• Aucun résultat trouvé

Evaluation of the differences in pest management for conventional and transgenic cotton

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Evaluation of the differences in pest management for conventional and transgenic cotton"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

XXII Congresso brasileiro de entomologia,Uberlândia – MG (Brésil), 24-29/08/2009 ResumoID:207-1

Especialidade: Manejo Integrado de Pragas

EVALUATION OF THE DIFFERENCES IN PEST MANAGEMENT FOR CONVENTIONAL AND TRANSGENIC COTTON

Rafaeti Capelari, Alexandre Betiol, Pierre Silvie, Antônio Correa Lima, Evaldo Kazushi Takizawa.

Abstract

In order to evaluate the differences in pest management for transgenic cotton - with the cry1Ac gene, such as NuOpal and DP 604 B (both resistant to the Cotton Blue Disease, CBD) - and conventional one, such as DeltaOpal, FM 910 (both resistant to the CBD) and FM 977 (susceptible to the CBD), a comparison was drawn by Ceres Consultoria Agronômica, CIRAD and the São José farm, 29 km away from Primavera do Leste – Mato Grosso, subsidized by FACUAL’s fund. Planting was done on December 22, 2007. These varieties were laid out on a production field totaling 57 ha, composed of 18 ha (NuOpal), 0,4 ha (DP 604 B), 4ha (DeltaOpal), 3 ha (FM 910) and 32 ha (FM 977). Pest control was done following threshold levels, through the monitoring of insects and mites over 80 plants twice a week. Beginning at 95 days after emergence, 400 green bolls were analyzed per cultivar. Data related to chemical applications were collected. The most relevant pests on both cultivars were Aphis gossypii aphid, followed by Pseudoplusia includens caterpillars, Tetranychus urticae mites, Euschistus heros pentatomid bug, Spodoptera eridania and Spodoptera frugiperda caterpillars. The occurrence of these non-target pests did not create differences on the applications among the different cultivars. Heliothis

virescens and Alabama argillacea caterpillars were observed on the conventional cultivars. Results

obtained on the managements verify the efficiency of the toxin on these target pests. There was no need to apply the insecticides Avaunt 150, Tracer and Mentox 600 EC on the transgenic cottons, resulting in the economy of three applications. In total, the transgenic cotton was protected by eighteen different products, while the conventional cotton received twenty different products.

Keywords: Pest management, NuOpal, DeltaOpal, transgenic cotton.

Références

Documents relatifs

– A matter of messy market and adaptation to – A matter of reduction of Bt cotton advantage g. • Regulation

Symptoms on cotton plants inoculated with cotton leaf roll luteovirus in the presence or absence of a SSR marker linked to the resistance gene.. Branquinho, AA 1 ; Oliveira, TS 2

Thu the identification of PCR-ba ed molecular markers linked to Blue Disease resistance would be of great help to the cotton breeders in their efforts to breed disease resi

Populations obtained from the cross of Delta Opal resistant cultivar with two susceptible varieties (CNPA ITA 90 and Mákina) also indicated that resistance to CBD in Delta Opal

expression ‘farmscaping’ has been proposed to designate ‘a whole- farm, ecological, approach to pest management’ (Dufour, 2000). Multiple cropping, where two or more crops may

The management was that of a standard commercial production unit of the region, including pest and disease monitoring of 40 plants by range up to 43 days old and 25 after that

Introduction Bâtiment Conditions normales Diagramme adiabatique et son utilisation • Les éléments d’un système • Impact sur les résultats • Conclusion... Introduction •

PROCEEDINGS OF THE WORLD COTT TT TT TT TTON RESEARCH CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH CONFERENCE-3 -3 -3 -3 -3