HAL Id: jpa-00247920
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00247920
Submitted on 1 Jan 1993
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
Measurement of the 2s 2p2(4P) 3s 3P2 lifetime in N II by beam-foil-laser spectroscopy
T. Bastin, Y. Baudinet-Robinet, P.-D. Dumont, H.-P. Garnir
To cite this version:
T. Bastin, Y. Baudinet-Robinet, P.-D. Dumont, H.-P. Garnir. Measurement of the 2s 2p2(4P) 3s 3P2
lifetime in N II by beam-foil-laser spectroscopy. Journal de Physique II, EDP Sciences, 1993, 3 (10),
pp.1479-1483. �10.1051/jp2:1993214�. �jpa-00247920�
J.
Phys.
ii France 3 (1993) 1479-1483 OCTOBER 1993, PAGE 1479Classification
Physics
Abstracts32.70F 32.70C 32.90
Measurement of the 2s 2p~(~P) 3s ~P~ lifetime in N II by beam- foil-laser spectroscopy
T. Bastin
(*),
Y. Baudinet-Robinet(**),
P.-D. Dumont and H.-P. GamirInstitut de Physique Nud6aire
Exp6rimentale,
Universitd de Libge, Sart Tilman B 15, B-4000Libge, Belgium
(Received 17
May
1993,accepted
infinal
form 5July
1993)R4sumd. Nous avons mesur6 avec
prdcision
la durde de vie radiative du niveau 2s2p~(~P
3s ~P~de NII par la mdthode de
spectroscopie
faisceau-lame-laser. La durde de vie obtenue (r=
0.456±0.020ns)
estplus
courte que celles mesurdesprdcddemment,
parspectroscopie
faisceau-lame, pour le terrne 3s' ~Pde N II. Aucune valeurth60rique
de la dur£e de vie de ce terme n'est actuellementdisponible.
Abstract. An accurate value for the radiative lifetime of the 2s
2p~(~P)
3s ~P~ level in N II has been obtainedusing
the beam-foil-laser spectroscopy method. The result (T= 0.456 ± 0.020 ns ) is shorter than the beam-foil lifetime values
reported previously
for the 3s' ~P term. No theoreticalvalue for the lifetime of this term is available at the present time.
1. Introduction.
In the beam-foil-laser
spectroscopy method,
described in detail in[1-3],
a fast ion beamcrosses at
right angles successively
a carbon foil and theintracavity
beam of a tunable cwdye
laser. The first excitation of the ions in the foil is nonselective whereas the second excitation in the laser field is selective. In this
method,
cascade-freedecay
curvesreducing
tosingle exponentials
are recorded and accurate lifetimes are deduced from theanalyses
of these curves.The lifetime of the 3s'
~P(ls~
2s2p~(~P)
3s~P)
term in N II has been measuredpreviously [4- 6] by
the beam-foilspectroscopy
method in which the ion excitation is nonselective. Thus, the lifetime is deduced from theanalyses
ofdecay
curvescorresponding
to a sum ofexponentials
which limits the accuracy of this method. In the present
work,
an accurate lifetime value for the3s'~P2
level in N II has been obtainedby
the beam-foil-laserspectroscopy
method. To ourknowledge,
no theoretical lifetime has beenreported
for this term.(*) Research Assistant of the
Belgian
FNRS.(**) Senior Research Associate of the
Belgian
FNRS.1480 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE II N° 10
2.
Experiment.
The detailed
description
of theexperimental
arrangement has beengiven
in[1, 2].
In thepresent experiment,
thewavelength
of thedye
laser is tuned to resonance with the4s~P(-3s'~P~
transition in N II at 661.362nm and the2p~~Dj-3s'~P2
transitionat
NII
~ 0.5 ns
661.36nm
~~
2 ~
Fig.
1. Laser induced transition and observed line for the lifetime measurement of the 3s' ~P~ level in N lI.Table 1.
-Sltmmaiy of experimental
conditionsfor
thelifetime
measurementof
the N II3s' ~P~ level.
N~+
bearn energylmev)
before the foil 1,050 £ o.005Ion
velocity
after the foil(mm/ns)
2.46 £ 0.05Ion beam cross section
(mm2)
0.6x 6.0
Dye
DCMPower of the argon laser pump ~W) 22
Dye intracavity
power(W)
=25Dye
laser beam diameter(mm)
~lCarbon foil thickness
(pg/cm~)
20 £ 2 and 15 + 2Carbon foil size
(mm2)
1.5x 7.0
Distance between foil and laser beam axis
(mm)
=3Ion beam
portion
viewedby
thespectrometer
(mm) ~0.6N° IO ACCURATE MEASUREMENT OF THE N II 2s
2p~(~P)
3s ~P~ LIFETIME 148183.619 nm is observed with a
Seya-Namioka
type spectrometerequipped
with channeltrondetectors
(see Fig. I).
Theexperimental
conditions are summarized in table I.The intensities of the 83.619 nm line when the laser is switched on and off are monitored as a function of the distance traveled
by
the ions downstream from the interactionregion.
The curveobtained
by
the difference of these intensities(called
a BFLdecay curve)
is asingle
exponential.
The lifetime of the upper level of the laser induced transition is much shorter than that of the lower level of this transition(see Fig,
whereapproximate
values of the level lifetimes arequoted). Thus, during
the 3 mm distance between the foil and the laser field(see
Tab.I),
thepopulation
of the studied upper level hasstrongly
decreased whereas that of the lower level ispractically unchanged.
Under theseconditions,
observablerepopulation
of thestudied level is
expected
to occur in the laser field.During
the measurements, thewavelength
of thedye
laser isautomatically
controlled andcorrected,
if necessary. Theintracavity
power of thedye
laser is recordedduring
eachphoton
measurement so that the
photon
differences(laser
on and laseroff~
can be normalized to takeinto account small variations of this power. The ion
velocity
before the foil is deduced from theaccurate measurement of the Van de Graaff accelerator
voltage.
Theslowing
down of the ions in the foil is calculatedusing
anempirical
relation that fits tabulated energy loss data[7].
The wholeexperiment
is controlledby
a network of small computers and the data are collected andanalysed
on line[8].
3. Results and discussion.
At the exit of the laser interaction
region,
the difference of the laser-on and laser-off intensities for the 83.619 nm line amounts to about 5 9i of the laser-offintensity.
To obtain astatistically significant
BFLdecay
curve, it is necessary to accumulate several BFLdecay
curves, each recorded in a reasonable time formaintaining
stableexperimental
conditions. In order to cancel smallsystematic
errors,decay
data were recordedby moving
the foil-laser interactionregion successively parallel
andantiparallel
to the ion beam direction. Nosignificant
differenceappeared
between the two groups of curves obtained in this way.For each BFL
decay
curve, twelve datapoints along
a total distance of 2.2 mm were taken.These
decay
curves were accumulated until the statistical error(one
standarddeviation)
in the difference ofphoton
numbers(with
and without laserexcitation)
at the maximum of the BFLcurve was
equal
to I 14 % of this difference. Thiscorresponded
to a laser-offphoton
counts ofabout 40 000 and a difference of
photon
numbers of about 2 000.Finally,
asample
of loaccumulated BFL
decay
curves of similar statisticalquality
was obtained. Each of these locurves were
adjusted
to asingle exponential using
aleast-squares fitting
program[9].
The loestimated lifetimes are
weighted by taking
into account the errorsgiven by
thefitting
program.The
weighted
mean value of the lo estimated lifetimes isr = 0.456 ± 0.018 ns
(1)
where the
quoted
errorrepresents
the standard deviation of the mean value estimated from thedispersion
of theweighted sample.
We have also summed the lo BFLdecay
curves and obtained the total BFLdecay
curve shown infigure
2. The error bars represent the statisticaluncertainties
(plus
and minus one standarddeviation).
The standard deviation, at theposition
x, is s(x =
(n~(,I
+n°(x))~"
where n~(x
andn°(.; )
are the numbers ofphotons
counted, with and without laserexcitation, respectively.
The lifetime value obtained from theadjustment
ofthis curve to one
exponential (x~
=
0.6)
isr =
0.456 ± 0.020 ns
(2)
1482 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE II N° lo
N II 83.62
nmz
~
i
" ioooo
il
~f
1000
0.2 0.2 0.6 1 1.4 1.8 2.2 2.6 3
Distance
(mm)
Fig.
2.- Total BFLdecay
curve recorded for the2p~~D(-3s'~P~
transition at 83.619 nm using1.05 MeV
N(
ions. The error bars represent the statisticaluncertainty (plus
and minus one standard deviation).where the
quoted
errorrepresents
the standard deviationgiven by
thefitting
program. Thelifetime values and the errors obtained
by
the twoanalysis
methods are in verygood
agreement. The total error in the lifetime value is obtained
by combining
a 2 fb error due to theuncertainty
in the ionvelocity
after the foil with the statistical errorgiven
in relation(I).
The final lifetime result ispresented
in table IItogether
with the lifetime values available[4-6].
Theprevious
lifetime values have all been obtainedby
beam-foilspectroscopy
and concem the3s'~P
term because the individual fine-structurecomponents
of the2p~ ~D°-3s'~P
transitionhave not been resolved. The beam-foil
decay
curves have beendecomposed
into a sum of at least twoexponentials.
The three beam-foil results are in agreement, within thequoted
error(one
standarddeviation).
The BFL lifetime is more accurate andsignificantly
shorter than themost
precise
beam-foil lifetimereported by
Kemahan et al.[6].
Table II.
Lifetime
resultsfor
the3s'~P~
level in N II.Lifetime
(ns)
Method0.57 ± 0.09 Bean-foil
spectroscopy [4]
0.51 t 0.I Bean-foil
spectroscopy [5]
0.554 t 0.028 Beam-fort
spectroscopy [6]
0.456 t 0.020 Beam-fort-laser
spectroscopy
(this work)N° lo ACCURATE MEASUREMENT OF THE N II 2s
2p~(~P)
3s ~P~ LIFETIME 1483References
Ii Dumont P. D., Gamir H. P., Baudinet Y., El
Himdy
A., Nucl. Instrum. Methods B 35 (1988) 191.[2] Baudinet Y., Dumont P. D., Gamir H. P., El
Himdy
A.,Phys.
Rev. A 40(1989)
6321.[3] Baudinet Y., Gamir H. P., Dumont P. D., Rdsimont J., Phys. Rev. A 42 (1990) 1080.
[4] Buchet J. P., Poulizac M. C., Cane M., J. Opt. Soc. Am. 62 (1972) 623.
[5] Dumont P. D., Bidmont E., Grevesse N., J. Quant.
Spectrosc.
Radiat.Transfer14
(1974) l127 [6] Kemahan J. A.,Livingston
A. E., Pinnington E. H., Can. J. Phys. 52 (1974) 1895.[7]
Gamir-Monjoie
F. S., Gamir H. P., Baudinet-Robinet Y., Dumont P. D., J. Physique 41 (1980) 599.[8]
Monjoie
F., Gamir H. P., Comput. Phys. Commun. 61(1990) 267.[9]
Monjoie
F., Gamir H. P., Comput. Phys. Commun. 74 (1993) 1.JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUEII T 3. N' 10, OCTOBER 1993
J. Ph_vs II Fiance 3 (1993) 1485-1496 OCTOBER 1993, PAGE 1485
Classification Physic-s Abstracts
68, lo 68.15 61.30 61.25
Static wetting behaviour of diblock copolymers
D. Ausserre, V. A.
Raghunathan
and M. MaaloumEquipe
dePhysique
de l'Etat Condensd. C-N-R-S- U-R-A. 807, Universitd du Maine, B-P. 535, 72017 Le Mans Cedex, France(Received 23 Febiuaiy 1993, revised and accepted16 July 1993)
Abstract. Thin
liquid
films of ordered diblockcopolymers deposited
on a solid substrate form amultilayer stacking parallel
to the solid surface. Amultilayer
with a finite extend can be stable, metastable, or unstable,depending
on the relative values of the surface energies of the various interfaces. Thespreading
parameter and chemical potential of a ii-layer are derived, and used for classifying all possible situations. It is shown that only mono- and bilayers can be stable, and that non-wetting multilayers are subjected to along-time piling
upinstability, leading
in practice to theformation of characteristic
ziggourat-like
structures.A diblock
copolymer
is made of twopolymer
chains with different chemicalcompositions
A and B linkedtogether
end to end.Depending
on the temperature, these materials are found in two different states. For T~
To~,
A and B are mixed and form ahomogeneous
melt. On theother
hand,
for T ~To~,
A and Bspecies phase-separate
and form miccrodomains with one dimension at leastcomparable
to the chain size.To~
is called themicrophase separation
temperature or the order-disorder transition temperature[I].
In the case ofsymmetric
diblockcopolymers,
which have almostequal
volume fractions of A andB,
themicrophase
structure is lamellar. In thin films of these materialsdeposited
on a solid substrate, theselayers
orientparallel
to the substrate. In the present paper, we examine thewetting properties
of thesecopolymer
melts.The
wetting
behaviour of asimple liquid
A on a solid surface is controledby
thespreading
parameter
[2],
definedby
~A " YSV
Y'S Y'V (1)
where ysv,
y(s
andy/v
are the surface tensions associated with thesolid-vapour, liquid-solid
and
liquid-vapour interfaces, respectively.
IfS~
ispositive,
theliquid spreads
on the solid Surface. Otherwise it does not wet the surface and forms adrop
with a well-defined contactangle 6~ given by
theYoung
relation"'~
~°~°~
~ °'Sv
Yts
~~~Equations (I)
and(2)
holdgood
for anyhomogeneous liquid including polymer
melts.1486 JOURNAL DE
PHYSIQUE
II N° 101.
Spreading parameter
of amonolayer.
Consider a
monolayer
of asymmetric
diblockcopolymer lying
on a solidsubstrate,
as illustrated infigure
I. The free energy per chain in such a film can be written as[3]
j~c
"(3/2)
£YkB~(~/~0)~
+(fif~~/~)(YAB
+l'/V
+Y'S)
~~~where
I
is themonolayer
thickness, a a numerical factor of the order ofI, k~
the Boltzmannconstant, N the monomer index of the
polymer,
a thetypical
monomer size andRo
=aN~~'~~
Thisphenomenological expression
is found to be able to describe most of the observedproperties
of the lamellarphase
ofcopolymers
in the strongsegregation limit,
I-e- far from the order disorder transition. In thefollowing
we assume the aboveexpression
to be valid for a wide range of values ofI,
ye
Lv
iAB B
~SV ~~L ° /~
Fig. I. Schematic cross-section of a finite
monolayer
AB on a solid substrate. Theequilibrium
thicknessto
is obtained for a balance of the different surface tensions, which can be viewed as forces per unit length of theedge.
The free energy of the system is therefore
given by
F=
mF~
+Ysv(As Ap)
~~~where
As
is the total surface area of thesolid, Ap
the area coveredby
thecopolymer
andm the total number of
polymer
chains in the melt.Taking
the energy of the bare solid as thereference,
one canreplace Fj by
h~l ~~l l'SV~S.
Since
Ap
=mNa~li,
one getsAF
j = m
((3/2) ak~ T(ilRo)~ Sj Na~li) (5)
with
~l
" l'SVY'S l'fV
YAB(~)
When
Sj
isnegative, AFj
has a minimum at I=
to,
with~o
Si aRo
i13Ro~ ~3~yk~T
~~~and
AF
j
(io)
=
(3/2 ) Sj Ap
N° lo STATIC BEHAVIOUR OF DIBLOCK COPOLYMERS 1487
If one includes the
possibility
ofmultilayer stacking,
the minimum ofAFj
does notgive necessarily
the most stable state. Hence themonolayer
atto
could be metastable. WhenSj
~0,
AFj
has no minimum for any
I
~ 0 within the framework of
equation (3),
and the melttotally spreads
on the solid surface. The final thickness of the film in this case will bedetermined
by
thedisjoining
pressure due to the van der Waals forces. Thesign
ofSj
therefore determines thewetting
behaviour of themonolayer.
Note that :I)
Thespreading
conditionSj
~ 0 is much more difficult to realize than for asimple liquid,
due to the additional surface tension y~~
2)
The fact that the two purespecies
A and B takenseparately
wet agiven
solidsurface,
does notimply
that the same is true for thecopolymer
3)
We call A thespecies
in contact with thesolid,
whichimplies
:2.
Energy
of acopolymer bilayer.
The structure of the
bilayer requires
that the same chemicalspecies
be in contact with both thesolid and the vapour
(Fig.
2). We take this to be thespecies
A. In other words, we assume that theinequality,
Y(s+Y(v~Y/s+Y/v
is satisfied. In terms of
Ay~~
=yf~ y(~
and by=
yf~ yfi~,
the aboveinequality
can be written asby +
Ay~~
~ 0.
(9)
We will
always
assume in thefollowing
that both(8)
and(9)
aresatisfied,
which readsAy~~
~iffy (.
It means that weimpose
thepreference
of the solid for A to be stronger than thepreference
of the free surface for anyspecies.
If it was not the case, we should call A thepolymer
at the free surface and invert LV and LS indexeseverywhere
; then we could usedirectly
all the results which follow.Indeed,
as we considergeometries
where theliquid-solid
and
liquid-vapor
interface have the same area,they play
asymmetric
role in theexpression
of the free energy. Hence conditions(8)
and(9)
do not restrict thegenerality
of theanalysis.
Let
ij
andi~
be the thicknesses of the twolayers
in thebilayer (Fig. 2).
For fixedAp,
one canexchange
molecules between the twolayers
and henceij
andi~
have to bedetermined
by minimizing
the energy of the system with respect to one of them. From volume conservation we haveA~ =
mNa~/(ij
+i~),
A
-B
B A
Fig.
2. Schematic cross-section of a finitebilayer
ABBA on a solid. The fictive interface BB is represented by dotted lines.1488 JOURNAL DE
PHYSIQUE
II N° loThe total energy of the system is
AF~
=
(3/2) ak~ T(mj I(
+ m~I()/R(
+(2
y~~ +y(v
+y(s ysv) Ap (lo)
with mj =Ap ij/(Na~)
and m~ =Ap i~/(Na~).
Minimization of
AF~
withrespect
toii
at constantAp
leads toii
=
i~, I-e-,
the twolayers
have the same thickness. The minimum of the energy is
given by AF~
= m
((3/2) ak~ T(ilRo)~
S~Na~li) (I1)
where
S~ =
(1/2) S~
y~~Note that this is the same
expression
as that forAFj,
but withSj replaced by
S~. When S~ ~ 0,AF~
has a minimum and thebilayer
is at least a metastable state. For S~ ~ 0, thebilayer
is unstable and
spreads
on the solid surface.3.
Wetting
behaviour of amultilayer.
In the
following
discussion we assume that all thelayers
in the film have the same area. As weare
considering only
the stable and metastable states, this does not exclude anyequilibrium possibility.
For nlayers
theexpression
for the free energygeneralizes
toAF,,
= m((3/2) mk~ T(ilRo
j~ S,,Na~li) (12)
All thelayers
in the film have the same thicknessI,
sincethey
have the same area. Thespreading
parameter S,, now becomess,,
=
(i/,i)(s
~ by UP) y
~~
(13)
where
Ay"P
= y for n odd
=
0 for n even
The
multilayer
is at least metastable ifS,,
~ 0. This condition isalways
satisfied forsufficiently large
n, sinceS,,
~ y~~ as n ~ oo. The free energy of a metastablen-layer
state isAF,~ =
(3/2)
nS,~Ap
with
Ap
=mNa~/ (ni ). Minimizing equation (12)
theequilibrium layer
thickness is found to be~o (n
S,, aR~
i13R~
3ak~
T(14)
Dividing AF,, by
mgives
the chemicalpotential
p,, =
(3 ak~ T)"~ (aRo
S,,)~~~(15)
2
As p,, is a monotonic function of
(S,,(,
all thestability analysis
can beeasily
carried out interms of the
spreading
parameter.Dividing
S,,by
y~~, one gets the dimensionlessspreading
parametertr,, =
(I/n)(tr~
6"P)(16)
N° lo STATIC BEHAVIOUR OF DIBLOCK COPOLYMERS 1489
where
~r~ =
S~/y~~
and 6"P=
by "P/y~~.
Note that
~~~ ~
"
(Y/V Y'V)/YAB
~Or n Odd=
0 for n even
These dimensionless
quantities
are used in thefollowing
discussion. As the behaviour of the system is determinedby
thesign
ofd~r,~/dn
and thesign
andmagnitude
of ~r,,, we consider the variouspossibilities
below.3,I ~r~ 6"P
~ 0. In this case ~r~ is
negative
for all n all states are metastable.Further,
asp~ decreases with
increasing
n, agiven
film would tend to decrease its surface areaby
increasing
the number oflayers
in it. This results in what may be called apiling
upinstability.
Figure
3 illustrates the situation where condition 3.I holds for bothparities.
Note that the continuous lines in thefigure
areonly guides
for the eye, since ~r~ is definedonly
forinteger
values of n.
Figure
4 shows anexperimentally
observedexample
of such apiled-up ziggourat-
like structure obtained after very
long
time from aninitially
uniform3-layers
film. Because of its circular symmetry, we call it Babel tower. Eachlayer
in thispyramidal
structure has adifferent area,
suggesting
that it is a transient state involved in the evolution process.0~n 2~
n
0 ' '
-2 0 2 1 4 ~ b
odd
~ven -2
1'
~3 ~
~
~TA- -?
$ _i
'
-4 ~ ~
,
_~
Fig. 3. Variation of «~ versus n for ~r~ = 2 and 6
= 1. «,, is
only
defined forinteger
values of n,corresponding
tobig
dots on the two continuous curves. The chemicalpotential
~1,, is monotonicfunction of the distance between the n~~ dot and the horizontal axis. A
preference
for a high number oflayers
is therefore obtained in thatexample.
1490 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE II N° 10
t.
Fig.
4.Ziggourat-like
structure obtained afterannealing
at 170 °C for oneday
a thin film of asymmetric (Polystyrene-polymethylmetacrylate)
diblock copolymer of mass 57 000, with a thicknessinitially
uniform, as observed by Atomic Force Microscopy. Each step between two circular terraces has the same height L 290 ± 10Ji,
identical to the lamellarperiodicity.
5 p
6~n
4
,
fi
5 C~A" 3.5
$
" 15
2
even
n
-2 -1 1 1 s 7 s 9 io
odd
~~
i
Fig. 5. «~ i>emus n for «~ =
5.5 and 6
=
2.
n-layers corresponding
tobig
dots above the n-axis are spreadingcompletely
on the solid substrate. Their chemicalpotential
is not defined. Dots below the n- axiscorrespond
to metastable state, with onepreferential
state n * for each parity. In this example, thelowest chemical potential is obtained for n* even, which is only metastable however.
N° lo STATIC BEHAVIOUR OF DIBLOCK COPOLYMERS 1491
3.2 ~r~ 6"P W 0. In this section we consider situations where ~r~ 6 is
high enough
sothat
~r~~0
for at least one value of n. In otherwords, ~r~~2
if n is even and~r~ ~ l + 6 if n is odd. On
increasing
n, ~r,~ becomesnegative
at n =n* and tends to
y~~ as n ~ oo. Thus for n
~
n*,
the condition forspreading
is satisfied. For nmn*,
metastable states are obtained with the state n= n *
having
the lowest energy. Note that eventhis state is
only
metastable as the energy of the film decreases without bound when itspreads
on the solid surface. This situation is illustrated in
figure
5.3.3 INTERMEDIATE CASE.
6 ~ ~r~ ~ l + 6
(n odd) (17)
0 ~ ~r~ ~ 2
(n even) (18)
3.3,I. In the narrow range of values of ~r~ defined
by
the above twoconditions,
~r~ is
again
adecreasing
function of n, but it isalways negative.
Therefore, agiven
film cannotspread.
All states are metastable and the chemicalpotential
increases with n. Hence there isone
absolutely
stable state which is either themonolayer
or thebilayer.
It is abilayer
if p~~ pj, I-e-, if~r~~26. (19)
Figure
6 shows the variation of ~r~ with n for such a situation. A necessary condition forsatisfying
the above three conditions is that 0~ 6 ~ 2.
On ~
4
~ l.5
s
=
2
even i
n
-2 -1 3 4 5 6 7
-1
-2
Fig. 6. «~ versus n for ~r~ =
1.5 and 6 1. There is no spreading n-layer since no dot is found above the n-axis. The big dot which is the closest from the axis is at n 2. The bilayer is therefore stable.
3.3.2. Let us now consider a situation where
(17)
is satisfied but not(18).
There are twopossibilities
; either ~r~ ~ 0 or ~r~ ~ 2.1492 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE II N° lo
I)
~r~~ 0.
A necessary condition is that 6
~ 0. Then the even n states fall into case a and are all
metastable with the chemical
potential decreasing
withincreasing
n. The chemicalpotential
of any odd state is smaller than that of any of the evenparity
states. If the system isinitially
in aneven state, it can be
expected
to switchparity
andfinally
reach theabsolutely
stablemonolayer.
This situation is illustrated infigure
7.5
an 1
&
~
£G~=- i
~
Odd ~
" ~1,5
z
~
-2 -~ 2 3 4 5 6 7
,
-2
-2
,/
_~
j
even-5
-6 L(
Fig.
7. «,, versus ii for WA l and 6=
-1.5. The monolayer is
absolutely
stable. A possible evolution of an initial bilayer is shown by the arrows.~
~in
7
~
11j, ~
))
S=3
,j
S" 2 5
~
even 5
2
j..i
u
-2 -" 2 3 7 8 9 10 11
-2
Fig.
8. «,, versus n for «~ = 3 and 6 2.5. The monolayer is only metastable, since the dot for thebilayer
is above the n-axis,meaning
that thebilayer
isspreading.
N° lo STATIC BEHAVIOUR OF DIBLOCK COPOLYMERS 1493
it)
~r~~ 2.
A necessary condition is that 6
~ l. In this case the
bilayer
andpossibly
some of thehigher
order even states are unstable and
spread
on the solid surface. Themonolayer
is metastable asswitching
to thebilayer
leads tocomplete wetting,
thuslowering
the energy of the system.Such a case is illustrated in
figure
8.3.3.3. We
finally
consider the case where(18)
is satisfied but not(17).
There areagain
twopossibilities
; either ~r~ ~ 6 or ~r~ >1 + 6.3 PI
c~n
j,
,i '
'I ~iA" 0 5
~
)
~
, =
even
' Tl
~ g
-2 ~l ~
l t ~
-i
f
/~
, j
~ )
-4
~Fig. 9.
-
«,,versus
nfor
ii.
~~
'
l m~
~
'
i~ ~
f~
'
~ S T A L
~
@ ztl _I
ffi
~i~~ B( A
examp~ at
i
Fig.
lo- - iagramm of all possible regimes in the(6,
«~)space. Types enclosed in
ellipses
corresponding sections in
text.
linesfour
regimes defined on the basi~ ofthe
owest
energy
state : spreading ;monolayer
; bilayer ; and Babel. Thin lines ividein subregions
1494 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE II N° lo
I)
~r~ ~ 6.The necessary condition on 6 is that 6
~ 0. This situation is similar to the one of
figure
7(section
3.3.2 ;I))
with odd and evenparities
inverted. Thebilayer
is nowabsolutely
stable ascan be seen from
figure
9.ii) ~r~~1+
6.A necessary condition on 6 is that 6 ~ l. The odd
parity
states fall into case 3.2 andspread.
The
bilayer
is now metastable. The case is very similar to the one illustrated infigure
8 foropposite parities.
All the discussion above has been summarized in the
diagramm
offigure
10 drawn in the(6, ~r~)
space. To illustrate how to use it inpractice,
let us consider anexample
with 6 = 1/2.Depending
on ~r~, several behaviours can be encountered.They
aregraphically
summarized below :
Odd Babel towers Metastable Stable
monolayers monolayers spreading
piling
up
Metastable Stable bilayers
~.~ Spreading
I ayers
0 28 1+6 2
«
The two dashed area have been left apart in the discussion.
They correspond
to the strange situation where filmsbelonging
to oneparity
arespreading
while thosebelonging
to the otherare
piling
up.4. Grafted
monolayer.
So far in this paper we have assumed that the
polymer
chains are free to movealong
the solid surface.However,
in manypractical
situations it need not be so.Therefore,
we now consider the case where the firstcopolymer monolayer
isgrafted
onto the solid substrate. Then the solid surface behaves like aplane polymer
melt surface. For connection with theprevious
sections,one assumes that the
species
B isgrafted
and that thespecies
A isexposed
to the air. Oneshould also relax the earlier conventions embodied in
(8)
and(9) conceming
A and Bdenominations.
Further,
thequantities
ysv,y(v, y/s
have to bereplaced respectively by
y(v, 0,
y~~, 0 andby
y~~.. If we have A
against
thesurface,
the dimensionlessspreading
parameter isgiven by
~r~ =
(I/n)
6"P IIf 6 is
positive
even states areprefered. They
are all stable with the same chemicalpotential.
Consequently, rough
surfaces candevelop
with time. On the otherhand,
if 6~
0,
odd statesare
prefered,
with :ii
stablemonolayer
and metastablemultilayers
if -1~ 6
~ 0 ;
it)
allstates
spreading
if 6~ l.
N° lo STATIC BEHAVIOUR OF DIBLOCK COPOLYMERS 1495
. If we have B
against
thesurface,
then~r~ =
(I/n)
I n odd~r~ =
(I/n)(1
+6)
n even.A necessary condition for the surface to
prefer
B over A is that("n(
~ ''This is
possible
for the even states if(d~r~/dn)
~0, I-e-,
if 6~ l. But this is
precisely
thespreading
condition when A isagainst
the surface. Hence no stable state can be obtained with Bagainst
the surface.As an additional remark we underline that
moving
6 across 0corresponds
inprinciple
to aroughening
transition. Since y~~,yfv
andyfiv
aretemperature dependent,
it should bepossible
to obtain a temperature controledroughening
transitionby
theright
choice of A and B.As an
example,
let us mention thepolystyrene/polymethylmethacrylate copolymer
as areasonable candidate.
5. On a
possible
reversible temperature inducedwetting-dewetting
transition.Consider a stable
monolayer
of thicknessto lying
on a solid substrate. Onincreasing
thetemperature
aboveTo~,
the film melts into ahomogeneous
mixture of the twospecies
A and B.As the A-B interface has
disappeared,
thespreading
condition is now that for asimple liquid given by equation (I).
It ispossible
thatS~>0
for thehomogeneous
melt,although Sj
~ 0 for themonolayer,
as the formerexpression
does not contain the y~~ term. Hence wecan induce a reversible
wetting-dewetting
transitionby changing
the temperature. ThePFM data
thnoacope II Parameters:
Z lW.D A/J
Xf 1976.6 A/J
%mples 4DMscar
tlata taKen Fri 0ec la 15:43:03 lB3a
Buffer arts:43:03tF) ), Rotated 0., Waxes tnml, Z axis tnml
Fig.
I. Disconnected islands ofheight io(1)
160 ± lofi
visualizedby
atomic forcemicroscopy.
The
copolymer
is a symmetric PS-PMMA dibloc of molecular mass 57 000, and the substrate a silicon wafer. The initial film was solid andhomogeneous
in thickness. The present structure has been obtained byannealing
it at T < TOD for 24 hours. Furtherannealing
for one month was unable tomodify
the islandpopulation.
1496 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE II N° lo
topology
of themonolayer
obtained oncooling
aninitially spread
film of thickness I at T>
To~
can beexpected
todepend
onI.
If I «I~/2, to being
theequilibrium monolayer thickness,
themonolayer
will consist of disconnected islands of thicknessto.
Once formed, nokinetic evolution is
possible
exceptby
diffusion of the islands as a whole. Such a structure isshown in
figure11.
On the otherhand,
ifij2«i~ to,
themonolayer
would have adistribution of holes in it. A slow
growth
process drivenby
the line tension should lead to theirultimate
disappearance.
Ifi~io/2,
thedewetting
should result in the formation of abicontinuous
labyrinth
of wet and dewetregions.
The slow evolution process can then beexpected
to lead to severallarge
disconnected domains.To
summarize,
the essential conclusion of the present work is that thepossible equilibrium
states of a
non-grafted copolymer
film reduce tomonolayers
orbilayers. Every n-layer
with11 > 2 is therefore unstable
(spreading)
or metastable(piling up).
The secondimportant
feature is that the orderedcopolymer
is morelikely
to benon-wetting compared
to thehomogeneous
melt of the same
composition.
This leads to thepossibility
of a temperature controledwetting- dewetting
transition, drivenby
the appearance ordisappearance
of the A-B interface. The third feature is the formation of characteristic Babel towers in thepiling
upinstability.
Theirshape, however,
cannot be understood within the staticpicture
used in thisstudy.
The case of agrafted monolayer
leads to theinteresting possibility
of thespontaneous roughening
of thecopolymer
filmdeposited
on it. Acomplete understanding
of all theexperimentally
observed behaviours would nowrequire
to go into thedynamics
of these systems.References
ill Bates F. S., Fredrickson G. H., Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 41(1990) 525.
[2] de Gennes P. G., Ret,. Mod. Phys. 57 (1985) 827.
[3] See e-g- Tumer M. S., Phys. Ret'. Lett. 69 (1992) 1788.