A NNALES DE L ’I. H. P., SECTION A
B ART D EMOEN
Coherent and quasi-free states
Annales de l’I. H. P., section A, tome 31, n
o1 (1979), p. 1-4
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=AIHPA_1979__31_1_1_0>
© Gauthier-Villars, 1979, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Annales de l’I. H. P., section A » implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.
org/conditions). Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
p. 1
Coherent and quasi-free states
Bart DEMOEN Instituut voor Theoretische Fysica, Universiteit Leuven, B-3030 Leuven, Belgium
Vol. XXXI. 11" 1. 1979, P ,
ABSTRACT. The convex hull of all
quasi-free
states,including
the gauge transformed ones is not dense in the set ofregular
states.RESUME. Nous prouvons que
l’enveloppe
convexe des etatsquasi-
libres n’est pas dense dans 1’ensemble des etats
reguliers.
I. INTRODUCTION
It is an
important
property of the coherent states thatthey
generatelinearly
all normal states. This has been proven forfinitely
many[1] ]
aswell as
infinitely
manydegrees
of freedom[2 ].
It means that every normalstate can be
represented by
a linear combination of coherent states. This is the so calledP-representation
ofdensity
operators, which has been usefull in quantumoptics [3 ].
Yet, it is not true that coherent states generate all normal states in a
convex way
[2 ].
-In
C*-algebraic language,
this can bespecified
as follows : let1B(H, (7)
denote the
CCR-C*-algebra
build on thesymplectic
space (H,6) [4 ].
6)
is the C*-closure of the*-algebra 1B generated by { W(/)! /
EH }
where the generators
satisfy
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré-Section A-Vol. XXXI, 0020-2339/1979 1/$4,00/
© Gauthier-Villars
2 B. DEMOEN
We suppose 6
non-degenerate.
The
gauge-transformations {
Tg( g
EH }
are definedby
A state cc~ on
0")
is calledregular
if the map/L E R -~ +
i~g))
is continuous for all~;
g E H . The set ofregular
states is denotedby
R, and the set of states on0") by
S.If J is an operator on H with the
properties
(+
is theadjoint
with respect tocr)
and~) = 2014 ,f )
> 0 for all~f
5~ 0 then == defines a pure,quasi-free
state or aFockstate on
7).
The
properties
on coherent states now read : thepositive,
normalizedelements of the linear hull are norm dense in S
[2,
th.11.4] ]
and the convex hullH}
is not norm densein S
[2,
th.11.5].
Wegeneralize
the latter result in thefollowing
sense :THEOREM 1. The convex hull
Q
ofquasi-free
states is not norm densein S.
§
2. Theproo~ f
2014 We first recall some facts :* the
quasi-free
states are the states c~ such thatand with
where s is a
positive
bilinear map on H.~x a map r :
6)
-~0")
ispositive ifT(~*~) ~
0 for all7).
* R is weak*-dense in S.
LEMMA 2. 2014 If P is a weak*-dense subset of Sand T is a map of 0394 into A which satisfies
(c~~ -
T)(x*x) >
0 for all o E P and x then T has apositive
extensionto
6).
Pr~oof
-- has an extension to A(H, cr) which is a state[4] (remark
l’Insritut Henri Poincaré-Section A
that this is true for the
CCR-algebra,
but wrong ingeneral)
For x == x* E 1Bso
since P is dense in S and
For
general
x E :So T is bounded and has an extension to
A(H, 0")
which will bepositive.
LEMMA 3. Let T be defined on 1B as
If
Q
is normdense in R, then T has apositive
extension to6).
Proof
2014 IfQ
is norm dense in R, then it is weak*-dense in S. Moreoverand if s satisfies
(1)
also 4s satisfies(1)
so, T satisfies the conditions of lemma 2,namely (OJ 0 T)(x*x) >
0 for all OJ in a w*-dense subset of Sand for all x E .II
Proof of
theorem 1. 2014 If T defined in lemma 3 ispositive,
then it satisfies theinequality :
Take " x = +
bW(g)
then(2)
becomesfor any 03C9 ~ S and all a, b ~ C, I, g E H so
0!~/)!=4!r(~/)!
I for all which is false since 6 is non-zero.So T is not
positive
andconsequently Q
is not normdense in R. IIVol. XXXI, n° 1-1979.
4 B. DEMOEN
DISCUSSION
In many
applications
one takes as firstapproximation
of a state itsassociated
quasi-free
state, determinedby
itstwo-point
function(see
e. g.Hartree-Fock
approximation,
randomphase approximation).
The theorempoints
out that thisprocedure might
behighly questionable.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
I want to thank Prof. A. Verbeure for discussions and
reading
themanuscript.
REFERENCES
[1] F. ROCCA, C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris, 262 A, 1966, p. 547.
[2] M. FANNES, A. VERBEURE, Journ. Math. Phys., t. 16, 1975, p. 2086.
[3] R. J. GLAUBER, Phys. Rev., t. 131, 1963, p. 2766.
[4] J. MANUCEAU, M. SIRUGUE, D. TESTARD, A. VERBEURE, Comm. Math. Phys.,
t. 32. 1973, p. 231.
[5] F. ROCCA, M. SIRUGUF, D. TESTARD, Comm. Math. Phys., t. 19, 1970, p. 119.
[6] E. STØRMER, Acta Math., t. 110, 1963, p. 233.
( Manuscrit reçu le 2 février 1979)
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré-Section A