• Aucun résultat trouvé

Addressing the social landscape dimensions: The need for reconciling cross scale assessments for capturing Cultural Ecosystem Services (CES)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Addressing the social landscape dimensions: The need for reconciling cross scale assessments for capturing Cultural Ecosystem Services (CES)"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Addressing the social landscape dimensions: The need for reconciling cross scale assessments for capturing Cultural Ecosystem Services (CES)

Sonia Maria Carvalho Ribeiro, Teresa Pinto Correia, Maria Luisa Paracchini

Abstract:This special issue integrates eleven papers focussing on indicators able to convey the multiple expectations that society has concerning agricultural land. As scale issues have been so far overlooked within this research topic, a particular focus of this themed issue is to highlight the need for reconciling assessments across scales. The shared purpose of the contributions is to examine how the multiple societal expectations concerning agrarian landscapes might be incorporated into land use policy at different governance levels.

A core set of these papers were presented in the symposium “Linking social indicators across scales”, to the European Congress of the International Association of Landscape Ecology (IALE) in September 2013 in Manchester, UK. This symposium was organized to create the time and space for a discussion on the issues of scale when capturing societal preferences concerning agrarian landscapes. While the landscape scale was specifically addressed by four papers, seven papers examined broader geographic units in addition to up-scaling and downscaling issues.

Keywords; Agrarian landscapes; Social landscape preferences; Social indicators; Up scaling;

Downscaling; Land use policy

doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.12.022

Citação: Carvalho-Ribeiro, S. M., Pinto-Correia, T., Paracchini, M., L., 2016, Addressing the social landscape dimensions: The need for reconciling cross scale assessments for capturing Cultural Ecosystem Services (CES). Land Use Policy, Available online 6 January 2016, doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.12.022

Références

Documents relatifs

Figure S17: Local climate regulation service potential maps using CLC land cover data and the ES potential matrix (left), ATKIS/InVeKoS land cover data and the ES potential

 Lists of contributors to a system’s vulnerability (e.g., dimensions of exposure, sensitivity and adaptive capacity and their sub-elements) have been identified in various

Characterizing spatial pattern in ecosystem service values when distance decay doesn’t apply: choice experiments and local indicators of spatial association.

The integration of the fields of traditional infectious diseases and social science provide a promising approach for the productive utilisation of community engagement as it relates

From numerical weather forecasting to climate simulations, from economic modeling to social planning, computer simulations play a leading role in our understanding of various

The topic of ecosystem services, ecological services, environmental services (ES) and payments for environmental services (PES) has recently become the main reference for

The “payment for environmental services” concept, initially introduced to designate intervention mechanisms resembling a private voluntary transaction, is currently tending

Recent years have seen widespread experimentation with market-based instruments for the provision of environmental goods and ecosystem services. Many believe that