• Aucun résultat trouvé

Practice tips. Colorectal cancer screening in my practice.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Practice tips. Colorectal cancer screening in my practice."

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

VOL 50: APRIL • AVRIL 2004dCanadian Family Physician • Le Médecin de famille canadien 555

Pratique clinique Clinical Pract ice

T

he United States and Canadian task forces on preventive health care have now recommended screening patients for colorectal cancer.1,2 Methods of screening include fecal occult blood (FOB) test- ing, sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy, and barium enema.

I have chosen to implement annual FOB test- ing in my practice because it is a grade A recom- mendation (good evidence for inclusion) of both task forces; it is the only screening method with level 1 evidence (from three large randomized con- trolled trials) of reduced mortality.3-5 As well, sev- eral endoscopists in my community now refuse to provide screening colonoscopies because they think this is not the best use of their limited time and resources.

I discuss and offer FOB screening to all my patients age 50 and older at average risk of colorec- tal cancer at each annual preventive health exam- ination. Patients receive a kit, the Hemoccult II, and a handout (available at http://members.rog- ers.com/mgreiver/colorectalcancer.htm). In my offi ce, I briefl y explain how to do the test; detailed instructions are written on the kit. I tell patients that positive test results will mean referral for colo- noscopy.6 Use of low-dose acetylsalicylic acid or warfarin is not a contraindication to FOB testing.7

I record that FOB testing was off ered by circling the relevant maneuver on my preventive health table (available at http://members.rogers.com/

mgreiver/tables.htm) and noting “kit given” and year. If a patient refuses the test, I note this as well.

Once the kit is returned, I note the month and year on the right lower corner of the Cumulative Patient Profi le (CPP).

If a patient is referred for colonoscopy, I note the date of the examination in the same area of the CPP. Because negative results of colonoscopy make development of cancer unlikely for the next 10 years,1 I no longer off er that patient FOB testing.

In conclusion, organized colorectal can- cer screening can be off ered in family physicians’

offices. I have found that a handout is helpful for counseling, and I use both CPP and preven- tive health tables to help me track this screening maneuver.

References

1. US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for colorectal cancer: recommendation and rationale. Ann Intern Med 2002;137:129-31.

2. Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. Colorectal cancer screening: recom- mendation statement from the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. CMAJ 2001;165:206-8.

3. Kronborg O, Fenger C, Olsen J, Jorgensen OD, Sondergaard O. Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test. Lancet 1996;348:1467-71.

4. Mandel JS, Bond JH, Church TR, Snover DC, Bradley GM, Schuman LM, et al. Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study. N Engl J Med 1993;328:1365-71. Erratum in N Engl J Med 1993;329:672.

5. Hardcastle JD, Chamberlain JO, Robinson MH, Moss SM, Amar SS, Balfour TW, et al.

Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer. Lancet 1996;348:1472-7.

6. Burge F. Colorectal cancer screening. In your offi ce now? Can Fam Physician 2003;49:903.

7. Greenberg PD, Cello JP, Rockey DC. Asymptomatic chronic gastrointestinal blood loss in patients taking aspirin or warfarin for cardiovascular disease. Am J Med 1996;100:598-604.

Michelle Greiver, MD, CCFP

Colorectal cancer screening in my practice

Dr Greiver is a family physician in North York, Ont.

We encourage readers to share some of their practice experience: the neat little tricks that solve diffi cult clinical situations. Canadian Family Physician pays $50 to authors upon publication of their Practice Tips. Tips can be sent to Dr Tony Reid, Scientifi c Editor, Canadian Family Physician, 2630 Skymark Ave, Mississauga, ON L4W 5A4; by fax (905) 629-0893; or by e-mail [email protected].

Practice Tips

Références

Documents relatifs

The optimal interval for screening in patients with a first-degree family history of CRC must balance the risks of unnecessary procedures and the serious implications of

} Outcome and quality assessment processes for preventive screening should focus on outcome measures that reflect the importance of shared decision making and the potential

People aged 50 to 59 years had lower screening rates than those aged 60 to 74 did, and men had lower screen- ing rates than women did with any method of screening, with

10,11 We administered a survey to family physicians across the province of Saskatchewan to ascertain their current screening practices and their views of the barriers to

Opinions on the cost-effectiveness and effect on mortality of screening modalities and FOBT sensitivity, but not colonoscopy wait times, significantly influenced both

cause?  Given  the  bottlenecks  that  are  already  affect- ing  too  many  health  care  sectors,  how  can  we  justify  preparing  for  what  could  be 

cause?  Given  the  bottlenecks  that  are  already  affect- ing  too  many  health  care  sectors,  how  can  we  justify  preparing  for  what  could  be 

Our comparison of patients’ self-reported history of CRC  screening  and  physicians’  reports  showed