-" , __t,
',. A' se'rious' st~.~l ' , of,-the .1.067m t,rack ah.o, u1d preoede any deci sion
-on
the Mekam~.
'case
in"·Gabon'.' - .
.,'"
•~ . r I
" '
Precautionary measures in case of
extenslon
or-renewal of-the 1m track It'isnecessary,,:wheri;'ch~ging
a Lmtr~~k t~
a ,-,#1.067mJ~ra.ck,
to& •
take up ~d re-bore the sleepers in order to lay the rails in a diffepent
• ,•~• 'I
position: this
operation;
lea~~'~o ~eatexpense
'if. precautionary "meaaures are not taken befo rehand; ,A;C?cording ~o a r ecent study made ·for Cameroun, tp.a cost ~'f~the opSra.tio~ would be apP:l'O.xima.t~~;Y700,000 ~FA/lan, or- '"use 28000
per km~_ , ' J . . . ..i ' - . ' . • I . . •~... •
Tli~re
are
t, however, s~veral,proce dur-e sWhicn, if
adop'ted du-ring., t . ...
p.~:rio~. ~~,~c~:c4n'g .t,he :~ha.~g~oy~r, lead to B.'
coneid-arabia -reduction
Cof"
these expen ses: ;
t:
J ~"'C t" ~ ;
the
:"
i), .:
theuse of
-douhLebore sleepers;
ii)
the use of eccentric rail-heaas; '..iii)
the
use ofdifferent inner and
outer di~pe.,... .~ '~.. ".:.: .
" I
_ In Cameroun the. co s t of such an operati'oh,
has ceen
'estimatedat
, . . . . • ~ , " - ~• J ~ • -• \ • •
.60,000 CFA/km (~r US$ ,240_p_er km),'-:which i's etev~n'·ti'mss iower
than
it'-::'·-~o~ld
be' i'f"no.·~·;e6a~tion6
had -been taken 'during therinter1in
pe'r'iodo '. ;._
Acc~';ding
toth~e.
s:tudy made for Cameroun'; '<these prebauti6nary mea eures• I_ • • ~ , I \. /I
-Lnvc Lve ~o J,i~_ancial. guJl~y at- track-laying. , J _
•
E/eN
.14/TRANs/17-,Annex I
-Page 12
" •
• ' 1 , . • . • .
..; ."'-.
It' i t is agreed '~hat netwo.~ks· ahout d be inter-connected.witb a.
~'tandard' 'lo067m '~a~ge,
one of thes.e' procedures should immediately be• • • • fl.· I• ~ J I I •
: - I adopt'e d
,by
all ne two rks !3~tending:,?,r. renewing tr acka l i t will, whenI);,• t ,,.::1'~~.1·.··~ " , .•~. • ~l'" I -, . " 1·~·lt!·'oJl~·:~
, 'the',',tiiIi,e for "the' changeover 'comes, lead to a saving of a.pproxima.t€d'y;·l~'~,
• • ' .. • • .. I l . ' ' . ~
USS2800-240= 2560 per km of track to be transformed and will :thUB advance
, . ' . . J. I ' . ' , • •
the d~te at 'wh'ich -changeovar would.:,'be economically justifiedo ,( '" .
•' 1• ..·.:\.c_.= - .
, ,This wouLd apply" . in, par
t.t
cuf ar-, to ~he Bamako-Koulikoro se'ction- .'..'. : 'i... ' ':. I " , . ,: '- " . I . . ' . I '••' .- • ..
. ··.. In· 'Maii,
t'((Guinea"Thieh
.must
renew the"whole, of.i tn"network except the.. 4.• 4. ..:: .•. ' :• . , , ' f • ~ •~• .. • •
Fria"line'i(66I km}, to 'th'e I~ory Coast rrhi,ch must make. extenBi,ye~.alignment
"re,ctifications between
~4.gbobille a~d T~f:i;e
(300km)
;and~.s
';l,anl?-ing to build a 'branch line from Anoumba to ]aIoa (300 'km)~ to Tbgo if revision of' the Lqme-Palime line i 8~nde·ita.ken,~: :0'..
Dahomey .-for tlie'Pa:j;Eik6~::rosso
... ~....": . ..:.-- .. .~ ~" .. - . . "~ ... - .
extension which is being. . suryey.~9.,.~. ... . and: f,in.ally, to Ethi,opioa for the planned
~.' ,
extension
to 'Sidamo0 ~• • _: : . : If.',. . .:,' , ' , .I '"~' •, '
.<c) ,Consul ta tiona before the, .closing of cer'tain
lines
There are many r-eaaon e
(insuffici"~n,~' 't~~ffi~~'-'defici
t, 'nee'd for tooextensive
repair work.~' eXisten:6~"~'f:'i~~bod :~~'~h~lt~'d
road) . why consd de ra td on might be Jiven to the abandonment of certain railway lines of uncertain.national val;ue·., . SUbregi9~ally,,·however.,' 'thEi's'~ ,l~'nes may, in
whol:e
or i~ part,be an e~sential:link-for"S!- .fu tur e 'rail":connex{on with neighbouring' cOw1~:rieso In such 'cas~s, the country concerned should not decide to abandon the line without first having examinea'~;..r{thneighbouring States 'the effective
; • • I
use 9f the line at eub-z-egf.onaIv LeveL,
.. ~. '.~.. .~:....,"~;" I • . : . . : ... • 4
This m~ght be the case in'Togo, with the Lome-Palime line which needs extenai ve repair work est~mated:O'to cd'st::USS4~OOO~OOOo
Asphalt1ng'
of theLome~Pa;lime
road ;is . also envr aage d , .: but.'~he
ti.le is peneling whii'e~waiti~g
" 4" •
the reSl-;ll-t:, -of a tran~port·.:plan which
:lS
being studied. If -it is decided to a epha.Lt t~e road" the Lome-Palime railw~y may- be .abandoned, but i t coul d b>used, partially' at least,
in
an'AG6ra-Lome-Cotonoll~Las'Osjunction once the
gauge has been changedo.. .
'"
.
E/C~ ~~.4/,lt~1J~~/IT
.\,
.Annex I - ..., .. :
.' ," .• -!~'.,
Page 13
i.« '.
• I~i J
The, purcl].ase.".o·+ wagons' or -Lo comotd ves the axles, of· whi ch can. easily# - .... j . . . . ~ ~, . , . ' • •
be adapted .:t.o - Im, pr.. 1.067m gauges. • . . . . .has. been_,_~r-ecommende d for~.... :.l. • • • •the~ _.~.fex1:,ene~on. .~
of the Cameroun network to Goyoum and NIGaoundere , 1m network,s~.:~hfce., ".'J
might change over to 1.067m gau~e before comp~ete amortization of roll~ng
stock should a do pt this procedure
~Theri"~~rcna~i~g"~4.lliI5rrien·t
..··'ACCb'rdin~";
to
the
'StlJ:dy'male .
f~r"Cameroun, . thi
s I'precaution :LnvoI vea "no fin~:fclal outl'a.y··,the-coBt'-:~f a.d~pta1ile' rolting st~ck bein!g the'same' as:'that of·I(''' equt.pment d:esigned"for a
~inglegauge. '"IJ .. Li-.l':~With adaptable
!'oli'i~~~'S'~~Ck,
the "cost oftr~sf~~~~i'~n
isv~~;: l~~~:
CFA 400 per axle or a Ii ttle less than USS2 for":fnser",tio~._:a.nd ·,remo.val
bt>
an axle, pl.us'·. an unco at e d pre~..~jngo ., a,," ._, .,' j
•
"., .... ,: .. With unadap tab l e equilmient the axle must be- changed~' 'This -cos·t·s, ..",
counti'ng
the recovery value' of" the' old" axle, CFA 18;000 (or US':72), for,:a;wag'on axle and CFA
26,150
(or US$107 ) for a locomotive, light raii-"motor tractor or railc~r,axle" to w~ich m~8t be a~d~4 th~ USS2 p~~ axle for in~ertion.>and r-emovaL; "r.r _ ' • •
2'. ·i;1ea.sur~·s' desigll"ed to:-:faci'li fate the fopnat1on'
and
cir'culation of '.:, ,~.
trains' :. . . . '
.: : ...'~•• ' _"a " .. '....
Even if gauges were sta.ndardized and network's connected , certain technical
." "..; ..: ."'..:.... =.;:::
characteristics peculiar to each network would impede the international circulation of wagonso There must, therefore, be an immediate attempt to standardize, particularly on the following points:
(a)
Standardization of couplingsThere are at present two types of coupling in West Africa~ the Ivery Coast, Tbgo and Dahomey still have the double buffer system while Cameroun,
Ghani and
Nigeria have the more advanced central impact traction buffer, but with different models. Trains cannot be formed with wagons of different buffer systemso If wagons are to circulate internationallY'a standardtype must be adopted for all African countrieso
The
difficulties experienced by European networks in choosing a common buffer model, and the length of the negotiations involved, proves that this problem must be tackledimmediately in AfricaD
E/CN~14/TR_UT~/l7' Annex I ' . Page 14 . ,
(b)
Standardi zation ofthe
braking .system ,:" ':,c -',: ,...: .~,-'. ~:.:.:. '."As'- J:nost~ African: netWorks have maint~ined'the vacuum-brake sy s'tem,
, ,
standardization' 'of -braking- will be easier t.o achieve than standardization
•
of buffers ..:
Ii ,-,
,
.
..
-, .;
~ -, ' . • • . . ' I'\ !, , . . ; I • ·f
(c) ,
Standardization of axle loads) . :~ ~~ , , ..." I • • ' , '" .
. ' : .
. . Equi.pmentiof the. t.rack (rail and s;1e~~,'t.r-weight).
and
~t~ctur.~l .. , Work, are." condati.on~d,.hy axle ..loads circula~ing'on the Li.ne , An .attempt .- ..' I I •~ t ~ .' 4,. I
. .
should therefore be made to st.andar-dize loads" ~hus ,faci;l~tati~g .,t.~e:
oirculation of trains from one network to another.
!'0;. ~~. I t I1-: '.: . ~ ~ - . . I
.'o:('d) ..
Administrative- measur.esThe circulation of trains from one country to' another will, give ,ri,se to many, ,legal:' pz-ob.Lem s such as customs, control.,... tariffi2:1g, us~ of, ~quipment etc •.;: f?r; t.he ,·.a9~u:tior of which some, common ge~eral principles should be.) estabJisped." . . t.". . ~'. '. , - ,"
" :" .. whtle
'the measures co~ceriiing,gauges
tandar-ddza t.i.cn concern chiefly. " , I
1m networks, the above measures concern all Afr(can ne twoz-ks , At present ther.e isJ.no .forum.wh..e r e they--can be. studied .. An Afric~n Railw,aY,s)Jnion,
~ ."--~ .. .. .
_
..~..~ ,.-~ -...-..'_.... _.. .'.~...-
~ . ..--' ..-
~..'.~--
~ . ' : " - '.. . .~':. :'...-affiliated to the International Union of Railways, would permit. ~a8ter
. ... '.",,,,:
---progress tow~rds solution of the problems raised and of the difficulties to
1" . . ,.~• ': - .' .. : L··t ' • •j - . . •
be, expected ..
. i" •. ... :~~# .~:: . :•
; 1 .t,.I. "}I ." • .:.:
I oj
.
'"(- I I ' •:.
....
..
\:
~. I
•
" '.:". r , ,
...
, ,.'." .:~,.'
\
I I t"'" .. I '
,, .~ ., .~'.'...",... • ,:aI ' :'.
i t : . ;. ' J ' ..1J~~-~:~· '1, . ~ ,\ r
- r:, --/ 4,
•• ,' .: .j'
E/CN·~.,[4/TRm$/11 . \',,,:.~'
Annex II . - .,;,·.\':f.~:;,
ANN3X I I