• Aucun résultat trouvé

Adjustable autonomy in swarms of UAVs

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Adjustable autonomy in swarms of UAVs"

Copied!
3
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-02862279

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02862279

Submitted on 9 Jun 2020

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access

archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-entific research documents, whether they are pub-lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Adjustable autonomy in swarms of UAVs

François Legras, Gilles Coppin

To cite this version:

François Legras, Gilles Coppin. Adjustable autonomy in swarms of UAVs. CERI Human Factors of UAVs Workshop, May 2007, Chandler, Arizona, United States. �hal-02862279�

(2)

Adjustable Autonomy in Swarms of UAVs

François Legras & Gilles Coppin

March 2, 2007

Current UAV systems employ several human operators to control a single vehicle endowed with almost no decisional autonomy. As the next generation of systems will comprise several vehicles operating together, it appears that a change in the control ratio is needed alongside an increased decisional autonomy for the UAVs. Several well-documented problems can arise when a human operator is in control of a complex automated sys-tem like the classical example of the modern aircraft or power plant. These adverse effects of automation can be summed-up into four categories:

• excessive mental workload, for example due to badly-designed in-formation display;

• loss situation awareness, as too much automation is going on behind the scenes;

• complacency, as the automation is so effective that the operator fails to recognize its failures;

• skill degradation, as the operator relies too much on automation. There is no doubt that these classical problems will arise in the con-text of multiple UAVs control. We argue that there is a need to design new instruments that allow an operator to interact efficiently with a large number of semi-autonomous UAVs. Introducing adjustable autonomy in the various components of the system (perception, information analysis & display, decision, action) is the first step in this direction, but we propose that this should be done with the following design principles in mind:

(3)

• exploit pre-existing mental models of the operators or construct new ones that are easily integrated;

• using these, inform the operator of what the system is doing, why, what it is about to do, and how it is going ;

• take advantage of this to involve the operator (allow him/her to step-in in relation to this information).

In the framework of the SMAART project (funded by the DGA, French Ministry of Defense), we are currently conducting research on the control of a swarm of rotary-wings UAVs for the surveillance of critical sites like strategic air-bases, possibly in conjunction with other means of surveil-lance. One of the key features of this project is that a swarm-intelligence, emergent approach was chosen to control the UAVs rather than a more traditional (e.g. teamwork-based) approach. Rather than reasoning on mission objectives, strategies or goals, the UAVs decide their actions ac-cording to the local values of digital pheromones. Therefore, there is a real challenge in bridging the gap between the operator’s and the system’s representations. For example, the operator manipulates objects like the frequency of patrols in the vicinity of a hangar, or the presence of an in-truder in the perimeter, whereas the UAVs base their behavior on several surimposed digital grids of numerical values which diffuse and evapo-rate. Adjustable autonomy in SMAART is used not only at the UAV level to affect how they determine their behavior, but also at the interface level. We propose to the operator several levels of information display and man-agement, decision aid for the selection and dispatching of UAVs, etc. The system is currently in the software development phase and wizard of Oz simulation with operators in the loop will be conducted in late 2007.

Références

Documents relatifs

Figure 1 Comparison of swarm size, swarming period, height and number of mating couples observed between the swarms of

Previous studies based on nannofossils (Jan du Cheˆne et al. 1975 ; Van Stuijvenberg 1980 ) and planktonic foraminifera (Ospina-Ostios et al. 2013 ; Ospina-Ostios 2017 ) placed

Teleoperation is used when the agent reaches a critical situation (strongly limited actions). Otherwise, that is, when the agent has execution troubles but the situation is

Devis Etude quantitative Pays Etats-Unis (Californie) Les classes d'élèves des 15 écoles ont été assignées au hasard groupes d'intervention etde comparaison.. 27 But

Nella dedica al direttore della rivista, Carlo Maria Curci, del suo primo e più celebre racconto apparso in volume (1852), L’Ebreo di Verona, così Bresciani si espresse in merito:

To define this path planning, we have implemented a three-dimensional (3D) mobility model for swarms of UAVs using both the Artificial Potential Fields (APF) principle and a global

It is thus clear that the reference to the process of overcoding allows to widen the meaning further, in the context that is of interest to us here, that is to say,

TOWARDS A DESIGN METHODOLOGY OF A MULTI-AGENTS STRUCTURE INTEGRATING THE HUMAN OPERATOR FOR THE ACTIVITY CONTROL OF COMPLEX INDUSTRIAL SYSTEMS... TOWARDS A DESIGN METHODOLOGY OF