• Aucun résultat trouvé

Vection des bactéries par les insectes : la cuticule importe t’elle ?

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Vection des bactéries par les insectes : la cuticule importe t’elle ?"

Copied!
56
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-01651301

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01651301

Submitted on 5 Jun 2020

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access

archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-entific research documents, whether they are pub-lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - NoDerivatives| 4.0 International License

Vection des bactéries par les insectes : la cuticule importe t’elle ?

Yves Rahbé, Natalia Guschinskaya, Baptiste Monsion, Marilyne Uzest

To cite this version:

Yves Rahbé, Natalia Guschinskaya, Baptiste Monsion, Marilyne Uzest. Vection des bactéries par les insectes : la cuticule importe t’elle ?. 10. Réunion annuelle du Réseau de Biologie Adaptative des Pucerons et Organismes Associés : Bapoa, Nov 2017, Colmar, France. 35 p. �hal-01651301�

(2)

Intro Methods Results Discussion & now

Vection des bactéries par les insectes : la cuticule importe t’elle ?

Rahbé, Yvan

Guschinskaya, Natalia

Monsion, Baptiste

Uzest, Marilyne

(3)

Intro Methods Results Discussion & now

MAP

Part A: Panoramic

2

(4)

Intro Methods Results Discussion & now

3

Epicuticle: the outermost envelope (lipids + polyphenol + few proteins)

Exocuticle: (or inner epicuticle): lipids + proteins

Endocuticle: chitin + matrix of proteins +

lipids + pigments and N-acylcatecholamines à cross-linking

➔ The composition of the insect cuticle with

respect to protein content can be highly variable

Building Parts of insect Cuticle :

From Cuticle to cuticular proteins

Intro a: Glandular duct b: cement c: wax d: epicuticle e: exocuticle f: endocuticle g: glandular cell h: epidermal cell

(5)

Intro Methods Results Discussion & now

4 https://www.shmoop.com/animal-evolution-diversity/land-animals.html

(6)

Intro Methods Results Discussion & now

(7)

Intro Methods Results Discussion & now

(8)

Intro Methods Results Discussion & now

(9)

Intro Methods Results Discussion & now

(10)

Intro Methods Results Discussion & now

(11)

Intro Methods Results Discussion & now

(12)

Intro Methods Results Discussion & now

(13)

Intro Methods Results Discussion & now

(14)

Intro Methods Results Discussion & now

(15)

Intro Methods Results Discussion & now

(16)

Intro Methods Results Discussion & now

(17)

Intro Methods Results Discussion & now

(18)

Intro Methods Results Discussion & now

(19)

Intro Methods Results Discussion & now

(20)

Intro Methods Results Discussion & now

(21)

Intro Methods Results Discussion & now

12

MPMI Vol. 29, No. 7, 2016, pp. 535–544. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-02-16-0032-R

Blocking the

Transmission of a

Noncirculative

Vector-Borne Plant

Pathogenic Bacterium

Oui, des bactéries peuvent s’accrocher spécifiquement à des territoires

cuticulaires définis,

• par certains déterminants bactériens identifiés (eg PD1764, HxfB) et

• par des déterminants insectes ciblés (chitine)

(22)

Intro Methods Results Discussion & now

13

(23)

Intro Methods Results Discussion & now

(24)

Intro Methods Results Discussion & now 14 Scanning electron micrograph of Yersinia pestis on proventricular spines of Xenopsylla cheopis

(25)

Intro Methods Results Discussion & now

15

(26)

Intro Methods Results Discussion & now

(27)

Intro Methods Results Discussion & now

(28)

Intro Methods Results Discussion & now

18

(29)

Intro Methods Results Discussion & now

19

(30)

Intro Methods Results Discussion & now

(31)

Intro Methods Results Discussion & now

(32)

Intro Methods Results Discussion & now

(33)

Intro Methods Results Discussion & now

22

Oui, des bactéries ont vraisemblablement le potentiel de se lier spécifiquement à des territoires cuticulaires, notamment internes des pièces buccales et de l’intestin antérieur (stylets &

foregut), dans d’autres modèles que 
 la maladie de Pierce

(34)

Intro Methods Results Discussion & now

Exploring the interaction between bacteria and insect

cuticular proteins by peptide Arrays using the pea aphid

(Acyrthosiphon pisum) model

.

Encadrant: Yvan RAHBE, DR INRA

Natalia GUSCHINSKAYA, Post doct. Collaboration: Guy Condemine, DR CNRS

Laboratoire d'accueil: MAP UMR5240 CNRS UCBL INSA de Lyon

1

Stagiaire: Hoang Thong KIEU, M2 biochimie-biologie moléculaire

(35)

Intro Methods Results Discussion & now

Screening the interactions, at the molecular level,

between the cuticular proteins of 


Acyrthosiphon pisum 


and the phythopathogenic bacteria Dickeya dadantii,

by peptide arrays

24 Main objective

(36)

Intro Methods Results Discussion & now

25 What is a peptide array ?

CelluSpotsTM peptide arrays - Intavis

- Size: 76 × 26 mm (microscope slide)

- Peptides are covalently bound to cellulose via Cter.

- 18 aa peptides immobilised on the spots.

- Spots: 2× 384 spots (technical repeat)

- Distance between spots: 1,2 mm. - Spot diameter 0.8 mm.

- Cellulose mesh of : 8 – 10 μm.

- 2 versions: V1 and V2 (peptides / proteins)

Methods Methods

(37)

Intro Methods Results Discussion & now

Array design

26 Methods

à 143 Cuticular proteins in the genome of the pea aphid


Belonging to 5 classes, among which the largest is the CPR family (PFAM PF00379), or « RR motif family »

à 3 Subclasses: RR1, RR2 and Unclassified CPRs à V1 contains a complete set of RR2 proteins 


(core set, full coverage)

à V2 contains:

à All RR1 (full set, full coverage)

à Remaining RR2 


(partial set, partial coverage)

à Remaining, = Unclassified CPR 


(partial set, partial coverage)

à 18 AA peptides with 3 AA overlap

à Peptides are immobilized as 2 duplicates in array à Example of chemiluminescence detection of hybridation


(38)

Intro Methods Results Discussion & now Detection method 27 Arrays V1 & V2 Fluorescence Chemiluminescence and - Bio-Rad imager. - Excitation wavelength: 530 nm - Emission wavelemgth: 605 nm - Acquisition time: 1s

- Analysis intensity by  Image Lab  - Vilber imager.

- Antibody anti-KdgM / Antibody coupled HRP / Luminata®

Crescendo•.

- Excitation wavelength: UV - Acquisition time: 30s

- Analysis intensity by Spotfinder Methods

(39)

Intro Methods Results Discussion & now 28 Arrays V1& V2 Fluorescence - Bio-Rad. - Excitation wavelength: V605. - Acquisition time: 1s Agrobacterium tumefaciens Dickeya dadantii

Detection by chemiluminescence (PepArray V1)

Erwinia aphidicola Pantoea agglomerans Chimiluminescence - Vilber imager. - Antibody coupled HRP/ luminata crescendo. - Exitation wavelength: UV. - Acquisition time: 30s - Analysis intensity by spotfinder Results

(40)

Intro Methods Results Discussion & now 28 Arrays V1& V2 Fluorescence - Bio-Rad. - Excitation wavelength: V605. - Acquisition time: 1s Agrobacterium tumefaciens Dickeya dadantii

Detection by chemiluminescence (PepArray V1)

Erwinia aphidicola Pantoea agglomerans Chimiluminescence - Vilber imager. - Antibody coupled HRP/ luminata crescendo. - Exitation wavelength: UV. - Acquisition time: 30s - Analysis intensity by spotfinder à Reproducibility issues à Erratic spot issues à No real fixation of the

bacteria on V1 arrays ?

(41)

Intro Methods Results Discussion & now 29 Arrays V1 &V2 Fluorescence - Bio-Rad. - Excitation wavelength: V605. - Acquisition time: 1s Dickeya dadantii Agrobacterium tumefaciens Erwinia aphidicola Pantoea agglomerans Chimiluminescence - Viber imager. - Antibody coupled HRP/ luminata crescendo. - Exitation wavelength: UV. - Acquisition time: 30s - Analysis intensity by spotfinder

Detection by chemiluminescence (PepArray V2)

(42)

Intro Methods Results Discussion & now 29 Arrays V1 &V2 Fluorescence - Bio-Rad. - Excitation wavelength: V605. - Acquisition time: 1s Dickeya dadantii Agrobacterium tumefaciens Erwinia aphidicola Pantoea agglomerans Chimiluminescence - Viber imager. - Antibody coupled HRP/ luminata crescendo. - Exitation wavelength: UV. - Acquisition time: 30s - Analysis intensity by spotfinder

à Spots detected on the arrays à Fixation of the bacteria on the peptides of the V2 arrrays à Probable true positive

signal, visible especially with D. dadantii

Detection by chemiluminescence (PepArray V2)

(43)

Intro Methods Results Discussion & now Analysis arrays (1)

30

Quantification by TIGR

spotfinder software

Computer (excel, jmp) analysis and classification of signal intensities

(44)

Intro Methods Results Discussion & now Analysis arrays (1)

30

Quantification by TIGR

spotfinder software

Computer (excel, jmp) analysis and classification of signal intensities

(45)

Intro Methods Results Discussion & now Analysis arrays (1)

30

Quantification by TIGR

spotfinder software

Computer (excel, jmp) analysis and classification of signal intensities

(46)

Intro Methods Results Discussion & now Analysis arrays (1)

30

Quantification by TIGR

spotfinder software

Computer (excel, jmp) analysis and classification of signal intensities

(47)

Intro Methods Results Discussion & now Analysis arrays (1)

30

Quantification by TIGR

spotfinder software

Computer (excel, jmp) analysis and classification of signal intensities

(48)

Intro Methods Results Discussion & now Analysis arrays (1)

30

Quantification by TIGR

spotfinder software

Computer (excel, jmp) analysis and classification of signal intensities Normalisation and substraction 


by the negative controls

(49)

Intro Methods Results Discussion & now Analysis arrays (1)

30

Quantification by TIGR

spotfinder software

Computer (excel, jmp) analysis and classification of signal intensities Normalisation and substraction 


by the negative controls

corresponding peptides (and protein / families) bind bacteria, and are manually grouped by homology

groups are analysed (WebLogo)

(50)

Intro Methods Results Discussion & now

31 Analysis arrays (D.dadantii) (2)

B C

(51)

Intro Methods Results Discussion & now

31 Analysis arrays (D.dadantii) (2)

B C

R

L

(52)

Intro Methods Results Discussion & now

31 Analysis arrays (D.dadantii) (2)

che m ilum ine sc e nc e inte nsity 0 36250 72500 108750 145000 spots rang 0 96 193 289 385 B C

Chemiluminescence intensity spots of array incubed with D.dadantii (RFP) bacterias.

A

A: positive spots B: negative spots C: no signal detected

~40000 ~20000

L

à 50 - 60 spots considered positive (intensity > 40 000 ).

à 180 – 200 spots considered negative (intensity ~40 000 – 20 000). à 80 – 100 spots no dectected (intensity < 20 000).

R che m ilum ine sc e nc e inte nsity 0 31250 62500 93750 125000 spots rang 0 96 193 289 385 A B C ~40000 ~20000 R L Results

(53)

Intro Methods Results Discussion & now Analysis (D.dadantii) (2)

32 à 50 peptide sequences correspond to 50 positive spots

à belong to 23 CuPs

à For example: 3 peptides sequences (326, 324, 325) from CuP ACYPI010088 Results

(54)

Intro Methods Results Discussion & now

33

For example

3 peptide sequences (pep-324, pep-325 and pep-326) 
 of CuP ACYPI010088 (CPR unclassified)

Results

(55)

Intro Methods Results Discussion & now Conclusion

34

- Interaction of D.dadantii with some CuPs proteins from CRP family was detected.

- No interaction of D.dadantii bacterias with the major CuP RR2 subfamily.

- 23 CuPs (RR1 and Unclassified) are able to take part in the interaction with D.dadantii in vitro.

(56)

Intro Methods Results Discussion & now Perspectives

35

- Test a colorimetric method - More reproducibile ? - Less sensitive ?

- Non re-usable

- SEM of hybridized arrays

- Non Dickeya : change to other primary antibody

- Test purified major bacterial envelope components: - Extract pilus and flagellum and hybridize (V1 ?, V2) - Incubation with mutant bacteria to test outer membrane

components (kdgM, ompA, ompF …) - Impact of growth phase on binding

- Go to in vivo situation in aphid anterior digestive tract 
 (SEM of dissected stylets - oesophagum). Entry OK, Binding ?

Références

Documents relatifs

De même, la pathogénèse entre Agrobacterium tumefaciens et la plante hôte, aboutissant à la galle du collet, résulte de la perception successive de divers signaux : une

phytopathogènes d’avoir un système de sécrétion de type III (T3SS) et des effecteurs adéquats pour provoquer soit une réponse hypersensible (réaction rapide et

Moreover, the identification of a putative lipid binding pocket in CytC NMR structure, which has been maintained in two clades (evf and Dickeya clades), and probably in

يبرطلا لوقيو ت( 310 اوناك بارعأ لىإ يرشت ةيلآا ّنإف &#34;:ةيمركلا ةيلآل هيرسفت في )ـه ْنإف ،مهتيداب نم نيرجاهم ملسو هيلع للها ىلص للها لوسر ىلع نومدقي دعب

A procedure has been established for Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated genetic transformation of Hevea brasiliensis embryogenic friable calli and the plantlet regeneration by

Combien de pieds sont dans 10 kilom` etre?. Combien de pieds sont dans 9

Selon les études, les taux d’acquisition d’EMR lors d’un voyage varient de 21 à 51 % selon les régions visitées, et peuvent atteindre.. 80

Wild type and various mutants in genes involved in resistance to AMP (phoP, pmrA, dltB, arnB) were incubated in the presence of 1 mg ml 21 polymyxin for 1 h.. Samples were diluted