Evaluation of genetically engineered crops using transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic profiling techniques.

HAL Id: hal-00590803

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00590803

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-entific research documents, whether they are pub-lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution| 4.0 International License

Evaluation of genetically engineered crops using

transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic profiling

techniques.

Agnès E Ricroch, Jean B Bergé, Marcel Kuntz

To cite this version:

Agnès E Ricroch, Jean B Bergé, Marcel Kuntz. Evaluation of genetically engineered crops using transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic profiling techniques.. Plant Physiology, American Society of Plant Biologists, 2011, 155 (4), pp.1752-61. �10.1104/pp.111.173609�. �hal-00590803�

Ricroch, Berge and Kuntz. Plant Physiol. 2011

Supplemental list of references S2 – Selection of references on the use of

“omics” to identify food allergens.

1. Adel-Patient K, Guimaraes VD, Paris A, Drumare MF, Ah-Leung S, Lamourette P,

Nevers MC, Canlet C, Molina J, Bernard H, Créminon C, Wal JM (2011)

Immunological and Metabolomic Impacts of Administration of Cry1Ab Protein and MON 810 Maize in Mouse. PLoS ONE 6: e16346.

2. Barros E (2010). Molecular Profiling Techniques Detect Unintended Effects in Genetically Engineered Maize. ISB News Report May 2010.

3. Batista R, Martins I, Jeno P, Ricardo CP, Oliveira MM (2007) A proteomic study to

identify soya allergens - the human response to transgenic versus non-transgenic soya samples. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 144: 29-38

4. Chen H, Bodulovic G, Hall PJ, Moore A, Higgins TJ, Djordjevic MA, Rolfe BG (2009) Unintended changes in protein expression revealed by proteomic analysis of seeds from transgenic pea expressing a bean alpha-amylase inhibitor gene. Proteomics 9: 4406-4415

5. EFSA (2008) Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: The role of animal feeding trials. Report of the EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials. Food Chem Toxicol 46: 2–70

6. EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (2010) Scientific Opinion on the assessment of allergenicity of GM plants and microorganisms and derived food and feed. EFSA J 8 : 1700

7. Kuiper HA, Kleter GA (2004) Food Safety and Nutritional Aspects of Modification of Crop Quality.The 8th International Symposium on the Biosafety of Genetically Modified Organisms, Montpellier, France, 26-30 September, 2004 p.137-143

8. Nakamura R, Satoh R, Shimazaki T, Kasuga M, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Kikuchi

A, Watanabe KN, Teshima R (2010) Immunoproteomic and Two-Dimensional

Difference Gel Electrophoresis Analysis of Arabidopsis Dehydration Response Element-Binding Protein 1A (DREB1A)-Transgenic Potato. Biol Pharma Bulletin 33: 1418-1425 9. Nap JP, Atanassov A (2004) Genomics for Biosafety in Plant Biotechnology. Volume

359 NATO Science Series: Life and Behavioural Sciences. Ed Jan-Peter Nap, Atanas Atanassov and Willem J. Stiekema

10. Natarajan SS (2010a) Gene expression profiling for food safety assessment: Examples in potato and maize. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 58: 21-25

11. Natarajan SS (2010b) Natural variability in abundance of prevalent soybean proteins. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 58: 26-29

12. Natarajan SS, Xu C, Cregan P, Caperna TJ, Garrett WM, Luthria D (2009) Utility of proteomics techniques for assessing protein expression. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 54: 32-36

13. Pappas F, Stefanidou M (2006) Genetically modified food. J Hellenic Vet Med Soc 57: 241-246

14. Rouquié D, Capt A, Eby WH., Sekar V, Hérouet-Guicheney C (2010) Investigation of endogenous soybean food allergens by using a 2-dimensional gel electrophoresis approach. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 58: 47-53

15. Sancho AI, Mills ENC (2010) Proteomic approaches for qualitative and quantitative characterisation of food allergens. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 58: S42-S46

16. Scossa F, Laudencia-Chingcuanco D, Anderson OD, Vensel WH, Lafiandra D,

D'Ovidio R, Masci S (2008) Comparative proteomic and transcriptional profiling of a

bread wheat cultivar and its derived transgenic line overexpressing a low molecular weight glutenin subunit gene in the endosperm. Proteomics 8: 2948-2966

17. Selgrade MK, Bowman CC, Ladics GS, Privalle L, Laessig SA (2009) Safety assessment of biotechnology products for potential risk of food allergy: implications of new research. Toxicol Sci. 11: 31-9

18. Stevenson SE, Houston NL, Thelen JJ (2010) Evolution of seed allergen quantification - From antibodies to mass spectrometry. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 58: 36-41

19. Teshima R, Nakamura R, Satoh T, Nakamura R (2010) 2D-DIGE analysis of rice proteins from different cultivars. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 58: 30-35

20. Thelen JJ (2009) Proteomics tools and resources for investigating protein allergens in oilseeds. Regul. Toxicol Pharmacol 54: 41-45