A NNALES MATHÉMATIQUES B LAISE P ASCAL
G. R ANGAN
p-adic almost periodicity and representations
Annales mathématiques Blaise Pascal, tome 2, n
o1 (1995), p. 237-243
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=AMBP_1995__2_1_237_0>
© Annales mathématiques Blaise Pascal, 1995, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Annales mathématiques Blaise Pascal » (http://
math.univ-bpclermont.fr/ambp/) implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions). Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
P-ADIC ALMOST PERIODICITY
AND REPRESENTATIONS
G.
Rangan
Abstract- In the first international conference on
p-adic
functionalanalysis,
thequestion
whether it is
possible
toget
the structure of the BanachAlgebra
ofp-adic
valued con-tinuous almost
periodic
functions on atotally
disconnectedtopological IB-group
Gthrough
the structure of its non-archimedean Bohr
compactification G
was raised. Weaffirmatively
answer this
question
here. This structure ofAc(G) helps
one tostudy
thep-adic regular representation
of Gusing
the knowntheory
ofrepresentations
forcompact
groups.1991
Mathematicssubject classification: 46S10
1 Introduction
Let G be a group and Ii a
complete
ultra-metric valued field. When G carries atopology
under which G is atopological
group, we have studied in earlier papersRangan (~~, [6], [7]
and[8]
continuous almostperiodic
functions on G with values in Ii . InRangan [8]
we
conjectured
that a structuretheory
for the Banachalgebra
A =Ac(G)
of continuous al- mostperiodic
functions on G can be obtainedusing
the known structuretheory
of the groupalgebra
of acompact
groupby going
to the Bohrcompactification G
of G. In this paper wegive
an affirmative answer to theconjecture.
The observation that G is anIB-group
if andonly
if the Bohrcompactification G
is anIB-group
orequivalently
ap-free
group, where p is the characteristic of the residue class field ofIt ,
which isimplicitly
contained in the resultsproved
inRangan [7], helps
us to establish theconjecture.
When G is an
arbitrary
group and I~ is alocally compact
field we consider thesubgroup topology
on G definedby
the normalsubgroups
of finite index in G under which238
G becomes a Q-dimensional group. The space of continuous almost
periodic
functions on Gdescribed above coincides with the space of almost
periodic
functionsAP(G --~ ]()
definedby
Schikof[10] using compactoid.
This enables us to prove that there exists an invariantmean on
AP(G -> K)
orequivalently
thepair (G, K)
isa.p.i.m.
in the sense of Diarra[2](p.23, N.B.(i))
if andonly
if G is aIB-group
orequivalently
ap-free
group(see Rangan [7]).
Thus in the case when the base field islocally-compact,
theproblem
ofcharacterising (G, li ) pairs
which area.p.i.m posed by
Diarra is solved. Theproblem
still remains open fornon-locally compact
fields. This alsogives
rise to the structuretheory
forAP(G --~ h)
which is
got by going
to its Bohrcompactification.
The structure
theory
so arrived at for thealgebra
of almostperiodic
functionsgives
rise to a
study
ofrepresentations
of Gtaking
the base space forrepresentation
to be thespace of almost
periodic
functions on G. This maygive
rise to an alternativeapproach
torepresentation theory developed by
Diarra[1] using Hopf algebras.
Ve intenddiscussing
the details in another paper.
Using
the structuretheory
ofAP(G --~ I1 ),
we prove that theregular representation decomposes
as a direct sum of finite-dimensionalrepresentations.
2 Notations and Definitions
G is a group and It is a
complete
ultra metric rank one valuedfield,
p de- notes the characteristic of the residue class field. Forf :
: G --~Is
, x, s E G weput fs(x)
: = f(s-1x),fs(x)
: = f(xs), fv(x) : = f(x-1), fG ={fs
: s EG}
andfG
: = {fs : s ~G}.
A functionf
defined on G is called almostperiodic
iffG
is pre-compact
orequivalently
if for every f > 0 there exists acovering
of Gby
a finite collectionof subsets
A1, A2, ..., An
such that for x, y EA;
for i =1, 2, ..., n |f(cxd)
-f( cyd)1 |
Efor all
c, d
E G(See
Maak[4]). Interestingly
it turns out that for agiven
f > 0 and analmost
periodic
functionf
onG,
thecovering consisting
of minimum number of subsetsA1, A2 ..., An
such that forIf(cxd) - f(cyd)|
E for i= 1, 2, ...,
n is thecovering by
cosets of a suitable normalsubgroup H( f, ~)
called the E -kernel of finite index n in G. Iff
is a continuous almostperiodic
function on atopological
groupG, H( f, , ~)
is also an openand closed
subgroup
of finite index in G. A(topological)
group is called anIB-group (Index
Bounded
group)
if inf~n~
>0 ,
as n varies over all the indices of(closed) subgroups
of finiteindex of G. We take c = inf G is
p-free
ifonly
if c = 1 orequivalently |n|
= 1 for eachindex n. There exists a Nlean At with
J~
M~j= 1 (sup norm)
onAc(G)
if andonly
if G is ap-free
group.Schikhof
[10]
calls a functionf
: G --> I~ almostperiodic
iffG
is acompactoid
inB(G, I~),
the space of bounded functions on G with the supremum norm. The set of all almostperiodic
functions from G to K is denotedby AP(G
~It ).
The almostperiodic
functions which are
analogous
of the classical case discussed earlier are calledstrictly
almostperiodic
and the space of such functions is denotedby SAP(G
--~ When G is a topo-logical
group the space of continuousstrictly
almostperiodic
functions is the spaceAc(G)
ofthe earlier papers of the author. In
general SAP(G
-~K)
CAP(G
--.A~) ; ; however
whenthe base field is
locally compact SAP(G
-->K)
=AP(G
---~I~).
Diarra[1]
has shown that XN the characteristic function of a normalsubgroup
Nbelongs
toAP(G
-~A")
if andonly
if N is of finite index in G.
3 Existence of Mean
Theorem 3.1
If G is
atopological
0-dimensional group then G is anIB-group if
andonly if
its Bohrcompactijication G
is anIB-group
orequivalently
ap-free
group.Proof: Let G be an
IB-group.
Then Theorem 3.3.[5] implies
that there exists a Mean VI onAc(G). Again by
Theorem 3.8.[7]
tyl defines an invariantintegral
for continuous functionson
G
and soG
is ap-free
group orequivalently
anIB-group.
Conversely
ifG
is anIB-group
orequivalently
ap-free
group, theintegral
onG
inducesan invariant mean
onAc(G).
and so G is ap-free
group or anIB-group
with c = 1. NRemark 1: When G is
compact
the collection of open and closedsubgroups
coincides with the collection of closedsubgroups
of finite index in G and so thep-free
condition in the usualsense coincides with the IB-condition on G.
Remark 2: When the base field A’ is
locally-compact
Diarra hasgiven (corollary 2, p.13, [1])
severalequivalent
criteria for the existence of mean onAP{G -~ It )
in terms of almostperiodic representations,
existence of Haar measure on the Bohrcompactification
etc. Theabove theorem which
gives
a criterion for the existence of mean inAP(G
--~I~)
enables oneto conclude that Diarra’s
equivalent
formulations holds when andonly
when the group isp-free.
If G is an
arbitrary
group. Let TB be thesubgroup topology
on G for which thecollection of all normal
subgroups
of finite index is a fundamentalsystem
ofneighbourhoods
at the
identity
of G. With thistopology,
G is atopological
group..Proposition
3.2 When Ii islocally compact
and G is anarbitrary
group,AP(G
~K)
=SAP(G
-+!()
=Ac(G),
where is the spaceof
all continuous(in
thesubgroup topology defined above) of
almostperiodic functions
in the senseof
Maak.Proof: When li is
locally compact
every closed bounded subset of li is compact and soSAP(G
~K)
=AP(G
~K) (See
Schikhof[10], p.3); clearly Ac(G)
CAP(G
-K).
Iff
EAP(G
-;It ), f
ESAP(G
--~It ).
Hence for E >0,
there exists anormal subgroup
offinite index H =
H( f , E)
such that240
( i )
G =~ni=1Hxi,xi
E G(ii)
for x, y EHxi,
i =1, 2,
... , nf(cyd)|
E for all c, d E G.In
particular
for z, yE H, ~ f (x) - f (y))
E, i.e.f
isuniformly
continuous withrespect
to thesubgroup topology
rB on G and sof
EAc(G).
This proves theproposition..
The next theorem
gives
a necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of Mean onAP(G --~
in tune with the earlier conditions for the existence of Haar measureetc.
(see
vanRooij [8])
where G is anarbitrary
group which solves theproblem posed by
Schikhof
[10]
in the case of thelocally compact
base field Ii. See also Diarra[1]
theorem 4and Schikhof
[10],
Theorem 8.2.Theorem 3.3 Let li be a
locally compact field.
An invariant Mean M onAP(G
~Ii )
exists
if
andonly if
G isp-free.
Proof: we consider the
subgroup topology
TB on Ggiven by
the normalsubgroups
offinite index as a
neighbourhood
base at theidentity. By
the earlierproposition 3.2,
AP(G
-3I1 )
=SAP(G
-;Ii)
=Ac(G).
Now the Theorem follows from Theorem 3.3of
Rangan (5~ .
1Example:
Let G be anyfree-group.
Then for every x EG,
x different from theidentity
ofG,
there exists a normal
subgroup
of finite indexN,
x~
N.(See
Hewitt and Ross[3]).
Hence thesubgroup topology
on Ggiven by
thefamily
of normalsubgroups
of finite index as aneigh-
bourhood base is a Hausdorff
topology
on G. HenceAP(G
-+Ii )
=SAP(G
~K)
=Ac(G).
G is a
maximally
almostperiodic
group. An invariant Mean exists onAP(G --> I~)
if andonly
if G isp-free.
Remark: when It is
locally compact
for thestudy
of continuous almostperiodic
functionson a
totally
disconnectedtopological
group,only
thetopology
TB on G matters. For if(G, r)
be a
totally-disconnected topological
group. G is atotally
disconnectedtopological
group also withrespect
to thetopology
TB definedby
closed(in r)
normalsubgroups
of finite index in{G, r).
Thetopology
TB is weaker than T.By
Theorem 4.1Rangan [6],
andproposition
3.2 above it follows that =
Ac(G, B)
=AP(G
-K).
4 Structure of A
=Ac(G)
Throughout
this section we assume that I~ islocally compact
and G is either atotally
disconnectedtopological
group or anarbitrary
group G considered as atopological
group with
respect
to thesubgroup topology
TB definedby
the normalsubgroups
of finiteindex in G. So
Ac(G, T)
=Ac(G, TB)
=AP(G
--;K).
We assume G to be ap-free
group.Theorem 4.1 The
algebra
A =Ac(G)
isisometrically isomorphic
to the groupalgebra L( G)
of
the Bohrcompactificationl G of
G.Proof: The map 9 : A -~
L( G) given by f --> f where f
is the associated continuous functionon the compact group
G
tof (see Rangan [6],
Theorem4.4).
If p is thehomomorphism
which imbeds G in
G,
for x EG,f(x)
=f (p(x)).
B is one-to-one: For6( f )
=03B8(g)
~f
=g
~f(x)
=g(x)
for all x E G ~f
= g. 0is onto:
if h EL(G),h
is a continuous functionon
G.
Definef(x)
=h(p(x))
for x E Gthen j
= h. 8 is analgebra homomorphism:
Forf
*9(x)
-=
/ G f(y)g(y-1x)dy = j
* 9(x)
where the
integral
is the Haarintegral
and it exists sinceG
isp-free,
Gbeing
so.8 is an
isometry:
~Vhen G isp-free In
=1 for every normalsubgroup
of finite index and so c =1. Hence forf
EA,
~ f ~ =
sup |f(x)| = sup |(p(x))| = sup|f(t)|
sEG xEG xEG
sinc,e
p(G)
is dense in.
Proposition
4.2 A is the closureof
the K-linear spanof
theidempotents of
A.Proof: Since A =
Ac( G)
=Ac(G, TB)
=AP(G
--~h’)
=SAP(G
--~]()
theproposition
follows from Lemma
4.4,
Schikhof[10],
which is noweasily
seen to be a restatement of theapproximation
Theorem 7.4 ofRangan [5]..
Theorem 4.3 For a
p-free
groupG,
A =~Ae
whereAe
= e * A is afinite-dimensional
twosided ideal
of
A andfor
everyf
EA,
f = 03A3 e * f and ~f~ = sup ~e * f~
~EE eEE
and every non-zero minimal two sided ideal in A is an
A~ for
a suitable e E E.If I
is aclosed two sided ideal in A then
1= cl
~ A~
eEI
where E is the set
of
all minimal non-zero centralidempotents of
A.242
Proof: Follows from 8.14 Theorem van
Rooij [9]
sinceby
the earlier theorem A andL()
are
isometrically isomorphic..
It is not difficult to prove,
using
the existence of theapproximate identity (UH), (H varying
over the collectionr~
of normalsubgroups
of finite index inG)
that the closed ideals in A are same as closed invariantsubspaces.
Forf E A, defining (Laf)(x)
=f(a-1x)
forx E
G,
weget
the(left) regular representation
a --~La
on G.Ae being
invariantsubspaces
in view of Theorem
4.3, La decomposes
as a direct sum of finite-dimensionalrepresentations.
Thus we
get
thefollowing
result.Theorem 4.4 The
regular Representation decomposes
as a direct sumof finite-dimensional representations.
References
[1] Diarra,
B. : Ultrametric almostperiodic
Linearrepresentations (Preprint).
[2] Diarra,
B. : Onreducibility
of ultrametric almostperiodic
linearrepresentation, (Preprint)
[3] Hewitt,
E. and K.A. Ross. :Abstract HarmonicAnalysis
Vol.1(Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1963)
[4] Maak,
W. : Fastperiodische Funktionen,
Berlin -Göttingen - Heidelberg, Springer
1950.[5] Rangan,
G. : Non-archimedean valued almostperiodic functions, Indag.Math.,31 (1969), 345-353.
[6] Rangan,
G. : Non-archimedean BohrCompactification
of atopological
group,Indag.Math.,31 (1969),
354-360.[7] Rangan,
G. : On the existence of non-archimedean valued invariant Mean Publ. Math.(Debrecen)29 (1982),
57-63.[8] Rangan,
G. and M.S.Saleemullah. : Banachalgebra
ofp-adic
valued almostperiodic functions: p-adic
FunctionalAnalysis, (Eds.
J.M.Bayod,
N.DeGrade-De Kimpe
and J.Martinez-Maurica),
MarcelDekker,
New York1991,
141 - 150.[9] Rooij
van, A.C.M. : Non-archimedean FunctionalAnalysis,
Marcel-Dekker-NewYork,
1978.
[10] Schikhof,
W.H. : Anapproach
top-adic
almostperiodicity by
Means of Com-pactoids,Report8809, Department
ofMathematics,
CatholicUniversity, Nijmegen,
1988.