• Aucun résultat trouvé

Ecosystem services, social interdependencies and collective action : moving from a conceptual to an actionable framework

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Ecosystem services, social interdependencies and collective action : moving from a conceptual to an actionable framework"

Copied!
13
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-02908290

https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02908290

Submitted on 28 Jul 2020

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access

archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-entific research documents, whether they are pub-lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Ecosystem services, social interdependencies and

collective action : moving from a conceptual to an

actionable framework

Cécile Barnaud, Clémence Moreau, Raphael Mathevet

To cite this version:

Cécile Barnaud, Clémence Moreau, Raphael Mathevet. Ecosystem services, social interdependencies and collective action : moving from a conceptual to an actionable framework. 17. Biennial IASC Conference : In Defense of the Commons: Challenges, Innovation, and Action, Jul 2019, Lima, Peru. �hal-02908290�

(2)

Cécile Barnaud

a

, Clémence Moreau

a,b

, Raphaël Mathevet

b,c

a

UMR Dynafor, INRA, Toulouse University, France

b

UMR CEFE, CNRS, Montpellier, France;

c

French Institute of Pondicherry, India

3 July 2019, IASC Conference, Lima, Peru

Ecosystem services, social interdependencies and collective action :

moving from a conceptual to an actionable framework

(3)

“the benefits people obtain from

ecosystems”

(MEA, 2005)

“the coordinated behaviour of groups

toward a common interest or purpose”

(Vermillon et al. 2001)

?

Ecosystem Services and Collective action : which connections?

Ecosystem Services

(4)

Ecosystem Services

Collective Action

Most ES are common and public goods

that require collective action – beyond

state and market

(Muradian and Rival, 2013;

Primmer et al. 2015; Loft et al. 2015)

ES as object : governance of ES

ES as concept : operationalisation of ES knowledge

Participatory approaches are needed to

operationalize ES knowledge

(Langemeyer et al. 2018; Jax et al. 2018;

Saarikoski et al. 2018)

Added-value of the ES concept

for collective decision-making :

e.g. heuristic, shared vision

(Spyra et al. 2018; Dick et al. 2018)

ES are new types of commons

that require to re-think collective

action

(Duraiappah et al. 2014)

?

Ecosystem Services and Collective action : which connections?

(5)

Used to highlight

social interdependancies

,

could the ES concept help to

understand and foster

collective action

?

(6)

Ecosystem

(dis)

service A

Providers

Ecosystem services

Beneficiaries

Co-produce,

preserve,

degrade,

manage

Benefit,

harm

Antagonism,

synergy

ACTION ARENA : Potential or existing collective actions

Social interdependencies

Institutions

Formal & informal

Representations

Interests, values, framings

Power relations

Levels of organization

Social & ecological

Ecosystem

(dis)

service B

LEGEND :

External drivers / outcomes

Decision makers

Facilitators

Informants

Intermediaries

Barnaud et al. (2018) Ecology & Society

(7)

Land abandonment

Cévennes National Park (France)

Land abandonment

Montseny Biosphere Reserve (Spain)

Land abandonment

Pyrénées National Park (France)

© C lémenc e Mor eau

Moving from an analytical to an actionable framework

 Using the ES concept to increase people’s awareness of interdependencies

Biological control

Apple production (France)

Salliou et al. (2019) Sustainability

Barnaud et al. (subm.) J. Rural Studies

(8)

Context : a conflict over farming practices in the Cévennes National Park

© J Prudent

Open grasslands with rocks

Shrublands and woodlands

Meadows : permament / temporary

No grazing

Removing rocks

Ploughing

How to conciliate agriculture with

heritage and biodiversity

conservation?

(9)

SECOLOZ : a Role-Playing Game highlighting trade-offs among ES

Objective of the Secoloz game

= each player tries to achieve his/her own objectives,

which implies negociating trade-offs among ES

(10)

Targetted ES

Hay + grass

Actions

Remove rocks (!)

Plough meadows (!)

Cattle grazing

Re-open shrubland

3 National Park Agents

with competing objectives

Tourism satisfaction

Patrimonial landscape

Grass

Patrimonial

landscape

4 farmers aiming

to maintain their livestock

Targetted ES

Biodiversity

Actions

(!) Give permits

Distribute subsidies

Among them : a mayor

Targetted ES

Water quality

Moreau et al. 2019. Sustainability

(11)
(12)

Enhanced mutual understanding, empathy

Aknowledging and dealing with uncertainty

• Cumulative effects / thresholds

• Ambiguity / Disputed knowledge claims

Increased awareness of social interdependencies

• Between farmers and national park agents

• Among farmers

• Among national park agents

• With other stakeholders and the society as whole

Exploring institutional innovations

• Need for concerted management at landscape scale

Effects of the RPG on the participants

Added-value of the ES or the RPG?

(13)

Cultural landscapes : commons that are socially constructed

and should therefore be inclusively negociated

• Social interdependencies are +/- perceived

 Awareness of interdependencies

(learning):

necessary,

but not sufficient

(Leeuwis, 2000)

• Social interdependencies are +/- assymetric, +/- desired,

+/- voluntarily hidden

 Need to negociate interdependencies : deal with multiple

interests, power asymetries

(negotiation)

(Saarikaski et al. 2018)

Social interdependencies are +/- regulated by institutions

 Need to create institutional space for interdependencies

(institutional innovation)

(Muradian & Rival 2013; Loft et al. 2018)

Références

Documents relatifs

Then, we propose an architectural model of System of Information Systems (SoIS) and investigate the knowledge base role in such complex system operating in the environment of a

However, we will need to focus on landscape planning and management (‘Agro-ecosystem management’ box) and encourage coordination between multiple actors within a landscape

This paper aims to develop a conceptual framework presenting how so- cial influences, including technology-based influence, and millennials’ inherent corporate social

Bringing these various elements together, the CSDH framework, summarized in Figure A, shows how social, economic and political mechanisms give rise to a set of socioeconomic

Barnaud, Cécile Drawing on ecosystem services thinking to highlight social interdependencies and foster collective

Ultimately, this demonstrates the generic character of the proposed framework that can be applied for a variety of target ecosystem services, as well as for different

Therefore, this study aims to: understand the factors that affect citizens’ adoption and on going usage of LGAF, and suggest a conceptual model explaining the dynamics of citizens

 Test the ES Transition framework in different study sites and at different scales (local to national).  Improve the understanding of