Université Denis Diderot 2010-2011
Mathématiques M1 Spectral Theory
Examen Durée 3 heures
1. Let A, B, T ∈ B(H) with T = T ∗ . We suppose that AT = T B and T A = BT . (a) Let g ∈ C( R ) be an even function. Show that g(T ) commutes with A and B.
(b) Let f ∈ C( R ) be an odd function. Show that Af (T ) = f (T )B.
Answer — We first show by recursion on n the property :
P n : T 2n A = AT 2n , T 2n B = BT 2n , T 2n+1 A = T 2n+1 B, T 2n+1 B = AT 2n+1 . For n = 0, P 0 is a straightforward consequence of the hypotheses AT = T B and T A = BT . Now assume that P n has been proved. Then we write :
T 2n+2 A = T 2n+1 T A = T 2n+1 BT = AT 2n+1 T = AT 2n+2
and we obtain by a similar computation that T 2n+2 B = AT 2n+2 . Similarly we obtain T 2n+3 A = T 2n+2 T A = T 2n+2 BT = BT 2n+2 T = BT 2n+3
and also T 2n+3 B = AT 2n+3 . Hence P n+1 holds. It follows that, for any odd polynomial P , we have AP (T) = P(T )B and, for any even polynomial Q, [A, Q(T )] = [B, Q(T )] = 0. Now we use the fact that T is self-adjoint, so that we can define a continuous functional calculus C 0 (SpT, C ) ∋ f 7−→ f(T ) ∈ B(H), which satisfies in particular ||f (T )|| B(H ) ≤ ||f || C0( Sp T ) . Moreover by the Stone–Weierstrass theorem the set of restrictions of polynomial functions on SpT is dense in C 0 (SpT, C ). Hence for any, say, even function g ∈ C 0 (SpT, C ), there exists a sequence of polynomials (Q n ) n s.t. Q n | Sp T converges to g. Then one proves easily that if we set : Q b n (x) = 1 2 (Q n (x) + Q n (−x)), then Q b n is obviously even and Q b n | Sp T
converges to g also in C 0 (SpT, C ) and hence Q b n (T) converges to g(T ) in B(H). Since [ Q b n (T ), A] = [ Q b n (T), B] = 0, (a) follows. The proof of (b) is similar.
2. Let U be the bilateral shift on ℓ 2 ( Z ) ie, U e n = e n+1 where (e n ) n∈ Z is the canonical basis.
We recall that the spectrum of U is the unit circle. Let k ∈ Z . Show that e k is a cyclic vector for U and compute the associated spectral measure.
Answer — The vector e k is cyclic iff the vector subspace spanned by (U n (U ∗ ) m e k ) n,m∈ N
is dense in ℓ 2 ( Z ). Since U ∗ = U −1 (this can be seen from the very definition of U or as
a consequence of the fact that U is unitary because its spectrum is a subset of the unit
circle), we have U n (U ∗ ) m = U n−m , so that this amounts to show that the vector subspace
spanned by (U n e k ) n∈ Z is dense in ℓ 2 ( Z ). But this is clearly the fact, for (e n+k ) n∈ Z being
a Hilbert basis of ℓ 2 ( Z ).
The spectral measure dµ ek on the circle S 1 ⊂ C is defined by the relation
∀f ∈ C 0 (S 1 , C ), Z
S
1f (e iθ )dµ ek(θ) = he k , f (U )e k i.
By using a Fourier series decomposition f (e iθ ) = P
n∈ Z f b n e inθ and the fact that U ∗ = U −1 , we obtain f (U ) = P
n∈ Z f b n U n . Hence he k , f (U )e k i = X
n∈ Z
he k , f b n U n e k i = X
n∈ Z
f b n he k , e n+k i = f b 0 = 1 2π
Z
S
1f (e iθ )dθ, so that
dµ ek(θ) = 1 2π dθ.
3. Let a = (a n ) n∈ N be a sequence of complex numbers and M a be the following operator on ℓ 2 ( N )
D(M a ) = {x = (x n ) n ∈ ℓ 2 ( N ) : X
n
|a n | 2 |x n | 2 < ∞}, M a x = (a n x n ) n . (a) Show that M a is densely defined and closed.
Answer — The fact that D(M a ) is dense in ℓ 2 ( N ) is a consequence of the fact that D(M a ) contains all finite sequences and that finite sequences are dense in ℓ 2 ( N ). We now need to show that GrM a is a closed subspace of ℓ 2 ( N )×ℓ 2 ( N ). Consider a sequence (x k , M a x k ) k∈ N with values in GrM a and assume that (x k , M a x k ) converges to some (x, y) ∈ ℓ 2 ( N )×ℓ 2 ( N ), when k → +∞. Setting x k = (x 1 0 , x k 1 , · · · ) and x = (x 0 , x 1 , · · · ), this implies immediately that, for any fixed n ∈ N , lim k→∞ x k n = x n in C and hence that lim k→∞ a n x k n = a n x n in C . Hence since we also have lim k→∞ a n x k n = y n , this implies that a n x n = y n , ∀n ∈ N . Hence, since y ∈ ℓ 2 ( N ), P
n∈ N |a n | 2 |x n | 2 < +∞ and we deduce that x ∈ D(M a ) and y = M a x, i.e. (x, y) ∈ GrM a . Hence GrM a is closed.
(b) Show that sp(M a ) = {a n : n ∈ N }.
Answer — We first observe that any value a n is an eigenvalue of M a for at least the eigenvector e n . Hence {a n : n ∈ N } ⊂ Sp p M a ⊂ SpM a . Since we know from the course that the spectrum of any operator is closed, this implies that {a n : n ∈ N } ⊂ SpM a . Now let b ∈ C \ {a n : n ∈ N }. Then, since {a n : n ∈ N } is closed, there exists some ε > 0 s.t. B(b, ε) ∩ {a n : n ∈ N } = ∅. We will then first show that M a − b is a bijection between D(M a ) and ℓ 2 ( N ) : given some y ∈ ℓ 2 ( N ) we need to prove that there exists an unique x ∈ D(M a ) s.t. (M a − b)x = y. If such an x would exist, it would be the unique solution of the equation (a n − b)x n = y n ⇐⇒ x n = y n /(a n − b),
∀n ∈ N . Lastly one needs to prove that (b − M a ) −1 : ℓ 2 ( N ) −→ ℓ 2 ( N ) is bounded, a consequence of :
||(b − M a ) −1 y|| 2 = X
n∈ N
|y n | 2
|b − a n | 2 ≤ X
n∈ N
|y n | 2
ε 2 = ||y|| 2 ε 2 .
Hence the resolvent set of M a contains C \ {a n : n ∈ N }, which is equivalent to say
that SpM a ⊂ {a n : n ∈ N }.
4. Let a = (a n ) n∈ Z be a sequence of complex numbers indexed by Z and T a be the operator defined on ℓ 2 ( Z ) by
D(T a ) = {x = (x n ) n∈ Z ∈ ℓ 2 ( Z ) : X
n∈ Z
|a n | 2 |x −n | 2 < ∞}, T a x = (a n x −n ) n∈ Z . (a) Show that T a is densely defined and closed.
Answer — Use the same method as in question 3 – (a).
(b) Compute T a ∗ .
Answer — We first compute its domain D(T a ∗ ) : this is the set of y ∈ ℓ 2 ( Z ) s.t. the linear form
D(T a ) −→ C x 7−→ hy, T a xi
admits a continuous extension on ℓ 2 ( Z ) (which is then unique since D(T a ) is dense in ℓ 2 ( Z )). By Riesz’ theorem this property is equivalent to say that there exists some z ∈ ℓ 2 ( Z ) s.t. hy, T a xi = hz, xi, ∀x ∈ D(T a ). But
hy, T a xi = X
n∈ Z
y n a n x −n = X
n∈ Z
y −n a −n x n . Hence such a z exists, its satisfies z n = a −n y −n . Thus y ∈ D(T a ∗ ) iff P
n∈ Z |a −n y −n | 2 <
+∞, i.e.
D(T a ∗ ) = {y ∈ ℓ 2 ( Z ) : X
n∈ Z
|a n y n | 2 < +∞} and ∀y ∈ D(T a ∗ ), T a ∗ y = (a −n y −n ) n∈ Z . (c) Find a necessary and sufficient condition on a for T a to be normal.
Answer — For any x ∈ D(T a T a ∗ ) := {x ∈ D(T a ∗ ) : T a ∗ x ∈ D(T a )}, T a T a ∗ x = T a ((a −n x −n ) n ) = (a n (a n x n ) n ) = |a n | 2 x n
n , wheras for any x ∈ D(T a ∗ T a ),
T a ∗ T a x = T a ∗ ((a n x −n ) n ) = (a −n (a −n x n ) n ) = |a −n | 2 x n
n ,
Whatever D(T a T a ∗ ) and D(T a ∗ T a ) are, they contain the space of finite sequences. Hence a necessary condition for T a to be normal is that, for any finite sequence x = (x n ) n ,
|a n | 2 x n = |a −n | 2 x n , ∀n ∈ Z , which implies that :
|a n | = |a −n |, ∀n ∈ Z .
Conversely it is clear from the preceding computation that, if the above condition holds, then D(T a T a ∗ ) = D(T a ∗ T a ) and T a T a ∗ = T a ∗ T a , i.e. T a is normal.
(d) Find a necessary and sufficient condition on a for T a to be bounded.
Answer — The operator T a is bounded iff D(T a ) = ℓ 2 ( Z ) and there exists a constant
C ∈ [0, +∞) s.t. ∀x ∈ ℓ 2 ( Z ), ||T a x|| ≤ C||x||. Testing this condition with x = e n ,
for any n ∈ Z implies that |a n | ≤ C. Conversely, it is easy to check that the latter
condition implies that T a is bounded. Hence the necessary and sufficient condition
is : the sequence (a n ) n∈ Z is bounded.
(e) Compute sp(T a ∗ T a ) and sp(T a T a ∗ ).
Answer — We have seen in question c) that T a ∗ T a has the domain {x ∈ ℓ 2 ( Z ) : P
n∈ Z |a −n | 4 |x n | 2 < +∞} and is defined by T a ∗ T a (x) = (|a −n | 2 x n ) n . Hence by a reasoning similar to the question 3 – (b), we deduce that the spectrum of T a ∗ T a is {|a −n | 2 : n ∈ Z } = {|a n | 2 : n ∈ Z }. Similarly T a T a ∗ has the domain {x ∈ ℓ 2 ( Z ) : P
n∈ Z |a n | 4 |x n | 2 < +∞} and is defined by T a ∗ T a (x) = (|a n | 2 x n ) n . Hence the spectrum of T a T a ∗ is also {|a n | 2 : n ∈ Z }.
(f) Find a necessary and sufficient condition on a for T a ∗ T a (resp. T a T a ∗ ) to be compact.
Answer — Assume that T a ∗ T a is compact. Note also that this operator is self-adjoint.
Then it follows from the course that the spectrum of T a ∗ T a is equal to {0} ∪ Λ, where Λ is a subset of C \ {0} which is at most countable and has no accumulation point, excepted may be 0. In particular, for any r > 0, SpT a ∗ T a ∩ ( C \ B(0, r 2 )) is finite. Moreover Λ is composed of eigenvalues λ associated with finite dimensional vector eigenspaces. However we have seen in the preceding question that SpT a ∗ T a = {|a n | 2 : n ∈ Z } and the dimension of the eigenspace corresponding to any value λ ∈ Λ is the cardinal of {n ∈ Z : |a n | 2 = λ}. We hence deduce that the number of values n ∈ Z s.t. |a n | 2 ≥ r 2 is finite. In particular, if we set N (r) := sup{|n| ∈ Z : |a n | 2 ≥ r}, we have ∀n ∈ Z s.t. |n| > N (r), |a n | < r. Hence lim |n|→∞ a n = 0.
Conversely if lim |n|→∞ a n = 0, then we define for any r > 0 the operator K r on ℓ 2 ( Z ) by
K r x = X
n∈ Z ;|a
n|
2≥r
2|a −n | 2 x n e n .
Then ||T a ∗ T a − K r || ≤ r 2 , so that lim r→0 ||T a ∗ T a − K r || = 0 and each K r is a finite rank operator. Hence T a ∗ T a is compact.
A similar reasonning shows that T a T a ∗ is compact iff the same condition holds, i.e.
|n|→∞ lim a n = 0.
5. Let H be a complex separable Hilbert space. Let A be a non bounded self-adjoint operator such that its domain D(A) is dense in H. We assume that A is positive, i.e. that ∀ϕ ∈ D(A), hϕ, Aϕi ≥ 0.
(a) recall the spectral decomposition theorem for A ;
Answer — There exists a topological space X endowed with a Borelian measure µ, an unitary operator U : H −→ L 2 (X, µ; C ) and a real-valued Borelian 1 function f : X −→ C s.t., for any function ϕ ∈ U (D(A)),
(U AU −1 ϕ)(x) = f (x)ϕ(x), for µ − a.e. x ∈ X.
In the following we will write L 2 (X) = L 2 (X, µ; C ) for shortness. Note that the positivity condition translates here as ∀ϕ ∈ U (D(A)), R
X f (x)|ϕ(x)| 2 dµ(x) ≥ 0.
Moreover since D(A) is dense in H, U (D(A)) is dense in L 2 (X) and hence the latter condition implies that f is real and f ≥ 0, µ−a.e.
1. not necessarily bounded
(b) Prove that, for any t > 0, one can define the operator e −tA and that this operator is bounded on H ;
Answer — Since the function x 7−→ e −tf(x) is Borelian and bounded, it suffices to define e −tA by : ∀ϕ ∈ L 2 (X),
(U e −tA U −1 ϕ)(x) = e −tf(x) ϕ(x), for µ − a.e. x ∈ X.
This operator is bounded and its norm is equal to the supremum of x 7−→ e −tf(x) over X.
Beware : it is not possible to use the series P
n≥0 (−tA) n /n!, which does not converge since A is not bounded.
(c) Prove that ∀t, s > 0, e −tA e −sA = e −(t+s)A ;
Answer — This follows from the definition of e −tA and the fact that e −tf(x) e −sf(x) = e −(t+s)f(x) .
(d) Prove that ∀t 0 > 0, lim t>0,t→0 e −tA = e −t0A ;
Answer — We need to evaluate the limit of ||e −tA − e −t0A || H , when t → t 0 . Without loss of generality we can assume that t 0 /2 < t < 3t 0 /2. For any u ∈ H, let ϕ := U u ∈ L 2 (X), so that u = U −1 ϕ. Then
||(e −tA − e −t0A )u|| 2 H = ||(e −tf − e −t
0f )ϕ|| 2 L
2 = Z
X
|e −tf(x) − e −t0f (x) | 2 |ϕ(x)| 2 dµ(x).
By the mean value theorem, for any x ∈ X, there exists some τ between t 0 and t s.t. |e −tf(x) − e −t0f(x) | = | − f(x)e −τ f(x) (t − t 0 )| = |f(x)|e −t
0f (x)/2 |t − t 0 | ≤ C|t − t 0 |, where C := sup z>0 ze −t
0z/2 (actually C = 2/et 0 ). Hence
||(e −tA −e −t0A )u|| 2 H ≤ C 2 (t−t 0 ) 2 Z
X
|ϕ(x)| 2 dµ(x) = C 2 (t−t 0 ) 2 ||ϕ|| 2 L2 = C 2 (t−t 0 ) 2 ||u|| 2 H and ||e −tA − e −t0A || H ≤ C|t − t 0 |, which implies the result.
A || H ≤ C|t − t 0 |, which implies the result.
(e) Prove that ∀u ∈ D(A),
t>0,t→0 lim
e −tA u − u
t = −Au
Answer — For any u ∈ D(A) and ϕ := U u ∈ L 2 (X), so that u = U −1 ϕ, we have, for t > 0 :
e −tA − 1 t + A
u
2 H
=
e −tf − 1 t + f
ϕ
2
L
2= Z
X
e −tf(x) − 1
t + f (x)
2
|ϕ(x)| 2 dµ(x)
Using the mean value theorem, we know that, for any x ∈ X, there exists some τ ∈ (0, t) s.t.
e −tf(x) − 1
t + f(x) = −f (x)e −τ f (x) + f(x) = f (x)(1 − e −τ f (x) ),
and hence
e −tA − 1 t + A
u
2 H
= Z
X
|1 − e −τ f(x) | 2 f(x)|ϕ(x)| 2 dµ(x).
The function |1 − e −τ f(x) | 2 f (x)|ϕ(x)| 2 is dominated by f (x)|ϕ(x)| 2 , which is µ- integrable and it converges pointwise to 0 when t (and hence τ ) converges to 0.
Hence we can apply Lebesgue’s dominated convergence theorem to conclude that
e
−tAu−u
t − Au converges to 0.
(f) We define D(A n ) for all n ∈ N recursively by : D(A 0 ) := H and ∀n ∈ N , D(A n+1 ) :=
{u ∈ D(A n )| A n u ∈ D(A)}. Prove that ∀t > 0, ∀n ∈ N , ∀u ∈ H, e −tA u ∈ D(A n ).
Answer — This is just a consequence of the fact that, for any n ∈ N , x 7−→
f (x) n e −tf(x) is bounded on X, since f is a nonnegative function.
Supplementary questions (an application) 2
(g) Let Ω ⊂ R n be a bounded domain with smooth boundary. Let A be the non bounded operator on L 2 (Ω, C ) with domain D(A) = H 2 (Ω, C ) ∩ H 0 1 (Ω, C ) and such that ∀u ∈ D(A), Au = −∆u. Show that A is symmetric.
Answer — We must show that D(A) ⊂ D(A ∗ ) and that A and A ∗ coincides on D(A). In other words it suffices to check that, for any u ∈ D(A), the linear form
D(A) −→ C
v 7−→ hu, Avi
admits a continuous extension on L 2 (Ω), which coincides with v 7−→ hAu, vi. But, since u and v belongs to H 2 (Ω, C ) ∩ H 0 1 (Ω, C ), we have
hu, Avi = − Z
Ω
u∆v = − Z
Ω
v∆u + Z
∂Ω
v ∂u
∂n − u ∂v
∂n = − Z
Ω
v∆u = hAu, vi, where we have used the fact that the boundary integral cancels because u and v vanish on ∂Ω (u, v ∈ H 0 1 (Ω, C )).
In the following we will admit that A is self-adjoint ; (h) Prove that, for any f ∈ L 2 (Ω, C ), there exists 3 a C 1 map
u : (0, +∞) −→ D(A) t 7−→ u(t, ·) such that :
2. One could use the following formula, valid for f, g ∈ H
2(Ω, C ) Z
∂Ω
f ∂g
∂n − g ∂f
∂n = Z
Ω