• Aucun résultat trouvé

Correcting Biases in a lower resolution global circulation model with data assimilation

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Correcting Biases in a lower resolution global circulation model with data assimilation"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Geophysical Research Abstracts Vol. 18, EGU2016-14835, 2016 EGU General Assembly 2016

© Author(s) 2016. CC Attribution 3.0 License.

Correcting Biases in a lower resolution global circulation model with data

assimilation

Martin Canter and Alexander Barth

Université de Liège, GHER, Liege, Belgium (martin.canter@ulg.ac.be)

With this work, we aim at developping a new method of bias correction using data assimilation. This method is based on the stochastic forcing of a model to correct bias.

First, through a preliminary run, we estimate the bias of the model and its possible sources. Then, we es-tablish a forcing term which is directly added inside the model’s equations. We create an ensemble of runs and consider the forcing term as a control variable during the assimilation of observations. We then use this analysed forcing term to correct the bias of the model. Since the forcing is added inside the model, it acts as a source term, unlike external forcings such as wind.

This procedure has been developed and successfully tested with a twin experiment on a Lorenz 95 model. It is currently being applied and tested on the sea ice ocean NEMO LIM model, which is used in the PredAntar project. NEMO LIM is a global and low resolution (2 degrees) coupled model (hydrodynamic model and sea ice model) with long time steps allowing simulations over several decades. Due to its low resolution, the model is subject to bias in area where strong currents are present. We aim at correcting this bias by using perturbed current fields from higher resolution models and randomly generated perturbations. The random perturbations need to be constrained in order to respect the physical properties of the ocean, and not create unwanted phenomena. To construct those random perturbations, we first create a random field with the Diva tool (Data-Interpolating Variational Analysis). Using a cost function, this tool penalizes abrupt variations in the field, while using a custom correlation length. It also decouples disconnected areas based on topography. Then, we filter the field to smoothen it and remove small scale variations. We use this field as a random stream function, and take its derivatives to get zonal and meridional velocity fields. We also constrain the stream function along the coasts in order not to have currents perpendicular to the coast. The randomly generated stochastic forcing are then directly injected into the NEMO LIM model’s equations in order to force the model at each timestep, and not only during the assimilation step.

Results from a twin experiment will be presented. This method is being applied to a real case, with obser-vations on the sea surface height available from the mean dynamic topography of CNES (Centre national d’études spatiales). The model, the bias correction, and more extensive forcings, in particular with a three dimensional structure and a time-varying component, will also be presented.

Références

Documents relatifs

4.4 Comparison with the aircraft in situ measurements In this section, we evaluate in detail the performance of the CALIOP lidar assimilated field by comparing the results

However, these observations provide only a partial evaluation of the simulations: (i) the snow height was measured only at the Oukaimeden weather station, therefore it is

The solutions computed with the full algorithm have been compared to solutions obtained using a high-resolution grid for both dynamics and passive tracers (HR configuration, 1/4

(1997) iceberg model, devel- oped by MA10, is coupled to an eddy-permitting global im- plementation of the Nucleus for European Modelling of the Ocean (NEMO) (Madec, 2008), to

The experimental data available for more mafic compositions than silicic andesite does not allow us at present to carry out this type of modelling, but it is clear that,

Accordingly, the LMDz zonal wind zonal mean is nega- tive in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere implying that the RGW packets with negative phase speed are more

The chemical tropopause height from the UReading ozone forcing input data is compared to the IPSL-CM6A-LR model dynamical tropopause (1983–1989 mean of a 1980–1989

Data assimilation, and in particular the Ensemble Transform Kalman Filter (ETKF) is used, in a similar way to parameter estimation, to tune and find an optimal forcing term which