1 R´esum´e d’indices de distribution . . . .xxiv 2 Impacts potentiels d’un augmentation exog`ene de l’´education du jeune
fr`ere/sœur (A) . . . .xxvi 3 Transition times from Garcia and Fares (2008) . . . 9 4 Labor Force in 1990, by highest certificate obtained . . . 72 5 Labor Force in 2011, by highest certificate obtained . . . 72 6 Evolution of industry labor shares and proportion of skilled labor by
industry, 2007-2010 . . . 73 7 Sectoral production growth differentials 2010-2020 without SBTC (private
sectors) . . . 88 8 Sectoral production growth differentials 2010-2020 with rationing (private
sectors) . . . 90 9 Summary of distributional indices from micro accounting exercise . . . 93 10 Variables used in the CGE model . . . 100 11 Parameters used in the CGE model . . . 101 12 Elasticity parameters used in the CGE model . . . 102 13 Evolution of industry labor shares and proportion of skilled labor by
industry, 1990-2011 . . . 103 14 Potential impacts of an exogenous shock to younger siblings’ (A) education117 15 Descriptive statistics, 1980 census survey sample . . . 123 16 Composition of the sample of out-of-school children more than 10 years old125 17 Estimates of younger siblings’ years of education (First stage) . . . 130 18 Main results: Older sibling labor market outcomes . . . 133 19 Gender-specific results (younger sibling is male) . . . 135 20 Gender-specific results (younger sibling is female) . . . 136 21 Main results: Older sibling labor market outcomes (younger sibling out of
school) . . . 137 22 Impact of younger siblings’ education on household shares of work . . . . 140 23 Additional results on older siblings’ occupations . . . 142 24 Estimates of older sibling’s education (falsification test) . . . 143 25 Impacts on the composition and number of older siblings . . . 144 26 Main results INPRES: Older sibling labor market outcomes (OLS) . . . . 149 27 Main results INPRES: Older sibling labor market outcomes (OLS) . . . . 150 28 Descriptive statistics by (younger sibling) sex, 1980 census . . . 151 29 Estimation of younger siblings’ occupational outcomes . . . 152 30 Age distribution of siblings in primary sample . . . 153 31 Evolution of child characteristics in Senegal between 2006 and 2012 (all observations)168 32 Evolution of child characteristics in Senegal between 2006 and 2012 (panel
observations) . . . 169 33 Identity of the deceased and number of bereaved children, by sex . . . 170
34 Death impact on current schooling - Individual fixed effects - Children aged between 4 and 17 in first wave . . . 171 35 Death impact on the probability of having ever worked on the market
-Individual fixed effects - Children aged between 6 and 17 in first wave . . 173 36 Death impact on current market work - Individual fixed effects - Children
aged between 6 and 17 in first wave . . . 174 37 Death impact on hours of household chores Individual fixed effects
-Children aged between 6 and 17 in first wave . . . 175 38 Death impact on probability to be fostered Individual fixed effects
-Children less than 15, not fostered in first wave . . . 176 39 Cell head death impact on various outcomes - Individual fixed effects . . . 178 40 Cell head death impact on current schooling Household fixed effects
-Children between 4 and 17 in first wave . . . 180 41 Own cell head death impact on current market work - Household fixed
effects - Children between 6 and 17 in first wave . . . 181 42 Own cell head death impact on the probability of having ever worked on
the market - Household fixed effects - Children between 6 and 17 in first wave . . . 182 43 Own cell head death impact on hours of domestic work - Household fixed
effects - Children between 6 and 17 in first wave . . . 182 44 Own cell head death impact on probability of being fostered - Household
fixed effects - Children less than 15 not fostered in first wave . . . 183 45 Cell head death impact on various outcomes Individual fixed effects
-Impacted households only . . . 184 46 Cell head death impact on various outcomes -Individual fixed effects
-Trends added . . . 185 47 Attrition analysis . . . 186 48 Household composition . . . 191 49 Descriptive statistics by cell status (cells in affected households) . . . 191 50 Descriptive statistics by cell status (all cells) . . . 192 51 Descriptive statistics by household status . . . 192 52 Causes of death, male and female, 15-49 y.o., Senegal, 2010 . . . 193 53 Inter-wave mortality and self-assessed health in PSF1 . . . 193 54 Death impact on current schooling - Individual fixed effects - Children
aged between 4 and 17 in first wave - by sex . . . 194 55 Death impact on current schooling - Individual fixed effects - Children
between 4 and 17 in first wave - by urban/rural . . . 195 56 Death impact on the probability of having ever worked on the market
-Individual fixed effects - Children aged between 6 and 17 in first wave - by sex . . . 196 57 Death impact on the probability of having ever worked on the market
- Individual fixed effects - Children between 6 and 17 in first wave - by urban/rural . . . 197
l
58 Death impact on current market work - Individual fixed effects - Children aged between 6 and 17 in first wave - by sex . . . 198 59 Death impact on current market work - Individual fixed effects - Children
between 6 and 17 in first wave - by urban/rural . . . 199 60 Death impact on hours of domestic work - Individual fixed effects - Children
aged between 6 and 17 in first wave - by sex . . . 200 61 Death impact on hours of domestic work - Individual fixed effects - Children
between 6 and 17 in first wave - by urban/rural . . . 201 62 Death impact on probability of being fostered Individual fixed effects
-Children less than 15 not fostered in first wave - by sex . . . 202 63 Death impact on probability of being fostered Individual fixed effects
-Children less than 15 not fostered in first wave - by urban/rural . . . 203 64 Cell head death impact on various outcomes - Individual fixed effects - by
sex . . . 204 65 Cell head death impact on various outcomes - Individual fixed effects - by
urban/rural . . . 205 66 Prevalence of depression and anxiety disorder in Mexico . . . 216 67 Descriptive statistics on panel sample . . . 218 68 CCDSD score by round and population . . . 220 69 Descriptive statistics from victimization module, 2002-2005-2009 . . . 226 70 Two-sample t-tests on main outcomes . . . 228 71 Parental CCDSD impact on the probability of being in school . . . 230 72 Parental CCDSD impact on the probability of having repeated a grade . . 231 73 Parental CCDSD impact on the probability of having ever worked . . . . 232 74 Parental CCDSD impact on the probability of combining school and work 233 75 Marginal effects of parental CCDSD, at levels of 2002 CCDSD. . . 237 76 Alternative samples and specifications (robustness checks) . . . 241 77 Effect of depressive symptoms on work-related outcomes (HH) . . . 244 78 Potential transmission mechanisms between parental CCDSD and child
outcomes . . . 245 79 Description of variables used . . . 252 80 Descriptive statistics from Victimization module, 2002-2005-2009 . . . 253 81 Cuestionnario Clinico para el Diagnostico del Sindrome Depresivo . . . 255 82 Parental CCDSD impact on the probability of having attended high school256 83 Parental CCDSD impact on the probability of having attended college . . 257 84 Parental CCDSD impact on the probability of currently working . . . 258 85 Parental CCDSD impact on the probability of currently being inactive . . 259 86 Household heads and spouses depressive symptoms and child outcomes . . 260 87 Father/mother depressive symptoms and child outcomes . . . 261 88 Summary statistics by panel round presence . . . 262 89 Polynomials of CCDSD score and marginal effects on grade repetition at
first round CCDSD score value . . . 263