Femtosecond pump-probe study of carrier- relaxation dynamics in the Metal-Insulator
transition compound NdNiO
3 .P.Ruello
1, B.Perrin
2, T.Pézeril
1, V.Gusev
1, P.Laffez
1.
1/ Laboratoire de Physique de l’Etat Condensé, UMR 6087 CNRS-Université du Maine
Av. O.Messiaen 72085 Le Mans, France
2/ Laboratoire des Milieux Désordonnés et Hétérogènes, UMR 7603 CNRS- Université Pierre et Marie Curie, 4 Pl. Jussieu, 75252 Paris, France
Metal-insulator transition in Thin NdNiO 3 film
I U
1 10 100 1000 10000 100000
50 100 150 200 250 300 350
T(K)
resistivity (ohm.cm)
NdNiO
3/Si(100)
Literature survey
Structural point of view
•Structural refinements (neutron diffraction) (Garcia-Muñoz, PRB 1992 )
•Raman spectroscopy and TEM (Zaghrioui et al, PRB 2001 ) The origin of the MIT in the RNiO
3compound
(R= Sm, Pr, Nd)
MIT = first order phase transition T<T
MIT>T
MIP2
1/n Pbnm
•Decrease of the Ni-O bounds
•Tilt of the super- exchange angle
O-Ni-O
The ZSA Model (Zaanen et al, )
EF
Ni(3d)
O(2p)
∆
Eg~ 0,1eVW
T<T
MIT>T
MINi Ni
O θ Ni O Ni
Ni
O Nd
Satisfactory for NdNiO
3, SmNiO
3, PrNiO
3,
Dynamics point of view
IR Spectroscopy
(Massa et al, PRB 1997, Mroginski et al, PRB 1999)•At T<T
MIself-trapping of electron in a polaronic medium is evidenced
•Isotopic exchange (
16O /
18O)
(Medarde et al, PRL 1998)T
MI(
18O) - T
MI(
16O)=+10.3K
Electron-phonon interaction is
therefore a driving mechanism for
MIT
Experimental set-up
Reflectivity measurement
probe
λ/4 λ/4
pump H
H Detector V
Si Diode
Pump beam stop
cryostat
λ/4
polarisator
AOM Acousto-Optic Modulator Lock-In Amplifier
probe
λ/4 λ/4
pump H
H Detector V
Si Diode
Pump beam stop
cryostat
λ/4
polarisator
AOM Acousto-Optic Modulator Lock-In Amplifier
λ =770nm (h ν =1,6 eV) Pump energy = 180mW Probe energy = 13mW Flux ~ 0,6mJ.cm
-2(1 photon for 42 unit cells)
Sample = 120nm film
ξ =60nm (absorption length)
NdNiO 3 : Charge transfer Metal-insulator
10eV
O(2p)→Ni(5d4f)
5eV
CT excitation range
Ni (3d) O (2p)
Ni (3d) LH Ni (3d) UH
Zaanen et al, PRL 1985, Katsufuji et al, PRB 1995
Ni(5d4f)
Mott transition ?
Mott transition
In our study :
Laser irradiation creates 0,02 e
-/Ni
Recent study
(Iwai et al, PRL 2003): If number of photoexcited
electron is >0,1e
-/Ni [Ni(chxn)
2Br]Br
2Probably no Mott
transition induced
by the Laser
Results
Transient reflectivity versus temperature
R R
∆
270K
124K T
MIC B
A
C
Characteristics of optoacoustical spectra
•A-No change of the first echo shape but an evanescent echo with decreasing temperature
•B-A large increase of the magnitude of the fast component : new electronic dynamics when
T<T
MI•C- strong thermal signal below the MIT
Thermal variation of the first acoustic echo
•The magnitude decreases when T decreases
•The shape remains the same
No variation of
⇒ n, κ , dn/d η , d κ /d η
270K 222K 200K 182K 164K
146K
Consistent with optical conductivity measurement on bulk
(Katsufuji et al, PRB 1998 )
The shape remains the same No variation of
⇒ n, κ , dn/d η , d κ /d η are constant
E=1,6eV
Probe energy
The echo shape
Fast component versus temperature
The optical parameters, at
thermodynamic equilibrium, remain the same for E=hv=1,6eV :
⇒ The sharp increase is then related
to intrinsic dynamics
Fitting of the leaving echo at the short time scale
Classical model (Maris et al,
Thomsen et al) : - thermal stress is the only parameter - no hot electron diffusion
200K
124K
164K
Renormalized fast component versus T
Relaxation time
270K ⇒ 124K
τ ~ 0.5ps ⇒ τ ~2.5ps
Thermal signal
At τ > few ps, the thermodynamical equilibrium is reached
Heat conductivity κ
metal>>> κ
insulatorThe heat transport is then less efficient in the insulating state.
0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1 1,2
90 140 190 240
T(K)
Thermal gap at 43ps
D=K/C
K/ σ =(3/2)*(k/e)²T
Simplistic model
(Wiedeman-Franz law)
D
Why a change of the dynamics at MIT?
Change of the electron
lattice interaction evidenced by photoinduced absorption in IR range
(Mroginski et al, PRB 1999)
Polaron peaks at : - 0,1eV
- 0,28eV
(Massa et al, PRB 1997)
Strong similitude with HTSC and CDW SC
• Large increase of the fast component
• Increase of the relaxation time
⇒ Hot phonon bottleneck
(Kabanov et al, PRB 1999, Demsar et al, PRL 1999)
Single particule relaxation
mechanism in a schematic parabolic band
T<T
MIT>T
MIPhonon emission
holes
E
kE
kPhonon
emission
Photo-induced absorption
Argon Laser irradiation (488 nm) IR
spectroscopy
- ∆ T/T=(T
photo-T)/T
Polaron states are formed and detected
ν
The femto-second experiment
time resolved photo-induced reflectivity
⇒ The polaron relaxation might contribute to the overall relaxation
process.
Consistency between relaxation time and electron-lattice interaction strength
• According to this point of view the relaxation process would be driven by e-lattice interaction (trapping) only
-Is this approach can explain the sharp
increase of the fast
component of ∆ R/R ?
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450
T(K)
SmNiO3
TMI
Mroginski et al, PRB 1999
Polaron binding energy E
b~h ϖη /2
NdNiO
3Kabanov et al, PRB 1999
YBACUO
Similitude with HTSC and CDW SC
Magnitude
of the fast
component
Single particule relaxation mechanism in a schematic parabolic band
T<T
MIT>T
MIPhonon emission
holes
Phonon emission
E
kE
kHigh frequency phonon
emission
Fast component increase
• laser pulse (0,6mJ.cm
-2) ⇒ 0,025 e-/Ni site
⇒ Frequency plasma of the photoexcited electron accumulated in the bottom of the CB
⇒ ω
p~ (h ω
p~0,8eV)
E
probe> E
plasma⇒ Fermi’s golden rule OK
∆ R/R ~- δ ( n
pe <H
dipole> ² ρ
f(E))
~ - δ ( n
pe) <H
dipole> ² ρ
f(E)
npe : photo-excited carrier
E
gTransient reflectivity of the fast component
E
gE
2E
1E
1E
2E
3Bottleneck effect
• Accumulation of relaxed electron in the bottom of the CB. A near steady state equilibrium between high frequency phonon
and photo-excited carrier Phonon with E(=hw
p) > E
gonly
are concerned
In NdNiO
3Only LO phonon
fulfill this condition
Optical phonon in NdNiO 3
w(LO) (cm-1) hv(LO) eV 185,1 0,02295 321,8 0,03990 391,5 0,04855 428,8 0,05317 435,8 0,05404 542,1 0,06722 567,1 0,07032 1108,5 0,13745
E
g~ 0,1eV
May are concerned in
hot phonon bottleneck
effect
Summary
• Evidence of a change of the electronic relaxation mechanism above and below MIT
• Both processes might contribute to this relaxation process :
* polaron self-trapping of photo-excited carriers
* bottleneck effect due to LO phonon
Quantitative calculations and modelling are required to
assess the above idea
Unanswered question
• Why the acoustic echo magnitude is vanishing when t decreases ?
* problem of detection ?
* intrinsic property ?
Perspectives
* Bottleneck effect exists :
⇔ LO phonon lifetime τ
ph> τ
e(Raman studies of LO phonon linewidth)
* New studies on MIT compounds NdNiO
3with various electronic structure
Ni(3d)
O(2p)
∆
150nm
17nm 70nm
Eg
W
Laffez et al, Eur.
Phys. J. (2003)