• Aucun résultat trouvé

Ce travail a été l’objet d’une publication parue en juin 2017 dans European Urology Focus référencée sur PubMed :

Manach Q, Rouprêt M, Reboul-Marty J, Drouin S.J, Guillot-Tantay C, Matillon X, Parra J, Mozer P, Bitker M-O, Lefèvre J.H, Phé V. Hospital readmissions after urological surgical procedures in France: a nationwide cohort study over three years. Eu Urol Focus. Jun 2017.

BIBLIOGRAPHIE

1. Minnillo BJ, Maurice MJ, Schiltz N, Pillai AC, Koroukian SM, Daneshgari F, et al. Few modifiable factors predict readmission following radical cystectomy. Can Urol Assoc J J Assoc Urol Can. 2015;9(7‑8):E439-446.

2. Leow JJ, Gandaglia G, Sood A, Ruhotina N, Klett DE, Sammon JD, et al. Readmissions after major urologic cancer surgery. Can J Urol. 2014;21(6):7537‑46.

3. Rambachan A, Matulewicz RS, Pilecki M, Kim JYS, Kundu SD. Predictors of readmission following outpatient urological surgery. J Urol. juill 2014;192(1):183‑8.

4. Gauduchon L, Sabbagh C, Regimbeau JM. Re-admission after gastro-intestinal surgery. J Visc Surg. déc 2015;152(6 Suppl):S97-104.

5. Eggli Y. Réadmissions potentiellement évitables. Sqlape. 2012;

6. Wei F, Mark D, Hartz A, Campbell C. Are PRO discharge screens associated with postdischarge adverse outcomes? Health Serv Res. août 1995;30(3):489‑506.

7. Ashton CM, Kuykendall DH, Johnson ML, Wray NP, Wu L. The association between the quality of inpatient care and early readmission. Ann Intern Med. 15 mars 1995;122(6):415‑21.

8. Stein J, Ossman P, Viera A, Moore C, Brubaker BA, French J, et al. Was This Readmission Preventable? Qualitative Study of Patient and Provider Perceptions of Readmissions. South Med J. juin 2016;109(6):383‑9.

9. Zuckerman RB, Sheingold SH, Orav EJ, Ruhter J, Epstein AM. Readmissions, Observation, and the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program. N Engl J Med. 24 févr 2016;

11. Benlice C, Seyidova-Khoshknabi D, Stocchi L, Hull T, Steele S, Gorgun E. Decreasing readmissions by focusing on complications and underlying reasons. Am J Surg. 21 juill 2017;

12. Ansari MZ, Collopy BT, Booth JL. Hospital characteristics associated with unplanned readmissions. Aust Health Rev Publ Aust Hosp Assoc. 1995;18(3):63‑75.

13. Milne R, Clarke A. Can readmission rates be used as an outcome indicator? BMJ. 17 nov 1990;301(6761):1139‑40.

14. McIlvennan CK, Eapen ZJ, Allen LA. Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program. Circulation. 19 mai 2015;131(20):1796‑803.

15. van Walraven C, Jennings A, Taljaard M, Dhalla I, English S, Mulpuru S, et al. Incidence of potentially avoidable urgent readmissions and their relation to all-cause urgent readmissions. CMAJ Can Med Assoc J. 4 oct 2011;183(14):e1067‑72.

16. Graham KL, Dike O, Doctoroff L, Jupiter M, Vanka A, Davis RB, et al. Preventability of early vs. late readmissions in an academic medical center. PLoS ONE [Internet]. 16 juin

2017 [cité 12 août 2017];12(6). Disponible sur:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5473551/

17. Chin DL, Bang H, Manickam RN, Romano PS. Rethinking Thirty-Day Hospital Readmissions: Shorter Intervals Might Be Better Indicators Of Quality Of Care. Health Aff Proj Hope. 1 oct 2016;35(10):1867‑75.

18. Dandolu V, Pathak P. Health resource utilization and costs during the first 90 days following robot-assisted hysterectomy. Int Urogynecology J. 7 août 2017;

19. Bendvold B, Refsum A, Schjøth-Iversen L, Bringedal K, Husby A, Brudvik KW. Unplanned readmission and outpatient examination 90-days after acute appendectomy in adults. Am J Surg. 21 juill 2017;

Day after Radical Cystectomy in Patients on Early Recovery after Surgery Protocol. Bladder Cancer Amst Neth. 27 janv 2017;3(1):51‑6.

21. Lefèvre JH, Reboul-Marty J, de Vaugrigneuse S, Zeitoun J-D. Readmissions After Surgery: A French Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study of 1,686,602 Procedures Performed in 2010. World J Surg. janv 2017;41(1):31‑8.

22. Barber EL, Doll KM, Gehrig PA. Hospital readmission after ovarian cancer surgery: Are we measuring surgical quality? Gynecol Oncol. août 2017;146(2):368‑72.

23. Zogg CK, Olufajo OA, Jiang W, Bystricky A, Scott JW, Shafi S, et al. The Need to Consider Longer-term Outcomes of Care: Racial/Ethnic Disparities Among Adult and Older Adult Emergency General Surgery Patients at 30, 90, and 180 Days. Ann Surg. juill 2017;266(1):66‑75.

24. Caracciolo C, Parker D, Marshall E, Brown J. Excess Readmission vs Excess Penalties: Maximum Readmission Penalties as a Function of Socioeconomics and Geography. J Hosp Med. août 2017;12(8):610‑7.

25. OCDE. Panorama de la santé 2013 : Les indicateurs de l’OCDE. Éditions OCDE. 2013;

26. Kansagara D, Englander H, Salanitro A, Kagen D, Theobald C, Freeman M, et al. Risk prediction models for hospital readmission: a systematic review. JAMA. 2011;306(15):1688‑98.

27. United States Department of Health and Human Services. New HHS data shows major strides made in patient safety, leading to improved care and savings. http:// innovation.cms.gov/Files/reports/patient-safety-results.pdf.

29. Rothberg M, Lee N. Reducing Readmissions or Length of Stay-Which Is More Important? J Hosp Med. août 2017;12(8):685‑6.

30. Le Pogam M. Modalités d’utilisation et de diffusion des PSI (in dicateurs de sécurité des soins hospitaliers) dans les pays de l’OCDE : revue des études publiées et interview des experts internationaux. https://www.has-sante.fr/portail/upload/docs/application/pdf/2012- 06/ipaqss_4pages_utilisation_psi_ocde.pdf.

31. Parc Y, Reboul-Marty J, Lefevre JH, Shields C, Chafai N, Tiret E. Factors influencing mortality and morbidity following colorectal resection in France. Analysis of a national database (2009 - 2011). Colorectal Dis Off J Assoc Coloproctology G B Irel. 2015;

32. Lefèvre JH, Reboul-Marty J, de Vaugrigneuse S, Zeitoun J-D. Readmissions After Surgery: A French Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study of 1,686,602 Procedures Performed in 2010. World J Surg. janv 2017;41(1):31‑8.

33. Yilmaz E, Vuagnat A. Tarification à l’activité et readmission. Économie et statistique. 2015;475‑6.

34. Fagerström T, Nyman CR, Hahn RG. Complications and clinical outcome 18 months after bipolar and monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate. J Endourol. juin 2011;25(6):1043‑9.

35. Pilecki MA, McGuire BB, Jain U, Kim JYS, Nadler RB. National multi-institutional comparison of 30-day postoperative complication and readmission rates between open retropubic radical prostatectomy and robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy using NSQIP. J Endourol. avr 2014;28(4):430‑6.

36. Schmid M, Chiang HA, Sood A, Campbell L, Chun FK-H, Dalela D, et al. Causes of hospital readmissions after urologic cancer surgery. Urol Oncol. mai 2016;34(5):236.e1- 236.e11.

Versus Open Radical Prostatectomy: A Contemporary Analysis of an All-payer Discharge Database. Eur Urol. 10 févr 2016;

38. Chappidi MR, Kates M, Stimson CJ, Bivalacqua TJ, Pierorazio PM. Quantifying Nonindex Hospital Readmissions and Care Fragmentation after Major Urological Oncology Surgeries in a Nationally Representative Sample. J Urol. janv 2017;197(1):235‑40.

39. Friðriksson JÖ, Holmberg E, Adolfsson J, Lambe M, Bill-Axelson A, Carlsson S, et al. Rehospitalization after radical prostatectomy in a nationwide, population based study. J Urol. 2014;192(1):112‑9.

40. Stimson CJ, Chang SS, Barocas DA, Humphrey JE, Patel SG, Clark PE, et al. Early and late perioperative outcomes following radical cystectomy: 90-day readmissions, morbidity and mortality in a contemporary series. J Urol. oct 2010;184(4):1296‑300.

41. Hu M, Jacobs BL, Montgomery JS, He C, Ye J, Zhang Y, et al. Sharpening the focus on causes and timing of readmission after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Cancer. 1 mai 2014;120(9):1409‑16.

42. Pak JS, Lascano D, Kabat DH, Finkelstein JB, RoyChoudhury A, DeCastro GJ, et al. Patterns of care for readmission after radical cystectomy in New York State and the effect of care fragmentation. Urol Oncol. oct 2015;33(10):426.e13-19.

43. Chappidi MR, Kates M, Stimson CJ, Johnson MH, Pierorazio PM, Bivalacqua TJ. Causes, Timing, Hospital Costs and Perioperative Outcomes of Index vs Nonindex Hospital Readmissions after Radical Cystectomy: Implications for Regionalization of Care. J Urol. févr 2017;197(2):296‑301.

45. Hwang YJ, Minnillo BJ, Kim SP, Abouassaly R. Assessment of healthcare quality metrics: Length-of-stay, 30-day readmission, and 30-day mortality for radical nephrectomy with inferior vena cava thrombectomy. Can Urol Assoc J J Assoc Urol Can. avr 2015;9(3‑4):114‑21.

46. Brandao LF, Zargar H, Laydner H, Akca O, Autorino R, Ko O, et al. 30-day hospital readmission after robotic partial nephrectomy--are we prepared for Medicare readmission reduction program? J Urol. sept 2014;192(3):677‑81.

47. Maurice MJ, Ramirez D, Kara Ö, Nelson RJ, Caputo PA, Malkoç E, et al. Non- modifiable factors predict discharge quality after robotic partial nephrectomy. Int Urol Nephrol. janv 2017;49(1):37‑41.

48. Buldu I, Tepeler A, Karatag T, Ozyuvali E, Elbir F, Yordam M, et al. Which factors affect the hospital re-admission and re-hospitalization after flexible ureterorenoscopy for kidney stone? World J Urol. sept 2016;34(9):1291‑5.

49. Scales CD, Saigal CS, Hanley JM, Dick AW, Setodji CM, Litwin MS. The impact of unplanned postprocedure visits in the management of patients with urinary stones. Surgery. mai 2014;155(5):769‑75.

50. Beiko D, Elkoushy MA, Kokorovic A, Roberts G, Robb S, Andonian S. Ambulatory percutaneous nephrolithotomy: what is the rate of readmission? J Endourol. avr 2015;29(4):410‑4.

51. Tepeler A, Karatag T, Tok A, Ozyuvali E, Buldu I, Kardas S, et al. Factors affecting hospital readmission and rehospitalization following percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol. janv 2016;34(1):69‑73.

52. Bloom J, Matthews G, Phillips J. Factors Influencing Readmission after Elective Ureteroscopy. J Urol. mai 2016;195(5):1487‑91.

53. Cohen AJ, Packiam VT, Nottingham CU, Alberts BD, Faris SF, Bales GT. 30-Day Morbidity and Reoperation Following Midurethral Sling: Analysis of 8772 Cases Using a National Prospective Database. Urology. sept 2016;95:72‑9.

54. Pederzoli F, Chappidi MR, Collica S, Kates M, Joice GA, Sopko NA, et al. Analysis of Hospital Readmissions After Prosthetic Urologic Surgery in the United States: Nationally Representative Estimates of Causes, Costs, and Predictive Factors. J Sex Med. août 2017;14(8):1059‑65.

55. Tsai TC, Joynt KE, Orav EJ, Gawande AA, Jha AK. Variation in surgical-readmission rates and quality of hospital care. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(12):1134‑42.

56. Kim H, Hung WW, Paik MC, Ross JS, Zhao Z, Kim G-S, et al. Predictors and outcomes of unplanned readmission to a different hospital. Int J Qual Health Care. déc 2015;27(6):512.

57. Boudemaghe T, Belhadj I. Data Resource Profile: The French National Uniform Hospital Discharge Data Set Database (PMSI). Int J Epidemiol. 7 févr 2017;

58. Bloom J, Matthews G, Phillips J. Factors Influencing Readmission after Elective Ureteroscopy. J Urol. mai 2016;195(5):1487‑91.

59. Yamashita S, Kohjimoto Y, Iba A, Kikkawa K, Hara I. Stone size is a predictor for residual stone and multiple procedures of endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery. Scand J Urol. avr 2017;51(2):159‑64.

60. Hein S, Miernik A, Wilhelm K, Schlager D, Schoeb DS, Adams F, et al. Endoscopically Determined Stone Clearance Predicts Disease Recurrence Within 5 Years After Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery. J Endourol. juin 2016;30(6):644‑9.

62. Zhang W, Zhou T, Wu T, Gao X, Peng Y, Xu C, et al. Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Versus Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy for Treatment of Lower Pole Renal Stones: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review. J Endourol. juill 2015;29(7):745‑59.

63. Sabnis RB, Jagtap J, Mishra S, Desai M. Treating renal calculi 1-2 cm in diameter with minipercutaneous or retrograde intrarenal surgery: a prospective comparative study. BJU Int. oct 2012;110(8 Pt B):E346-349.

64. Léon P, Seisen T, Rouprêt M. Surgical landscape of radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in France over the last 10 years. World J Urol. 28 juin 2014;

65. Carter J, Philp S, Wan KM. Optimising recovery after surgery: Predictors of early discharge and hospital readmission. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;

66. Cloyd JM, Huang L, Ma Y, Rhoads KF. Predictors of readmission to non-index hospitals after colorectal surgery. Am J Surg. 2016;

67. Moschini M, Gandaglia G, Dell’Oglio P, Fossati N, Cucchiara V, Burgio G, et al. Incidence and Predictors of 30-Day Readmission in Patients Treated With Radical Cystectomy: A Single Center European Experience. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2016;14(4):e341-346.

68. Legner VJ, Massarweh NN, Symons RG, McCormick WC, Flum DR. The significance of discharge to skilled care after abdominopelvic surgery in older adults. Ann Surg. 2009;249(2):250‑5.

69. Trinh Q-D, Bjartell A, Freedland SJ, Hollenbeck BK, Hu JC, Shariat SF, et al. A systematic review of the volume-outcome relationship for radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2013;64(5):786‑98.

70. Wilt TJ, Shamliyan TA, Taylor BC, MacDonald R, Kane RL. Association between hospital and surgeon radical prostatectomy volume and patient outcomes: a systematic

review. J Urol. 2008;180(3):820-828; discussion 828-829.

71. Santos F, Zakaria AS, Kassouf W, Tanguay S, Aprikian A. High hospital and surgeon volume and its impact on overall survival after radical cystectomy among patients with bladder cancer in Quebec. World J Urol. 2015;33(9):1323‑30.

72. Sun M, Ravi P, Karakiewicz PI, Sukumar S, Sammon J, Bianchi M, et al. Is there a relationship between leapfrog volume thresholds and perioperative outcomes after radical cystectomy? Urol Oncol. 2014;32(1):27.e7-13.

73. Allareddy V, Ward MM, Allareddy V, Konety BR. Effect of meeting Leapfrog volume thresholds on complication rates following complex surgical procedures. Ann Surg. févr 2010;251(2):377‑83.

74. Trinh Q-D, Schmitges J, Sun M, Shariat SF, Sukumar S, Bianchi M, et al. Radical prostatectomy at academic versus nonacademic institutions: a population based analysis. J Urol. 2011;186(5):1849‑54.

75. Vartak S, Ward MM, Vaughn TE. Do postoperative complications vary by hospital teaching status? Med Care. 2008;46(1):25‑32.

76. Siciliani L, Hurst J. Explaining waiting times variations for elective surgery across OECD Countries. OECD Econ Stud. 2004;38:96‑122.

77. Coleman EA, Min S, Chomiak A, Kramer AM. Posthospital Care Transitions: Patterns, Complications, and Risk Identification. Health Serv Res. oct 2004;39(5):1449‑66. 78. Varadhan KK, Lobo DN, Ljungqvist O. Enhanced recovery after surgery: the future of improving surgical care. Crit Care Clin. juill 2010;26(3):527‑547, x.

80. Cerantola Y, Valerio M, Persson B, Jichlinski P, Ljungqvist O, Hubner M, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(®)) society recommendations. Clin Nutr Edinb Scotl. déc 2013;32(6):879‑87.

81. Nygren J, Thacker J, Carli F, Fearon KCH, Norderval S, Lobo DN, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in elective rectal/pelvic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(®)) Society recommendations. World J Surg. févr 2013;37(2):285‑305.

82. Hamilton-Reeves JM, Bechtel MD, Hand LK, Schleper A, Yankee TM, Chalise P, et al. Effects of Immunonutrition for Cystectomy on Immune Response and Infection Rates: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Eur Urol. mars 2016;69(3):389‑92.

83. Xu R, Zhao X, Zhong Z, Zhang L. No advantage is gained by preoperative bowel preparation in radical cystectomy and ileal conduit: a randomized controlled trial of 86 patients. Int Urol Nephrol. déc 2010;42(4):947‑50.

84. Awad S, Varadhan KK, Ljungqvist O, Lobo DN. A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials on preoperative oral carbohydrate treatment in elective surgery. Clin Nutr Edinb Scotl. févr 2013;32(1):34‑44.

85. Kurz A, Sessler DI, Lenhardt R. Perioperative normothermia to reduce the incidence of surgical-wound infection and shorten hospitalization. Study of Wound Infection and Temperature Group. N Engl J Med. 9 mai 1996;334(19):1209‑15.

86. Wuethrich PY, Studer UE, Thalmann GN, Burkhard FC. Intraoperative continuous norepinephrine infusion combined with restrictive deferred hydration significantly reduces the need for blood transfusion in patients undergoing open radical cystectomy: results of a prospective randomised trial. Eur Urol. août 2014;66(2):352‑60.

Enhanced recovery after surgery: are we ready, and can we afford not to implement these pathways for patients undergoing radical cystectomy? Eur Urol. févr 2014;65(2):263‑6. 88. Pillai P, McEleavy I, Gaughan M, Snowden C, Nesbitt I, Durkan G, et al. A double- blind randomized controlled clinical trial to assess the effect of Doppler optimized intraoperative fluid management on outcome following radical cystectomy. J Urol. déc 2011;186(6):2201‑6.

89. Donat SM, Slaton JW, Pisters LL, Swanson DA. Early nasogastric tube removal combined with metoclopramide after radical cystectomy and urinary diversion. J Urol. nov 1999;162(5):1599‑602.

90. Fitzgerald JEF, Ahmed I. Systematic review and meta-analysis of chewing-gum therapy in the reduction of postoperative paralytic ileus following gastrointestinal surgery. World J Surg. déc 2009;33(12):2557‑66.

91. Zingg U, Miskovic D, Pasternak I, Meyer P, Hamel CT, Metzger U. Effect of bisacodyl on postoperative bowel motility in elective colorectal surgery: a prospective, randomized trial. Int J Colorectal Dis. déc 2008;23(12):1175‑83.

92. Lewis SJ, Andersen HK, Thomas S. Early enteral nutrition within 24 h of intestinal surgery versus later commencement of feeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg Off J Soc Surg Aliment Tract. mars 2009;13(3):569‑75.

93. Xu W, Daneshmand S, Bazargani ST, Cai J, Miranda G, Schuckman AK, et al. Postoperative Pain Management after Radical Cystectomy: Comparing Traditional versus Enhanced Recovery Protocol Pathway. J Urol. nov 2015;194(5):1209‑13.

American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, and American Society for Clinical Nutrition. Am J Clin Nutr. sept 1997;66(3):683‑706.

95. Mukhtar S, Ayres BE, Issa R, Swinn MJ, Perry MJA. Challenging boundaries: an enhanced recovery programme for radical cystectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. avr 2013;95(3):200‑6.

96. Azhar RA, Bochner B, Catto J, Goh AC, Kelly J, Patel HD, et al. Enhanced Recovery after Urological Surgery: A Contemporary Systematic Review of Outcomes, Key Elements, and Research Needs. Eur Urol. juill 2016;70(1):176‑87.

97. Persson B, Carringer M, Andrén O, Andersson S-O, Carlsson J, Ljungqvist O. Initial experiences with the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in open radical cystectomy. Scand J Urol. 2015;49(4):302‑7.

98. Ministère des Affaires Sociales et de la Santé. Manuel des groupes homogènes de malades, Version 2017. mars 2017;

RÉSUMÉ

Objectif :

L’objectif était d’évaluer le taux de réadmission chirurgicale après une procédure urologique et d’identifier les facteurs de risque associés à une réadmission.

Matériel et méthodes :

Les données de toutes les hospitalisations concernant les chirurgies urologiques planifiées entre janvier 2010 et novembre 2012 ont été extraites du Programme de Médicalisation des Systèmes d'Information. Le taux de réadmission était évalué à partir des ré-hospitalisations réalisées dans les 30 jours suivant la chirurgie urologique. Les facteurs de risque suivants ont été évalués : le sexe, l’âge, le Groupe Homogène de Malades (GHM), la durée de l'hospitalisation initiale, le type d'hospitalisation (conventionnelle ou ambulatoire), le volume d’activité de chirurgie urologique global de l’établissement ainsi que le volume d’activité spécifique de la procédure réalisée et le statut administratif de l’établissement. Une analyse multivariée par régression logistique a été utilisée pour évaluer les facteurs de risque.

Résultats :

Au total, 419 787 patients ont été inclus, dont 77 241 patients (18,40%) ont été réadmis dans les 30 jours suivant l’intervention. Après analyses multivariées, le sexe masculin (OR = 1,84 [CI95% : 1,81-1,88]), un GHM élevé (GHM 3-4 vs. 1-2 : OR = 2,14 [CI95% : 2,10-2,21]) et la prise en charge initiale dans un établissement privé (Hôpital privé vs. Hôpital universitaire : OR = 1,13 [IC95% : 1,11-1,16], Hôpital privé vs. Hôpital public : OR = 1,21 [CI95% : 1,18- 1,23]) ont été associés à un risque plus élevé de réadmission dans les 30 jours.

Conclusion :

Le taux de réadmission dans les 30 jours suivant une procédure urologique planifiée était de 20%.

MOTS CLÉS

Réadmission ; Procédure chirurgicale urologique ; Volume d’activité chirurgicale ; Durée de séjour ; Statut administratif ; Groupe Homogène de Malades.

Documents relatifs