• Aucun résultat trouvé

Treaty making power in Belgian constitutional law: the case of CETA

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Treaty making power in Belgian constitutional law: the case of CETA"

Copied!
13
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Treaty making power in

Belgian constitutional law:

the case of CETA

Quentin PIRONNET

Brussels, Mission of Switzerland to the EU June 12th, 2018

(2)

The federal system in Belgium

3 Regions Enact decrees OR ordinances (Brussels) Sphere of competences : - Energy - Roads - Tourism - Economy - …

(3)

The federal system in Belgium

3 Communities Enact decrees Sphere of competences : - Education - Culture - Health - Youth - … 2 (3) Community Commissions

(4)

The federal system in Belgium

1 federal authority Enacts laws (+ special laws) Revises the Consitution Sphere of competences : - Defense - Security - Justice - Foreign Affairs - …

(5)

Constitution

Special laws

Federal Laws | Regional

decrees | Community decrees

| Brussel’s ordinancies

Executive Regulations

(6)

Article 167 of the Constitution

§1. The King shall direct international relations,

without prejudice to the competence of the

communities and regions to regulate

international cooperation, including the

conclusion of treaties, in matters within their

competence by or under the Constitution.

(7)

Distribution of competences

RULE N°1 : Exclusivity of the exercice of competences

RULE N°2 : In foro interno, in foro externo

Exclusive treaties Mixed treaties

Signature, ratification,

(8)

Nuances

´

First exception to the equipollence:

federal suspension (

art. 81 special

law of 1980

)

1. Obligation of information

2. Discussion in Interministerial Conference on Foreign Policy

3. The King can « confirm the suspension » IF

a. Belgium does not maintain diplomatic relations

b. The proposed treaty violates the international law

´

Second exception to the

equipollence: federal

substitution(

art. 169, Const.

)

1.

Proper warning

2.

Only IF Belgium has been held

responsible on the international

level (ie ECJ)

3.

Discussion in the Concertation

Committee (environmental field)

(9)

Process (Belgian law)

MTWG

• Assess the type of treaty (exclusive or mixed)

• Ask the entities to grant full signature power

ICFP

• Interministerial Conference of Foreign Policy

• Association to the negociation

Parl.

• Assent

King

• Ratifies alone

Mixed treaties Work Group

(10)
(11)

Process for CETA (EU law)

Negotiations by the EU Commission

Mixed agreement (art. 4 TFEU)

Signature EU - Canada Ratification EU + 28 member States Assents (28) application in domestic laws Provisional

application application in the

(12)

Oct. 14, 2016 The PS announces it will oppose CETA Oct. 27, 2016 Internal agreement between the 8 authorities Oct. 29, 2016 Belgium signs the CETA Oct. 30, 2016 EU and Canada sign the treaty Jun. 2017 Preliminary draft law concerning the assent to the CETA

(13)

Thank you for your attention

Références

Documents relatifs

This is because in principle, limitations of funda- mental rights have to be adopted by the legislature, curtailing the options to delegate such powers to the King (i.e. the

The disparity solidified as First Nations continued to maintain their right to education stemmed from reference in the numbered treaties, while the Crown chose to make no reference

Ainsi, nous pouvons tenir compte de l’analyse faite à propos des compétences sociales qui semblent aboutir à la même conclusion : à savoir que la taille et la

Binding or not, the authority international decisions have in EU law stems from the origi- nal consent given by the parties to the agreement when defining the mandate of the au-

C’était le moment choisi par l’aïeul, […] pour réaliser le vœu si longtemps caressé d’ accroître son troupeau que les sècheresses, les épizoodies et la rouerie de

[r]

In addition to the specifi c rules and procedures referred to in paragraph 1 of Article 11 of the Treaty on European Union, the Conference underlines that the provisions covering

Hypothesis 2 (Adoption Stage Presidency Hypothesis): The member state that holds the presidency in the adoption stage is better able to realize a policy outcome close to its