• Aucun résultat trouvé

Myths and realities around Open Access before and after 2021

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Myths and realities around Open Access before and after 2021"

Copied!
32
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Jonathan ENGLAND

Myths and realities around Open

Access before and after 2021

Luxembourg Learning Centre

Librarian Specialist

jonathan.england@uni.lu

@jonatortue

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6715-8628

LISER / LIST 2021 – Myths and realities around OA before/after 2021 – University of Luxembourg – 11/02/2021 Share and reuse by citing: England, J. 2021 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4519479 under CC-BY 4.0International

(2)

Open Science

‘Myths and Realities around Open Access' – FNR Open Access Fund information session – 01/03/2018 Share and reuse by citing: Jonathan England, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1189190under CC-BY 4.0 International

= free unrestricted online access to

peer-reviewed research publications

(3)

Funders’ OA mandates

LISER / LIST 2021 – Myths and realities around OA before/after 2021 – University of Luxembourg – 11/02/2021 Share and reuse by citing: England, J. 2021 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4519479 under CC-BY 4.0International

(4)

The costs of reading

Yet another mandate! I

want to publish wherever

and however I want!

‘Myths and Realities around Open Access' – FNR Open Access Fund information session – 01/03/2018 Share and reuse by citing: Jonathan England, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1189190under CC-BY 4.0 International

Tax-payers are paying twice

to access publicly-funded

research outputs

Patrick Hochstenbach, “Yes! I told you!”, 2012

(5)

The costs of reading

‘Myths and Realities around Open Access' – FNR Open Access Fund information session – 01/03/2018 Share and reuse by citing: Jonathan England, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1189190under CC-BY 4.0 International

Researcher

Manuscript

Research

project

Journal

Journal

editors Reviewers

Publisher

Copy-editing

Article published

Public

Read article

Library

consortium

Research

Institutions

Government

Images:

John R. McKiernan, Why Open Research?

Nick Kim, Science and Ink

LISER / LIST 2021 – Myths and realities around OA before/after 2021 – University of Luxembourg – 11/02/2021 Share and reuse by citing: England, J. 2021 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4519479 under CC-BY 4.0International

(6)

The costs of reading

> 1.1 M € (HTVA)

for journal subscriptions

Luxembourg spends per year

Figures from 2016 and 2019, kindly provided by Consortium Luxembourg

> 550k €

for Article Processing Charges (APC)

(7)

The costs of reading

37 % for Elsevier (in 2019)

‘Myths and Realities around Open Access' – FNR Open Access Fund information session – 01/03/2018 Share and reuse by citing: Jonathan England, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1189190under CC-BY 4.0 International

In 2014:

LISER / LIST 2021 – Myths and realities around OA before/after 2021 – University of Luxembourg – 11/02/2021 Share and reuse by citing: England, J. 2021 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4519479 under CC-BY 4.0International

(8)

Misconceptions

 Myth 1 Is the reviewing process

in OA journals as good as

in non OA journals?

‘Myths and Realities around Open Access' – FNR Open Access Fund information session – 01/03/2018 Share and reuse by citing: Jonathan England, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1189190under CC-BY 4.0 International

Open Access ≠ journal…

Open Access = archiving model / philosophy

It is NOT about where you publish but where it is available

(9)

Misconceptions

 Myth 2

‘Myths and Realities around Open Access' – FNR Open Access Fund information session – 01/03/2018 Share and reuse by citing: Jonathan England, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1189190under CC-BY 4.0 International

I’d like to publish Open

Access but I can’t pay the

high costs

Open Access ≠ author pays for Open Access

Several routes to make research outputs freely available

LISER / LIST 2021 – Myths and realities around OA before/after 2021 – University of Luxembourg – 11/02/2021 Share and reuse by citing: England, J. 2021 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4519479 under CC-BY 4.0International

(10)

Open Access routes

‘Myths and Realities around Open Access' – FNR Open Access Fund information session – 01/03/2018 Share and reuse by citing: Jonathan England, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1189190under CC-BY 4.0 International

Might include Article

Processing Charges

(APC)

Self-archiving

Freely available on

publisher/journal

website

Open Access explained, Piled Higher and Deeper Production, CC-BY

(11)

Minimum for Open Access

SELF-ARCHIVING =

= depositon a suitablerepository

‘Myths and Realities around Open Access' – FNR Open Access Fund information session – 01/03/2018 Share and reuse by citing: Jonathan England, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1189190under CC-BY 4.0 International

(12)

The costs of reading

‘Myths and Realities around Open Access' – FNR Open Access Fund information session – 01/03/2018 Share and reuse by citing: Jonathan England, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1189190under CC-BY 4.0 International

Researcher

Manuscript

Research

project

Journal

Journal

editors Reviewers

Publisher

Copy-editing

Article published

Public

Read article

GREEN

ROUTE

Read article

Repository

Library

consortium

Research

Institutions

Copyright transferred to publisher

Images:

Nick Kim, Science and Ink

(13)

Misconceptions

 Myth 3 I put my papers in

ResearchGate, is that

enough for the Open

Access policy?

‘Myths and Realities around Open Access' – FNR Open Access Fund information session – 01/03/2018 Share and reuse by citing: Jonathan England, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1189190under CC-BY 4.0 International

A social networking site is not an Open Access repository

Provide free, unrestricted and permanent access

LISER / LIST 2021 – Myths and realities around OA before/after 2021 – University of Luxembourg – 11/02/2021 Share and reuse by citing: England, J. 2021 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4519479 under CC-BY 4.0International

(14)

OA repository

Find your subject-

specific repository:

Or choose a generic one:

https://open-research-europe.ec.europa.eu/

(15)

Manuscript version

Pre-print

LISER / LIST 2021 – Myths and realities around OA before/after 2021 – University of Luxembourg – 11/02/2021 Share and reuse by citing: England, J. 2021 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4519479 under CC-BY 4.0International

(16)

Manuscript version

Pre-print

(17)

Manuscript version

Pre-print Author

Accepted

Manuscript

AAM previously

known as ‘Postprint’

LISER / LIST 2021 – Myths and realities around OA before/after 2021 – University of Luxembourg – 11/02/2021 Share and reuse by citing: England, J. 2021 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4519479 under CC-BY 4.0International

(18)

Manuscript version

Pre-print Author

Accepted

Manuscript

Version of

Record

VoC previously known

as ‘Publisher’s version’

(19)

SHERPA/RoMEO

www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo

LISER / LIST 2021 – Myths and realities around OA before/after 2021 – University of Luxembourg – 11/02/2021 Share and reuse by citing: England, J. 2021 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4519479 under CC-BY 4.0International

(20)

Minimum for Open Access

SELF-ARCHIVING =

= depositon a suitablerepository

(embargo periodmayapply)

(21)

Go even further

IMMEDIATE ACCESS + =

RETAIN RIGHTS

= readimmediatelyfromanywhere, including

journal’swebsite(no embargo)

But youshouldstilldepositon a suitablerepository

‘Myths and Realities around Open Access' – FNR Open Access Fund information session – 01/03/2018 Share and reuse by citing: Jonathan England, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1189190under CC-BY 4.0 International

(22)

What’s coming up next…

https://www.coalition-s.org/

(23)

What’s coming up next…

 Up to December 2020 funders accepted:

AAM or VoC on a suitable repository

 Embargo period of 6 months (or 12 months for the

humanities)

 Publish in hybrid journals (subscription journals that

have an APC option)

Horizon 2020 2017-2020

LISER / LIST 2021 – Myths and realities around OA before/after 2021 – University of Luxembourg – 11/02/2021 Share and reuse by citing: England, J. 2021 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4519479 under CC-BY 4.0International

(24)

What’s coming up next…

 From 2021 onwards:

 AAM or VoC on a suitable repository

No embargo period

Authors retain their rights (i.e. no Copyright

Transfer Agreement) – publication in CC-BY 4.0

Hybrid journals are not allowed, except if they are

part of a Transformative Agreement (negotiated by

the Consortium Luxembourg)

Horizon Europe (2021-2027) 2021-…

(25)

Creative Commons

From:How To Attribute Creative Commons PhotosbyFoter

(26)

Misconceptions

 Myth 4 Now I have to pay to

publish

If the journal is not OA, you can use the Green route

You only need to deposit the AAM (or VoR) on a suitable

repository, and inform the publisher of the Rights

Retention Strategy (i.e. no embargo and retain your rights)

(27)

Rights Retention Strategy

“For the purpose of Open Access,

the author has applied a CC BY

public copyright licence to any

Author Accepted Manuscript

version arising from this

submission.”

https://www.coalition-s.org/rights-retention-strategy/

LISER / LIST 2021 – Myths and realities around OA before/after 2021 – University of Luxembourg – 11/02/2021 Share and reuse by citing: England, J. 2021 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4519479 under CC-BY 4.0International

(28)

Misconceptions

 Myth 5 I can no longer publish

in the journal I want

because it’s hybrid

Transformative Agreement are being

negotiated for you by the Consortium

Luxembourg. Your journal might not be

compliant now, but could be in the future.

Just check on the Journal Checker Tool…

(29)

Journal Checker Tool

https://journalcheckertool.org/

LISER / LIST 2021 – Myths and realities around OA before/after 2021 – University of Luxembourg – 11/02/2021 Share and reuse by citing: England, J. 2021 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4519479 under CC-BY 4.0International

(30)

Journal Checker Tool

https://journalcheckertool.org/

(31)

REMINDER…

 Make sure to identify which policy applies to you (pre-2021, post-2021)

 Decide on the Green or Gold route to make your publications OA, both comply

with funders’ old and new policies (with restrictions set in post-2021 policies)

 But always self-archive your publications on a suitable repository in any case

 Always make sure you upload the correct version (Sherpa/Romeo) and include

the DOI given by the publisher

 Retain your author rights whenever possible (required for post-2021 projects)

 Resources:

FNR new OA policy - https://www.fnr.lu/download-center/

Plan S info - https://www.coalition-s.org/resources/

LISER / LIST 2021 – Myths and realities around OA before/after 2021 – University of Luxembourg – 11/02/2021 Share and reuse by citing: England, J. 2021 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4519479 under CC-BY 4.0International

(32)

Jonathan England

Thank you

jonathan.england@uni.lu

This presentation is available here:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4519479

Références

Documents relatifs

• Faculty agreements to retain author rights, and allow open access to intellectual output.. National Institutes

“Open access is the principle that publicly funded research should be accessible online, for free,.. immediately

• Results from research supported, in whole or in part, by gov funding must be made freely available online.. Right to Research.. Open Text Books.. Open Text Books.. MIT

• Results from research supported, in whole or in part, by gov funding must be made freely available online.. Right to Research.. Open Text Books.. Open Text Books.. MIT

142 Second, there should be additional incentives for authors to publish in journals that fulfil the 143 criteria (incl. full refund of OA publishing processing charges also

Like other scientific disciplines, geochemistry now has a number of publishing options available to authors, managed by a variety of institutions, commercial

Open Access = gold Open Access only (author pays) … Several routes to make research outputs freely available. Myth 2 I’d like to publish

Cependant, les réseaux sociaux scientifiques soulèvent des questions et des réticences de la part des chercheurs, pour plusieurs raisons : ils ne sont pas pris en compte dans