A NNALES DE L ’I. H. P., SECTION A
F. G ESZTESY
H. G ROSSE B. T HALLER
A rigorous approach to relativistic corrections of bound state energies for spin-1/2 particles
Annales de l’I. H. P., section A, tome 40, n
o2 (1984), p. 159-174
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=AIHPA_1984__40_2_159_0>
© Gauthier-Villars, 1984, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Annales de l’I. H. P., section A » implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.
org/conditions). Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
159
A rigorous approach to relativistic corrections of bound state energies for spin-1/2 particles
F. GESZTESY
H. GROSSE B. THALLER
Institut fur Theoretische Physik, Universitat Graz, A-8010 Graz, Austria
Institut fur Theoretische Physik,
Universitat Wien A-1090 Wien, Austria
Institut fur Theoretische Physik
Universitat Graz, A-8010 Graz, Austria
Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré,
Vol. 40, n° 2, 1984, Physique e théorique ’
ABSTRACT. - Under
fairly general
conditions on the interactions weprove
holomorphy
of the Dirac resolvent around its nonrelativistic limit.As a consequence,
perturbation theory
in terms of resolvents(instead
ofHamiltonians) yields holomorphy
of Diraceigenvalues
andeigenfunc-
tions with respect to
c-1
and a new method ofcalculating
relativistic cor-rections to bound state
energies.
Due to a formulation in an abstractsetting
our method isapplicable
in many different concrete situations.In
particular
ourapproach
covers the case of the relativistichydrogen
atom in external
electromagnetic
fields.RESUME. - Sous des
hypotheses
assezgenerales
sur lesinteractions,
on demontre
l’holomorphie
de la resolvante del’opérateur
de Dirac auvoisinage
de sa limite non relativiste. Enconsequence,
la theorie desperturbations
en termes des resolvantes(au
lieu deshamiltoniens),
fournitl’holomorphie
par rapport a c-1 des valeurs propres et des fonctions propres del’opérateur
deDirac,
et une nouvelle methode de calcul des corrections relativistes auxenergies
de liaison. Grace a sa formulation dans un cadre(*) Supported by Fonds zur Forderung der wissenschaftlichen Forschung in Oesterreich, project no. 4778.
l’Institut Poincaré - Physique theorique - Vol. 40, 0246-0211 84/02/ 159/ 16/$ 3,60 cg Gauthier-Villars
160 F. GESZTESY, H. GROSSE AND B. THALLER
abstrait, notre met 0 e
s’applique
a ungrand
nombre de situations concretes differentes. Enparticulier
elle couvre Ie cas de l’atomed’hydro- gene
relativiste dans deschamps electromagnetiques
externes.1. INTRODUCTION
The aim of this paper is to discuss the
family
of abstract Dirac opera-tors
H(c), ce[RB{0}, (cf.
eq.(2.10))
in aneighbourhood
ofc -1 -
0. Inapplications
c is thevelocity
oflight
andH(c)
describes the behaviour ofspin-1/2 particles
in externalelectromagnetic
fields. There exist formal schemestrying
toexpand
the concrete Dirac operatorHD(c) (eq. (3.15))
into powers of and
showing
that the nonrelativistic limit c -1 - 0 isformally given by
the Pauli operatorH ~ (cf.
eq.(3.16)) [4] ] [7~].
Inspite
of the fact that
HD( c)
as a function of c-1 is notholomorphic
aroundc-1=
0one has obtained relativistic
perturbations ofHin
form of a power series inc - 2.
These corrections are,however,
verysingular. Adding
the c - 2-perturbation already destroys
allspectral properties
ofHoo,
lower semi- boundedness turns into uppersemiboundedness,
and the discreteeigen-
values dissolve into a continuous spectrum in the interval
(201400, mc2/2 ].
Higher
order corrections make the situation even worse.Nevertheless,
the results on the relativistic corrections of the
eigenvalues
calculatedby
means of
formally applied perturbation theory
can beinterpreted
in termsof
spectral
concentration[5] [6] ] and yield
reasonable numerical results[7.? ].
This
approach
is notquite satisfactory
for thefollowing
reasons :i )
It seems to be difficult if notimpossible
tojustify
the formal mani-pulations
of[~],
andii)
it is well-known that the Dirac operator e. g. in thehydrogen
case haseigenvalues
which areholomorphic
functions with respect toc - 2. Therefore,
since bound states are turned into resonances, the addition of relativistic «perturbations »
toH ~ qualitatively
does notreproduce
the actualproperties
of the Dirac operatorHD(c).
In the
following
we present an alternative method ofinvestigating
thedependence
ofeigenvalues
andeigenfunctions of H(c)
on the parameter c-1.Our
approach
is based on an extension of the results of Veselic[2~] and
Hunziker
[77] ] concerning
theholomorphy
of the Dirac resolvent(H(c) - mc2 -
with respect to under certain conditions on the external fields. In section 2 we proveholomorphy
of the Dirac resolvent and of relatedquantities
for a wide class of interactionsincluding
e. g.Coulomb-like
potentials.
It turns out that the Dirac resolvent converges in norm to the Pauli resolvent times aprojector (cf.
eq.(2 .17)).
Afterderiving
the
explicit expansion
of the Dirac resolvent around its non-relativisticde l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique theorique
RELATIVISTIC CORRECTIONS OF BOUND STATE ENERGIES 161
limit and
reformulating perturbation theory
in terms of resolvents we are able to obtain relativistic correction formulas(2.30), (2.32)
for theeigenvalues
of the Pauli operator. We conclude section 2by sketching
the derivation of estimates on the convergence radius of the
expansion
of the resolvent into powers of
c -1.
Since all calculations of section 2 are
performed
in the abstract repre- sentation introduced in refs.[11] ] [2] ]
our results areapplicable
for agreat
variety
of situationsincluding
Dirac operators over Riemannian manifolds[2 ].
In section 3 we discussapplications
to concrete realizations of the abstract Diracoperator H(c)
andinvestigate
the relations to the conventionalapproach
of refs.[4] ] [13 ].
A short outline of these resultsalready appeared
in ref.[ 7 ].
We
finally
mention some related work.Strong
convergence of theunitary
groups associated with the Klein-Gordon and Dirac
theory
has been derivedby
Cirincione and Chernoff[2 ].
Schone[7~] ] investigated
solutions of the Klein-Gordon and Diracequations
in the nonrelativistic limitby
means of different methods. An
investigation
ofscattering theory
asc -1
-+ 0can be found in refs.
[2~] ] [26 ]. Quite recently
Veselic[2~] gave
a detaileddescription
of the Klein-Gordon case. The nonrelativistic limit of proper- timequantum-mechanics
has been treatedby
Horwitz and Totbart[10 ],
Steinmann
[20] ]
discussed ac-1-expansion
of bound stateenergies
inquantum-electrodynamics
whichpartly
motivated our work.2. THE ABSTRACT APPROACH
Following
Hunziker[11] and
Cirincione and Chernoff[2] we
introducean abstract
setting
for the Dirac operator.Let a
and 03B2
beself-adjoint
operators in some(complex)
Hilbert space H and assume(i. e. (3
E~(~f)
and the commutation relation D ue to eq.(2 .1 ) P+
definedby
obey
and we introduce
As a consequence
ofself-adjointness
and(2.1)-(2.4)
aand 03B2
can be writtenwith respect to the
decomposition (2. 5)
Vol. 40, n° 2-1984
162 F. GESZTESY, H. GROSSE AND B. THALLER
where A is a
densely
defined closed operator fromJf +
into ~_ . Next we defineand
where
V±
denoteself-adjoint
operators in;ýf::i: (note
thatobviously
Vcommutes with
J9).
If in addition we assume relative boundedness ofV+
(resp. V-)
withrespect
to A(resp. A*)
i. e.then the abstract Dirac
operator H(c)
defined asis
self-adjoint for I large enough.
Finally
we also introduceand the
pair
of abstract Pauli operatorsDue to
assumption (2 . 9) V+ (resp. V_ )
isinfinitesimally
bounded with respect toH~ (resp. H~)
and henceH~
areself-adjoint. Clearly
has the
spectral
gap( -
+ andby (2 . 9)
one can prove thatfor I c I large enough
alsoH(c)
has aspectral
gapcontaining
zero(cf. [2 ]).
Now we state some commutation formulas
proved by
Deift[3] which
are needed several times later : .
for all
The bounded operators on the
right
hand side of(2.14)
arejust
the closuresof the
densely
defined operators on the left hand side. In thefollowing
we
freely
use suchdensely
defined operators instead of their bounded closures if no confusions arise.Now we are
prepared
to stateTHEOREM 2.1. - Let
H(c)
be defined as in eq.(2.10)
and assumeAnnales de I’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique theorique
RELATIVISTIC CORRECTIONS OF BOUND STATE ENERGIES 163
Then
(H(c) - mc2 - z) -1
isholomorphic
with respect toc -1
around c - 1 =0, and
From
(2.14)
one infersand thus
Since
for|
Imz large enough
(2.16) implies
eq.(2.15) for I large enough.
Note that all matrix elements in(2.15)
have boundedclosures,
e. g.and
since
~(H+)=~(A*A)
and~«AA *)1/2) = ~(A *). Finally holomorphic
continuation of both sides in
(2.15)
withrespect
to removes the restrictionon Consequently (2.15)
provesholomorphy
of(H(c) -
mc2 -z) -1
inc -1
1 aroundc -1
= 0(in
az-dependent neighbour-
hood of =
0)
for z ESince the nonrelativistic limit c ~ oo is of
particular
interest we stateCOROLLARY 2.1. - As c ~ oo the Dirac
operator (rest
energy sub-Vol. 40, nO 2-1984
164 F. GESZTESY, H. GROSSE AND B. THALLER
tracted) H(c) -
mc2 converges in norm resolvent sense to the Pauli o p e- ratorH +
times theprojector
onto~f+
In
particular ~,o
E7(H+) (resp.
if andonly
if there exists a sequence~,(c)
E(resp.
which converges to~,o
as c ~ oo.Proof. 2014 Eq. (2 .17)
results from(2 .15). Taking -Z0>0 large enough
then
for I c I large enough
and convergence of the spectrum(as
well as the essentialspectrum)
follows from normconvergence of
self-adjoint
operators([76,
p.289 ], [25,
p.272 ]).
QExpanding
theright
hand side of(2.15) yields
Theorem 2.1 and
Corollary
2.1 describe the Dirac resolvent and its non-relativistic limit. To treat relativistic bound state
energies
we need someadditional results.
Following
Hunziker[77] we
firstgive
LEMMA 2.1. - Let
then under the conditions of Theorem
2.1,
is
holomorphic
with respect to c - 2 around c - 2 = 0 for fixed z EProof 2014 Eq. (2.15) implies
Annales de l’Institut Henri Physique - theorique .
RELATIVISTIC CORRECTIONS OF BOUND STATE ENERGIES 165
From
one infers
and eqs. (2.14).
DFirst order
expansion
of(2.19) yields
Our
approach
to calculate relativisticeigenvalue
corrections is basedon the idea to use
perturbation theory
of the Dirac resolvent(instead
ofthe Dirac
operator)
since it isholomorphic
in whereas the Dirac Hamil- tonian is not. While thisprocedure
ispossible
inprinciple
weprefer
touse instead of
(H(c) - mc2 - z) -1
since itdirectly
leads to relativistic bound state corrections in terms instead of c -1. Thus we need thespectral properties
of the «unperturbed »
ope- ratorRo(z)
of(2.20).
LEMMA 2. 2. - Assume the conditions of Theorem 2.1. Then
Vol. 40, n° 2-1984
166 F. GESZTESY, H. GROSSE AND B. THALLER
In addition 0 E with
geometric multiplicity equal
to dim~_ ,
andMoreover,
implies
Conversely, implies
In
particular
all discreteeigenvalues ~,o
of(H + - z) -1
aresemisimple eigenvalues
ofRo(z)
i. e.algebraic
andgeometric multiplicity
of~,o
as aneigenvalue
ofRo(z)
coincide.proves
(2 . 21 ). Eqs. (2 . 22)-(2 . 26)
followby
directcomputation.
Thatdiscrete
eigenvalues ~,o
of(H + - z) -1
aresemisimple eigenvalues
ofRo(z)
follows from
(2 . 27)
since due tonormality
of(H
+ -z) -1, [(H
+ -z) - 1 -, ]-1
has
precisely
a first orderpole at , = ~,o (cf. [12 ],
ch.1.5.4]).
REMARK 2.1. - In concrete
applications (cf.
section3)
and thus 0 is an
infinitely degenerate eigenvalue
ofRo(z).
Of coursez) -1 ) (and
thenz) 1 ))
if andonly
ifH +
isunbounded
[17,
p.109 ].
After these
preliminaries
we obtain thefollowing
characterization ofrelativistic bound state,
energies :
.THEOREM 2.2. - Assume the conditions of Theorem 2.1.
a)
Let be an isolatednondegenerate eigenvalue
ofH +
and assume
H+fo
=E0f0, f0~D(H+), ~f0~ =
1.Then,
forc - 2
smallenough
there is aunique (simple) eigenvalue
withE(0)
=Eo
which isholomorphic
withrespect
toc- 2
atc- 2
= 0.Moreover,
there areeigenvectors f± (c-2)~H± holomorphic
atc - 2 = 0
such thatAnnales de l’Institut Henri Physique theorique "
167 RELATIVISTIC CORRECTIONS OF BOUND STATE ENERGIES
and
Writing
one obtains
b)
IfE o
E is a discreteeigenvalue
ofH +
withmultiplicity
2then,
forc- 2
smallenough, H(c) - mc2
hasprecisely
Soeigenvalues (counting multiplicity)
nearc’~=0.
Alleigenvalues
1~’
so, are holo-morphic
inc -1
and m,Moreover, if
E~.(c -1 )
is aneigenvalue
then alsoE/- C - 1)
is aneigenvalue of H(c)-mc2.
Proof. Uniqueness
andholomorphy
ofE(c - 2), f ± (c - 2)
etc. followsfrom Lemmas 2 .1 and 2 . 2 and
nondegenerate perturbation theory [1] [12]
[17 ].
Insertion of(2 . 29)
into the left hand side of thefollowing
first orderperturbation
formula v ~ ~ wwhere
o 0 represents
theeigenvector
of to thesimple eigenvalue (Eo - z) -1,
proves(2 . 30).
That all of partb)
areholomorphic
near = 0 follows from Theorem 2.1 and
normality
[12,
p.71 ].
Sinceby
Lemma 2 . 2 is asemisimple eigenvalue
ofRo(z)
one getsby
the reduction process described in[7] ] [12 ].
The last statementfinally
follows fromREMARK 2 . 2. 2014 For
simplicity
weonly
derivedE 1
in Theorem2 . 2 a).
A
straightforward computation taking
into account allspectral properties
of
Ro(z) (in particular
thepoint
0 E e. g.yields
for the second coefficientE2
in(2.29)
where
R~-(Eo)
denotes the reduced resolventWe note that under stronger
assumptions
on the interactionholomorphy
Vol. 40, n° 2-1984
168 F. GESZTESY, H. GROSSE AND B. THALLER
of the Dirac resolvent and relativistic
eigenvalues
with respect to c -1using pseudo-resolvent techniques
has beenproved by
Veselic[22 ].
Holomorphy
of the Diracresolvent,
eq.(2.18), Ro(z)
in(2.20),
and(2.28)
of Theorem 2 . 2 have been derived
by
Hunziker[77] using
somewhatdifferent methods and relative compactness
assumptions.
Within this abstractapproach
eqs.(2.15), (2.19),
andparticularly (2.30)
are new.Strong continuity
of the Dirac resolvent(cf. (2.17))
and thecorresponding unitary
group in the nonrelativistic limit underassumptions (2 . 8)
and(2. 9)
is a result of Cirincione and Chernoff
[2 ].
REMARK 2.3. - Of course all results of this section have direct ana-
logues
if one adds the rest energymc2
toH(c).
E. g. eq.(2.17)
has to bereplaced by
Finally
we sketch how to obtain norm estimates of variousquantities
whichin
particular imply
an estimate of the convergence radius of theexpansion (2.19).
Forsimplicity
assume A = A* andV+
= V_ = V. Then(2.19)
may be written aswhere
Assuming
Re z = 0 weimmediately
get from(cf. assumption (2. 9))
and
that
Annales de Henri Physique ’ theorique ’
RELATIVISTIC CORRECTIONS OF BOUND STATE ENERGIES 169
and
consequently
implying
From
we infer
Summing
up we obtainThus the
expansion (2 . 34) (resp. (2.19))
converges in normif ~03B1(z)~
3. CONCRETE REALIZATIONS
As shown in
[2] the
abstractapproach
of section 2 isgeneral enough
to cover Dirac operators over Riemannian manifolds. Here we restrict ourselves to the Dirac
operator
in flat space and first discuss the case ofvanishing
external vectorpotentials
andspherically symmetric
electro-static
potentials V(r).
We define and
Let denote the closure of and
Next assume
Vol. 40, n° 2-1984
170 F. GESZTESY, H. GROSSE AND B. THALLER
where
VI
islocally uniformly
squareintegrable,
i. e. for all A ¿ 0and
Then the radial Dirac operator
hDK(c)
inL~((0,oo))(x)C~
definedby
is
self-adjoint
forI large enough (cf.
section2),
and the radial Pauli operatorsh ± ,~,K
inL2((o, oo ))
aregiven
as the Friedrichs extension ofLemma 1
].)
The full Dirac operatorHD(c)
inL2(~3)
(8)(:2 @
(:2 and thefull Pauli operator
H
inL~tR~) 0
(:2 are then defined as direct sums overhDK(c)
Since under conditions(3 . 4)-(3 .’6)
discreteeigenvalues
of are
simple ( [14,
p.13 3 ]),
Theorem2 . 2 a) applies
and we obtain.COROLLARY 3.1. - Let be a discrete
eigenvalue
of/!+
~ ~ f~~°~ ~ ~
= 1then,
for c - 2 smallenough,
there isprecisely
one(simple) eigenvalue
ofhDK(c) - mc2
near c- 2 = 0 which isholomorphic
in c- 2 with ’
Using
differentmethods, employing
inparticular holomorphy of eigenfunc-
tions of with respect to
c - 2,
Titchmarsh[27] ]
derived the result(3.9).
Next we discuss
non-spherically symmetric interactions,
Letand assume
[7J] ]
where
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincare - Physique . theorique
RELATIVISTIC CORRECTIONS OF BOUND STATE ENERGIES 171
and
V2
is a finite sum of Coulombpotentials
With
where 6k, 1 k
3,
denote the usual Pauli matrices[7~] we
define theDirac operator
HD(c)
isself-adjoint for Ie large enough (cf.
section2).
The Pauli Hamil- tonianH~ = H 00
then readsThus Theorem 2.2
implies
COROLLARY 3.2. -
a)
AssumeEo
to be adiscrete, simple eigenvalue
of
H Then,
forc - 2
smallenough,
there is a
unique (simple) eigenvalue E(c - 2)
ofHD(c)-mc2
nearc - 2 = 0
which is
holomorphic
inc - 2
withb)
IfEo
E is a discreteeigenvalue
ofH ~
withmultiplicity So ~ 2 then,
forc - 2
smallenough, H(c) - mc2
hasprecisely
Soeigenvalues (counting multiplicity)
nearc’~=0.
Alleigenvalues
1y ~
so, are holo-morphic
in with 00If is an
eigenvalue
then alsoE_,.( -
is aneigenvalue of H(c) - mc2.
In the
special
case ofvanishing
external vectorpotentials A=0
eq.(3.17)
has been derived
by
Sewell[79] ] using
formalexpansions of
wave func-tions in powers of
c- 2..
At this
point
it isinteresting
to remark that in thephysical
literaturerelativistic corrections to bound state
energies
areusually
obtainedby completely
different means.Following
theprocedure
ofFoldy
and Wout-Vol. 40, n° 2-1984
172 F. GESZTESY, H. GROSSE AND B. THALLER
huysen [4] one
adds a first order relativistic correction to the Pauli ope-rator
H ~
to get ,where for
simplicity
we assumeRelativistic corrections to bound state
energies
of the Pauli operatorH ~
are then obtained
formally
from(3.19) by
means ofperturbation theory [4] [13].
Under conditions
(3 . 20) H(c)
isself-adjoint
and(cf. [5] ] [6 ])
but
(Of
course these conditions can be relaxedregarding
smoothness and their behaviour atinfinity
butCoulomb-type interactions ! I:! 1- 1
nearthe
origin
arecertainly
excluded due to the term(AV)
in(3.19).)
Thus(in
contrast toHoo) certainly
has nonegative
discreteeigenvalues.
Nevertheless one can prove first order
spectral
concentration ofat the
negative eigenvalues ofHoo
in the nonrelativistic limit. Moreexplicitly
we have
([5] ] [6 ]).
PROPOSITION 3.1. - Under conditions
(3.20)
in addition to that ofCorollary (3.2 a)
there is a first orderpseudo-eigenvalue E(c-2)
ofIn
particular E 1
coincides withE 1
ofCorollary 3 . 2 a).
Proof 2014 Eq. (3 . 23)
has beenproved
in[6 ]. Using
inE1
of
(3.17)
andcalculating
various commutators showsE 1
=E 1.
DThus in the presence of smooth
electromagnetic potentials A,
V(excluding
the
important
case ofhydrogen-type systems)
bothapproaches yield
thesame relativistic bound state energy corrections to first order in
c- 2.
But
obviously
there areimportant
differences from aconceptual point
of view : The method described in
Corollary
3 . 2 starts from a discreteeigenvalue Eo
of the nonrelativistic Pauli operator and proves thateigen-
values
E(c - 2)
of the Dirac Hamiltonian(rest
energysubtracted)
are holo-morphic
around their nonrelativistic limit c ~oo. The Foldy-Wouthuysen
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique theorique
RELATIVISTIC CORRECTIONS OF BOUND STATE ENERGIES 173
method also starts from a discrete
eigenvalue Eo
of the Pauli operator and then shows the existence of first orderpseudo-eigenvalues
of someappropriately relativistically
corrected Hamiltonian. Thesepseudo-eigen-
values are not discrete
eigenvalues
butintuitively they correspond
toresonances whose width become
arbitrarily
small as c -~ oo.We
finally
note that our concept ofexpanding
the Dirac resolvent around its nonrelativistic limit notonly
includes adescription
of Coulomb-type interactions but
trivially generalizes
to nonlocal interactions V(cf.
the
example
in[7 ])
and also allows a discussion of anomalous electric(resp. magnetic)
moments 5(resp. ,u)
of acharged particle
in external vectorpotentials A,
V. In this case the Dirac Hamiltonian readswhere
and
V, Ak, (V
AA)k,
1 ~ ~ 3 are assumed to beinfinitesimally
bounded with
respect I (e.
g. eachoperator
actsby
a function in +L°°(~3), p
> 3[15 ]).
Since a detailed treatment of anomalous moment interactionsincluding hydrogen-type
systems will appear else- where[9] we only
note that in the nonrelativistic limit c ~ 00[1] H. BAUMGÄRTEL, Endlichdimensionale analytische Störungstheorie, Akademie-Verlag, Berlin, 1972.
[2] R. J. CIRINCIONE and P. R. CHERNOFF, Dirac and Klein-Gordon Equations: Conver-
gence of solutions in the nonrelativistic limit. Commun. Math. Phys., t. 79, 1981,
p. 33-46.
[3] P. A. DEIFT, Applications of a commutation formula. Duke Math. J., t. 45, 1978, p. 267-310.
[4] L. L. FOLDY and S. A. WOUTHUYSEN, On the Dirac theory of spin 1/2 particles and
its non-relativistic limit. Phys. Rev., t. 78, 1950, p. 29-36.
[5] F. GESZTESY, H. GROSSE and B. THALLER, Spectral concentration in the nonrelati- vistic limit, Phys. Lett., 116 B, 1982, p. 155-157.
[6] F. GESZTESY, H. GROSSE and B. THALLER, First order relativistic corrections and
spectral concentration. Adv. Appl. Math. (to appear).
[7] F. GESZTESY, H. GROSSE and B. THALLER, An efficient method for calculating rela-
tivistic corrections for spin-1/2 particles. Phys. Rev. Lett. (to appear).
[8] F. GESZTESY and L. PITTNER, On the Friedrichs extension of ordinary differential operators with strongly singular potentials. Acta Phys. Austr., t. 51, 1979, p. 259-268.
[9] F. GESZTESY, B. SIMON and B. THALLER, On the self-adjointness of Dirac operators with anomalous magnetic moment (Caltech preprint, Pasadena, 1984).
Vol. 40, n° 2-1984
174 F. GESZTESY, H. GROSSE AND B. THALLER
[10] L. P. HORWITZ and F. C. ROTBART, Nonrelativistic limit of relativistic quantum mechanics. Phys. Rev., t. D 24, 1981, p. 2127-2131.
[11] W. HUNZIKER, On the nonrelativistic limit of the Dirac theory. Commun. Math.
Phys., t. 40, 1975, p. 215-222.
[12] T. KATO, Perturbation Theory for Linear Operators, 2nd ed., Springer-Verlag, New York/Berlin, 1980.
[13] A. MESSIAH, Quantum Mechanics, vol. 2, North Holland, Amsterdam, 1970.
[14] M. A. NAIMARK, Linear Differential Operators, vol. 2, F. Ungar Publ., New York, 1968.
[15] R. T. PROSSER, Relativistic potential scattering. J. Math. Phys., t. 4, 1963, p. 1048-1054.
[16] M. REED and B. SIMON, Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics, vol. I: Functional Analysis, Academic Press, New York/London, 1972.
[17] M. REED and B. SIMON, Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics, vol. IV: Analysis
of Operators, Academic Press, New York-San Francisco-London, 1978.
[18] A. Y. SCHOENE, On the nonrelativistic limits of the Klein-Gordon and Dirac equations,
J. Math. Anal. Appl., t. 71, 1979, p. 36-47.
[19] G. L. SEWELL, An appropriate relation between the energy levels of a particle in a
field of given potential energy, calculated in the relativistic and non-relativistic theories. Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc., t. 45, 1949, p. 631-637.
[20] O. STEINMANN, 1/c Expansion of bound-state energies in QED, Nucl. Phys., t. B 196, 1982, p. 394-412.
[21] E. C. TITCHMARSH, On the relation between the eigenvalues in relativistic and non- relativistic quantum mechanics. Proc. Roy. Soc., t. A 266, 1962, p. 33-46.
[22] K. VESELI0106, Perturbation of pseudoresolvents and analyticity in 1/c of relativistic quantum mechanics. Commun. Math. Phys., t. 22, 1971, p. 27-43.
[23] K. VESELI0106 and J. WEIDMANN, Existenz der Wellenoperatoren für eine allgemeine
Klasse von Operatoren, Math. Z., t. 134, 1973, p. 255-274.
[24] K. VESELI0106, On the non-relativistic limit of the bound states of the Klein-Gordon
equation. J. Math. Anal. Appl., t. 96, 1983, p. 63-84.
[25] J. WEIDMANN, Linear Operators in Hilbert Spaces, Springer-Verlag, New York/
Berlin, 1980.
[26] K. YAJIMA, Nonrelativistic limit of the Dirac theory, scattering theory, J. Fac. Sci.
Univ. Tokyo, Sec. I A, t. 23, 1976, p. 517-523.
(Manuscrit reçu Ie 10
Annales de l’Institut Poincaré - Physique theorique