Turkey breast 3,5 4,0 4,5 5,0 5,5 3,5 4,0 4,5 5,0 5,5 Measured pH Calculated pH

Figure 1. Hydrochloric acid (0.1 M) acidification of a turkey breast homogenate and a dab fillet homogenate: (a) evolution of buffering

capacity ß () as a function of pH; (b) evolution ofbound proton concentration [Hb] () as a function of pH.

Figure 2. Comparison between measured and calculated pH for various meat and fish muscle

homogenates (turkey breast, chicken thigh, breast and drumstick, dab fillet and beef sirloin)

acidified by acetic acid (0.5N).

3,0 3,5 4,0 4,5 5,0 3,0 3,5 4,0 4,5 5,0 Measured pH Calculated pH

Figure 3. Comparison between measured and calculated pH for meat cubes (turkey

breast) marinated in solutions of acetic acid (0.25 and 1.03M) and salt (0 to 1.5M)

for durations from 0.25 to 6 h.

Time (h) Dry matter loss (%)1 Fall in lactate content (%)2

0.5 16.1 ± 6.1 33

3 20.0 ± 6.4 66

6 23.2 ± 6.4 70

1 % of initial dry matter (w/w). 2 % of initial lactates (w/w).

Prediction of pH Changes During Immersion

of Meat Proteic Matrices in Acidic Marinades

Références

Documents relatifs

Heat and mass transfers are coupled through the value of the water activity at the surface of the product which takes into account the local values of the water and of the

These models link deformation, proton density and temperature, and provide new information about the underlying mechanisms of meat deformation and water transfers

To satisfy the increasing demand for food by the growing human population, cultured meat (also called in vitro, artificial or lab-grown meat) is presented by its advocates as a

Summary ― The histological characteristics, ie, myofibre types and cross-sectional areas (CSA), of pectoralis major and sartorius muscles of 20 male

Allometric relationship between the area of the absorptive mucosa of the digestive tract and functional body size in three distinct group of species, according to major

The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.. L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est

On the other hand, analysis by 1H-NMR spectroscopy of the E10 amniotic fluid showed a different metabolic signature between the lines with leucine, isoleucine,

This paper, based on recent fieldwork, will show how, despite these regulations, marginal tribes and traditional hunters, such as Nari Kuravars and Irulars in Tamil Nadu, keep