• Aucun résultat trouvé

Providers of emergency care in rural and urban settings

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Providers of emergency care in rural and urban settings"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

VOL 55: OCTOBER • OCTOBRE 2009 Canadian Family PhysicianLe Médecin de famille canadien

1003

Fast Facts National Physician Survey

Providers of emergency care in rural and urban settings F

amily physicians have an increasingly important role

in the provision of emergency health care across Canada. Most FPs who work in small towns or rural set- tings have become important providers of emergency medicine in their communities in addition to their family medicine practices.

The results of the 2007 National Physician Survey (NPS) show that FPs in non-urban settings greatly con- tribute to the provision of emergency care for their com- munities (Figure 1). This underscores the breadth of skills that FPs must possess to meet all the immedi- ate needs of their patients. According to the 2007 NPS, young, male FPs are more likely to provide emergency care (Figure 1).

In a recent survey, 72% of FPs with the Certifi cate of Special Competence in Emergency Medicine [CCFP(EM)]

stated they intended to practise only in emergency

departments1; given this information, perhaps it is not surprising that 73% of all members of the College of Family Physicians of Canada (CFPC) with the EM desig- nation (ie, 9.7% of CFPC members overall) work in urban centres.

The NPS is a collaborative project of the CFPC, the Canadian Medical Association, and the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Additional results are available at www.nationalphysiciansurvey.ca. If you would like the opportunity to develop and write a future Fast Fact using the NPS results, please con- tact Harleen Sahota, National Physician Survey Project Manager, at 800 387-6197, extension 416, or hs@cfpc.ca.

Reference

1. Shepherd LG, Burden JK. A survey of one CCFP-EM program’s gradu- ates: their background, intended type of practice and actual practice. CJEM 2005;7(5):315-20.

0 20 40 60 80

Total

PRACTICE SETTINGS

Geographicially isolated or remote Rural Small town Urban or suburban Inner city

Figure 1. Percentage of FPs providing emergency care

Male Female Sex unknown

FAMILY PHYSICIANS, %

Références

Documents relatifs

Based upon the 2016, 2017, and 2018 Family Medicine Longitudinal Survey results, approximately half of all exiting family medicine residents across Canada who participated in

Conclusion This study identifed a number of demographic and attitudinal variables at medical school entry that predict postresidency practice in a rural setting.. These

Observers from the Canadian Medical Association and Health Canada’s Council on Health Workforce, and rep- resentatives from the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of

Overall, PCPs were engaging infrequently with personalized medicine, and owing to lack of knowledge were either reverting to personal experiences to inform clinical practice

Objective To determine the effect of the presence of family medicine residents on the use of laboratory and imaging investigations in a rural emergency department (ED).. Design

A total of 76.5% of program directors thought that introductory courses in EMUS should be mandatory; 62.5% (10/16) believed that residents were able to acquire suffi cient

OBJECTIVE To determine whether family medicine residents graduating from rural programs assess themselves as more experienced and competent in a range of procedural skills

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Number of rural training programs and positions; months of rural exposure, degree of remoteness, and specialist support of rural communities within