Freshwater food web studies: a plea for multiple tracer approach
David X. Soto1,∗, Esperança Gacia2and Jordi Catalan2,31Canadian Rivers Institute and Department of Biology, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB, Canada, E3B 5A3.
2Centre for Advanced Studies of Blanes (CEAB-CSIC), 17300 Blanes, Spain.
3CREAF, 08193 Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain.
∗ Corresponding author: [email protected]
2
Received: 18/12/12 Accepted: 1/3/13
ABSTRACT
Freshwater food web studies: a plea for multiple tracer approach
Food webs are complex systems of interactions between ecosystem species. Beyond the direct analysis of stomach contents, stable isotopes of carbon (δ13C) and nitrogen (δ15N) have been used widely to evaluate these trophic relationships and calculate the relative contribution of food sources to a consumer’s diet using mixing models. However, there are still some constraints on the use of these traditional tracers that limit their output. Here, we briefly comment on the potential of using multiple tracers (i.e., stable isotopes of C, N and H; trace metals), and applying recent numerical approaches (i.e. Bayesian mixing models) to advance the understanding of complex aquatic food webs. Stable isotopes of hydrogen (δ2H), normally used to examine large-scale migration patterns of terrestrial animals, have been recently proposed as a complementary trophic tracer in aquatic ecosystems. The principle for this application is the large isotopic difference inδ2H among food items that can be found in some aquatic systems. Other potential trophic indicators are such substances that accumulate through diet (e.g., trace metals). These substances are traditionally studied from bioaccumulation or toxicological perspectives, but there are indications that encourage their use for tracing food web interactions. Bayesian mixing models, which are able to incorporate several sources of variability and multiple food sources in the model, can help to solve puzzling results. In summary, we suggest that the simultaneous use of multiple tracers will provide more reliable results than any of them in isolation. The challenge is to develop methods to combine them enhancing their strengths and minimizing uncertainty.
Key words: Stable isotopes, food webs, deuterium, trace metals, Bayesian mixing models.
RESUMEN
Estudio de redes tróficas acuáticas: una llamada al uso de múltiples marcadores
Las redes tróficas son sistemas complejos de interacciones entre las especies del ecosistema. Más allá del análisis directo de los contenidos estomacales, los isótopos estables del carbono (δ13C) y nitrógeno (δ15N) se han utilizado con frecuencia para evaluar las conexiones tróficas y calcular la contribución relativa de cada alimento en la dieta de los consumidores mediante modelos de mezcla. Sin embargo, todavía hay algunas restricciones en el uso de estos marcadores tradicionales que limitan su rendimiento. En este artículo comentamos brevemente la posibilidad de utilizar varios marcadores (i.e., los isótopos estables del C, N y H; metales traza), y aplicar nuevos métodos numéricos (i.e., modelos de mezcla bayesianos) para avanzar en la comprensión de las complejas redes tróficas acuáticas. Los isótopos estables del hidrógeno (δ2H), que normalmente se usan para examinar patrones de migración de los animales terrestres a grandes escalas, se han propuesto recientemente como un trazador trófico complementario en los ecosistemas acuáticos. Su aplicación se basa en la gran variabilidad deδ2H entre las fuentes de alimento que se puede encontrar en algunos sistemas acuáticos. Otros posibles indicadores tróficos son tales sustancias que se acumulan a través de la dieta (por ejemplo, metales traza). Estas sustancias han sido tradicionalmente estudiadas desde perspectivas de bioacumulación o toxicológicas, pero hay indicios que estimulan su aplicación en el estudio de las interacciones tróficas. Los modelos bayesianos de mezcla, que son capaces de incorporar varias fuentes de variabilidad y múltiples fuentes de alimentos, pueden ayudar a resolver casos ambiguos. En resumen, sugerimos que el uso simultáneo de varios marcadores proporcionará resultados más fiables que cualquiera de ellos de forma individual. El reto está en desarrollar métodos para combinarlos aprovechando sus fortalezas y minimizando las incertidumbres.
Palabras clave: Isótopos estables, redes tróficas, deuterio, metales traza, modelos bayesianos de mezcla.
INTRODUCTION
Ecosystems are organized communities of pro- ducers, consumers, and decomposers along with an abiotic environment that influences species growth, reproduction, and dispersal (Covich, 2001). The early approach to trophic structure was a simple linear food chain where species aggregate into discrete trophic levels (plants- herbivores-carnivores) with declining numbers of individuals at higher levels (Elton, 1927). Soon, this simplistic view of ecosystem trophic struc- ture was revised. Lindeman (1942) introduced the tropho-dynamics viewpoint in an article of exceptional significance for ecology. This paradigm included some basic principles, such as that energy transfer efficiency between trophic levels should limit the size and length of the food chain; and that increase in biomass at higher trophic levels can only be sustained if biomass turnover at lower levels is higher. The latter, for instance, occurs in marine pelagic food webs, in which short-living algal cells (i.e., phytoplank- ton) support a large biomass of longer-living zooplankton, and the biomass of heterotrophs exceeds that of autotrophs (Odum, 1971; Gasol et al., 1997). Currently, the food chain view (Fig. 1a) has been replaced by the more realistic
food web concept (Fig. 1b), which due to its complexity is a challenging research topic.
Food webs are networks of trophic interac- tions within an ecosystem, characterized by the number of species involved and the nature, num- ber and intensity of their connections. The static view of trophic structure of ecosystems has been substituted by a concept that sees complexity and dynamism as an intrinsic property of food webs (Pimm, 1984; Polis & Strong, 1996). However, how variable trophic links are over space and time, how we can measure these complex inter- actions are questions difficult to approach.
Progress in the understanding of this com- plexity and dynamism requires development of new theoretical and operative frameworks, and the eventual merging of them. Here, we discuss pros and cons of the use of some new tracers (i.e., δ2H, trace metals) and numerical approaches (i.e., Bayesian mixing models) that might be helpful to advance the understanding of the food web structure in aquatic ecosystems.
STABLE ISOTOPE ECOLOGY
Stable isotopes have been used widely in ecolog- ical research during the last decades (Westet al.,
Figure 1. Rather than ordinary food chains (a), trophic relationships between aquatic organisms constitute complex food webs (b), which are difficult to disentangle without a set of different tracers.Más allá de simples cadenas tróficas (a), las relaciones tróficas entre los organismos acuáticos forman complejas redes tróficas (b), las cuales son difíciles de desenmarañar sin un conjunto diverso de trazadores.
2006). Particularly, after the development of continuous flow methods (CF-IRMS) of isotopic analyses, which are faster and cheaper tech- niques, stable isotope analyses have expanded to a widespread use in biology. Stable isotopes are forms of a given element that differ in atomic mass since they have the same number of protons, but different number of neutrons.
This mass difference generates a variation in abundance of the heavier to the lighter isotope in organism tissues due to the different reaction and transport rates for molecules. Stable isotope measurements are generally expressed as the relative isotope-ratio difference or isotope delta (δ) values. They are usually reported in parts per thousand () deviations from an international standard, as follows:
δX =[(RA/Rstd)−1] (1) where RA and Rstd are the isotope ratio of the heavier and lighter isotope of the elementX(e.g.,
13C/12C, 15N/14N, and2H/1H) in the sample and the international standard (e.g., PDB, AIR, and VSMOW, respectively).
In ecological studies, stable isotopes of carbon (δ13C) and nitrogen (δ15N) have been applied to gain insight into food web structures (e.g., Peterson & Fry, 1987; Cabana & Ras- mussen, 1994). Basically, the isotope ratio of a consumer reflects those of its diet with some trophic isotopic discrimination. The discrimi- nation factor can vary according to species and tissues but, usually, average values from meta- analysis studies are applied in the calculations.
Isotopic differences provide insight for investi- gating the relative use of food sources, contribu- tions of different habitats to the entire food web, general degree of omnivory and other relevant aspects of the food web structure (France, 1995;
Vander Zanden et al., 1999). Stable isotopes provide some advantages to assess feeding relationships compared to traditional approaches (e.g., stomach content studies). For instance, they can trace the animal diet over different time periods, compared to the snapshot that us- ing stomach content represents. Isotope turnover rates of each tissue vary and may provide in-
formation of animal diet over different time intervals (Karasov & Martínez del Rio, 2007).
Tissues with fast turnover rates will achieve earlier the isotopic equilibrium and will reflect diet changes at shorter temporal scales.
BAYESIAN MIXING MODELS
Mixing models evaluate the relative contribu- tion of different food items to consumer’s diet (Phillips & Gregg, 2003), and their estimation can be refined incorporating differences in food stoichiometry (Phillips & Koch, 2002).
Among several existing models, the one-isotope, two-source model (Boecklen et al., 2011) is extensively used. It is based on the following assumptions:
δT =fA(δ
A+ ∆A)+fB(δ
B+ ∆B) (2)
1=fA+fB (3)
where δT, δA, and δB are the isotope value in the consumer’s tissue, source A and source B, respectively; fA and fB are the fractional contri- bution for each source; and ∆ is the diet-tissue trophic discrimination.
Trophic discrimination factors (e.g.,∆15N and
∆13C) must be assigned a priori to each dietary food component to build mixing models. There are some aspects that require attention before applying these models. For example, consumers may lie outside the mixing polygon delimited by all the potential sources because some key end-member source is lacking or there are large differences in stoichiometry among food sources.
Recent stable-isotope mixing models (e.g., SIAR and MixSIR; Moore & Semmens, 2008;
Parnellet al., 2010) implement the Bayesian ap- proach that may enable more accurate estimates to track trophic links in complex food webs than traditional approaches. The advantages of these models to previous approaches are the possibility to incorporate the variation in diet-tissue trophic discriminations (McCutchan et al., 2003; Caut et al., 2009) and prior information. Diet-tissue trophic discrimination can vary among con- sumers depending on sampled tissue (Pinnegar
Figure 2. Hypothetical case illustrating the limitation of us- ing two isotopic tracers in complex food webs. Three equally feasible solutions for the diet of a consumer can be estimated based on theδ13C andδ15N values of its potential food. There are three combinations of two 50 % food items (illustrated by different grey broken lines) from distinct trophic levels (TL):
(i) TL1 (pelagic) and TL3 (littoral); (ii) TL3 (pelagic) and TL1 (littoral); and (iii) TL2 (pelagic) and TL2 (littoral). Uncertain- ties of the isotopic values were estimated as standard deviations (SDs) from 1,000 bootstrap iterations of the mixing model. New values of model parameters were drawn from normal distribu- tions described by the estimated means and SDs for each itera- tion. No trophic discrimination was assumed.Caso hipotético que ilustra la limitación del uso de dos trazadores en redes tróficas complejas. Se dan tres soluciones igualmente plausi- bles para la dieta de un consumidor estimadas a partir de los valores deδ13C yδ15N de su comida potencial. Hay tres combinaciones de dos fuentes de comida con una contribución del 50 % (ilustradas por distintas líneas segmentadas grises) procedentes de distintos niveles tróficos (TL): (i) TL1 (pelá- gica) y TL3 (litoral); (ii) TL3 (pelágica) y TL1 (litoral); y (iii) TL2 (pelágica) y TL2 (litoral). La variabilidad de los valores isotópicos se estimó como desviaciones estándar (DS) de 1000 iteraciones de remuestreo del modelo de mezcla. Nuevos va- lores de los parámetros del modelo se extrajeron de distribu- ciones normales determinadas por las medias y DS para cada iteración. Se asumió que no hay discriminación trófica.
& Polunin, 1999), protein composition and pro- portion in the diet (Kelly & Martínez del Rio, 2010; Robbins et al., 2010), food nitrogen con- tent (Adams & Sterner, 2000), an animal growth and ingestion rates (Gaye-Siesseggeret al., 2004;
Martínez del Rioet al., 2009). The uncertainty of model estimates increases when consumers po- tentially feed on many sources (Phillips & Gregg, 2003). This uncertainty may be reduced using stomach content analysis to disregard some food sources (Catalan et al., 2004), or introducing it in the Bayesian mixing models as prior informa-
tion. In any case, stomach content is always useful to examine unexpected associations between food and consumers. However, it is necessary to keep in mind that stable isotopes and stomach contents are techniques that can refer to different time scales.
When using only two isotope tracers (e.g., δ13C and δ15N), consumers that potentially feed on totally different food sources can lie in the same isotopic niche (Fig. 2). Despite the advances of Bayesian mixing models, there is no way to disentangle the correct food composition.
Figure 2 illustrates such case with a hypothetic example: the isotope values of a unique con- sumer in theδ13C-δ15N space could be feasibly interpreted by three completely different diet compositions within a complex food web. In addition to this complex case, limited power for discerning source contributions also occurs when there is little isotopic differentiation among sources or high variation in the diet-tissue trophic discrimination (Phillips & Gregg, 2003; Moore
& Semmens, 2008; Bond & Diamond, 2011). In complex food webs, additional constraints might be useful to simplify the mixing models; for instance, gut contents could be used to discard certain sources and, in cases where the isotopic values of some sources are not statistically different, these sources can be pooled to reduce their number. However, increasing the number of tracers, which increase the degrees of freedom for the estimation of trophic links, may be more powerful for solving misleading cases.
STABLE ISOTOPES OF HYDROGEN Stable hydrogen isotope ratios (δ2H) have been used for tracking large-scale terrestrial migra- tion movements and wildlife provenance. This approach is based on the well-known spatial isotope landscapes (or isoscapes) and the strong correlation betweenδ2H values in precipitation and those in tissues from a given location (Hob- son et al., 2012). Hydrogen isotopes have also been used to distinguish between allochthonous and autochthonous sources (leaf litter versus primary producers) in a consumer diet (Doucett et al., 2007). Aside from these applications, the
large δ2H differences among the basal carbon sources of the food web in aquatic systems indicate that there is potential for distinguishing food web pathways. This means high δ2H variability among food web components and, thus, increased interaction resolution if used in combination with the traditional stable isotopes.
The use of δ2H as a dietary tracer in aquatic ecosystems is promising. However, previously, the mechanisms and processes that determine the variation of H isotopes in aquatic systems must be understood sufficiently in order to build a the- oretical δ2H framework for food web studies.
Recent applications of δ2H as an aquatic food web tracer assume a trophic compounding effect of water rather than trophic isotope discrimina- tion (Solomonet al., 2009; Sotoet al., 2011b), as an explanation to the trophicδ2H patterns found by Birchall et al. (2005). This apparent trophic discrimination is caused by the H isotopic ex- change with water in vivo during protein syn- thesis (Sotoet al., 2013). Controlled experiments have shown that the water contribution to tissue H varies with the type of organism. Therefore, in contrast with C and N, H in the consumer’s tis- sues is derived both from diet and environmental water. The contribution of ambient water to tis- sue H at each trophic step through the food web determines the2H enrichment in consumers com- pared to their diet. Furthermore, there are other mechanisms of variation for H isotopes in organ- isms; for instance, the effect of the metabolic wa- ter derived from the metabolism of lipids. Ideally, in a given location, researchers should be able to determine dietδ2H values for a consumer knowing the stable isotopic composition of the environmen- tal water and that of metabolic water from ingested food components using mass-balance models.
Analytically, there are other factors that do not make trivial theδ2H application for trophic pur- poses. (i) The isotopic exchangeability of H in or- ganic samples with ambient vapour adds uncon- trolled uncertainty to δ2H measurements. This can makeδ2H results not comparable among lab- oratories unless they use some method to correct for the exchangeable H, such as the Compara- tive Equilibration method (Wassenaar & Hobson, 2000, 2003). (ii) Variation in the lipid content
of tissues induces uncertainty because lipids are highly depleted in2H compared to the protein of the same animal tissue (Hobsonet al., 1999; Soto et al., 2013). In addition, lipids do not have ex- changeable H with ambient water vapour in the laboratory (Wassenaar & Hobson, 2000), in con- trast with the calibrated standards used with the Comparative Equilibration method. Thus, lipids should be removed from samples beforeδ2H mea- surements to avoid uncertainties in the evaluation of trophic relationships (Jardineet al., 2009).
TRACE METAL BIOACCUMULATION Trace metal bioaccumulation in aquatic organ- isms has been studied widely during last decades, being a major concern due to the impacts in hu- man health (Luoma & Rainbow, 2008). However, trace metals have been seldom used to trace di- etary sources (Stewart et al., 2004) compared with their potential. Trace metals are ubiquitous elements whose environment concentrations depend on the natural background and con- tamination spills due to industrial production and agricultural treatments. Trace metal bioac- cumulation in aquatic organisms results from exposure to medium and diet and involves com- plex mechanisms such as assimilation, storage, metabolism, and elimination of contaminants.
Comparative studies considering several food web components for distinct contaminants are rare but hold a great potential for environmental biomonitoring and food web considerations (Soto et al., 2011a). Food web components showed differences in trace metal concentrations among aquatic species with the same apparent trace metal exposure (Soto et al., 2011a) and the difference in biomonitoring capacity is also the basis for the proposal that trace metals can complement stable isotopes in unveiling aquatic food web structure.
Concentrations of chemical elements that bioaccumulate in an organism should correlate to some degree to concentrations in its diet.
Similarly to stable isotopes and according to trace metal bioaccumulation models, the trace metal concentrations in aquatic species are
affected by physiological characteristics of the species (e.g., growth, elimination rates, ingestion rates), which usually are related to animal size (Trudel & Rasmussen, 1997; Trudelet al., 2000).
Therefore, the relative differences of trace metal bioaccumulation among organisms can provide insights into species trophic relationships, and also the species metabolic requirements. Trace metals may become particularly useful when i) studying species with similar rates of key phys- iological processes (e.g., ingestion, trace me- tal elimination), and ii) the variation of trace metal concentration in food sources is high.
Combining trace metals and stable isotopes for evaluating trophic links appears promising.
Cabana & Rasmussen (1994) showed that Hg
bioaccumulation was related to the trophic posi- tion (δ15N) and that the knowledge of the degree of omnivory could predict realistically the Hg biomagnification. Biomagnification of trace met- als along food chains occurs because uptake from the diet is higher than elimination. On the con- trary, As concentrations are biodiminished along food chains (Chen & Folt, 2000). The same ex- planation applies toδ15N in which organisms re- tain15N preferentially over 14N. There are cases in which trace metal discriminate better among trophic levels than stable isotopes. An example is shown in figure 3, corresponding to the macroin- vertebrate food web of Flix reservoir. Predators and consumers (collector/scrapers) can scarcely be differentiated using C and N stable isotopes.
Figure 3. A case study example showing a situation in which trace metals discriminate better among trophic groups than stable isotopes. Data correspond to macroinvertebrates from the Flix reservoir (Ebro River, Spain) sampled in 2006. (a) Theδ13C and δ15N values (Sotoet al., 2011b). (b) Principal component biplot of trace metal concentrations (trace metal data from Sotoet al., 2011a). The principal components (PC1 and PC2, respectively) explained 50 % and 17 % of the variation, respectively. Predators are clearly discriminated from consumers by the biodiminished arsenic (As) concentrations. Only the peculiar case of Turbellaria (Dugesiasp.) does not follow the pattern. Predator taxa include:Dugesiasp. (Turbellaria), Hydrophilidae adults (Coleoptera, Insecta), Coenagrionidae (Odonata, Insecta), andNaucorissp. (Naucoridae, Heteroptera, Insecta); and collectors/scrapers include:Physasp.
(Gastropoda, Mollusca),Cloëonsp. (Baetidae, Ephemeroptera, Insecta), and Hydrophilidae larvae (Coleoptera, Insecta).Un caso de estudio que ilustra una situación en que los metales traza discriminan mejor entre grupos tróficos que los isótopos estables. Los datos corresponden a macroinvertebrados del embalse de Flix (río Ebro, España) muestreados durante el 2006. (a) Valores deδ13C yδ15N (Soto et al., 2011b). (b) Biplot de un análisis de componentes principales de las concentraciones de metales traza (datos de metales traza de Soto et al., 2011a). Las componentes principales (PC1 y PC2) explican un 50 % y un 17 % de la variación, respectivamente.
Los depredadores se discriminan claramente de los consumidores por el efecto de biodisminución del arsénico (As). Sólo el caso peculiar de los Turbelarios (i.e., Dugesia, sp.) no sigue la pauta. Los depredadores incluyen: Dugesia sp. (Turbellaria), adultos de Hydrophilidae (Coleoptera, Insecta), Coenagrionidae (Odonata, Insecta), y Naucoris sp. (Naucoridae, Heteroptera, Insecta); y los consumidores: Physa sp. (Gastropoda, Mollusca), Cloëon sp. (Baetidae, Ephemeroptera, Insecta), y larvas de Hydrophilidae (Coleoptera, Insecta).
However, the trace metal signatures clearly dif- ferentiate between the two trophic groups. More research regarding the consistency of the multi- variate trace metal patterns should be undertaken.
There are already some studies that point towards a use of multiple tracers. Soto et al., (2011b) found that Hg and As concentrations in fish from a reservoir were positively and negatively correlated, respectively, with trophic indicators based on C and N stable isotopes. The combination of trace metals and stable isotopes (δ13C andδ15N) were also useful to show a po- tential trophic meaning ofδ2H values which was unclear only using δ13C and δ15N (Soto et al., 2011b). A case study from San Francisco Bay, organisms feeding on bivalves had much higher selenium concentrations than those species that fed on crustaceans because of the lower loss rate constant of selenium in bivalves (Stewartet al., 2004). Organochlorine contaminants have also been occasionally used in feeding ecology, in cases where the interpretation of trophic position with only stable isotopes as indicators could be imprecise (Fisket al., 2002).
In summary, we suggest that increasing the number of tracers by combining trace metals (or other bioaccumulated contaminants) and stable isotopes can be a powerful technique in systems where the isotope values of consumers result in- sufficient to separate feeding modes.
FINAL REMARKS
The use of δ13C and δ15N is helpful for reveal- ing the food web structure of aquatic ecosys- tems, but usually insufficient for disentangling complex food webs. It cannot be expected that only two tracers solve the myriad of possible in- teractions that occur in food webs. Complemen- tary trophic tracers of considerable potential are other stable isotopes (i.e., δ2H) and substances that bioaccumulate through food webs (i.e., trace metals, organic pollutants).
For a confident use of δ2H in aquatic food web studies, the potential confounding effect of seasonal and spatial hydrogen isotopic variation of environmental water should be taken into ac-
count along with other mechanisms that drive the hydrogen isotopic variability.
Differential trace metal accumulation patterns occur among food web organisms. This diversity is the basis to suggest trace metal use for study- ing food webs. Any increase in understanding the bioaccumulation process will serve also the ap- plication of trace metals as food web tracers. The combined use of both techniques (stable isotopes and trace metals) can be highly complementary, particularly, when values in the potential food sources show little variability for one of them.
In addition to using more tracers, the numer- ical estimations can also be improved. Bayesian mixing models are a powerful tool to obtain reli- able results because can take into account sources of variability in the data interpretation. These models can be performed at both population and individual levels to trace the links of com- plex food webs. Quantitative estimation of tro- phic food webs may have applications that range from theoretical (e.g., food web stability) to ap- plied investigations (e.g., invasive species diet).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Thanks to L. Wassenaar and K. Hobson for their inspiration in the use of hydrogen iso- topes. Financial support was provided by the MOBITROF project (Spanish Ministry of the En- vironment and Rural and Marine Affairs and the Catalan Agency of Water) and GRACCIE project (CSD2007-00067). D.X. Soto acknowl- edges an FPU fellowship from the Spanish Ministry of Education.
REFERENCES
ADAMS, T. S. & R. W. STERNER. 2000. The effect of dietary nitrogen content on trophic level15N en- richment.Limnology and Oceanography,45: 601–
607.
BIRCHALL, J., T. C. O’CONNELL, T. H. E. HEA- TON & R. E. M. HEDGES. 2005. Hydrogen iso- tope ratios in animal body protein reflect trophic level. Journal of Animal Ecology, 74: 877–881.
BOECKLEN, W. J., C. T. YARNES, B. A. COOK &
A. C. JAMES. 2011. On the use of stable iso- topes in trophic ecology. Annual Review of Ecol- ogy, Evolution, and Systematics,42: 411–440.
BOND, A. L. & A. W. DIAMOND. 2011. Recent Bayesian stable-isotope mixing models are highly sensitive to variation in discrimination factors.
Ecological Applications,21: 1017–1023.
CABANA, G. & J. B. RASMUSSEN. 1994. Mod- elling food chain structure and contaminant bioaccumulation using stable nitrogen isotopes.
Nature,372 (6503): 255–257.
CATALAN, J., M. VENTURA, I. VIVES & J. O.
GRIMALT. 2004. The roles of food and water in the bioaccumulation of organochlorine com- pounds in high mountain lake fish.Environmental Science and Technology,38: 4269–4275.
CAUT, S., E. ANGULO & F. COURCHAMP. 2009.
Variation in discrimination factors (∆15N and
∆13C): the effect of diet isotopic values and ap- plications for diet reconstruction. Journal of Applied Ecology,46: 443–453.
CHEN, C. Y. & C. L. FOLT. 2000. Bioaccumulation and diminution of arsenic and lead in a freshwater food web.Environmental Science and Technology, 34: 3878–3884.
COVICH, A. P. 2001. Energy Flow and Ecosystems.
In: Encyclopedia of Biodiversity. A. L. Simon (ed.): 509–523. Elsevier, New York, USA.
DOUCETT, R. R., J. C. MARKS, D. W. BLINN, M.
CARON & B. A. HUNGATE. 2007. Measuring terrestrial subsidies to aquatic food webs using stable isotopes of hydrogen. Ecology, 88: 1587–
1592.
ELTON, C. S. 1927.Animal ecology. Macmillan. New York. USA.
FISK, A. T., S. A. TITTLEMIER, J. L. PRANSCHKE
& R. J. NORSTROM. 2002. Using anthropogenic contaminants and stable isotopes to assess the feeding ecology of Greenland Sharks.Ecology,83 (8): 2162–2172.
FRANCE, R. L. 1995. Differentiation between littoral and pelagic food webs in lakes using stable carbon isotopes.Limnology and Oceanography,40: 1310–
1313.
GASOL, J. M., P. A. DEL GIORGIO & C. M.DUAR- TE. 1997. Biomass distribution in marine plank- tonic communities.Limnology and Oceanography, 42: 1353–1363.
GAYE-SIESSEGGER, J., U. FOCKEN, S. MUET- ZEL, H. ABEL & K. BECKER. 2004. Feeding
level and individual metabolic rate affect δ13C and δ15N values in carp: implications for food web studies.Oecologia,138: 175–183.
HOBSON, K. A., L. ATWELL & L. I. WASSE- NAAR. 1999. Influence of drinking water and diet on the stable-hydrogen isotope ratios of animal tissues. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,96: 8003–8006.
HOBSON, K. A., D. X. SOTO, D. R. PAULSON, L.
I. WASSENAAR & J. H. MATTHEWS. 2012. A dragonfly (δ2H) isoscape for North America: a new tool for determining natal origins of migratory aquatic emergent insects.Methods in Ecology and Evolution,3: 766–772.
JARDINE, T. D., K. A. KIDD & R. A. CUNJAK.
2009. An evaluation of deuterium as a food source tracer in temperate streams of eastern Canada.
Journal of the North American Benthological Society,28: 885–893.
KARASOV, W. H. & C. MARTÍNEZ DEL RIO.
2007. Physiological ecology: How animals process energy, nutrients, and toxins. Princeton University Press. Princeton.
KELLY, L. J. & C. MARTÍNEZ DEL RIO. 2010. The fate of carbon in growing fish: an experimental study of isotopic routing.Physiological and Bio- chemical Zoology,83: 473–480.
LINDEMAN, R. L. 1942. The trophic-dynamic as- pect of ecology.Ecology,23: 399–417.
LUOMA, S. N. & P. S. RAINBOW. 2008.Metal con- tamination in aquatic environments: science and lateral management. Cambridge University Press.
New York.
MARTÍNEZ DEL RIO, C., N. WOLF, S. A. CAR- LETON & L. Z. GANNES. 2009. Isotopic ecology ten years after a call for more laboratory experi- ments.Biological Reviews,84: 91–111.
MCCUTCHAN, J. H., JR., W. M. LEWIS, JR., C.
KENDALL & C. C. MCGRATH. 2003. Variation in trophic shift for stable isotope ratios of carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur.Oikos,102: 378–390.
MOORE, J. W. & B. X. SEMMENS. 2008. Incorpo- rating uncertainty and prior information into stable isotope mixing models.Ecology Letters,11: 470–
480.
ODUM, E. P. 1971. Fundamentals of ecology. Saun- ders. Philadelphia.
PARNELL, A. C., R. INGER, S. BEARHOP & A. L.
JACKSON. 2010. Source partitioning using stable isotopes: Coping with too much variation. PLoS ONE,5: e9672.
PETERSON, B. J. & B. FRY. 1987. Stable isotopes in ecosystem studies.Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics,18: 293–320.
PHILLIPS, D. & P. KOCH. 2002. Incorporating concentration dependence in stable isotope mixing models.Oecologia,130: 114–125.
PHILLIPS, D. L. & J. W. GREGG. 2003. Source par- titioning using stable isotopes: coping with too many sources.Oecologia,136: 261–269.
PIMM, S. L. 1984. The complexity and stability of ecosystems.Nature,307 (5949): 321–326.
PINNEGAR, J. K. & N. V. C. POLUNIN. 1999. Dif- ferential fractionation of δ13C and δ15N among fish tissues: implications for the study of trophic interactions.Functional Ecology,13: 225–231.
POLIS, G. A. & D. R. STRONG. 1996. Food web complexity and community dynamics.The Ameri- can Naturalist,147: 813–846.
ROBBINS, C. T., L. A. FELICETTI & S. T. FLORIN.
2010. The impact of protein quality on stable ni- trogen isotope ratio discrimination and assimilated diet estimation.Oecologia,162: 571–579.
SOLOMON, C. T., J. J. COLE, R. R. DOUCETT, M.
L. PACE, N. D. PRESTON, L. E. SMITH & B.
C. WEIDEL. 2009. The influence of environmen- tal water on the hydrogen stable isotope ratio in aquatic consumers.Oecologia,161: 313–324.
SOTO, D. X., R. ROIG, E. GACIA & J. CATALAN.
2011a. Differential accumulation of mercury and other trace metals in the food web components of a reservoir impacted by a chlor-alkali plant (Flix, Ebro River, Spain): Implications for biomonitor- ing.Environmental Pollution,159: 1481–1489.
SOTO, D. X., L. I. WASSENAAR, K. A. HOBSON
& J. CATALAN. 2011b. Effects of size and diet on stable hydrogen isotope values (δD) in fish:
implications for tracing origins of individuals and
their food sources.Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences,68: 2011–2019.
SOTO, D. X., L. I. WASSENAAR & K. A. HOB- SON. 2013. Stable hydrogen and oxygen isotopes in aquatic food webs are tracers of diet and provenance.Functional Ecology, 27: 535–543.
STEWART, A. R., S. N. LUOMA, C. E. SCHLEKAT, M. A. DOBLIN & K. A. HIEB. 2004. Food web pathway determines how selenium affects aquatic ecosystems: A San Francisco Bay case study.Envi- ronmental Science and Technology,38: 4519–4526.
TRUDEL, M. & J. B. RASMUSSEN. 1997. Modeling the elimination of mercury by fish.Environmental Science and Technology,31: 1716–1722.
TRUDEL, M., A. TREMBLAY, R. SCHETAGNE &
J. B. RASMUSSEN. 2000. Estimating food con- sumption rates of fish using a mercury mass bal- ance model. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences,57: 414–428.
VANDER ZANDEN, M. J., J. M. CASSELMAN & J.
B. RASMUSSEN. 1999. Stable isotope evidence for the food web consequences of species invasions in lakes.Nature,401 (6752): 464–467.
WASSENAAR, L. I. & K. A. HOBSON. 2000. Im- proved method for determining the stable-hydrogen isotopic composition (δD) of complex organic materials of environmental interest.Environmental Science and Technology,34: 2354–2360.
WASSENAAR, L. I. & K. A. HOBSON. 2003. Com- parative equilibration and online technique for determination of non-exchangeable hydrogen of ker- atins for use in animal migration studies.Isotopes in Environmental and Health Studies, 39: 211–217.
WEST, J. B., G. J. BOWEN, T. E. CERLING & J. R.
EHLERINGER. 2006. Stable isotopes as one of nature’s ecological recorders.Trends in Ecology &
Evolution,21: 408–414.