• Aucun résultat trouvé

Quality criteria of measurements based on counts

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Quality criteria of measurements based on counts"

Copied!
20
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

ITMF, ICCTM

Stickiness Working group

Quality criteria of measurements

based on counts

Bremen, April 1, 2008

Gozé E., Gourlot J.-P., Lassus S., Frydrych R.

Annual cropping systems research unit, CIRAD

(2)

Quality criterion of measurements

based on counts

Useful measurement must be

1 correlated to practical properties of the

analyzed material

2 reproducible

Measurements are variable

Variability => risk in decisions

need of criteria to measure variability : e.g. CV=5%

Is a single figure of standard deviation or a CV useful

for count data? Is a 5% CV a good benchmark ?

(3)

Outline

• Variability of some defects measurements

on yarn and fiber

• Known probability distributions as

theoretical landmarks

• Some practical recommendations to

evaluate precision + discussion

(4)

• Variability of some defects measurements

on yarn and fiber

• Known probability distributions as

theoretical landmarks

• Some practical recommendations to

evaluate precision + discussion

(5)

200% Neps on yarn

5 s a m p l e s o f 2 0 0 m p e r y a r n S t a n d a r d D e v i a t i o n 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 1 2 M e a n 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 6 0 7 0 8 0 (Cirad laboratory)

(6)

200% Neps on yarn

5 s a m p l e s o f 2 0 0 m p e r y a r n C V ( % ) 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 M e a n 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 6 0 7 0 8 0 (Cirad laboratory)

(7)

200% Neps on yarn

5 s a m p l e s o f 2 0 0 m p e r y a r n L o g N ( 1 + V a r i a n c e ) 2 3 4 5 L o g N ( 1 + M e a n ) 2 . 6 2 . 8 3 . 0 3 . 2 3 . 4 3 . 6 3 . 8 4 . 0 4 . 2 4 . 4 (Cirad laboratory)

(8)

200% Neps on yarn

5 s a m p l e s o f 2 0 0 m p e r y a r n L o g N ( 1 + V a r i a n c e ) 2 3 4 5 L o g N ( 1 + M e a n ) 2 . 6 2 . 8 3 . 0 3 . 2 3 . 4 3 . 6 3 . 8 4 . 0 4 . 2 4 . 4 (Cirad laboratory)

Poisson distribution :

Variance=mean

(9)

Afis n ASTM D 5866

r e p e a t a b i l i t y w i t h i n l a b o r a t o r i e s C V ( % ) 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 6 0 M e a n 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 4 0 0 5 0 0 6 0 0 7 0 0 8 0 0 9 0 0

(10)

Afis n ASTM D 5866

r e p e a t a b i l i t y w i t h i n l a b o r a t o r i e s L o g N ( 1 + V a r i a n c e ) 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 L o g N ( 1 + M e a n ) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Variance

mean

Overdispersion =

≈ Log(overdispersion)

(11)

Trash count

( C i r a d l a b o r a t o r y ) L o g N ( 1 + V a r i a n c e ) 1 2 3 4 5 6 L o g N ( 1 + M e a n ) 1 2 3 4

(12)

• Variability of some defects measurements

on yarn and fiber

• Known probability distributions as

theoretical landmarks

• Some practical recommandations to

evaluate precision + discussion

(13)

Landmark probability distributions

• Independently located defects in a homogeneous material

Poisson distribution

σ² = µ

• Patchy located defects in a homogeneous material

Neyman type A distribution

σ² = µ(1+φ)

• Independantly located defects in an heterogeneous material :

density varies randomly : compound distribution

‰

Log-normal density :

Poisson-lognormal distribution σ² = µ ø

‰

Gamma density

(14)

• Variability of some defects measurements

on yarn and fiber

• Known probability distributions as

theoretical landmarks

• Some practical recommandations to

evaluate precision + discussion

(15)

• Distributions are only landmarks

• Addition of multiple effects : operator,

laboratory, calibration yields a more

complex compound distribution

• Any of the observed mean-to-variance

relationships could be fitted with an

overdispersed negative binomial, where

σ²/µ = ø (1+µ/k)

(16)

Mean-to-variance relationship summary

i n s t r _ p r e p A F I S - n r e p e a t A F I S - n r e p r o d H 2 S D m i x e d T r a s h m r e p e a t Y a r n - N e p r e p e a t o v e r d i s p e r s i o n 1 2 3 4 m e a n 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 6 0 7 0 8 0 9 0 1 0 0

(17)

Mean-to-variance relationship summary

i n s t r _ p r e p A F I S - n r e p e a t A F I S - n r e p r o d H 2 S D m i x e d T r a s h m r e p e a t Y a r n - N e p r e p e a t c v 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 6 0 7 0 8 0 9 0 m e a n 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 6 0 7 0 8 0 9 0 1 0 0

(18)

Mean-to-variance relationship summary

i n s t r _ p r e p A F I S - n r e p e a t A F I S - n r e p r o d H 2 S D m i x e d T r a s h m r e p e a t Y a r n - N e p r e p e a t s t d e v 0 2 4 6 8 1 0 1 2 1 4 1 6 1 8 2 0 m e a n 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 6 0 7 0 8 0 9 0 1 0 0

(19)

Mean-to-variance relationship summary

i n s t r _ p r e p A F I S - n r e p e a t A F I S - n r e p r o d H 2 S D m i x e d T r a s h m r e p e a t Y a r n - N e p r e p e a t s t d e v 0 2 4 6 8 1 0 1 2 1 4 1 6 1 8 2 0 m e a n 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 6 0 7 0 8 0 9 0 1 0 0

(20)

Trash area

( C i r a d l a b o r a t o r y ) L o g N ( 1 + V a r i a n c e ) 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 1 0 . 0 2 0 . 0 3 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 5 0 . 0 6 0 . 0 7 0 . 0 8 0 . 0 9 0 . 1 0 0 . 1 1 0 . 1 2 0 . 1 3 0 . 1 4 0 . 1 5 L o g N ( 1 + M e a n ) 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 5 0 . 1 0 0 . 1 5 0 . 2 0 0 . 2 5 0 . 3 0 0 . 3 5 0 . 4 0

Références

Documents relatifs

The standard method of bi-directional best hit (BDBH) was used to predict orthologous genes between two gen- omes and proteic sequence alignments were obtained using the

the expected values of the number of crashes over a one-year period at these sites — are Gamma distributed (A 1 and n 1 are estimates of the shape parameter and scale parameter

• Variability of some defects counts on yarn and fiber : evidence and characterization of a mean to variance relationship.. • How to analyze calibration and round test

If the distribution of r conditional on   (and their past) were multivariate normal, with a linear mean a + b  and a constant covariance matrix Ω, then OLS

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des

GUILLEMIN, The spectrum of positive elliptic operators and periodic bicharacteristics, Invent. STERNBERG, The metaplectic représentation, Weyl operators and spectral

We illustrate the usefulness of our geometric representation of multi-periods optimal policies and mean variance frontiers by discussing specific issued related to AL portfolios:

For general models, methods are based on various numerical approximations of the likelihood (Picchini et al. For what concerns the exact likelihood approach or explicit