• Aucun résultat trouvé

EXAM #1 REPORT Number of Students Total 37 Submitted 37 Not Submitted 0

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "EXAM #1 REPORT Number of Students Total 37 Submitted 37 Not Submitted 0"

Copied!
3
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

EXAM #1 REPORT

Number of Students

Total 37

Submitted 37

Not Submitted 0

GRADE DISTRIBUTION

DISTRIBUTION PER PROBLEM

(2)

INDIVIDUAL PROBLEM BREAKDOWN

Problem1 Problem 2 Problem3 Total Average 8.22 8.54 9.07 86.08 Std Dev 1.30 1.59 1.61 12.12

COMPARISON WITH LAST 4 YEARS

(3)

SPECIAL COMMENTS

Overall

- 3 Students did not follow the required exam note sheet format o 1 student zeroxed conversion factors to note sheet o 1 student included an example on note sheet

o 1 student used a large sheet of paper, using both sides

Problem 1

- Manometry: Some students used ( ) instead of

( )

- Linear momentum: some students did not include the force due to pressure; some students did not assume the correct direction for the forces

- Energy equation: most students did well on energy equation; some students did not consider the change in elevation

Problem 2

- Continuity: There were no issues in this part. Few students did not show the velocity relation by using continuity.

- X-momentum:

o Very few did not cancel the pressure gradient term.

o Many made a mistake in sign for the gravity force (-ρg sinθ instead of ρg sinθ) o Many forgot to divide the momentum equation with viscosity μ

Problem 3

- Number of PI parameters: Almost all students found the correct number of PI parameters.

- Dimensions: Most students used correct dimensions.

- Repeating variables: Most students used correct repeating variables.

- Arithmetic: Some students made small arithmetic errors when solving for the exponents.

Références

Documents relatifs

said housing including a casing having circular open ing formed therein, a base plate, the base plate including an annular platform portion and means mounted to the periphery

However, since we are projecting the force vector into (1,0,0) vector to get the drag for other parts too, we shouldn’t change the sign of force for that specific part.. Some

• Some students did not use the integral form of the momentum equation; they assumed a uniform velocity distribution not just at section 1 (correct) but also at section (2).. •

Analysis and Discussion, can fix the mistakes and resubmit for full credit by (10/7). This is only allowed of CFD Lab 1, no future leniency will be granted. o Many students did

 All students understood the CFD process and were successful running the simulations.  Many students were satisfied with the lab and felt they benefitted from the lab. Negative.

Instead, they calculated it by using F=PA equation, which brought huge value for pressure at point 2.. Therefore, the pressure at point 2 wasn't removed in the energy

COMPARISON WITH LAST 4

 Some students used wrong units on speed of sound in air, units did not cancel correctly for Mach