A NNALES DE L ’I. H. P., SECTION A
L. C. T HOMAS
On the eventual absorption of a quantum particle
Annales de l’I. H. P., section A, tome 21, n
o1 (1974), p. 81-87
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=AIHPA_1974__21_1_81_0>
© Gauthier-Villars, 1974, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Annales de l’I. H. P., section A » implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.
org/conditions). Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
81
On the eventual absorption
of
aquantum particle
L. C. THOMAS
Department of Pure Mathematics, University College of Swansea, Singleton Park, Swansea
Ann. Inst. Henri Poincare, Vol. XXI, n° 1, 1974,
Section A :
Physique thearique.
ABSTRACT. - For a
general system consisting
of aquantum particle
and an
absorbing detector,
theprobability
that the detector willeventually
absorb the
particle
is calculated.RESUME. 2014 Pour un
systeme, qui
est uneparticle quantique
et un instru-ment
absorbant,
on obtient laprobability
que I’instrument absorbera laparticle.
1. INTRODUCTION
Quantum
stochastic processes[1]
enable one to deal withquantum systems
in which the time evolution is notunitary.
Inparticular,
one canconsider a
system consisting
of aquantum particle
with anabsorbing detector,
which will absorb theparticle
when it comes in contact withit,
as for
example
in[2] [3].
Theparticle’s
space of states is aseparable
Hilbert space, with a
densely
defined HamiltonianH, describing
its timeevolution. We assume that the
spectrum
of H isonly
purepoint,
and itseigenvectors
e~, ofeigenvalue
,u~, form an orthonormal basis. For the combi- nedsystem,
the space ofpossible
states is~(~f),
thesymmetric
Fock space built on and letR
be the extension of H from Jl’ In the termi-nology
of quantum stochastic processes the state space(V, !)
is takenas V = the Banach space of self
adjoint
trace classoperators
on with! the trace. The detector is
represented by
the canonicalAnnales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Section A - Vol. XXI, n° 1 - 1974 .
82 L. C. THOMAS
annihilation operator
A(d), d being
an element of~f,
which issupposed
to describe the characteristics of the detector.
The
quantum
stochastic process for thissystem
is a set of instrument~t,
indexedby
a timeparameter t
E[0, oo),
each of which maps the initialstate of the
system
onto the state at time t,dependent
upon what hashappened
up to time t.Formally
~’t : V xV,
whereXt
is thesample
space,
consisting
of allpossible
events that could havehappened
to thedetector up to time t. Thus
X, = {
s : S E[0, t] ~
u z, since either theparticle
has been absorbed at a time s less than t, or no
absorbing
hasyet
occurred thepoint
z. The definition of such instruments wasgiven
in[1],
where itwas shown that
Stv
= v EV,
the states conditional on nohitting
form a
semigroup
and if wewriter
= then the nohitting
time deve-lopment
is aperturbation
of the usual timedevelopment, given by
Let the initial state of the
particle
beP Ð,
theprojection operator
onto thesubspace
ofspanned by
cI> =(0, ~ 0,
0...).
Thesystem
is then describedby H, ~ and ~
and theprobability
that noabsorption
has occurredb
time r iswhile in
[1],
it is shown that theprobability
that the detector absorbs theparticle
in the interval(r,
t +bt)
isWe are interested in what is the
relationship
betweenH, 1~ and d,
in order that withprobability
one, the detector willeventually
absorb theparticle.
We will show that the
particle
willeventually
be absorbed if andonly if,
when d and h are
expanded
in terms of the orthonormal basisconsisting
of
eigenvectors
ofH, d
has a non-zerocomponent
of all theeigenvectors
contained in the
expansion
of h. Moreformally
There " is a
slight ambiguity
in the statement of theproposition
since theeigenvectors
fordegenerate eigenvalues
are ~ not defineduniquely.
HoweverAnnales de 1’Institut Henri Poincaré - Section A
83
ON THE EVENTUAL ABSORPTION OF A QUANTUM PARTICLE
to avoid this
ambiguity,
if the initialone-particle
state ish,
we shallalways
assume that one of the
eigenvectors
in theeigenspace
is the normalisedprojection
of h onto thateigenspace,
and the others areorthogonal
to thisvector.
2. PROOF OF PROPOSITION
Since ~ has
only
a1-particle component
andB,
leaves thisspace invariant,
it is sufficient to restrict attention to the1-particle
space, ~f.where
Pd
is theprojection
onto thesubspace spanned by
d. Lety =F O}
and~2 = O}
whereV { }
implies
the closed linearsubspace spanned by
the elementswithin { }.
The
proposition
isproved
if we can show thatB,
leaves the~t invariant,
isstrongly
contractive on i. e. t -~ limBth
= 0 b’h E and isunitary
00
o n
~2 .
where
Since
Pd 1.Jt’2
= 0 andsince e-tHt
leavesH2
invariantCm1 1£2
= 0. Thusand so is
unitary.
It is now obvious thatBt
leaves~2
invariant.Let
hl
E~1
and let e~2 be aneigenvector
of H in thenThis is true for all et2 in
~2
and soBt
leaves~1
invariant.Finally
it is necessary to show thatBr 1Jf’1 is strongly contracting.
Davies[1]
has shown that such a
semigroup
is a contractionsemigroup,
so we need1
only
show that -iH - 2 Pd
has no pureimaginary eigenvalues.
Considerthe action of this operator on the
eigenvectors
e~, which span:Ýf1
Choose the
phase
factors ofthe ej,
sothat (
is real andthe dj
’s areVol. XXI, n° 1 - 1974.
84 L. C. THOMAS
real
with ) ~
= l. The matrix for( - iH - ~ with this basis is
}
B 2/~~
of the form
and the
eigenvalues
of the operator aregiven by
Put ~, = then
If the operator has a pure
imaginary eigenvalue,
then there exists a real valueof
for which andtherefore |f( )|2
is zero. However 2 . 7 is the sum of two squares which have non-coincident roots(since
the~
must be
non-zero).
The result is thus proven.1’Institut Poincaré - Section A
85 ON THE EVENTUAL ABSORPTION OF A QUANTUM PARTICLE
3. ALTERNATIVE APPROACH
One is able to
get
more detailed information about theprobability
ofabsorption
of theparticle
at anytime, by using
anexpansion
formula ofthe form 2.2 for
B,
on~~_~),
where
Since 03A6 has
only
aone-particle component
isonly
non-zeroin the
O-particle
state, sowhere is a function.
We assume for
simplicity
that d is such thatonly finitely many dk
’s arenon-zero. Since 03A6 =
(0, h, 0, ... )
andusing
theexpansions
of d and hof
Proposition 1,
Taking Laplace transforms,
weget
In
[1],
it was shown that theprobability
that the detector will absorb o theparticle
~ in the interval(t,
t + isVol. XXI, n° 1 - 1974.
86 L. C. THOMAS
Thus to calculate the
density
function of theabsorbing time,
one takes theinverse
Laplace
transform of~(p),
toobtain a(.s) 12.
Theprobability
thatthe detector will
eventually
absorb theparticle
isroo I 2d.s.
Plan-cherel’s formula for
Laplace
transforms can beapplied
in this case, sinceis
obviously
aL2
functions. Sowhere x is real. In section
2,
we have shown that theprobability particle
is
eventually
absorbed isRewriting
this result in terms ofthe p
andusing 3. 7,
it follows that the functions of 3 . 5 must form an ortho-normalsystem,
i. e.We
again
choosethe ei
sothat dk
is real for all/,
and let03BBk
==d2k
so = 1.Proposition
1 thusimplies
that if we have a finite set ofpositive
numbers/, == 1 = N
with 03A303BBk
==1.
then the functions" ,
, withweight
z-j
~+~~
function
form an orthonormal set, i. e.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
My
thanks are due to Dr E. B. Davies both forsuggesting
thisproblem
and for several valuable conversations
concerning
it.Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Section A
ON THE EVENTUAL ABSORPTION OF A QUANTUM PARTICLE 87
[1] E. B. DAVIES, Quantum stochastic processes I. Comm. Math. Phys., t. 15, 1969,
p. 277-304.
[2] E. B. DAVIES, Quantum stochastic processes III. Comm. Math. Phys., t. 22, 1970,
p. 51-70.
[3] L. C. THOMAS, Probabilistic calculations on the ground state of the harmonic oscillator.
J. Statist. Phys., t. 7, 1973, p. 287-294.
(Manuscrit reçu Ie 4 ’ octobre 1973)
Vol. XXI, n° 1 - 1974.