• Aucun résultat trouvé

Bacterial communities associated with the midgut microbiota of wild Anopheles gambiae complex in Burkina Faso

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Bacterial communities associated with the midgut microbiota of wild Anopheles gambiae complex in Burkina Faso"

Copied!
14
0
0

Texte intégral

Figure

Table 1    Location and sites surveyed for An. gambiae s.l mosquito samples
Fig. 1    Relative proportions of OTUs at the phylum level in all 17  samples (sites)
Fig. 2    Pie chart of the pre- pre-dominant genera (98.44% of  total OTUs) of Anopheles  gambiae Anopheles gambiae s.l  gut microbiota diversity at the  genus level
Fig. 4   a Heatmap tree of the median relative abundance tree per  site. b Heatmap tree of the median relative abundance tree per  cli-matic area
+3

Références

Documents relatifs

Here we demonstrate that bacterial infections of the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae are sensed by the orthologous PGRPLC protein which then activates a signaling pathway

Leur comparaison avec les effectifs observés montre que pour les systèmes 2Ra, 2Rb 2Rd’ et 3Ra, les différences ne sont pas significatives et sont compatibles avec

Correspondence analysis (CA) plot generated from the whole non cyanobacterial OTUs obtained with Eub-Pr1 (A) and NC-Pr2 (B) primer set, showing the distribution of the

Table 1 Rotated factor patterns testing for behavioural differences between larval instars (2 nd , 3 rd and 4 th ) of An. High positive scores on PC1 indicated that larvae

gambiae complex is given for all sites, providing a comprehensive description of the extent and diversity of insecticide multiresistance phenotypes and mechanisms in major

Figure 1 Comparison of swarm size, swarming period, height and number of mating couples observed between the swarms of

reported in south-western Burkina Faso, West Africa. Cross-resistance to DDT and pyrethroids was conferred by alterations at site of action in the sodium channel, the Leu-Phe kdr

coluzzii males (Results above, Figure 4A). The criteria used to define the start of activity in the two assays are too different, however, to allow more detailed compari- sons