• Aucun résultat trouvé

Épreuve de section européenne

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Épreuve de section européenne"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Baccalauréat, série S, spécialité maths Session de juin 2014

Épreuve de section européenne

Mersenne Numbers

Many mathematicians and hobbyists search for large prime numbers. As of January 2014, the largest known prime number is 257,885,1611 , a number with 17,425,170 digits. Many of the largest known primes are Mersenne primes.

The Mersenne numbers are numbers of the form 2n1. These numbers have fascinated number theorists, particularly because of their connection with perfect numbers: numbers that are the sum of their divisors, including 1 but not the number itself (6, 28, 496, ...). If p2n1 is a Mersenne prime, it automatically leads to a perfect number by way of Euclid’s formula 2n1p.

It is easy to show that a Mersenne number cannot be prime unless the exponent n is prime. If n is prime, will the Mersenne number be prime? The strong law of small numbers suggests it will, because it is true when n equals 2, 3, 5, and 7. The law fails for n11, however, because 2111 equals 2047, which equals 23 89 . It holds for n13, n17 and n19, then fails again for n23. From here on, successes rapidly become rarer. At the moment only 48 Mersenne primes (hence only 48 perfect numbers) are known.

Figure 1: Graph of number of digits in largest known prime by year, since the electronic computer’s invention. Note that the vertical scale is logarithmic.

From The Last Recreations, by Martin Gardner, and from Wikipedia

Questions

1. Give two interests of Mersenne numbers.

2. Is every Mersenne number a prime?

3. "The strong law of small numbers" is a humorous title of a popular paper by a mathematician.

What could that law refer to in the text? What do you think of that law?

4. Describe the evolution of the number of digits in largest known primes since 1950. How would you qualify it?

5. How can you build a perfect number out of a Mersenne number? Is it true for every Mersenne number? Can you prove it?

2014 – 06 – Mersenne Nimbers

Références

Documents relatifs

Start with the smallest number that divides exactly, repeat as many times as necessary with the same prime number, then try the next prime number in the same way, and stop when you

We refer to [11] for several proofs involving (5.8):.. When K contains the p-th roots of unity it can also be proved by using arguments from Kummer’s theory as follows.. The

Although Theorem 1.3 gives solutions to the same equation as Theorem 1.1 (if m is the same), the spirit is quite different: While m could take any value in Theorem 1.1, we have here

Repeat this procedure until you get a number that you know for sure it is or it is not divisible by seven.. Then the X's divisibility will be

work done by Eliahou and Kervaire in [EK] and the upper bounds for the Betti numbers in the resolution of a standard graded algebra having a given.. Hilbert function,

We can think of applying the statement of theorem 10, which asserts that any holomorphic complex function can be holomorphically extended to dual-complex numbers, to build

After recalling some lemmas in section 2, it is proved in Theorem 3.1 that if θ 6≡ 0( mod pA) and p|i(θ /p k ), for some positive integer k, then the p-adic valuation of the

As is known from work of Alladi [All87] and Hildebrand [Hil87], the number ω(n) of prime factors of n ∈ S(x, y) typically tends to grow with n, in such a way that we may expect the