HAL Id: jpa-00208258
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00208258
Submitted on 1 Jan 1975
HAL
is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire
HAL, estdestinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
Crystal fields and magnetic properties of NdSn3, NdPb 3 and Ndin3
P. Lethuillier, J. Pierre, K. Knorr, W. Drexel
To cite this version:
P. Lethuillier, J. Pierre, K. Knorr, W. Drexel. Crystal fields and magnetic properties of NdSn3, NdPb 3 and Ndin3. Journal de Physique, 1975, 36 (4), pp.329-333. �10.1051/jphys:01975003604032900�.
�jpa-00208258�
CRYSTAL FIELDS AND MAGNETIC PROPERTIES OF NdSn3, NdPb3 AND Ndin3 (*)
P. LETHUILLIER and J. PIERRE
Laboratoire de
Magnétisme, C.N.R.S.,
BP166,
38042Grenoble, Cedex,
France andK. KNORR
(**)
and W. DREXEL Institut Max-vonLaüe-Paul-Langevin,
BP
156,
38042Grenoble, Cedex,
France(Reçu
le 9 décembre1974, accepté
le 23 décembre1974)
Résumé. 2014 Nous avons réalisé des expériences de diffusion inélastique des neutrons sur les composés intermétalliques
NdPb3
et NdSn3. Nous avons observé des transitions bien résolues entre niveaux de champ cristallin à différentes températures. Deux schémas de champ cristallinsont possibles pour chaque composé. Des mesures magnétiques et des
expériences
de diffractionneutronique permettent de lever cette indétermination. Les paramètres de champ cristallin obtenus diffèrent beaucoup des
prévisions
d’un modèle de chargesponctuelles.
Abstract. 2014 Inelastic neutron scattering experiments have been performed on the intermetallic
compounds NdPb3
and NdSn3. Well resolved transitions between crystal field levels were observed at different temperatures and for each compound, two level schemes were possible. Magnetic measure-ments and elastic neutron scattering experiments were performed to remove this uncertainty. The
experimental
crystal field parameters deviate considerably frompoint charge
estimates.Classification Physics Abstracts 8.524 - 8.537 - 8.512
1. Introduction. - The cubic
compounds RX3
withCU3Au
structure between rare earths(R)
and different metals(X)
such asIn,
Sn and Pb have been studied from differentpoints
of view :magnetic
structure,crystalline field, superconducting properties
and elec-tronic structure. In
particular,
a great deal of work has been spent to determine thecrystalline
electricfield
(CEF)
levels : the direction and the values of the ordered moments have been determined in theRIn3 [1-3]
and theRSn3 [3] compounds. Schottky
anomalies have been observed and
analyzed
inspecific
heat measurements onCeln3, Prln3 [4]
and
Lao.9Pro.1Pb3 [5]. Susceptibility
studies have led to the determination of theground
state levelsin
praseodymium compounds [6, 7].
However,
the moststraightforward
method todetermine the level scheme is inelastic neutron
scattering.
We have thus undertakenexperiments
on the two
neodymium compounds, NdSn3
andNdPb3,
which werecomplemented by magnetization
measurements in
pulsed fields, susceptibility
andmagnetic
structure determinations. All theseexperi-
ments were
performed
withpolycrystalline samples.
(*) This work is part of the thesis of P. Lethuillier.
(**) Present address : Physikalisches Institut, Frankfurt/M, Germany.
2. Neutron
spectroscopy.
- In cubic symmetry, the J =2 multiplet
of the Nd3+ ion issplit
intoone doublet
r6
and two quartetsT8(1)
andT8(2).
The level scheme can be described
by
two CEF-parameters A4 r 4 >
andA6 r6 >
orequivalently, following Lea,
Leask and Wolf[8],
W and x. Thetransition
probabilities
aregiven by Birgeneau [9].
Inelastic neutron
scattering
is a very direct method for the determination ofcrystal
field levels.Magnetic dipole
transitions betweencrystal
field levels occurwith
matching
neutron energy transfers. Theresulting peaks
in the neutron energy spectrum are propor- tional to the square of themagnetic dipole
matrixelements and to the thermal
population
of the initial CEF-level.The inelastic neutron
scattering experiments
wereperformed
on the statisticalchopper
time offlight
spectrometer IN 7 of the Institut
Laüe-Langevin
at Grenoble. An array of 10 detectors was located at
scattering angles
between 150 and 200. Several incident neutronenergies
wereused,
from 10 meVup to 56 meV. The
samples weighed
about 100 g ;a
typical counting
time was oneday.
The resolutionof the instrument was seven time of
flight
channels(full
width at halfmaximum).
All spectra were domi- natedby
the elastic line. The error bars were estimated from the scatter of datapoints
betweenpeaks.
NeutronArticle published online by EDP Sciences and available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/jphys:01975003604032900
330
detected in channels to the left of the elastic
peak gained
energyby
the de-excitation of upper states,neutrons
inducing upward
transitions were counted in channels on theright
hand side.The first measurement was taken on
NdPb3
at6,5 K with incident neutrons of 56 meV. A
peak at
10 to 11 meV
appeared
on the neutron energy loss side(Fig. 1).
A measurement onLaPb3
at 80 K butotherwise under the same conditions did not show any structure other than the elastic line. Thus we
explain
thepeak
observed forNdPb3
as a transitionfrom the
ground
state to an excited state at about11 meV. The second spectrum was measured at 120 K in order to observe new transitions from this excited level
(Fig. 1).
Theoriginal peak
waschanged
into a shoulder
indicating
a new, not yetresolved,
transition in the energy range from about 4 to 9 meV.Fm. 1. - Neutron time of flight spectra of NdPb3 at 6.5 and 120 K.
The incident energy is E. = 56.0 meV.
A
corresponding
shoulderappeared
on the de-excita- tionside,
too. Since this new transition was absent at 6K,
it must connect the two excited CEF levels ofNd3+.
To increase the resolution and to ascertain thetransition,
a third spectrum was measured at 51 K with the incident neutron energy lowered to 40.0 meV(Fig. 2a).
The two transitions were nowFIG. 2. - Neutron time of flight spectra. The incident energy is Eo = 40.0 meV. a) NdPb3 : T = 51 K. b) NdSn3 : T = 10 K.
c) NdSn3 : T = 51 K.
resolved,
withenergies
of(10.6
±0.2)
meV and(7.6
±0.2)
meV. Ahint
of the reverse transitions canbe seen on the de-excitation side of the spectrum.
The fact that the 7.6 meV transition was
already
visible at 51 K where the level at 10.6 meV is still not
substantially populated
demands a sequence of levels as follows :We searched for the transition between the
ground
state and the first excited level at 3.0 meV. A spectrum taken at low
temperature
with an incident energy of 14.0 meV did not show more than aslight
indicationof a
peak
around 3 meV. One has to conclude that theprobability
for this third transition issignificantly
lower than for the other two.
Refering
to the level schemegiven
in ref.[8]
forNd3+,
one finds that five sets of CEF parameterscan
reproduce
the observedsplitting, namely :
The decision between these cases has to be based on
the transition
probabilities [9]. Quite clearly,
thesolutions
c) d) e)
can be ruled out becausethey
demand a very intense transition at 3 meV. The distinction between case
a)
andb)
is more difficult.The situation is best described
by
a calculation of the theoretical spectra[13, 14]
for both cases(Fig. 3).
Both spectra fit the
experimental
results within the statistical error. There is a smallpreference
for casea),
where the
ground
state is ther 6
doublet.FIG. 3. - Theoretical spectra of NdPb3 and NdSn3 at 51 K, with Eo = 40.0 meV.
The results on
NdSn3
are very similar and theinterpretation
follows the same scheme. At 10K,
an excitation
peak
at 10.2 meV can be observed(Fig. 2b).
At 51K,
a broad maximumranging
from 7to 12 meV is visible
(Fig. 2c).
It isexplained by
asecond transition at 8.2 meV of about the same
intensity as
the first one. We conclude that the sequence of levels is 0meV, (10.2 - 8.2)
= 2meV,
10.2 meV.The transition at 2.0 meV could not be detected.
These results exclude all but two sets of CEF para- meters,
namely x = 0.24,
W = 0.123 meV andx = 0.48,
W = 0.166meV,
whichagain
fit theexperimental
data with about the samequality (Fig. 3b).
For bothcompounds,
thequestion
remainsas to whether the sequence of levels is
r 6’ T8(1), rà2)
or
râ1), r 6’ râ2).
In order to remove thisuncertainty,
we
performed magnetic
measurements and elastic neutron diffraction studies.3.
Magnetic susceptibility (Fig. 4).
- We havestudied the
magnetic susceptibility
of thesecompounds using
a translation balance in amagnetic
field of7
kOe,
over the temperature range from 1.6 K to 300 K. Above 50K,
a Curie-Weiss behaviour is observed for bothcompounds,
the effective momentsFIG. 4. - Reciprocal susceptibility versus temperature for NdSn3
and NdPb3. The continuous curves have been calculated for respec-
tively : W = 1.43 ; x = 0.24 and W = 1.26 ; x = 0.13.
are in close agreement with that of the free
tripositive
Nd ion.
NdSn3
shows a maximum of the suscep-tibility
at 4.6K,
ingood
agreement with Tsuchida and Wallace[10], indicating
the onset of antiferro-magnetism ;
thiscompound
shows a minimum of thesusceptibility
at 3 K. Below 50K,
in theparamagnetic domain,
thesusceptibility
x deviatesslightly
fromCurie-Weiss behaviour.
NdPb3
orders antiferroma-gnetically
at 2.6 K and as forNdSn3,
x deviatesslightly
from a Curie-Weiss behaviour at low tempe-rature. We have calculated the
crystal
fieldsuscepti- bility
for the threecrystallographic ’axes 100 j, 111 >, 110 >
and found itweakly anisotropic.
For both
compounds,
the agreement between the calculated and measured values of thesusceptibility
is
good
for the different sets of W and x : it isslightly
better when
r 6
is the lowest level.332
4. Elastic neutron diffraction. - In a
previous study,
we had
performed
a neutron diffractionexperiment
on
NdSn3 [3].
Themagnetic
cell was foundquadratic (a,
a, 2a)
and themagnetic
moment, which is in the basalplane,
reaches 1.5 +0.311B
at 1.3 K. Weperformed
similar work onNdPb3
at the reactorSiloe
(Neutron
DiffractionLaboratory, C.E.N.,
Gre-noble).
Thiscompound
has the samemagnetic
struc-ture as
NdSn3
and themagnetic
moment reaches1.4 ±
0.411B
at 1.3 K[11].
In order to account for these neutron diffractionresults,
we have calculated themagnetic
moment at 1.3 K. For this purpose wediagonalize
the Hamiltonianwhere the
exchange
fieldHm
is taken fromJz)
is the thermal average of themagnetization
and C is the Curie constant at low temperature. The
magnetization
andground
state energy are foundby
a self-consistent method. The
anisotropy
energy between theprincipal
axes is weak(AE
1K)
forthe different sets of W and x. For
NdSn3,
the solutionW = 0.123 meV
(1.43 K),
x = 0.24(r6 lowest) gives
a moment Il =1.62,u,
close to theexperimental
value
(1.5
± 0.3I1B).
The other solution will lead to a moment Il = 2.47 IUB-For
NdPb3,
Ilexp = 1.4 +0.4’UB.
The solution W = 0.109 meV(1.26 K),
x = 0.13(r6 lowest) gives
a moment p =1.39 ,uB.
The other solutiongives
a moment Il =2.26 y/a. Quite clearly,
for bothcompounds,
ther 6
level is lowest and the CEFparameters
are : forNdSn3 : W
= 1.43K ;
x = 0.24 and forNdPb3 : W
= 1.26K ; x
= 0.13 .We
give
the level scheme infigure
5.5.
Magnetization
measurements(Fig. 6).
-Finally, experiments
on the threecompounds NdIn3, NdPb3
and
NdSn3
wereperformed
at 1.35 K inpulsed
fieldsup to 260 kOe in order to overcome the antiferroma-
gnetic exchange
field andalign
the moments. Thesamples
arepowders,
and theeddy
currents do notsignificantly perturb
the measurements. The magne- tization ofNdln3
increasesslowly
andlinearly
above160
kOe,
where its value is about 1.55 ,uB, close to the moment of ther 6
level. Themagnetization
ofNdPb3
andNdSn3
do not saturate. For the threecompounds,
themagnetization
in thehighest
fieldis below
2,uB,
far from the free ion value(gJ
=3.27 IUB)’
This is in
qualitative
agreement with the behaviour of ar 6 ground
level in a field.FIG. 5. - Crystal field level scheme for NdSn3 and NdPb3’
FIG. 6. - Magnetization curves of Ndln3, NdSn3 and NdPb3.
6. Discussion. - In the
following,
we willanalyze
the CEF parameters for these
neodymium compounds.
In the two isoelectronic
compounds NdSn3
andNdPb3,
the two parametersA2 r4 )
andAg ( r6 ) keep
the samenegative sign (Table I).
In apoint charge model,
where all theneighbouring
atomsare taken into account, the CEF parameters can be written as :
TABLE 1
CEF parameters determined
experimentally
If we first
analyze
the fourth order termalone,
theexperimental
values lead to a small ornegative charge
on Sn or
Pb,
if we assume a trivalent rare earth ion(Table II).
This is in agreement with theassumptions
of Bucher et al.
[12]
whoanalyze
the effectivecharges
in relation to
electronegativity. However,
with suchcharges,
the calculated sixth order term is smaller than observedby
one order ofmagnitude.
Thisexcessive value of the sixth order term has been
TABLE II
CEF parameters Ag r4 ), Ag r6 ) (K)
calculatedfor NdSn3 from a point charge model, assuming
trivalentneodymium
andgiven charges ZM for
theSn atoms.
observed in a number of intermetallic
compounds :
in the cubic Laves
phases TbAl2
andNdAl2
com-pounds [13],
in the cubic CsCItype phases
betweenHo and Er and the different metals
Cu, Ag,
Zn andRh
[14, 15]
and in the cubicAuCu3 type TmAl3 compound [16].
In all thesecompounds,
apoint charge model,
where the rare earth has apositive charge
and thealloyed
metal has nocharge, gives
the correct
sign
forA2 ,4)
andAg r6 )
but thecalculated order of
magnitude
forAg ,6 )
is thengenerally
much smaller than theexperimental
value.Dixon and
Dupree [17, 18] analyze
the resultsobtained
by
Williams et al.[19]
in solid solutions ofheavy
rare earths in a f.c.c. matrix(Ag, Au) by taking
into account the d- and f-like character of the conduc- tion electrons. In the
LaSn3 compound,
band calcula- tions[20, 21]
have shown that conduction electrons have alarge
d character in thevicinity
of the Fermilevel. It is
possible
that the influence of the d-electronsaspherical
distribution mayexplain
thenegative sign
ofA04 r4 >
encountered inNdSn3
andNdPb3 ;
the
large
value ofA06 ,6 )
may then arise from anexchange-type
interaction with the conduction band.A
peculiar
case is that of somecompounds
withpraseodymium :
inPrln3 [6], PrSn3
andPrPb3 [7],
the fourth order term is
positive;
on the contrary,a
study
of themagnetic properties
of theRIn3
com-pounds
withheavy
rare earths[22]
has shownthat,
most
probably,
theA04 ( r4 >
parameter isnegative,
as in
NdPb3
andNdSn3.
The case ofNdln3
is stilluncertain and must await a new determination.
References
[1] ARNOLD, G. and NERESON, N., J. Chem. Phys. 51 (1969) 1495.
[2] NERESON, N. and ARNOLD, G., J. Chem. Phys. 53 (1970) 2818.
[3] LETHUILLIER, P., PIERRE, J., FILLION, G. and BARBARA, B., Phys. Stat. Sol. (a) 15 (1973) 613.
[4] VAN DIEPEN, A. M., CRAIG, R. S. and WALLACE, W. E., J. Phys.
& Chem. Solids 32 (1971) 1867.
[5] BUCHER, E., ANDRES, K., MAITA, J. P. and HULL, G. W., Jr., Helv. Phys. Acta 41 (1968) 723.
[6] BUSCHOW, K. H. J., DE WIJN, H. W., VAN DIEPEN, A. M., J. Chem. Phys. 50 (1969) 137.
[7] LETHUILLIER, P., CHAUSSY, J., To be published.
[8] LEA, K. R., LEASK, M. J. M. and WOLF, W. P., J. Phys. & Chem.
Solids 23 (1962) 1381.
[9] BIRGENEAU, R. J., J. Phys. & Chem. Solids 33 (1972) 59.
[10] TSUCHIDA, T. and WALLACE, W. E., J. Chem. Phys. 43 (1969)
3811.
[11] LETHUILLIER, P., To be published.
[12] BUCHER, E. and MAITA, J. P., Solid State Commun. 13 (1973) 215.
[13] BARBARA, B., ROSSIGNOL, M. F., PURWINS, H. G. and WALKER, E., Phys. Stat. Sol. 22 (1974) 553.
[14] MORIN, P., PIERRE, J., ROSSAT-MIGNOD, J., KNORR, K. and DREXEL, W., Phys. Rev. B 9 (1974) 4932.
[15] CHAMARD-BOIS, R., ROSSAT-MIGNOD, J., KNORR, K. and DREXEL, W., Solid State Commun. 13 (1973) 1549.
[16] DE WIJN, H. W., VAN DIEPEN, A. M. and BUSCHOW, K. H. J., Phys. Rev. B 1 (1970) 4203.
[17] DIXON, J. M., Solid State Commun. 12 (1973) 789.
[18] DIXON, J. M. and DUPREE, R., J. Phys. F 3 (1973) 118.
[19] WILLIAMS, G. and HIRST, L. L., Phys. Rev. B 185 (1969) 407.
[20] GRAY, D. M., MEISEL, L. V., Phys. Rev. B 5 (1972) 1299.
[21] FREEMAN, A. J., KOEHLING, D. D., J. Physique Colloq. 33 (1972) C 3-57.
[22] LETHUILLIER, P., Thesis, University of Grenoble, 1972, unpu- blished.