• Aucun résultat trouvé

The Seed Theory: A new vision of gravitation

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "The Seed Theory: A new vision of gravitation"

Copied!
11
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-02152801

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02152801

Preprint submitted on 11 Jun 2019

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Copyright

The Seed Theory: A new vision of gravitation

Anisse Zerouta

To cite this version:

Anisse Zerouta. The Seed Theory: A new vision of gravitation. 2019. �hal-02152801�

(2)

The Seed Theory: A new vision of gravitation

Anisse Zerouta1

Physics Department, USTHB – Université de Sciences et de la Technologies Houari Boumediene Algiers, Algeria.

Abstract

What if our trouble understanding the very nature of gravitation resided in the fact that this force is not the result of matter interactions originating from our own universe, but of matter and antimatter interactions originating from various universes? This interaction is made possible thanks to the presence of “Djamilars”, circular openings that cover the fabric of space-time.

In this article, we shall demonstrate these statements by offering a new approach to describe gravitation, the birth of a black hole, and finally the possibility of artificially altering gravitation by manipulating the opening diameter of djamilars.

___________________________

1a.zerouta@gmail.com

(3)

g

x

F

m

D

x

D

x

       r

dx2

n

d

  g

x

       F

m

r

d2x

n

d

 

 

2

1

2

2

2 2

: ( . )

: . ,

: : : .

3 , 1.27 7

:

x

m

d d

The multiverse force Constant of the proximity f g Gravitation m s

F n kg n kg m

s

r R m

n Nu m

d m djamila

orce adius of the djamilar

mb i

rs

er of djam la s p

r per er m

 

(4)

The theory: Gravitation and antimatter

The gravitational force of attraction is one of the many forms that the multiverse

 

Fm force takes when interacting with our universe. But the ideas of an attraction between two bodies1 and space-time deformation2 are erroneous concepts. Gravitation, the multiverse force

 

Fm , finds its explanation in the existence of an antimatter universe cluster H parallel to our matter universe cluster H (FIG. 1).

Indeed, when the universe was created, there was as much matter as antimatter. Because their natures are such that they repel each other, matter and antimatter have each formed a distinct universe. The existence of these two types of universes generates a multiverse force that is materialized, like the magnetic force, by a field which is the multiverse field. Both matter and antimatter universes play the same role as the north and south poles of a magnet.

-Interactions between “matter” and “antimatter” universes H, existence of the multiverse force and its correlation with the gravitational force - FIG. 1 -

1- Front view of the antimatter universes H 2- Front view of the matter universes H

3- Profile view of the matter and antimatter universes 4- Visualization of the multiverse force field 5- The matrix

We can represent our universe U.H // 6 like the other universes of our H cluster as a 2 dimensional screen (primary screens) with circular perforations all over their surface (FIG. 2).

These perforations have the ability of changing their opening diameter in order to adjust to the

(5)

size of the object. We will be calling these perforations “djamilars”. Pretty much as the iris adjusts its diameter to the quantity of light it receives, the djamilars react instantly, and adjust to the size of the object (secondary screens) on the screen: for a microscopic object, the opening will be small, while for a macroscopic one, it will be wider. This is the main difference between microscopic and macroscopic worlds: matter will behave differently in the microscopic and macroscopic worlds, because it will be submitted to different constraints in each of them (Figure 3).

These djamilars are therefore open windows between the different parallel universes in a cluster, which allows them to interact with each other in different manners and on different scales: on a microscopic scale, the djamilars allow the multiverse force

 

Fm to go through, which allows the primary and secondary screens to remain tied to each other.

(6)

In the case of the multiverse pair (matter/antimatter) H, the interaction of 2 multiverses generates a gravitational force (multiverse force,Fm) of 3 10 . 8n kg1 . This matches the maximum speed observed (speed of light). The value of C is related to the mass of the 2 multiverses H. For multiverse pairs of different masses, the value of C will also be different (more significant in the case of multiverses with a higher mass than ours, and lower in the opposite case).

In the same way as the sun, which is a balanced system between gravitational forces and nuclear fusion. The pair of matter / antimatter universes is a stable system too. This stability is possible by the existence of the multiverse force (Fm ) that attracts the 2 universes clusters and the repulsive nature of the matter / antimatter universes.

On Earth:

9,80665 . 2

gem s

The different superconducting experiments allowed us to have an order of magnitude of a djamilar's radius on earth: at a temperature of T 70K and with a gravitation

9,80665 . 2

gem s , the electron succeeded in crossing the djamilars (the material becomes superconducting).

: de é

If we take rr , réelectron s radius' 2.8179 10 15m

8 8

9.80665

3.2688 10 3 10

e

e m e e e

m

g F D D g D D

F

        

2

2

8 15

2 21 2

1.273

3.2688 10

1.02880 10 . 2.81

7 3.1415 79 10

e

e

e

e d d d d

d

D r n n D n d m

  r

 

  

 

2 2

: . :

de

r djamilar radius on Earth d m djamilars per m On the Moon :

1, 62 . 2

gmm s

9 8

1.62 5.4 10

3 10

m

m m m m m m

m

g F D D g D D

F

        

2m

2m

m

m d d d

d

D r n r D

  n

      

 

9 21 2

5.4 10 1.02880 10 .

m d

with D   and n   d m

 

9

2 2 30 15

21

5.4 10

1.3163 10 1.1473 10 1.2737 3.1415 1.02880 10

m m m

d d d

with r r r m

       

  

: '

dm

r a djamilar s radius Moon

r

dm

r

é

(7)

The experiment

Our various experiments in superconductivity have shown us that the decrease in the temperature of the superconducting material increases the opening diameter of the djamilar by an average of 1 to 2%. On Earth, this increase in the diameter of the djamilar makes it possible to wait for a critical size for which an electron can cross the djamilar (the material becomes superconducting). In the case of the Moon, the djamilar has a radius of

1.1473 1015 dm

r   m, which is 40% of the size of an electron. If we lower the temperature of a superconductor on the moon, we increase its opening diameter by 1 to 2%, which is below the minimum opening size of the djamilar allowing the material to behave like a superconductor.

At T=70K we have (P2=1000g) so (gxge 9,80665 m s. 2).

At this temperature, we notice that the weight of the measured object no longer increases.

This implies that the diameter of the djamilar no longer increases either. These two observations make it possible to determine the size of the radius of a djamilar on Earth, which corresponds to the size of an electron.

' 2.8179 10 15

de é

r  r electron s radius  m

(8)

Calculation of the distance between two djamilars

21 2 15

1.02880 10 . 2.8179 10

d é

with n   d m and r   m

On 1m2surface we have1.02880 10 21djamilars, which gives us 3.2074 10 10djamilars per meter.

With a djamilar’s diameter d 2ré d 5.6358 10 15 m The space occupied by the djamilars for a meter is:

10 15 4

3.2074 10 5.6358 10 1.8076 10 m

Calculation of the space (e) without djamilar for a meter:

1 1.8076 104 0.99981

e   m e m

The space between two djamilars is: 0.9998110 3.1171 10 11 3.2074 10

d d

d   d   m

What value of r (radius of the djamilar) is required to create a black hole?

2bh

bh m bh bh d d

With gFD et D    rn , in the case of a black hole, we have: gbhFm

2

1 bh

bh m bh bh d d

gFDwith D    rn

2 11

21

1 1.5586 10

1.2737 3.1415 1.02880 10

bh bh

d d

r r m

    

  

(9)

Let us explain the nature and formation of black holes, taking as an example a supermassive star at the end of its life. To keep this star fixed on the primary screen, the djamilars will have adjusted to its size by adopting an important opening diameter. When the star collapses, its size gets lower very quickly but its mass remains stable, which forces the djamilars to increase their opening diameter more and more. In certain cases (FIG. 4), the mass/size ratio becomes so disproportionate that to keep the star fixed, the djamilars merge to create a single gigantic djamilar, which corresponds to what we call a black hole.

11

11

15

1: , 1 1.5586 10

2 : max , 2 3 2 1.5586 10

2

3 : , 3 2.8179

2

10

d

s

r radius of a djamilar in order to obtain a black hole r m r radius of djamilars before their fusio d

distance between djamila

n r r r m

r radius of a djamilar on Earth r m r

3.1171 10 11

1 2

, d

on Earth d m

r r

(10)

Relationship between gravitation and the size of a djamilar

2 15

8 1

11

:

( ) 9.80665 .

( ) 2.8179 10

( ) 3 10 .

( ) 1.56 10

5530 5530

30580000

e

bh

bh

bh e

bh

e d

m bh

d d

d d

d bh

m e

We have

g gravitation Earth m s

r radius djamilar Earth m F g multiverse force n kg

r radius djamilar black hole m

r r r

r

g F g

g

 

  

 

   

  

2

2 2

2 2 2 2

2 2

2 2

30580000 5530 30580000

:

bh

bh e

e

bh bh bh bh

e

e e

e

bh

bh e

d

d d

d m

m e

e

d d d e d e

m m

e d

e d e d m m

d m

e

d

g

if x so x

which give r x r x r

r

F x g x F

g

r r r g r g

F F

r r

g r g r F F

r F

g r

 

 

   

   

   

        

  

 

These two formulas can be used for all objects x of our universe

2 2

2

bh x

x

bh

d x d m

d x

m d

r g r F

r g

F r

 

 

 

11 8 1

11 2 2

8

1.56 10 3 10 .

1.56 10 3 10

bh

bh x

d m

d x x

d

m

with r m and F n kg

r g g whe have r

F

   

 

  

16 30 2

9 10 1.23 10

dx x x x

r

g and g r

      

2 16 16 15

: 24.79 . , 9 10 9 10 24.79 4.481 10

j j j

j d j d d

Exemple Jupiter gm s r   g   r   r   m

(11)

References

1. Newton, I., Philosophiae naturalis principa mathematica, 26-235, 236-400 (1687).

2. Einstein, A., Ann. der Phys., 38, 355, 443 (1912).

3. Zerouta, A., The Seed Theory: Unifying and replacing quantum physics and general relativity with “state physics”. 2017. ⟨hal-01689178v4⟩

Références

Documents relatifs

Two and a half years ago, Canadians gave our Government a strong mandate: a mandate to protect jobs and our economy; a mandate to keep taxes low; a mandate to make our families

My government is still hopeful that a significant proportion of these expenditures will be committed to British Columbia, in view of the economic potential of our province..

Because of the central importance of this fiscal program to the development of public policy in Ontario over the next few years, I propose to read Budget Paper B immediately

This $5.3 million strategy is aimed at continuing to improve the opportunities and support for our communities across the province to help our kids become more active and healthy..

Yet, the nature writers “of our time,” to go back to Berry’s statement, calling on powerful images to release their songs from the clutches of the

This assumption of exact physical equivalence makes it impossible for us to speak of the absolute acceleration of the system of reference, just as the usual theory of relativity

This issue synthesizes recent advances in the male reproductive field taking advantage of the emergence of new technologies such as next-generation sequencing, single cell

A non-commutative tangent space for conical pseudomanifolds In order to obtain an Atiyah-Singer type topological index theorem for our conical pseudomanifold X , we introduce in