• Aucun résultat trouvé

Agronomic performance of guayule as alternative source of rubber and latex in Europe: genetic variation and effects of irrigations and fertilization

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Agronomic performance of guayule as alternative source of rubber and latex in Europe: genetic variation and effects of irrigations and fertilization"

Copied!
27
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Agronomic performance of guayule as

alternative source of rubber and latex in

Europe: genetic variation and effects of

irrigations and fertilization

E.N. van Loo (Robert), Snoeck D., Pioch D., Chapuset T., Visser P. and Palu S.

(2)

Guayule field testing in Europe

Near Cartagena, Spain

Montpellier, France

Perpignan, France

Trial with > 30 guayule lines

Fertilizer/irrigation trial with AZ2 > 3 years

Cultivar trial with 6 lines > 2 years

Rubber & resin determination using NIRS (Sunisat et al. in press) on basis of ASE

(3)
(4)

Montpellier trial

Unexpected problems with snow cover and water

logging

Some guayule lines

survived extended frost periods and snow (< -5 C)

Yield potential with water logging severely

compromised

Irrigation had negative effect on yield

(5)

Cartagena trials

Nursery first

Technique like with lettuce

Drip irrigation

(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)

Fertigation trial: Total biomass

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 0 183 366 549 732 915 1098 DW To t. bio mass, t/ha

Days after planting (June 6, 2009)

100I/0F 100I/50F 100I/100F 66I/100F 33I/100F J09 D09 J10 D10 J11 D11 J12

(10)

Fertigation trial: Leaf biomass

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 183 366 549 732 915 1098 DW Leaf, t/ha

Days after planting (June 6, 2009)

100I/0F 100I/50F 100I/100F 66I/100F 33I/100F J09 D09 J10 D10 J11 D11 J12

(11)

Fertigation trial: Stem biomass

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 0 183 366 549 732 915 1098 DW Stem, t/ha

Days after planting (June 6, 2009)

100I/0F 100I/50F 100I/100F 66I/100F 33I/100F J09 D09 J10 D10 J11 D11 J12

(12)

Fertigation trial: Rubber % (NIRS-ASE)

NIRS-calibration:

Sunisat SUCHAT et al. (in press) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 183 366 549 732 915 1098 % Rubber in stem

Days after planting (June 6, 2009)

100I/0F 100I/50F 100I/100F 66I/100F 33I/100F J09 D09 J10 D10 J11 D11 J12

(13)

Fertigation trial: Resin % (NIRS-ASE)

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 183 366 549 732 915 1098 % Resin in stem

Days after planting (June 6, 2009)

100I/0F 100I/50F 100I/100F 66I/100F 33I/100F J09 D09 J10 D10 J11 D11 J12

(14)

Fertigation trial: Rubber yield

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 0 183 366 549 732 915 1098

Rubber yield, kg/ha

Days after planting (June 6, 2009)

100I/0F 100I/50F 100I/100F 66I/100F 33I/100F J09 D09 J10 D10 J11 D11 J12

(15)

Fertigation trial: Average annual yield

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 100I/0F 100I/50F

100I/100F 66I/100F 33I/100F

kg/ha per year

Annual resin production Annual rubber production

(16)

Fertigation trial: Gross chain value

rubber @ € 2.50/kg resin @ € 1.50/kg lignocellulose @ € 40/ton 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 18000 0 183 366 549 732 915 1098 To

tal chain value, euro

/ha

Days after planting (June 6, 2009)

100I/0F 100I/50F 100I/100F 66I/100F 33I/100F J09 D09 J10 D10 J11 D11 J12

(17)

Fertigation trial: Daily gross value/ha

rubber @ € 2.50/kg resin @ € 1.50/kg lignocellulose @ € 40/ton 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0 183 366 549 732 915 1098 To

tal chain value, euro

/ha/day

Days after planting (June 6, 2009)

100I/0F 100I/50F 100I/100F 66I/100F 33I/100F J09 D09 J10 D10 J11 D11 J12

(18)

Cultivar trial, stem production

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 183 366 549 732 Stem, t/ha

Days after planting (June 26, 2010)

593 CAL6 AZ1 AZ101 AZ2 11591

(19)

Rubber % of 6 guayule lines

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 183 366 549 732 Rubber, %

Days after planting (June 26, 2010)

593 CAL6 AZ1 AZ101 AZ2 11591

(20)

Rubber yield development of 6 lines

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 183 366 549 732

Rubber yield, kg/ha

Days after planting (June 26, 2010)

593 CAL6 AZ1 AZ101 AZ2 11591

(21)

Average annual rubber yield, kg/ha

Only data for year 1 and year 2

In Fertigation trial AZ2: 1300 kg/ha in year 2 and 2500 kg/ha in year 3 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400

593 CAL6 AZ1 AZ101 AZ2 11591

Annual rubber yield, kg/ha

Year1 Year2

(22)

Gross chain value – 6 lines

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 183 366 549 732 Eco no

mic yield, euro

/ha

Days after planting (June 26, 2010)

593 CAL6 AZ1 AZ101 AZ2 11591

Feb11 June11 Oct11 Feb12 June12

rubber @ € 2.50/kg resin @ € 1.50/kg

(23)

Agronomic and economic feasibility in Europe

Plenty of room for both farmers and industry to earn

money and obtain good quality rubber, resin and energy!

Large variation in rubber % between harvest dates, treatments and cultivars (4-13 %)

Optimal water use can be analysed

Resin % range = 7-11 %, mostly around 10 %

Rubber and resin yields: 1500-2500 kg/ha per year (both!)

Gross production chain value

● 

after 2 years: 8000 €/ha

(24)
(25)
(26)

Conclusions

Agronomic feasibility

● 

testing essential (guayule does not like all soils!)

● 

at the right sites: excellent performance also in Europe

Optimal cultivar choice and agronomy

● 

depends on cost prices and market prices and goals

● 

Didier Snoeck et al., this conference

Experimental data available to convince European farmers and industry of the feasibility of EU guayule

Thanks to: European Union, Dutch government Peter Visser (El Molinar, Spain), CIRAD team, my colleagues at PRI

(27)

Molecular variation in CPT-genes

DNA sequences from cDNA and genomic, from AZ2

CPT1 and CPT2: single genes apparently (but still not very high coverage)

CPT3 (with a 21 nucleotide deletion compared to CPT1 and CPT2): looks like at least four alleles/loci

RNA-samples taken from six varieties from stem and leaf

● 

testing whether the varieties show sequence variation

● 

testing whether expression level differences between varieties coincide with rubber % differences: set up not yet decided

Références

Documents relatifs

The zonally-integrated transport depicted in Fig. 1 for REF-05 and REF-025 exhibit the familiar signature of the subtropical-tropical overturning circulation.. Title Page

Total production cash cost, except family labor costs and fuel costs (which forma small part of total costs), was calculated as the variable cost. Finally, gross added value

Table 4 presents for each element (N P K) the elementary amount applied to each tree every year, the elementary amount exuded in the latex produced by that tree in one year, and

SPS and AMY were high at higher position on both untapped and tapped panels as compared to untapped trees under upward tapping but they increased slightly with downward tapping

Molecular cloning, expression profiles and characterization of a novel translationally controlled tumor protein in rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis). Transcriptome analyses

In order to further assess the overall feasibility of guayule rubber development in Europe, there is a need to also investigate the environmental impacts or benefits of such a

Rubber industry Tires Industrial Medical Non-allergy Gloves,Condoms GUAYULE PLANTS BIOMASS/BAGASSE CO-PRODUCTS LATEX DRY RUBBER/TSR Green chemistry Bio-polymers

Under such precautions, an accurate fertilization application, fitted to the stimulation intensity, seems to enhance the response to stimulation (IRCA109) or to limit the