• Aucun résultat trouvé

State aid in the energy sector: Capacity mechanisms

N/A
N/A
Info
Télécharger
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "State aid in the energy sector: Capacity mechanisms"

Copied!
2
0
0

Chargement.... (Voir le texte intégral maintenant)

Texte intégral

(1)

gcr.live/stateaid2017 Programme 8.45: Welcome coffee and registration

9.15: Chairs' opening remarks Nicole Robins, Oxera, Brussels

Yelena Trifounovitch, Bredin Prat, Paris 9.30: Keynote address

Gert Jan Koopman, Deputy Director-General State Aid, DG Competition, European Commission, Brussels

10.15: State aid in the energy sector

• The sector inquiry into national capacity mechanisms: where are we now? • Do recent decisions approving aid in the nuclear sector mark the start of a

new approach?

• What has been the impact of the 2014 Energy and Environmental Aid Guidelines so far?

Moderator:

Nicole Robins, Oxera, Brussels Panel:

Jaap de Keijzer, De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek, Brussels and Frankfurt Ulrich Soltész, Gleiss Lutz, Brussels

Kai Struckmann, White & Case, Brussels Jacques Derenne, Sheppard Mullin, Brussels 11.45: Coffee break

12.15: Monitoring, enforcement - and recovery

• How is the enforcement of state aid rules changing? What is the impact of decentralisation?

• How are ex-post evaluations working? What are the pitfalls?

• What is the current state of aid recovery? Are national courts playing their part?

Moderator:

(2)

gcr.live/stateaid2017 Panel:

Barbara Brandtner, Head of Unit, State Aid Strategy, DG Competition, European Commission, Brussels

Viktor Kreuschitz, Judge, General Court, Court of Justice of the European Union, Luxembourg City

Massimo Merola, BonelliErede, Brussels James Webber, Shearman & Sterling, London 13.45: Chairs' closing remarks

Nicole Robins, Oxera, Brussels

Yelena Trifounovitch, Bredin Prat, Paris 14.00: Close of conference

Références

Télécharger maintenant ( PDF - 2 Page - 184.55 KB )

Documents relatifs

The Court of Justice of the European Union and the European Administrative Space

However, the right to an effective judicial remedy is also, next to its recognition under Article 47 CFR recognised as General Principle of EU law (Article 6(3) TEU), the

Data Retention after the  Judgement of the  Court of Justice of the European Union

These  two  objectives  –  one  of  a  more  general  nature  which  aims  to  safeguard 

Data Retention after the  Judgement of the  Court of Justice of the European Union

 The  analysed  measures  show  considerable  shortcomings  when  it  comes  to 

Inquisitorial Procedures and General Principles of Law: The Duty of Care in the Case Law of the European Court of Justice

The question of who is in charge of providing (and possibly proving) the relevant information for decision-making appears to be one of the key questions resulting in

Judicial Review of Commission Decisions in State Aid

in the reasoning of the General Court is that where the Commission had expressly held in a letter addressed to the complainant that the State measure did not constitute aid,

Spectral discretization of an unsteady flow through a porous solid

We prove optimal a priori error estimates and present some numerical experiments which confirm the interest of the discretization.. R´ esum´ e: Nous consid´erons

Une nouvelle façon d'informer les femmes sur le suivi post-natal : étude prospective, quantitative et monocentrique sous forme de recherche-action, incluant la création d'une page web

Si on regarde l’impact que la page web a eu sur l’accompagnement des femmes lors de la période post-natale et que l’on se fie à notre critère de jugement principal qui est leur

Prise en charge de la douleur post-césarienne‎ : évaluation des pratiques professionnelles

La surveillance des effets indésirable est satisfaisante dans les vingt-quatre premières heures (soixante-seize pourcent) mais insuffisante après vingt-quatre heures (moins