• Aucun résultat trouvé

Supporting language development in preschools/kindergartens in Lebanon : exploring respective roles of teachers and Speech and Language Therapists.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Supporting language development in preschools/kindergartens in Lebanon : exploring respective roles of teachers and Speech and Language Therapists."

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Supporting language development in preschools/kindergartens in

Lebanon : exploring respective roles of teachers and Speech and

Language Therapists.

Edith Kouba Hreich

ab

, Camille Moitel Messarra

ab

, Trecy Martinez- Perez

b

, Sami Richa

c

& Christelle Maillart

b

[email protected]

;

abDepartment of Speech and Language Therapy, Saint Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon.

bDepartment of Speech and Language Therapy, Faculty of Psychology, Speech and Language Therapy and Education Sciences, University of Liège,

Belgium.

cDepartment of psychiatry, Saint Joseph University, Beirut Lebanon.

References.

-Ebbels, S. H., McCartney, E., Slonims, V., Dockrell, J. E., & Norbury, C. (2017). Evidence based pathways to intervention for children with language disorders. PeerJ Preprints.

-Law, J., Reilly, S., & Snow, P. C. (2013). Child speech, language and communication need re-examined in a public health context: a new direction for the speech and language therapy profession. International Journal of Language & Communication

Disorders, 48(5), 486-496.

-Shaughnessy, A., & Sanger, D. (2005). Kindergarten Teachers' Perceptions of Language and Literacy Development, Speech— Language Pathologists, and Language Interventions. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 26(2), 67-84.

Aknowledgements

The authors would like to thank S. Leroy (Ulg), F. Hallal, J. Khoury, R. Francis, R. Bou-Nader (ISO, USJ) and the SLT students S. Prévot, A. Salam, R. Hassan, N. Saliba & L. Wazzi. This project is supported by the Research Council of USJ, Beirut.

Background:

Professional’s beliefs about language development can impact practices in the field of preventing

language and literacy difficulties (Piasta et al., 2009). Moreover, inter-professional understanding of respective roles

of teachers and SLTs is necessary to understand how to support students in collaborative practices (Wilson & Gillon

2017). In the Lebanese context, both SLTs and KG Teachers’ roles in prevention remain unclear which raises major

questions related to the SLT profession’s legal frame.

Participants:

1259 KG teachers (public and private schools)

Age: M = 37.88 yrs; SD = 10 yrs;

Nb of yrs of exp.: M =15.51; SD = 9.88 yrs.

200 Lebanese SLTs, (Female: N= 195)

Age: M = 28.9 yrs; SD = 5.14 yrs

Nb of yrs of exp. : M = 7.11 yrs; SD = 5 yrs

SLTs practicing in schools : n = 47.

1- Perceptions of SLT’s role

Aims:

The study aims at exploring perceptions, identifying barriers and motivations for

collaboration between SLTs and KG teachers.

Teachers often agree that SLTs provide services to

children with identified Language disorders but are

not aware about their responsibility to teach

all

children

(Shaughnessy & Sanger, 2005).

Procedure:

2 questionnaires (paper for KG teachers

and online for SLTs) based on the tiered

model for intervention in SLT (Ebbels et al.

2017).

To explore: practices, perceptions, barriers

and motivation.

Prevention is less considered in the timeframe of SLTs in

schools. SLT Practices in schools are more focused on the

medical model for intervention: assessment and direct

individual sessions (Law et al. 2015).

2- Barriers

Conclusions:

ü

Findings suggest differences in SLTs and

KG Teachers’ perceptions of SLT’s role in

prevention which have to be taken into

consideration

when

preparing

a

collaborative language support program.

ü

SLTs in schools don’t have enough time for

universal and targeted interventions.

ü

Motivation to collaborate is positive for

both groups but is significantly more

important for SLTs.

3- Motivation

Références

Documents relatifs

Daisy believes that the goals of EFL learning in China should be "to communicate with English speakers smoothly and freely as well as to have an access to the understanding

In this article we present the main linguistic and phonetic features of Galician which need to be considered in the development of speech technology applications for this language..

IL A ÉTÉ TIRÉ DE CET OMAGE, LE 18 OCTOBRE 2013, DANS L’ATELIER ROUART QUELQUES EXEMPLAIRES. OFFERTS AUX

In taking vernacular voices seriously and mobilising them to guide our understanding of local ecologies of language, we attempt to ‘disinvent’ the

As teachers do not make the distinction of resource and obstacle explicit in their products, also utterances or aspects that could be used as a resource are

As for the lowest proficiency levels, the L2 learners rated all verbs statistically, alike, suggesting that they did not discriminate semantic subclasses in this construction, while

This study considers the similarity between the papers of each individual source and the complete set of papers in the whole corpus, according to four different types of relationship

Le but de cette étude était de déterminer l ’agrément entre les propositions thérapeutiques issues de l ’évaluation hémodyna- mique par TDTP et par ETO au cours de la prise