O
pen
A
rchive
T
OULOUSE
A
rchive
O
uverte (
OATAO
)
OATAO is an open access repository that collects the work of Toulouse researchers and
makes it freely available over the web where possible.
This is an author-deposited version published in :
http://oatao.univ-toulouse.fr/
Eprints ID : 19483
To link to this article : DOI:
10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.07.161
URL :
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.07.161
To cite this version :
Hemeryck, Anne and Motta, Alessandro and Lacaze-Dufaure,
Corinne
and Costa, Dominique and Marcus, Philippe DFT-D
study of adsorption of diaminoethane and propylamine molecules
on anatase (101) TiO 2 surface. (2017) Applied Surface Science,
vol. 426. pp. 107-115. ISSN 0169-4332
Any correspondence concerning this service should be sent to the repository
administrator:
staff-oatao@listes-diff.inp-toulouse.fr
DFT-D
study
of
adsorption
of
diaminoethane
and
propylamine
molecules
on
anatase
(101)
TiO
2
surface
A.
Hemeryck
a,∗,1,
A.
Motta
a,2,
C.
Lacaze-Dufaure
b,
D.
Costa
a,∗,
P.
Marcus
aaChimie-ParisTech—CNRS,IRCP,ResearchGroupofPhysico-Chemistryofsurfaces,11,RuePierreetMarieCurie,75005Paris,France bCIRIMAT,UniversitédeToulouse,CNRS,INPT,UPS,4alléeEmileMonso-BP44362,31030ToulouseCedex4,France
Keywords: Adhesion Amine Cohesivefilm DFT-D Diaminoethane Propylamine TiO2
a
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
The adsorption on anatase (101) TiO2 surface of two model amines, diaminoethane (DAE) and
propylamine(PPA),wasinvestigatedusingDensityFunctionalTheory-Dispersionincluded(DFT-D) cal-culations.Theinvestigatedcoverageisrangingfrom0.25monolayertofullcoverage(oneaminemolecule persurfaceTiion).Bothinteractionsoftheadsorbedlayerwiththeanatase(101)TiO2surfaceand
inter-molecularinteractionsaredescribed.Astructuraltransitionfromabridgetoaperpendicularstructure isfoundforDAEwhenevolvingfrom0.25monolayertofullcoverage.Atfullcoverage,adense,ordered adhesivelayerisformed.ForDAE,atintermediatecoverage,differentisoenergeticconfigurationsare foundandstructuraltransitionfromabridgetoaperpendicularstructureisfound.Incontrast,the adsorptionmodeofPPAismoreregularwithonlyperpendicularlyadsorbedmoleculesatall investi-gatedcoverages.Dispersionforcesalreadyaccountfor40%oftheadsorptionenergyatlowcoverage (0.25ML)andarethedrivingforceformonolayerformationwithacontributionof60%upto100%at highcoverage.Asrevealedbymoleculardynamics,themoleculescanchangetheirorientationtowards thesurfaceinaconcertedway.
©2017ElsevierB.V.Allrightsreserved.
1. Introduction
Modelaminesareoftenusedtoinvestigatethe epoxyamine-Tiinteractionsatthemolecularlevel(seeRef.[1]andreferences therein).Areliableadsorptionofaminesmoietiesonthesurface isa keypointforadhesion.Thestudyofsuch organic/inorganic interfacesisthuschallengingandmodelingapproachescanhelpto disentanglethehard-softmatterinteractionsattheatomicscale.
Adsorption of several bio- and organic molecules on TiO2,
including amines, has been reviewed [2,3]. Farfan-Arribas and Madix [4]used amineadsorptiontodeterminetheLewis acid-ityofsurface Ti4+ionsin rutileTiO
2 (110)surfaces.Ethylamine
anddiethylaminewerebothfoundtoadsorbonthe stoichiomet-ricsurfacethroughformationofN Tibonds.Ondefectivesurfaces bondingalsooccurredatoxygen-vacancysites.Inbothcasesthe aminesremainedintactbutonthedefectivesurfacelessamines
∗ Correspondingauthors.
E-mailaddresses:anne.hemeryck@laas.fr(A.Hemeryck),
dominique.costa@chimie-paristech.fr(D.Costa).
1Presentaddress:LAAS-CNRS,EquipeM37,avenueduColonelRocheBP54200 31031Toulousecedex4France.
2Presentaddress:ConsorzioINSTMUdRdiRomaSEDE:DipartimentodiChimica, UniversitàdiRoma“LaSapienza”,PiazzaleAldoMoro,6-00185Roma,Italy.
wereadsorbed.Theauthorssuggestedthatthismightbedueto adsorptionatthedefectsitesblockingadsorptionatmorethanone neighbouringTi4+site.Thedesorptionactivationenergydecreased
intheorderdiethylamine>ethylamine>ammoniawhichisalsothe orderofdecreasingLewisbasicity.Theauthorssuggestedthatthis wasanevidenceofadsorptiondrivenbyaLewisacid–base interac-tionwiththeTi4+ionsbehavingasLewisacidsites(LAS).OtherDFT
worksonadsorptionofarginineshowedanadsorptionofthe lat-eralNH2moietyonTiO2witharatherstrongenergyofadsorption
(1.4eVonrutile(110)[5],2.8eVon(100)anatase[6]and1.5eVon (001)anatase[7]).
Recentlyweshowedthatdiaminoethane(DAE),amodelamine molecule,canadsorbonTiO2bysubstitutingwatermoleculesand
formafullmonolayer[1].Our DFTstudyoftheadsorptionofa fulllayerofdiaminoethaneonanatase(101)TiO2concludedtoan
interactionenergyofaround0.5eV(0.7eVwithdispersionforces included)[1].Athermodynamicapproachwasthereforeusedto bridge thegap between calculations at 0K under vacuum and solid/liquidinterface[1].Itwasfoundthatthewatersubstitution byDAEtoformafullDAElayerisfavorableforalargerangeof DAEconcentrationintoluene[1].Thepurposeofthepresentwork istocomplementthepreviousapproachwithmoreinsightinto themechanismsofthemonolayerformation.Indeed,our previ-ousworkwasconductedinconsideringonlyoneadsorptionmode,
Fig.1. a)Topviewandb)Sideviewoftheperiodicslabusedtomodeltheanatase(101)TiO2surface.Covalenceofthetitaniumandoxygentopmostsurfaceatomsandthe so-called‘shortdirection’[010]and‘longdirection’[11-1]betweenTi4+atomsareshown.Blueandredballsrepresenttitaniumandoxygenatoms,respectively.Thiscolor schemeisusedthroughoutthepaper.(Forinterpretationofthereferencestocolorinthisfigurelegend,thereaderisreferredtothewebversionofthisarticle.)
withDAEformingonesinglebondwiththesurface.However,DAE possessestwoNH2functionalgroups,whichcanplayaroleinthe
adhesionwiththesurface.Thiscanbeaproblemforsome applica-tionsbecauseofi)amixtureofdifferentadsorptionmodesthatmay leadtoadisorderedlayer,ii)thehinderingofthereactivemoiety forfurtheradhesiontoasubsequentadsorption,e.g.forpolymer layers.
In the present paper, using first-principles calculations, our first aim is to further explore different adsorption modes of diaminoethane(DAE) molecules on anatase(101)TiO2 surface.
Moreoverwe also investigatethe adsorptionof another model aminemolecule,thepropylamine(PPA),ontheanatase(101)TiO2
surface.PPAexhibitsonesingleactivemoiety,supposedtoreact withsurfaceTi4+atoms,whereasDAEisabifunctionalmolecule
withtwo amine groupterminations, which maybind – or not – through both amines to the Ti4+ surface cations. These two
moleculescouldthushaveadifferenttopologicalbehaviorwhen interactingwiththesubstrate.Theassemblingofthemoleculesat thesurfaceoftheTiO2substrateisstudiedbyvaryingthecoverage
from0.25monolayer(ML)(oneaminemoleculeeveryfoursurface Tiatoms)to1ML(oneaminemoleculeperTiatom).Theinteraction oftheformedlayerwiththesurfaceis evaluatedthrough Den-sityFunctionalTheory-Dispersionincluded(DFT-D)calculationsto providecluesontheadhesivepropertiesofthefilms.
Inthis paper,wealsofocusand discussdispersion contribu-tions,by performingsystematicDFTand DFT-Dcalculations for alladsorptionmodes.Dispersioninteractionsappeartobecrucial whenoneconsidersself-assembledorganizationofmoleculesonto asurfacethatcouldchangedrasticallyadsorptionmodeinthestudy ofthemolecularassemblywithsurfaceinteraction[8].
2. Method
2.1. Detailsofcalculations
TheperiodiccalculationswereperformedusingtheDFTmethod based on the GGA approximation employing the rPBE [9,10]
exchange-correlation functional as implemented in the plane-waves program VASP [11,12]. The projector-augmented wave (PAW)potentials[13,14]wereusedforthecoreelectron repre-sentationwithaPAWcoreradiusof1.52Åforoxygen.Withplane wavesmethods,thequalityofthebasissetisdeterminedbya sin-gleparameter,thecut-offenergyEcut.Weusedaconvergedvalue
ofEcut=400eV.Theintegrationinreciprocalspacewasperformed
withaMonkhorst-Packgrid[15].
The bulk cell parameters for anatase TiO2 were calculated
asacalc=3.864Å,ccalc=9.707Å,values inagreementwith
exper-imental (aexp=3.776Å and cexp=9.486Å) [16] and other data
determinedwiththesamemethod[17].Theanatase(101)TiO2
surfacewasmodeledbyaperiodicslabdepictedinFig.1.Theunit cellwas(1×2)inthe[010]and[10-1]directionsrespectively.The cellwascomposedbyatotalnumberof72atomswith24titanium atomsand48oxygenatomscorrespondingtoacelldimensionof 10.3×7.6×43Å3withasurfaceareaof78.28Å2.Thecellexposed fourTi4+cations.Westudiedfourcoverages,addingonetofour
moleculesinthecell,thusfromonemoleculeeachfourTi4+toone
moleculeperTi4+cation.Avacuumzoneof33Åinthezdirection
wasusedtocreateasurfaceeffect.12TiandOatomswerefrozen intheirbulkpositionsatthebottomofthecelltosimulateabulk effect.Allotheratomswerefreetorelax.Theperiodicslabwas repeatedinthethreedirections.Ak-pointmeshof(2×2×1)was used.
The anatase(101)TiO2 surface exhibitstwo types of atoms
(Fig. 1a andb): thetopmostatoms arefive-fold coordinatedTi atoms(four atomsTi5c–referred asTi4+in thefollowing)and
two-foldcoordinatedOatoms(fouratomsO2c).Theotheratoms consideredinthebulkpositionaresix-foldcoordinatedTiatoms (Ti6c)andthree-foldcoordinatedOatoms(O3c).
Adipolarcorrectionwasintroducedalongthezaxis perpen-diculartothesurfacetotakeintoaccountthespuriouspolarity inducedbythenonequivalenceofthetopandbottomsurfaces. Thisprocedurewascarefullyvalidatedinrecentworks[1,18].
The isolated diaminoethane (DAE) and propylamine (PPA) molecules(seeFig.2)wererelaxedinthesamesimulationcellas theanatase(101)TiO2 slab.Becauseoftheexistingfreerotation
aroundtheC2 C3 bondfor both molecules,two representative
geometrieswerechosentostudydifferentconfigurationsofthe adsorbed molecules on thesurface (average orientation of the moleculetothesurface)anddifferentconformationsforeach con-figuration (local orientation of the NH2 ends versus the C2 C3
backbone):oneconformation(referredasE)withthetwo termi-nalgroups(NH2/NH2orNH2/CH3)awayfromeachothers(linear
arrangementoftheC Cbackbone,Fig.2)andtheother conforma-tion(referredasZ)withthetwoterminalgroupsincloserproximity (bentarrangementoftheC Cbackbone,Fig.2).Wehereusethe notationE–Z,asreminiscentofnomenclatureusedtodistinguish structuralcis/transstereoisomers.Sincebothmoleculesgive equiv-alentrelaxedenergiesforEandZconformations,asaconsequence ofthefreerotationaroundtheC2 C3bond,bothconformationsof
Fig.2. EandZconfigurationsofa)Propylamine(PPA)andb)Diaminoethane(DAE) molecules.Lightbluespheres,darkblueandyellowspheresrepresentcarbon, nitro-genandhydrogenatoms,respectively.Thiscolorschemeisusedthroughoutthe paper.(Forinterpretationofthereferencestocolorinthisfigurelegend,thereader isreferredtothewebversionofthisarticle.)
eachaminemoleculeshavebeenconsideredforadsorptionstudy inthefollowing.
Amineswereadsorbedbyapproachingthemoleculesabovethe LAS,Ti4+atomsoftheanatase(101)TiO
2surface,whichhavebeen
demonstratedtobetheadsorptionsitesofdiaminoethane[1].In thestartingconfigurations,aTi Nbondwasformed,respectingthe directionalityoftheTi ObondsinthebulkanataseTiO2structure.
Asfoursurfacefive-foldcoordinatedTi4+atomsareavailableinthe
(1×2)simulationcell,itenablesthestudyoftheadsorptionofone tofourmolecules,correspondingtoincreasingcoverage(=0.25, 0.50,0.75and1ML)ofDAEandPPAmolecules,thusexploringthe pathwayfromasingleaminemoleculeadsorptiontowards mono-layerformationabovetheanatase(101)TiO2surface.
ToexploretheinfluenceofvanderWaals(vdW)forcesonthe adsorptiontopologiesandenergetics,weperformedsystematically successivecalculationsin theDFTandDFT-DschemesusingD2 Grimme’sformalismasimplementedinVASP[19,20].Geometries weregenerallyonlyslightlyaffectedbyvdWforces:aslight short-eningof Ti Nbondlength(−2%) wasobserved whenthevdW forceswereincluded.Ifnotstatedotherwise,theenergetic quanti-tiesgiveninthetextaretheonecalculatedwiththeDFT-Dmethod. 2.2. Energeticconsiderations
Inthispaper,theadsorptionenergies1Eadsarecalculatedusing
thefollowingformula: 1Eads=
!
Etotal(mol+surf) −n×Eoptisol(mol) −Eoptisol(surf )
where Etotal(mol+surf) is the total energy of the system with
naminemoleculesadsorbedontheanatase(101)TiO2 surface,
Eoptisol(mol) andEoptisol(surf ) arethetotalenergiesoftherelaxed
isolatedmoleculeandsurface,respectively,andnisthenumberof adsorbedmoleculesonthesurface.Absolutevaluesofadsorption energiesarereportedinthepaper.Inthisway,positivevalues indi-cateexothermicadsorption.Inthefollowing,adsorptionenergies aregivenastotaladsorptionenergypercell,inordertocompare thesurfaceenergygainatdifferentcoverages.Whenadsorption energypermoleculeiscalculated,itwillbementionedspecifically inthetext.1Eadscanbedecomposedintoseveralcontributions:
1Eads=1EadsKS+1Eadsdisp where 1EadsKS is the Kohn-Sham
contribution tothe adsorption energy and 1Eadsdisp is the
dis-persion energy. This dispersive energy can be decomposed
into the molecules/surface interaction and the intermolecular interactions in the organic layer,1Eadsdisp=1Edisp
!
mol/surf+1Edisp
!
mol/mol
.Thisallowsusinparticulartoanalyzethe contri-butionofthedispersionforces1Edisp!
mol/molinself-assemblinginthecaseofafullmonolayer.Itisgivenby
1Edisp
!
molmol=1Edisp(layer) −1Edisp(isolated molecule) and1Edisp(layer) is obtained by a single point calculation of the
dispersive energyin vacuumof themonolayerinthe adsorbed geometryand1Edisp(isolatedmolecule) isthedispersiveenergyof
theisolatedmoleculeinthesamegeometryasinthemonolayer. Notethatallenergiesareevaluatedat0K.Inourpreviousstudy
[1]weproposedawholethermodynamicapproachtopredictthe conditionsofthediaminoethanelayerformationonanataseasa functionofthepartialpressureofwaterinthesystem.The pur-poseofthepresentworkistocomplementtheapproachwithmore insightintothemechanismsofthemonolayerformationonadry anatasesurface.
Weperformedadetailedanalysisofzeropointenergy(ZPE) con-tributionstoadsorptionenergiesinourpreviouswork[1].Thiswas necessarytoprovidethemostpreciseevaluationoffreeenergiesof adsorptionofDAEonanatase.Inthepresentwork,theZPE contri-butionstoadsorptionenergieswerefoundtobe0.10and0.17eV atthelowestandhighestcoverage,respectively.Thesesmall con-tributionsascomparedtothecalculatedenergiesofadsorptionare notincludedintheenergiesofadsorption.
ActivationbarriershavebeendeterminedalongtheMinimum EnergyPathusingadragmethod.Here,thesystemisminimized whileonecoordinateisheldfixedwhileallothercoordinatesof freedominthesystemarerelaxed.Themaximumenergy corre-spondstothetransitionstateanddeterminestheactivationbarrier. Inthefollowinginvestigatedpaths,thedragcoordinateischosen towardz-axisperpendiculartothesurface.
2.3. BornOppenheimermoleculardynamics
DFT-basedBorn-Oppenheimermoleculardynamicssimulations wereperformedwiththeCP2K/Quicksteppackage,usingahybrid Gaussianandplanewavemethodfortheelectronicrepresentation
[21].ThePerdew-Burke-Ernzerhof(PBE)[22]exchange-correlation densityfunctionalwasused.Goedecker-Teter-Hutter pseudopo-tentials(GTH)[23],atriplezetapluspolarizationGaussianbasisset (TZVP)fortheorbitalsandadensitycutoffof400Rywereused.Only fortitaniumatomadoublezetapluspolarizationGaussianbasisset (DZVP)wasemployed.Dispersionforcesweretakenintoaccount withtheGrimmeDFT-D2method[19,20].Theanatase(101)TiO2
surfacewasconstructedusingaslabmodelhavinga(1×4)surface unitcell(10.32Å×15.15Å)witha26Åvacuumregionbetweenthe slabs.Periodicboundaryconditionswereappliedinalldirections ofspace.Itwaslargeenoughinthethreedirectionstoensure con-vergenceofthewavefunctionattheGammapoint.Ononesideof theslabtheanatase(101)TiO2surfacewassaturatedbya
mono-layerofDAEmolecules.Theoverallstoichiometryoftheslabis 48TiO2+8DAE.Dynamicsof10pswereconductedinthe
micro-canonicalNVEensemble(afterequilibrationisachievedthrough canonicalNVTdynamics)withatime-stepof0.5fs.Average tem-peraturewasaround300±11K.
3. Results:amineadsorptionprocess:structuresand energies
3.1. AdsorptionofDAEontheanatase(101)TiO2surface
We considertheadsorptionprocess ofDAEmolecules form-ing zero(physisorption, Ph), one(perpendicular chemisorption, P)or two(bridgechemisorption, Br)N Tibonds.Whenseveral
Fig.3.a)PossibleorientationsoftheadsorbedDAEmoleculeonthedehydratedanatase(101)TiO2surfaceat0.25ML.Themoleculeliesparalleltothe[010]direction.b–d) moststablestructures.BondlengthsaregiveninÅ.
moleculesareadsorbed,wejustmentiontheiradsorptionmode, forinstanceBrBr,BrP,PPfortwoadsorbedmolecules,BrBrP,BrPP forthreeadsorbedmolecules,etc.ThesubscriptEorZisaddedto indicatetheconformationoftheadsorbedspeciesontheTiO2
sur-face.Finally,whentwomoleculesareadsorbedinthePmode,they maybealignedalongthe[010]orthe[11-1]directionsasdescribed onFig.1,andthiswillbealsonotified.
3.1.1. =0.25ML
Studyingthis coverage(1.28mol/nm2)enablesustoperform
acomprehensiveand detailedstudyof theinteractionbetween asingleaminemolecule(onemoleculepercell)andtheanatase (101)TiO2surfacewithoutmolecule-moleculelateralinteraction
(wecheckedthatthesizeofoursimulationcellislargeenoughto ensurenointeractionbetweenperiodicimages).Wedetermined severalchemisorbedstates witha combinedformation ofTi N bondsand Hbondsfromboth theNH2 endstosurfaceoxygen
O2catoms.AlltheseadsorbedconfigurationsareshowninFig.3
wheretheadsorptionenergiesandbondlengthsarealsogiven. InthePadsorptionmode, thetwoconfigurationsPE andPZ are
isoenergetic(1Eads=1.06eV). The Ti N averagebond length is
2.32±0.03ÅandtheTi Nbondalwaysfollowsthedirectionality ofthebulkTi Obonds.DependingontheEorZconformerandthe orientationwithrespecttothesurface,theDAEmoleculeexhibits weakHbondswiththesurfacethroughtheadsorbed-amine hydro-genatomspointingtowardssurfaceO2catoms.TheH Odistances are2.43Åand2.48ÅfortheEconformation(Fig.3b),andtheyare 2.35Åand2.78ÅwhentheadsorbedDAEisintheZform(Fig.3c) withonehydrogenatomoftheadsorbedaminegroupinteracting withoneO2catom(H Odistance:2.35Å)andthehydrogenatom ofthenonadsorbedsecondaminegrouppointingtowardsa sur-faceoxygenatomO2c(H Odistance:2.78Å).Otherisoenergetic configurationsstudiedbytiltingthemoleculetowardsthe[010]
or[11–1]directions(seeTableSIintheSupplementarymaterials) suggestthattheadsorbedDAEmoleculeisfreetorotatearoundthe Ti Nbond,highlightingthecapabilitytobendindifferent direc-tionstowardsthesurfaceatlowcoverage,switchingfromEtoZ conformationasschematizedinFig.3a.
Incontrast,intheBradsorptionmode,oneunique configura-tionisstable(Fig.3d)anditisparalleltothe[010]direction,in a ‘bridge’conformationbetween two Tiatoms. TheTi N bond lengthsare2.32Åand2.37Å andtwoweakadditionalNH O2c hydrogenbonds(2.47Åand2.50Å)arepresent.Theadsorption energyis1Eads=1.45eVinthisBrmode,morefavorableby0.39eV
comparedtothePmodes.Thisdifferenceismaintainedwhen con-sideringthedifferencesintherotationalentropycontributionsof thePandBrmodes,whichisoftheorderofRT.IntheBr configu-ration,themoleculeisdeformedingeometryinbetweenEandZ forms(measuredN C C Ndihedralangleof102◦).Suchabridge
conformationisnotpossiblealongthe[11–1]directionbecauseof sterichindranceduetotheO2csurfaceatoms.Ifwecalculate aver-ageinteractionenergyforoneNH2group,wefindavalueof1.05eV
forthePconfigurationandavalueof0.725eV/NH2groupforthe
Brconfiguration.Inotherwords,whentheDAEmoleculeisbonded totwoTications,thebondwitheachTiisweakerthanwhenitis adsorbedononesingleTi.
WealsoinvestigatedthepathwayfromthePtoBr topology usinga dragmethod.Theassociatedenergetic barrieris ofEact
(DFT)=0.08eVanditdoesnotexistwhendispersionisconsidered duetothemetastabilityofPadsorptionmodeatlowcoverage com-ingfromthehighflexibilityofTi NbondinPmodeasdescribed before.Theback reactionfromBrtoPtopology requireshigher activationenergyof0.39eV.Thisvalueisunder-estimatedwhen dispersionforcesarenotincluded(standardDFTcalculatedvalue: 0.21eV). We can notice herethat van der Waals contributions impactdrasticallycalculationofactivationbarriersandtherefore
Fig.4.a)andb)Adsorbedconfigurationsat0.5MLforisoenergeticBrBrandBrPZ structures,respectively.c)andd)PossiblearrangementofDAEmoleculesonthe anatase(101)TiO2surfaceatacoverageof0.5MLbyconsideringonlyvertical adsorptionPPmodes(c),andpathfromperpendiculartoparallelconfigurations (d),ModeAandmodeBaresignificantofDAEmoleculesalignedin[010]and[11-1] directionsrespectively.
mustbetakenintoaccount.Consideringboththermodynamicsand kinetics,thedataindicatethatatlowcoverage,theBrmodewillbe favored.
3.1.2. =0.50ML
SimilaranalysisofthepossibleconformationsofDAEonthe sur-facewasdoneforacoverageu=0.50ML(2.57DAEmolecules/nm2). Severaladsorptionmodesforthetwoadsorbedmoleculeswere investigated:BrBr,BrPE,BrPZ,PEPE,PZPZ,PZPE.
In the BrBr mode (Fig. 4a), both DAE molecules form [010] bridgesonthesurface,asatlowercoverage.Atthiscoverageand in this BrBr adsorption mode, allTi4+ atoms of thesurface are
involved inTi Nbonds.The total adsorptionenergyper cellis 1Eads=2.50eV,i.e.1.25eVpermolecule.Thisadsorptionprocessis
thusexothermic,butslightlylessexothermicthattheadsorption ofasingleDAE(1.45eV).Thisdecreaseofenergygainpermolecule canbeexplainedbystructuralmodifications inthetwoDAEBr adsorptionmode(comparedtotheadsorptionofoneDAEisolated molecule)andTi Nbondlengthsincreasefrom2.32Åto2.35Å andfrom2.37Åto2.40Åand2.42ÅwhentwoDAEmoleculesare adsorbed.
Fig.5.PossiblearrangementsforDAEmoleculesontheanatase(101)TiO2surface atcoverageof0.75ML.
TheBrBradsorptionmode(Fig.4a)isisoenergetictotheBrPZ
configuration(1Eads=2.58eV,seeFig.4b),wheretheDAEmolecule
inPZconfigurationisstabilizedbytheformationofaHbondwitha
surfaceO2catom.ThereisalsoaBrPEconfiguration(notshown)for
thetwoDAEmoleculeswithanadsorptionenergyof2.36eV,less stablethantheBrPZconfiguration.Forthemoleculeevolvingfrom
theBrtoPZtransition,thatisthemorestableBrPconfiguration,the
Ti Nbondattachedtothesurfacechangesfrom2.35Åto2.33Å andtheTi NbondsoftheBr-DAEadsorbedmoleculearereduced from2.40Åto2.38Å.TheassociatedactivationenergyfortheBrto Ptransitionestimatedusingdragmethodis0.27eV(0.10eV with-outvdWcontributions),sothattheBrtoPtransitioncouldoccurto releasestericeffects.ThislatterBrPZconfigurationcanbean
inter-mediateconfigurationadoptedbyDAEstoliberateaTi4+sitefor
theadsorptionofanothermolecule,andthusincreasethesurface coverage.
InthePPmode(someconfigurationsareschematizedinFig.4c andd),duetotheasymmetricenvironmentofeachTi4+surfacesite,
thetwoDAEmoleculescanbealignedeitheralongthe[010]or [11-1]direction(modeA:PP[010]andmodeB:PP[11-1]respectively). ThePEPE[010]andPEPE[11-1]adsorptionmodesarenearly
isoen-ergeticwithanadsorptionenergyofaveragevalue2.01±0.04eV,
Fig.4canddwhereasthePZPZ[11-1]configurationismorestable
thanthePZPZ[010]one(2.08eVvs.1.50eV).Indeed,asthevicinal
Ti–Tidistancesdifferinthe[010]and[11-1]directions(3.78Åand 5.48Årespectively),sterichindranceisresponsibleforthelower adsorptionenergycalculatedfortheZconformationwithrespect toEconformationinthePP[010]topology.Weobservethatinthe [010] direction,Ti N bondsare longercomparedtothe[11–1] direction,evenmorewhenthemoleculeoccupiesmorespacelike inZconformation:Ti Nbondshaveincreasedfrom2.30Åinthe caseofoneadsorbedPE to2.32Åand2.33Åin[11-1]and[010]
directions,respectivelyandfrom2.30Åinthecaseofoneadsorbed PZto2.32Åand2.36Åin[11-1]and[010]directions,respectively.
Fig.6. PossibleconfigurationsofDAEmoleculesontheanatase(101)TiO2surface atcoverageof1ML.RelaxedconfigurationofthemoststablestructurePEPEPEPEis given.BondlengthsareinÅ.
isoenergeticconfigurations,PEPE[010],PEPE[11-1]andPZPZ[11-1],
whichremainhoweverlessstablethantheBrBrandBrPZones.
WewilldemonstratebelowthattheincreaseoftheTi Nbond lengthswhentwo DAEmoleculesareadsorbed,i.e.asobserved inBrBr,showsadecreaseoftheKohnShamcontributioninthe totaladsorptionenergy.Moredetailsaboutthecontributionsof thedifferentforceswillbeprovidedinthefollowing(comments onFig.9).
3.1.3. =0.75ML
Atthiscoverage,correspondingtothreemoleculespercell,the followingconfigurationswereconsidered,asschematizedinFig.5: i)Thephysisorption(Ph mode)of anadditionalDAEmolecule ontheBrBr[010]configurationobtainedat0.5ML.Itresults in the BrBrPh configuration, with an adsorption energy of 1Eads=2.73eV,
ii)BrPEPh configuration,with1Eads=2.93eV.Interestingly,the
BrPEPhmodeisstabilizedovertheBrBrPhconfigurationanda
Ti4+atomisnowavailableforthenextstepofadsorption,
iii)BrPEPE (1Eads=3.07eV) or BrPZPZ (Eads=2.84eV)
configura-tions,and
iv)finallythePPPmode(with1Eads=2.96eVand2.46eVinthePE
andPZmodes,respectively)
Wenotethatthemoststableconfigurations,BrPEPEandPEPEPE
arenearlyisoenergetic,revealingsomedegreesoffreedomofthe moleculeadsorbedinthehalf-filled[010]direction.Moreoverwe showedthatthetransitionfromtheBrtothePmodestartingfrom BrPEPE toreachPEPEPE adsorptionmodeisassociatedtoasmall
activationenergyof0.27eV(DFT-D).InthePEPEPEmode,allthe
Ti NbondsareshortenedcomparedtoBrPEPE.Wealsonoticethat
whenthecoverageincreases,theEformisstabilizedovertheZ formforstericreasons.
3.1.4. =1.00ML
Finally,a fullmonolayerisobtainedbyaddinga fourthDAE molecule on the surface of the slab chosen as a model of the TiO2surface(Fig.6).Obviously,theonlyconfigurationisthePPPP
one.ThePEPEPEPEconfiguration(3.86eV)ismorestablethanthe
PZPZPZPZone(2.93eV)asexpectedduetotheincreasedcrowding
andmoresizeablePZconfiguration.Ifwecomparethechangesin
thecharacteristicsoftheadsorptionmodeinthemonolayer,we firstnotethattheTi Nbondlengthisincreasedfrom2.30Å(0.25 ML)to2.37Åfor1MLPEPEPEPEand2.38–2.39Åfor1MLPZPZPZPZ.
Inaddition,at1ML,thereisaninteractionbetweenoneHatom
Fig.7.Adsorptionenergy(eV)versuscoverageforadsorptionofDAEontheanatase (101)TiO2surfaceasafunctionofthesurfacecoveragewithvariousconfigurations ofadsorbedmolecules(PE,Pz,Br,Ph).
oftheaminegroupandthesurfaceoxygenatomO2cwithabond lengthof2.23Å.Actually,thisNH O2cbondisnotpresentat0.25 MLforthesameadsorptionmode(seeFig.3a).Infact,with increas-ingcoverage,theDAEaminetailsareslightlyreorientedtopoint towardthevicinaladsorbedamineendinthesame[010]row.This rotationisassociatedwithapreferentialNH O2cinteraction.The projecteddensityofstatesanalysis(PDOS)ofthesurfacebeforeand afteradsorptionoftheDAEMLisreportedintheS2section.
Wealsoconsideredtheformationofabilayerstructure consist-ingintheBrBrmodefortwoDAEmoleculesplustwoadditional DAE molecules in a second layer (not shown); the formation ofsuch configuration isexothermic, withanadsorption energy of 1Eads=3.07eV, less stable than the PEPEPEPE configuration
(1Eads=3.86eV,i.e.0.20eVlesspermolecule).
Fig.7 summarizesall the adsorptionenergies as a function of coverage for various configurations. The adsorption energy increaseslinearlywiththesurfacecoverage forthePE
configu-rations(PEtoPEPEPEPE),suggestingthattheenergyofadsorption
permoleculeiscoverageindependent.Thiscouldsuggestthatthe interactionsbetweenthechainsarenegligible.Howeverwewill demonstratebelowthat itisnot thecase.Theincrease ofvdW interactionsbetweenthechainsinthelayeriscompensatedbythe decreaseofthechemicalTi Nbondwiththesurface.Fromthe analysisofallthestructuresforthevariouscoverage,preferred reactionpathsforthemonolayerformationcanbededuced.At =0.25ML,theDAEmolecule(onepercell)chemisorbsinabridge conformationBrwithtwoTi Nbonds.At0.5ML,theBrBr struc-turewhereallTi4+atomsaresaturated,isisoenergeticwiththeBrP
Z
configuration.Forcoverageof0.75ML,theBrPEPEandPEPEPEare
alsoisoenergetic.ThefullMListhencharacterizedbyaPEPEPEPE
structure.From0.25 MLto0.75ML,in adsorbedconfigurations whereBrconfigurationsexist,anincreaseoftheTi Nbondlength isobservedfrom2.32Åto2.43Å,associated toincreasingsteric effectscausinganenergypenalty.TheBrtoPtransition compen-satesthisenergydecreasebecausethePadsorptionmodereduces sterichindranceintheadsorbedlayer,allowingforastrengthening ofTi Nbonds,asdeducedfromisoenergeticconfigurationssuchas BrBrandBrPZat0.5MLandBrPEPEandPEPEPEat0.75ML.Wethus
observeagradualBrtoPtransitionwithincreasingcoverage,with intermediatecoveragesituationswhereoneTi4+atomis
unsatu-Fig.8.MoststableconfigurationsobtainedforPPAadsorbedonanatase(101)TiO2surfaceata)0.25MLandb)1ML.BondlengthsaregiveninÅ. rated,enablingtheadsorptionofanadditionalmoleculetooccur
andresultingintheformationofadenselayer.
3.2. AdsorptionofPPAovertheanatase(101)TiO2surface
Herethesituationismuchmoresimpleaseachmoleculecan bindonlytooneTi4+centerthroughtheaminegroup.Asimilar
cov-erageanalysiswasperformedforthePPAmoleculetoinvestigate theroleoftheterminalgroupininteractionofthemoleculeswith thesurface.Foreachconsideredadsorptionmodeperpendicularto thesurface(EorZconfigurations),itwasfoundforthemoststable configurationsthatthePPAadsorptionenergiesareclose(different bylessthan0.30eV/cell)totheequivalentconfigurationfortheDAE molecule,andthuswhateverthesurfacecoverage.For=0.25,the adsorptionenergiesare1.06eVand1.08eVforthePE
configura-tionsoftheDAEandPPAmoleculesand1.05eVand1.09eVforthe PZconfigurations.Atu=0.5,theadsorptionenergiesare1.98eVand
1.88eV(PEPEmodeA)2.05eVand2.06eV(PEPEmodeB),1.50eV
and1.55eV(PZPZmodeA),2.08eVand2.06eV(PZPZmodeB)forthe
DAEandPPAmolecules,respectively.(FormoredetailsseeTables SIandSIIintheSupplementarymaterials).Moreover,forPPAas forDAE,thePEconformationisfavoredfromintermediate
cover-age(0.75ML,1Eads=2.81eVforPEand1Eads=2.50eVforPZ)to
theMLformation(1Eads=3.55eVforPEand1Eads=2.91eVforPZ
inFig.8).ForthePPAmolecule,fromu=0.25to1,theTi Nbond lengthincreasesfrom2.30Åto2.37Å(bothintheEandZ conforma-tions)asinthecaseoftheDAEmolecule,showingthatnoelectronic inductiveeffectstakeplaceintheDAEcomparedtoPPA.At0.25ML, theamineHatompointsinthedirectiontosurfaceO2cforPPAand DAEwhereasat1MLareorientationoftheamineHatomstowards avicinalamineandasurfaceOatomisobservedforPPA.Finally,in themoststableconfigurationofadsorption(PEPEPEPE),the
forma-tionofamonolayerofDAEis0.30eVmoreexothermic/cellthanthe formationofaPPAmonolayer(3.86eVvs.3.55eVforDAEandPPA respectively),duetoastrongerTi NchemicalbondintheDAElayer (29%vs.39%ofthetotalenergyofadsorptionisduetochemical bondingforPPAandDAErespectively).
3.3. Kohn-ShamversusvanderWaalscontributionsinthe monolayerformation
ThefollowingparagraphfocusesonFig.9whereKohn-Sham (Cov)andDispersive(bothintermolecularinteractionsinthelayer (Coh)andinterfacialsubstrate/layeradhesiveenergy(Adh)) contri-butionsofadsorbedconfigurationsofDAEmoleculesasafunction ofcoveragearedetailed.Itisworthtonotethat,forallthe inves-tigatedstructures,dispersionenergy(Coh+Adh)accountsfor42%
(PE)to100%(PZPZPZPZ)ofthetotalstabilizationenergy(Fig.9and
TablesSIIIandSIVintheSupplementarymaterials).
At0.25ML,intheperpendicularPorientationandwhateverthe moleculetopologyonthesurface,acombinationofoneTi Nbond, oneH-bond(NH O2c)and45±2%vanderWaalsinteractionsis obtained.IntheBrstructure,theadsorptionenergyisenhanced, butsurprisingly,withoutanylargeincreaseofthetotalKohn-Sham energy(∼0.07eV).Thiscanbepartlyexplainedbya compensa-tionintheKohn-Shamenergybetweenthecreationofanewbond withthesurfaceandthemoleculeflexibility(seethenextsection AbinitioMolecularDynamics(MD)ofthefullDAElayerinvacuum). Furthermore,inthisconfiguration,Ti Nbondlengthsareslightly increasedcomparedtoPmode.Infact,theenergygaininthebridge structureisbroughtmainlybythemolecule-surfacevanderWaals interactions,as,obviously,theentiremoleculeisclosertothe sur-facethanintheperpendicularorientation,revealingacontribution totheadsorptionenergyupto51%forvdWinteractions.
TheactivationbarriersforthePtoBrtransitionorBrtoP transi-tionarenotlargeevenathighcoverage,whichexplainstheability oftheDAEtoattachandseparateoneofitsextremitiesfromthe surfaceasafunctionofthecoverage.Thisabilitytochange adsorp-tionmodefrom BrtoP andviceversa is intimatelycoupled to thecoveragewheredispersivecontributionswillworkintandem withKohnShamcontributions:Bridgeconfigurationexhibitssteric effectsoncecoveragereaches0.5ML.Itisnoticeablebyanincrease ofthenumberofTi NbondsinbothBrconfigurations.Thesesteric effectscanthenbereducedthroughafavorableBrtoPtransition. Between0.25MLand0.5MLwhenBrconfigurationsareinvolved, weobservethattheKohnShampartofthetotalenergydecreases from49%inBrto43%inBrBr(Fig.9)astheTi Nbondsstretched from2.37Å/2.32ÅinBrto2.40Å/2.35Åand2.42Åand2.35Åin BrBr.FortheBrtoPtransition,notablyinBrPZ,weobservethat
KohnShampartincreasesupto48%,tofinallyprovidean equiv-alenttotaladsorptionenergyofaround2.50eVforBrBrandBrPZ
configurations.Thesameconclusionscanbedrawnfor0.75ML sincethreeisoenergeticadsorbedconfigurationsareidentified,i.e. BrPZPZ,BrPEPE andPEPEPE:inBrPZPZ Ti Nbondsareweakened
(2.43Å,2.37ÅfortheBr-DAE,and2.39Åand2.37Å)resultingin 28%Kohn-Shampartofthetotaladsorptionenergy,whereasthe Kohn-Shamcontributionisenhancedwhenconformationchanges fromBrPZPZtoBrPEPE(28%–47%).Then,theBrtoPtransitionisalso
afavorableprocesstohelpreducingstericeffectsencounteredin BrPZPZ(44%ofKohnShampartinPEPEPE).
AtthefullMLcoverage,theDAE-PEmonolayerformationhas
thestrongestKohn-Shamenergy(1.47eV),representing39%ofthe total(DFT-D)adsorptionenergy(SeeFig.9).Theother61%(2.37eV) comefromthedispersivecontribution,thatcanbedecomposedin 2/3duetotheinteractionbetweenthesurfaceandthemolecules
Fig.9.KohnShamanddispersivecontributionsobtainedfortheadsorptionofDAE asafunctionofcoverage.Onlyselectedadsorbedconfigurationsaredescribed.The yellowarearepresentstheDFTcontributiondepictedasKohnShampart(Cov). Orangearearepresentsthedispersivecontribution(D)duetotheinteractionenergy betweenthesurfaceandthemolecules(Adh).Greyareaisthecohesiveenergy betweenmoleculescontributingtothedispersiveforces(Coh).Percentofeach contributionofthetotaladsorptionenergyofeachconfigurationisprovided.(For interpretationofthereferencestocolorinthisfigurelegend,thereaderisreferred tothewebversionofthisarticle.)
and1/3due tomolecularinteractions energybetweentheDAE moleculeswithinthemonolayer.Similarratiosarefoundforthe PPA-Emonolayercoverage.
Fig.10.a)PreferentialorientationoftheDAEchainwithrespecttothesurface.b) DistributionofthepreferredorientationsoftheDAEmoleculesplacedinvicinal [010]rows.
AdsorptionsofbothDAEandPPAinZconformationsareless favorablethantheadsorptionoftheEconformationsforthe dens-estmonolayers. TheKohn-Sham energiesarenegligiblewithan athermic valueof−0.06eVand +0.07eVrespectively.For theZ conformations,theadsorptionenergiesarethusonlyduetohigh dispersivecontributions:2.99eVforDAE-Zand2.84eVforPPA-Z. Theseresultshighlightthatmediumscaleandlongscaledispersive forcescanforcetheadsorptionandmonolayerformation,evenin thepresenceofshort-rangesterichindrance.
3.4. AbinitioMolecularDynamics(MD)ofthefullDAElayerin vacuum
FromtheDFTresults,weundertookanabinitioMDstudyofthe moststableMLconfiguration,i.e.thePEPEPEPEDAElayeradsorbed
onTiO2.ItwasfoundthatmostofadsorbedDAEmoleculesretain
a linearPE conformationofthechain alongtheentire
trajecto-ries.Only13%oftheDAEmoleculespresenta stablebendedPZ
conformation.
Inthemonolayer,preferentialorientationsoftheDAEchains withrespecttothesurfacearealsoobserved.Inparticular,DAE chainsaretiltedby+20◦or−20◦withrespecttotheplanenormalto
thesurfacealongthe[10-1]direction(Fig.10a).Thisarrangement allowstheformationofH-bonds(asdetailedbelow)betweenthe aminegroupinvolvedinthecoordinationwiththeTisurfaceatoms andthevicinaloxygensurfaceatoms.Alongthewholetrajectory theDAEmoleculesswitchesfromoneorientationtotheotherone each3ps.AspresentedinFig.10b,thetiltingoftheDAEmolecules placedonthesame[010]rowoccursinaconcertedway.In con-trast,theorientationofvicinalDAEmoleculesadsorbedondifferent [010]rows arenotcorrelated, becausetheyarenot interacting, andthereforetwogeometricalarrangementsarepossible,i.e.DAE moleculesonvicinalrowscanbetiltedinthesameorthe oppo-siteorientations.During50%ofthesimulationtime,DAEchainsof
Fig.11.HbondsanalysisattheDAE/TiO2interfaceinvacuum.Countsrefertothe percentageoftimeinwhichnH-bondsarecounted.
vicinal[010]rowsliewiththesameorientationwhiletheyliein oppositeorientationfortheother50%oftime(seeFig.10b).
H-bondanalysishasbeenconductedtobetterunderstandthe interactionoftheDAEmoleculeswiththesurfaceandthe inter-actionamongtheDAEmoleculesofthemonolayer(Fig.11a).50% oftheDAEmoleculesareinvolvedinH-bondinteractionwiththe surfaceoxygenatoms,whereasnegligibleH-bondinginteraction occursamongtheterminalaminegroupsofthemonolayer. 4. Conclusion
Theformationofselfassembledmonolayersofdiaminoethane (DAE) and propylamine (PPA) molecules onanatase(101)TiO2
surfacehasbeeninvestigatedfromlowcoveragetoadenseand organizedlayer.Inthecase ofDAE,theresultssuggestthe fol-lowingreactionpathuptomonolayerformation:atlowcoverage, moleculesformbridgebondswithtwosurfaceTi4+atoms,thenat
intermediatecoverage,a‘bridgetoperpendicular’transitionofthe adsorbedmoleculesoccurs,liberating successivelyTi4+atoms,to
finallyformafullmonolayerwithallmoleculesinaperpendicular orientation,withoneTi Nbondpermolecule.
ForthePPAmolecule,whichexhibitsonesingleNH2
extrem-ity,adsorptionoccurswithmoleculesalwaysperpendiculartothe surface (at all coverages). For both molecules,the full ordered monolayer is the most favored configuration with a formation energyof3.5eV/celland3.8eV/cellforPPAandDAErespectively. Dispersionforcesareessential:VdWinteractionscontributedeeply into themonolayerformation upto40% and 100% ofthe total adsorption energy at low coverage and high coverage, respec-tively.Thedatainthispapershowthattheformationofthedense andwell-organizedSAMinvolvesacompromisebetweenchemical graftingonthesurface,andreductionofstericeffectsallalongthe assemblyprocess.
Acknowledgements
Calculations have been performed at the GENCI (CINES and IDRIS) French supercomputing center under the pro-gramx2011082217. This work was partially supported by the regionIDF(IledeFrance)andVilledeParis(FRESCORTprojectof PôleASTECH).
AppendixA. Supplementarydata
Supplementarydataassociatedwiththisarticlecanbefound,in theonlineversion,athttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.07.
161.
SectionS1providesadditionalenergeticdata,and sectionS2 theelectronicanalysisof1MLofDAEadsorbedonTiO2.SectionS3 therespectivecontributionsofdispersiveandionocovalentforces. SectionS4showssideviewsofadsorbedconfigurationsat0.75ML. References
[1]A.Hemeryck,A.Motta,J.Swiatowska,C.Pereira-Nabais,P.Marcus,D.Costa, Phys.Chem.Chem.Phys.15(2013)10824–10834.
[2]A.G.Thomas,K.L.Syres,Chem.Soc.Rev.41(2012)4207.
[3]D.Costa,C.-M.Pradier,F.Tielens,L.Savio,Surf.Sci.Rep.70(2015)449.
[4]E.Farfan-Arribas,R.J.Madix,J.Phys.Chem.B107(2003)3225.
[5]H.-P.Zhang,X.Lu,X.G.Luo,X.Y.Lin,Y.F.Zhou,Phys.E-Low-Dimens.Syst. Nanostruct.61(2014)83.
[6]R.Koch,A.S.Lipton,S.Filipek,V.Renugopalakrishnan,J.Mol.Model.17(2011) 1467.
[7]M.Sowmiya,K.Senthilkumar,Comput.Mater.Sci.104(2015)124.
[8]F.Chiter,C.Lacaze-Dufaure,H.Tang,N.Pebere,Phys.Chem.Chem.Phys.17 (2015)22243.
[9]Y.K.Zhang,W.T.Yang,Phys.Rev.Lett.80(1998)890.
[10]B.Hammer,L.B.Hansen,J.K.Norskov,Phys.Rev.B59(1999)7413.
[11]G.Kresse,J.Hafner,Phys.Rev.B49(1994)14251.
[12]G.Kresse,J.Furthmuller,Comput.Mater.Sci.6(1996)15.
[13]G.Kresse,D.Joubert,Phys.Rev.B59(1999)1758.
[14]P.E.Blochl,Phys.Rev.B50(1994)17953.
[15]H.J.Monkhorst,J.D.Pack,Phys.Rev.B13(1976)5188.
[16]F.Z.Schossberger,Kristallogr.Kristallogeom.Kristallophys.Kristallochem.104 (1942)358.
[17]C.Arrouvel,H.Toulhoat,M.Breysse,P.Raybaud,J.Catal.226(2004)260.
[18]C.DiValentin,D.Costa,J.Phys.Chem.C116(2012)2819.
[19]S.Grimme,J.Antony,S.Ehrlich,H.Krieg,J.Chem.Phys.(2010)132.
[20]S.Grimme,J.Comp.Chem.27(2006)1787–1799.
[21]TheCP2KDevelopersGroup.<http://www.cp2k.org/>.
[22]J.P.Perdew,K.Burke,M.Ernzerhof,Phys.Rev.Lett78(1997)1396(E).