• Aucun résultat trouvé

Aharonov-Bohm oscillations of bosonic matter-wave beams in the presence of disorder and interaction

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Aharonov-Bohm oscillations of bosonic matter-wave beams in the presence of disorder and interaction"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Aharonov-Bohm oscillations of bosonic matter-wave beams in

the presence of disorder and interaction

R. Chr´etien, J. Dujardin, C. Petitjean, and P. Schlagheck

D´epartement de Physique, University of Liege, 4000 Li`ege, Belgium

Abstract

We study the one-dimensional (1D) transport properties of an ultracold gas of Bose-Einstein condensed atoms through Aharonov-Bohm (AB) rings. Our system consists of a Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC) that is outcoupled from a mag-netic trap into a 1D waveguide which is made of two semi-infinite leads that join a ring geometry exposed to a synthetic magnetic flux φ. We specifically investigate the effects both of a disorder potential and of a small atom-atom contact inter-action strength on the AB oscillations. The main numerical tools that we use for this purpose are a mean-field Gross-Pitaevskii (GP) description and the truncated Wigner (tW) method. We find that a correlated disorder suppress the AB oscillations leaving thereby place to Aronov-Al’tshuler-Spivak (AAS) oscillations. The competition between disorder and interaction leads to a peak inversion at Φ = π, that is a signa-ture of a coherent backscattering (CBS) peak inversion. This is confirmed by truncated Wigner simulations.

Aharonov-Bohm rings for BEC

Toro¨ıdal optical dipole trap

[A. Ramanathan et al. PRL 106, 130401 (2011)] [L. Amico et al. PRL 95, 063201 (2005)] Sheet beam Laser beam V latt x y

Intersection of two red-detuned beams • Connection to two waveguides

Synthetic gauge fields

[N. Goldman et al. Rep. Prog. Phys. 77, 126401 (2014)]

Theoretical description

• Ring geometry connected to two semi-infinite homogeneous leads

• Perfect condensation of the reservoir (T = 0 K) with chemical potential µ

• Discretisation of a 1D Bose-Hubbard system

[J. Dujardin et al. Phys. Rev. A 91, 033614 (2015)]

S R L L Φ αS κ(t) δ −1 0 NR NR + 1 −Eδ 2 e iθ −Eδ 2 e −iθ − Eδ 2 −Eδ 2 interaction and disorder • Hamiltonian ˆ H = ˆHL + ˆHLR + ˆHR + ˆHS where ˆ HL = X α∈L h Eδˆa†αˆaα − Eδ 2 

ˆa†α+1ˆaα + ˆa†αˆaα+1 i ˆ

HLR = −Eδ 2



ˆa†−1ˆa0 + ˆa†0ˆa−1 + ˆa†N

RˆaNR+1 + ˆa † NR+1ˆaNR  ˆ HR = h X α∈R (Eδ + Vα) ˆa†αˆaα − Eδ 2 

ˆa†α−1ˆaα + ˆa†α+1ˆaα + gˆa†αˆa†αˆaαˆaαi

ˆ

HS = κ(t)ˆa†αSˆb + κ∗(t)ˆb†ˆaαS + µˆb†ˆb with :

• ˆaα (ˆb) and ˆa†α (ˆb†) the annihilation and

creation operators at site α (of the source),

• Eδ ∝ 1/δ2 the on-site energy,

• Vα the disorder potential at site α, • g the interaction strength,

• N → ∞ the number of Bose-Einstein

condensed atoms within the source,

• κ(t) → 0 the coupling strength.

Aharonov-Bohm effect

Theoretical description

• Interference pattern shifted due to the presence of vector potential A with depashing

∆ϕ = k∆l + e ~ I A · dl | {z } φ = k∆l + 2π φ φ0 | {z } Φ

with φ0 = h/2e the magnetic flux quantum

Oscillations in transport properties within a

two-arm ring due to interferences of partial waves crossing each arm

φ

1

2

• Transmission periodic with respect to Φ

T = |t1 + t2|2 = |t1|2 + |t2|2 + 2|t1| · |t2| cos ∆ϕ with period φ0. Numerical results T ra n sm is si on 0 Φ π/2 π 3π/2 2π 0 0.5 1 µ/Eδ = 1, g/Eδ = 0 Total density Total density No interaction T ra n sm is si on Φ π/2 π 3π/2 2π 0 0 0.5 1 g/Eδ = 0 g/Eδ = 0.05 g/Eδ = 0.1 g/Eδ = 0.15 µ/Eδ = 1 T ra n sm is si o n g/Eδ 0 0 0.075 0.15 0.1 0.2 Total Incoh. With interaction

Incoherent transmission when g 6= 0

Resonant transmission peaks move with g and

disappear if g is strong enough

• Transmission totally incoherent at Φ = π, for all g > 0.

More incoherent particles created as g ↑

Towards coherent backscattering

Same origin for coherent backscattering and

Aronov-Al’tshuler-Spivak oscillations

[E. Akkermans et al., PRL 56, 1471 (1986)]

Constructive wave interference between

reflected classical paths and their time-reversed counterparts

Recent verification with BEC

[F. Jendrzejewski, et al., PRL 109, 195302 (2012)]

Inversion in the presence of nonlinearity (2D)

[M. Hartung et al., PRL 101, 020603 (2008)]

Computational resources have been provided by the Consortium des Equipements de Calcul Intensif (C´ECI), funded by the Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique de Belgique (F.R.S.-FNRS) under Grant No. 2.5020.11

Higher order interferences

Presence of higher harmonics of weak intensity • Schematic approach of the problem

... . ... . . .... . .... . . .. . . ... .... ...... . .... . . . .... . . .... . . . . ... . . .. . . .. . . ... ... . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (a) (b) (c) φ φ φ

[Ihn T., Semiconductor nanostructures, Oxford (2010)]

The reflection probability is given by

R = r0 + r1eiΦ + r1e−iΦ + . . . 2

= |r0|2 + |r1|2 + . . . (1) + 4|r0| · |r1| cos Λ cos Φ + . . . (2) + 2|r1|2 cos (2Φ) + . . . (3) with Λ the disorder-dependent phase accumulated after one turn with Φ = 0.

(1) no Φ-dependence, classical contributions

(2) Φ-periodicity, AB contribution, damped to zero when averaged over the disorder

(3) Φ/2-periodicity, AAS contribution, robust to averages over the disorder

→ Appearance of Φ/2 periodic oscillations : Al’tshuler-Aronov-Spivak oscillations T ra n sm is si on Φ π/2 π 3π/2 2π 0 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Disorder No disorder µ/Eδ = 0.2, g/Eδ = 0

AAS oscillations with interaction

• What happens if we set a weak interaction ?

T ra n sm is si on 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 Φ π/2 π 3π/2 2π g/Eδ = 0 g/Eδ = 0.0002 g/Eδ = 0.0005 g/Eδ = 0.001 g/Eδ = 0.002 µ/Eδ = 0.2, W/Eδ = 0.2

• The oscillations amplitude is reduced

• The minimum at Φ = π becomes a maximum !

T ra n sm is si on 0.25 0.25 0.125 0.125 0.375 0.375 Φ π/2 π/2 π/2 π/2 π/2 π/2 π π π π π π 3π/2 3π/2 3π/2 3π/2 3π/2 3π/2 2π 2π 2π 2π 2π 2π 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 GP tW, total tW, coherent tW, incoherent

g/Eδ = 0.0002, N |κ|2 = 10 g/Eδ = 0.001, N |κ|2 = 2 g/Eδ = 0.002, N |κ|2 = 1

g/Eδ = 0.004, N |κ|2 = 0.5 g/Eδ = 0.001, N |κ|2 = 0.2 g/Eδ = 0.02, N |κ|2 = 0.1

µ/Eδ = 0.2, W/Eδ = 0.2

Truncated Wigner simulations confirm the

coherent peak inversion for weak interaction

Presence of dephasing for strong interaction • Analytical calculations with our 1D model

more feasible

• Full diagrammatic theory with interaction (non-linearity)

[T. Hartmann et. al. Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 327 (2012)]

Références

Documents relatifs

There fore, ~~ their sugges tion, It was ~eeided to test an alte rna te cognitive technique , guide d imagery , in order to determine whether this method would provide a more

We investigate the effect of the gain dynamics on the motion and interactions of solitons in the frame of a complex Ginzburg-Landau-type model, which accounts for dissipative

We define a partition of the set of integers k in the range [1, m−1] prime to m into two or three subsets, where one subset consists of those integers k which are < m/2,

Dans ce travail, nous avons proposé une approche pour la découverte et la composition des Web services sémantiques dans les systèmes P2P non structurés.. Dans

For the chemical model, we considered both the un- certainties in the rate coefficients and in the physical con- ditions, using Model 2 for both clouds. To compare the observed

Texier, Effect of connecting wires on the decoherence due to electron-electron interaction in a metallic ring, preprint

Pour comprendre le cadre dans lequel s’inscrivent les deux initiatives sélectionnées pour ce travail, et la manière dont se construit la différence entre la communauté

Processus lésionnel latéro cervical gauche 60*45*94.7 mm, hypodense hétérogène, non rehaussée après injection du produit de contraste. L’extension se fait en