[Acheret al., 2011] Mathieu Acher, Anthony Cleve, Philippe Collet, Philippe Merle, Laurence Duchien, et Philippe Lahire. Reverse engineering architectural feature models. In5th European Conference on Software Architecture, éditeurs Ivica Crnkovic, Volker Gruhn, et Matthias Book, vol-ume 6903 deLNCS, pages 220–235, Essen, Germany, September 2011. Springer.
[Ajila et Kaba, 2004] Samuel Ajila et Badara Ali Kaba. Using traceability mechanisms to support soft-ware product line evolution. InIRI, pages 157–162. IEEE Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Society, 2004.
[Al-Msie’Deenet al., 2013] Ra’Fat Al-Msie’Deen, Abdelhak Seriai, Marianne Huchard, Christelle Ur-tado, Sylvain Vauttier, et Hamzeh Eyal Salman. Mining features from the object-oriented source code of a collection of software variants using formal concept analysis and latent semantic index-ing. In The 25th International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, page 8. Knowledge Systems Institute Graduate School, 2013.
[Aliet al., 2011] Nasir Ali, Yann-Gaë andl Gueheneuc, et Giuliano Antoniol. Requirements traceability for object oriented systems by partitioning source code. In18th Working Conf. on Reverse Engineer-ing, pages 45–54. IEEE Computer Society, 2011.
[Allieret al., 2011] Simon Allier, Salah Sadou, Houari Sahraoui, et Regis Fleurquin. From object-oriented applications to component-object-oriented applications via component-object-oriented architecture.
InProceedings of the 2011 Ninth Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture, WICSA
’11, pages 214–223, 2011.
[Anquetilet al., 2010] Nicolas Anquetil, Uirá Kulesza, Ralf Mitschke, Ana Moreira, Jean-Claude Royer, Andreas Rummler, et André Sousa. A model-driven traceability framework for software product lines.Softw. Syst. l., 9(4):427–451, 2010.
[Antoniolet al., 2000] Giuliano Antoniol, Gerardo Canfora, Gerardo Casazza, et Andrea De Lucia.
Identifying the starting impact set of a maintenance request: A case study. InCSMR, pages 227–230, 2000.
[Antoniolet al., 2002] Giuliano Antoniol, Gerardo Canfora, Gerardo Casazza, Andrea De Lucia, et Et-tore Merlo. Recovering traceability links between code and documentation. IEEE Trans. Softw.
Eng., 28(10):970–983, Octobre 2002.
181
182 Bibliography
[Apelet al., 2011] Sven Apel, Hendrik Speidel, Philipp Wendler, Alexander von Rhein, et Dirk Beyer.
Detection of feature interactions using feature-aware verification. ASE ’11, pages 372–375, Wash-ington, DC, USA, 2011.
[Apel et Beyer, 2011] Sven Apel et Dirk Beyer. Feature cohesion in software product lines: an ex-ploratory study. InProceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE
’11, pages 421–430, New York, NY, USA, 2011.
[Apiwattanaponget al., 2005] Taweesup Apiwattanapong, Alessandro Orso, et Mary Jean Harrold. Ef-ficient and precise dynamic impact analysis using execute-after sequences. InProceedings of the 27th International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE ’05, pages 432–441, New York, NY, USA, 2005.
[Arnold, 1996] Robert S. Arnold.Software Change Impact Analysis. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, 1996.
[Asadiet al., 2010] Fatemeh Asadi, Massimiliano Penta, Giuliano Antoniol, et Yann-Gael Gueheneuc.
A heuristic-based approach to identify concepts in execution traces. InProceedings of the 2010 14th European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering, CSMR ’10, pages 31–40, Washington, DC, USA, 2010.
[Azmehet al., 2011] Zeina Azmeh, Fady Hamoui, Marianne Huchard, Nizar Messai, Chouki Tiberma-cine, Christelle Urtado, et Sylvain Vauttier. Backing composite web services using formal concept analysis. InProceedings of the 9th international conference on Formal concept analysis, ICFCA’11, pages 26–41, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011.
[Bachmann et Bass, 2001] Felix Bachmann et Len Bass. Managing variability in software architec-tures. SSR ’01, pages 126–132, New York, NY, USA, 2001. ACM.
[Badriet al., 2005] Linda Badri, Mourad Badri, et Daniel St-Yves. Supporting predictive change im-pact analysis: A control call graph based technique. InProceedings of the 12th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference, APSEC ’05, pages 167–175, Washington, DC, USA, 2005.
[Baeza-Yates et Ribeiro-Neto, 1999] Ricardo A. Baeza-Yates et Berthier Ribeiro-Neto. Modern Infor-mation Retrieval. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, USA, 1999.
[Batoryet al., 2003] Don Batory, Jia Liu, et Jacob Neal Sarvela. Refinements and multi-dimensional separation of concerns. InProceedings of the 9th European Software Engineering Conference Held Jointly with 11th ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering, ESEC/FSE-11, pages 48–57, New York, NY, USA, 2003.
[Batory, 2005] Don Batory. Feature models, grammars, and propositional formulas. InProceedings of the 9th International Conference on Software Product Lines, SPLC’05, pages 7–20, Berlin, Heidel-berg, 2005.
[Benavideset al., 2010] David Benavides, Sergio Segura, et Antonio Ruiz-Cortés. Automated analysis of feature models 20 years later: A literature review.Inf. Syst., 35(6):615–636, 2010.
Bibliography 183
[Bergrothet al., 2000] Lasse Bergroth, Harri Hakonen, et Timo Raita. A survey of longest common subsequence algorithms. InSPIRE, pages 39–48, 2000.
[Berryet al., 2014] Anne Berry, Alain Gutierrez, Marianne Huchard, Amedeo Napoli, et Alain Sigayret.
Hermes: a simple and efficient algorithm for building the aoc-poset of a binary relation.Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, pages 1–27, 2014.
[Beszédeset al., 2007] Árpád Beszédes, Tamás Gergely, Szabolcs Farago, Tibor Gyimóthy, et Ferenc Fischer. The dynamic function coupling metric and its use in software evolution. InCSMR, pages 103–112. IEEE Computer Society, 2007.
[Bhattiet al., 2012] Muhammad Usman Bhatti, Nicolas Anquetil, Marianne Huchard, et Stéphane Ducasse. A catalog of patterns for concept lattice interpretation in software reengineering. In SEKE, pages 118–123. Knowledge Systems Institute Graduate School, 2012.
[Bieman et Kang, 1995] James M. Bieman et Byung-Kyoo Kang. Cohesion and reuse in an object-oriented system. InProceedings of the 1995 Symposium on Software Reusability, SSR ’95, pages 259–262, New York, NY, USA, 1995.
[Biggerstaffet al., 1993] Ted J. Biggerstaff, Bharat G. Mitbander, et Dallas Webster. The concept as-signment problem in program understanding. InProceedings of the 15th International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE ’93, pages 482–498, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, 1993.
[bin Abid, 2009] Saad bin Abid. Resolving traceability issues in product derivation for software prod-uct lines. InICSOFT (1), pages 99–104. INSTICC Press, 2009.
[Binkley et Harman, 2005] David Binkley et Mark Harman. Locating dependence clusters and de-pendence pollution. InProceedings of the 21st IEEE International Conference on Software Mainte-nance., ICSM’05, pages 177–186, Sept 2005.
[Bixinet al., 2012] Li Bixin, Sun Xiaobing, Leung Hareton, et Zhang Sai. A survey of code-based change impact analysis techniques. Insoftware testing, verification and reliability. Wiley Online Library, 2012.
[Black, 2001] Sue Black. Computing ripple effect for software maintenance. Journal of Software Maintenance, 13(4):263–279, 2001.
[Blancet al., 2008] Xavier Blanc, Isabelle Mounier, Alix Mougenot, et Tom Mens. Detecting model in-consistency through operation-based model construction. InProceedings of the 30th international conference on Software engineering, ICSE ’08, pages 511–520, New York, NY, USA, 2008.
[Bo Yu, 2004] Ali Mili Bo Yu. Requirements change impact in software architecture. WSEAS’04, pages 1–6, Miami, Florida, USA, 2004.
[Bogdanet al., 2013] Dit Bogdan, Revelle Meghan, Gethers Malcom, et Poshyvanyk Denys. Feature location in source code: a taxonomy and survey. Journal of Evolution and Process, 25(1):53–95, 2013.