• Aucun résultat trouvé

Transcriptome wide analysis of natural antisense transcripts shows potential role in breast cancer

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Transcriptome wide analysis of natural antisense transcripts shows potential role in breast cancer"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Transcriptome wide analysis of natural antisense

transcripts shows potential role in breast cancer

Stephane Wenric, Sonia El Guendi, Jean-Hubert Caberg, Warda Bezzaou, Corinne Fasquelle, Benoit Charloteaux, Latifa Karim, Benoit Hennuy, Pierre Frères, Joëlle Collignon, Meriem Boukerroucha, Hélène Schroeder, Fabrice Olivier, Véronique Jossa, Guy Jérusalem, Claire Josse, Vincent Bours

Why breast cancer?

Why antisense lncRNAs?

● Most frequent cancer type in women ( ∼35% of female cancers)

● First cause of cancer death in women (∼35% of cancer deaths)

● ⅛ women will have breast cancer during their lifetime

● Breast cancer involves several genes

● Genetic alteration mechanisms not always well known ● Some of these mechanisms involve antisense lncRNAs

● Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) = non protein-coding transcripts longer than 200 nt

● Antisense lncRNA or natural antisense transcript (NAT) = lncRNA ○ Sharing the same genomic location as a protein-coding gene

○ Transcribed in the opposite direction ○ Overlapping > 1 exon

● NATs

○ Regulate protein-coding gene expression

○ Overlap more than 50% of sense RNA transcripts ○ Have a lower expression than protein-coding genes ○ Can have an effect in cis or in trans

Study design

Validation

23 ER+/HER- breast cancer patients ○ Tumors

○ Adjacent healthy tissue

DNA

RNA

Strand-specific RNA-Seq CGH ○ reads alignment ○ QC ○ gene quantification ○ normalization Validation

○ RNA-Seq fold-changes vs. CGH (all genes) ○ RNA-Seq fold-changes vs. microarray

fold-changes (external study) ○ RNA-Seq vs. RT-qPCR

(subset of genes)

○ Principal Components plot (tumors vs. healthy)

Results

RNA-Seq vs. CGH:

Overall expression levels of coding gene transcripts inside genomic amplification or deletion newly acquired in the tumor were respectively increased and decreased.

RNA-Seq PCA:

Appropriate separation between the sample classes.

RNA-Seq vs microarray:

Comparison with GEO Dataset GSE65216

● Average Spearman correlation: 0.613 (p-val < 0.001) ● 76.6% of genes modulated in the same direction

RNA-Seq vs RT-qPCR:

Small set of genes (protein coding and antisenses)

Differential expression analysis (DESeq2) Differential correlation analysis (DGCA) varRatio analysis: RT-qPCR External microarray data Lists of antisenses / protein-coding pairs Survival analysis TCGA Data 1066 RNA-Seq Breast Cancer samples p-val < 0.05 p-val < 0.05 extreme values

RNA-Seq pipeline Validation of RNA-Seq data Antisenses selection methods Filtering of significant / extreme antisenses

Test for enrichment in survival-associated genes

Conclusion

This is the first breast cancer-based, transcriptome-wide, strand-specific RNA-Seq study

performed with paired tumor and adjacent tissue samples. Our results show that opposite

strand transcription regulation might play a key role in the breast cancer disease, involving

several different protein-coding genes and antisenses. Further functional molecular studies

will be needed to explore the mechanisms and roles of specific antisenses.

Global over-expression of antisenses in breast cancer tumors

Highlighting of pairs of antisense/protein coding genes linked to survival

Disruption of positive correlations between antisenses and protein-coding genes in breast cancer tumors

Modifications of NAT/PCT correlations between healthy samples and tumors

Références

Documents relatifs

The comparison of two networks inferred on different sets of actors leads to define change motifs and AS- impacted genes, that highlight the impact of integrating

We therefore performed expression profiling with Gene st 1.1 Affymetrix chips in HCC38 and MDA-MB-468 cell lines stimulated with recombinant Wnt3a to identify a comprehensive list

[r]

Les défis liés à la recherche sur la formation auprès des étudiants francophones minoritaires Les contextes plus larges, dont les études sur les immigrations

SLN2 identified 171 genes as di fferentially expressed, but also showed a relatively high number of false positives and negatives. Table IV shows the top ten di fferentially

In addition to the intersection of independent per-study analyses (where genes were declared to be differentially expressed if identified in more than half of the studies with

The main features of the tool that make it different from what is already available are the possibility of directly processing the results of the differential expression analysis,

le manquement contractuel est constitutif d’une infraction pénale, la victime peut opter pour la responsabilité aquilienne, sans pour autant vérifier dans quelle