HAL Id: jpa-00247560
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00247560
Submitted on 1 Jan 1991
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
Focal conic faceting in smectic-A liquid crystals
J. Fournier, Geoffroy Durand
To cite this version:
J. Fournier, Geoffroy Durand. Focal conic faceting in smectic-A liquid crystals. Journal de Physique
II, EDP Sciences, 1991, 1 (7), pp.845-870. �10.1051/jp2:1991113�. �jpa-00247560�
J
Phys
II France(1991)
845-870 JUILLET 1991, PAGE 845Classification
Physics
Abstracts61 30J 68 10C
Focal conic faceting in smectic-A Iiquid crystals
J B Foumier and G Durand
Laboratoire de
Physique
des solldes, bit 510, 91405Orsay
Cedex, France(Received
27 December1990, revised Ii March 199I,accepted18
March1991)Abstract. Smectic-A
nucleating
in the isotropicphase
presents vanous bulk focal conic defects close to the interface, within the « bitonnets » first descnbed by Fnedel andGrandjean
in 1910 Weexpenmentally
study thestability
of the « bitonnets in ahigh-frequency
aligning electncal fieldAlthough
the extemal shape appears out-of-equilibnum, the focal conic texture is foundstable We build a model
explaining
thegeneral
interracial focal conic texture it participates inthe min1mlzatlon of the interfacial energy by orienting the smectic
layers
almostperpendicular
tothe interface, above a critical size
lo comparing
layer curvature and surface energies Thls modelexplains
new arborescent textures that we observe insidecapillary
tubes We then discussequilibrium
shapes of size L. We discuss three regimes L «lo yields
3D-cristal-bke Wulf»shapes
For Lm
lo, equilibnum shapes
must contain focal comcs, although we cannot solve the general solution In the asymptotic limit L-cc, wepredict
fractal textures of dimension~ d
~ 2 inside «
optimal
configurations, sphencal as for 3D-liquids. Finally focal comcs can be considered as bulk facets » whichpile
up to decorate « bitonnets and moregeneral
interfacialtextures. Focal conics appear then as intnnsic defects of Smectic-A materials in contact with their
isotropic
phase
1. Introduction.
Smectic-A
(Sm-A)
are lamellarliquid crystalline phases [I]
In theground
state, an ideal Sm-Aphase
consists in a uniformpiling
ofplanar, parallel
andequtdtstant layers
of molecularthickness In practice, Sm-A
phases usually
present bulk distorted textures in which thelayers, although
remainingequidistant,
can beviolently
curved These macroscopicdefects,
called
«focal
contcs ii were first studiedby
Friedel andGrandjean [2] They
consist m delimited bulk domains inside which the SnJ-Alayers
are curved in thevicinity
of twodisclination
lines,
anelltpse
and theconjugated
confocalhyperbola
Usually, focal
comcs areproduced by
extemal constraintsforcing layer
curvature In most cases, the curvature is induced to fulfill antogonistic orientationalboundary
conditions These antagonistic«anchorings» generally
occur on solid extnnsic substrates[2],
or betweensmectic
drops
andamorphous liquid
matrixes, on mixture interfaces [3]However,
it hasrecently
been shown that the surface energy anisotropy of interfaces intrinsic to theliquid
cnstalline material could also induce focal conic defects[4]
in aparticular planar
geometry,in which the Sm-A
phase
is sandwiched between air and the isotropicphase
of thematenal,
a first-order texturalinstability
creates freefloating
focal conic networks The focal coniccurvature is
produced by
theantagonistic
surface anisotropies of the two interfaces the Sm-Alair
interface favorsparallel layer/surface
onentation and the intnnsicSm-Alisotropic
interface favorsperpendicular layer/surface
onentation.More
generally,
it isinteresting
to discuss whether a similarinstability
would occur, in the absence of any airphase,
on intrinsicSm-Alisotropic
interfaces of variousshapes,
i-e- tostudy
the
problem
of theequilibnum shape
of a Sm-A volume nucleated inside the isotropicphase.
Indeed,
it is known since Fnedel andGrandjean's
studies in1910,
that the nucleation of Sm-A insideIsotropic phase gives
nse to vanouselongated shapes,
the « Bdtonnets »[2],
decoratedby
more or lesscomplicated
focal conic texturesHowever,
whether theongin
» of these focal comics is statical ordynamical,
or whetherthey
are stable or metastable has never beenestablished.
In this paper, resuming the anisotropy of the
Sm-A/isotropic
interfacial energy as theleading mechanism,
westudy
theequllibnum shapes
of Sm-A nucleated inside theIsotropic phase
of theliquid crystalline
matenal. Afterrecalling
in part 2 the focal conic structure and the associated energy, we establish m part3,
the «Wuf-like
»elongated shapes
that wouldcorrespond
to idealstrictly
undistorted Sm-Aliquid crystals
nucleated inside the isotropicphase Then,
we discuss the associatedelastically
relaxedconfiguration
and show that theamplitude
of the relaxation should be infinitesimal.Generalizing
the model of reference[4]
for Sm-A
plates,
we construct aconfiguration containing
asingle
focal conic defect which issignificantly
lessenergetical,
above atypical
size, than the previous Wulf solution.Equihbnum shapes
must then contain focal comics. Inpart 4,
weexperimentally study
thestability
of the « bitonnets » focal comics. We show thatalthough
the extemalshape
isprobably
out ofequilibnurn, according
to alD-crystal
behavior », the bulk focal conic can be considered as anequilibrium
texture. In consequence, in part 5 we consider interfaces ofarbitrary shapes.
Weestablish,
m the case oflarge interfaces,
ageneral procedure
to build focal conic texturesre1axlng
the amsotropic interfacial energy. We then discuss the case of thebitonnets » In
part 6,
westudy asymptotic equihbnum shapes
in the limit oflarge
Sm-A volumes and show that it mustcorrespond
tospheres
with a radial «Apollonius
»[5]
network of focal comics.Finally,
we show in conclusion that focal comics can begeometncally
considered as the « volumic
facets
» of Sm-Aequilibnurn shapes, by analogy
with the surface facets of usual3D-crystals.
Apartial
summary of this work wasrecently presented
in aworkshop [6].
2. Focal conic bulk defects.
An « ideal Sm-A
phase,
without anydefects,
consists in a one-dimensional(lD) piling
of 2Dliquid layers,
at the same timeplanar, parallel
andequidistant (Fig I)
Inside eachlayer
of molecular thickness a(a
30h
for usualtherrnotropic Sm-A),
rod-like molecules are on the average onented in the direction of the normal n to thelayers (nematic ordenng
of director n, n~=
I).
Thespecific properties
of smectlcphases
aremainly
due to the fact thatthey
are low- dimensionalcrystals (lD-crystals
and2D-liquids)
Forinstance,
unlike3D-crystals
whichalways
consist in domains of uniform onentationseparated by
grainboundanes,
real Sm-Aphases
are never quite ideal but dousually
show macroscopic bulkdefects,
the so-calledfocal
comcs, in which the Sm-A
layers
are nolonger planar
butviolently
curved. This property ischaractenstic of low-dimensional
crystals,
which can exbJbitlarge
bulk distortions of purecurvature
strictly leaving
thelD-crystal
undilated In the case of3D-crystals, however,
alltypes
of bulk distortions dilate the 3D-lattice.The free energy
density f~j
associated with the bulk elastic distortions of Sm-Aphases
contains two terms
[1]
:fel(~l
"
(K(Cl(~)
+C2(~l)~
+jBE(~l~ (11
N 7 FOCAL CONIC FACETING IN SMECTIC-A
LIQUID
CRYSTALS 847al llllllllllllllllllllllllllll
~
lllllllllllllllllllllllllllll lllllll
Fig.
Schematlc representation of an « ideal Sm-Aphase
The first term descnbes the curvature energy
(cj
and c~being
the localprincipal
curvatures of the Sm-Alayers,
K 10~~cgs)
the second term descnbes the energy associated withlayer
dilation
(e
stands for the relativelayer
thickness vanation,B~10~cgs).
Note thatB
K/A
~ defines a penetration »length
Aiii,
which compares vith a few molecularlengths
far from second-orderphase
transitions.With
simple
dimensional arguments, let us first recallwhy
pure curvature defects doactually
occur in Sm-A. We consider a onelength problem
in which the Sm-Alayers
arecurved with a
typical
curvature radius R~L inside a volume~L~ (Fig. 2a)
The totalintegrated corresponding
energy writes(K/L~) L~~
KL and growslinearly
with the size L of the domain Note that if R goes to zero inside thevolume,
aLog
L factor appears because of the curvaturedivergence. However,
such a modest factor will notchange
thediscussion
qualitatively,
as shown later onThls, indeed,
is a remarkable point that curvature volumic distortions behave as « lines ». Therefore «focal
conic » pure curvaturedefects,
of' ,'> ",~"
), r'b J
$, IQ
", ~,, ~'r
~' .~
"( ," [ ,~t
,-1'),'
-" T/ '
~
N~
a) b)
Fig. 2.-Elastic distortions in a one
length
~Lproblem a)The
Sm-Alayers
are curvedl
IL
inside a volumeL~. b) They
are alsogenerally
dilated if no precaution is takenenergy
roughly KL,
are lessenergetical
than grainboundaries,
whose energyobviously
scalesL~
In the case of3D-crystals, grain
boundanes are created to separate domainshaving
different orientations With ourprevious argument,
smectics willprefer
curvature to grain boundanes to connect such different domains. In practice, it is often the case that anantagonistic anchoring
of thelayers
on theboundary plates
induces a macroscopiclayer
curvature l
IL
on alength
L.Now,
adifficulty
arises sincecurving arbitranly
thelayers
will also
arbitrarily
dilate them(Fig. 2b).
Let us then compare curvature distortions withdilative distortions in the same one
length problem (Be
~)L~~
KL gives eAIL,
whichcorresponds
to the maximumlayer
thickness variation in the volume~
L~,
if werequire
that dilation energy should not exceed curvature energy. Since A ismolecular,
~ must vanish for macroscopic curvature; tlus of course comes from the fact that dilation energy scalesL and pure curvature
only
scales L. Since macroscopic curvature ~L cannot suffer » a
dilation greater than e
~
AIL (e.g.
e~10~~
for L ~10 ~m, far from second-orderphase transitions),
it is a verygood
approximation to use thegeometrical description,
I-e to assumestrictly
e=
0, excluding layer
dilation[7].
We now recall the focal conic structure
[8], using
our previousarguments
whichgeneral
structure can we build with families of curved but
equidistant layers
? If one starts with anygeneral (undulated)
surface and try to buildparallel
andstnctly equidistant surfaces,
the process willrapidly
stop becausesingularities,
where thelayers
are no moredefined,
will appear on surfaces[8] (Fig. 3).
This is notacceptable
because the energyL~
of such surfacesingulanties
compares with that of grain boundaries. To build structures of linear energyL,
the rules must be revisited in thefollowing
way : whichgeneral
structure can we build ifwe curve the Sm-A
layers
with the constraints ofkeeping
themstnctly equidistant
andcreating
no more than point or linesingularities
? For pointsingularity,
the solution is tnvialand consists in
folding
thelayers
on concentncspheres,
the « disclination » pointsingularity
being
the conunon center of thespheres (Fig 4a).
In the case of linesingularities,
it can be shown[8] that,
m the mostgeneral
case,they
must be anellipse (El
and theconjugated
«
confocal
»hyperbola (Hi
in theperpendicular plane (Fig. 4b)
The term confocal » refers to the property that the focus of one conic coincides with the summit of the other and vice,
s I
I ,
I
3~~
aj
Fig 3 -An
arbitrary
undulated layer S cannot indefinitely gJve birth toparallel equidistant layers
The loci «i and «~
(only
«j is represented) build surfacesingulanties
where the layer curvature will divergeN 7 FOCAL CONIC FACETING IN SMECTIC-A LIQUID CRYSTALS 849
M
t t
' j
' ' , ' j
,
H
a)
b)
Fig
4 Pure curvature Sm-A defects The locus of the layer curvature centers defines discbnationssingularities,
reducing
a) to a point ID= 0) m the
sphencal piling
textures, b) to a pair of confocalellipse (E)
andhyperbola (HI
lines(D
=
I in the « focal conic texture.
versa These confocal conic
singulanties
are Volterra disclination lines of the(nematically
onented)
smecticordenng
Theordenng (isotropic
ornematic)
in the core of these lines is not known. At least the smecticordenng
does melt.The bulk Sm-A
layers
are built m such a way that their local normal n, which is also the nematicdirector,
lies on the fictitious linesjoining
anypoint
M on theellipse
to anypoint
M' on the
hyperbola (Fig 4b).
Thesimplest
focal conic has a revolutionsymmetry
andcorresponds
to thedegenerated
case in which theellipse
becomes a circle and thehyperbola
becomes the
perpendicular conjugated straight
line(the
revolutionaxis)
passingthrough
thecenter of the circle The Sm-A
layers
are then concentnc ton folded around the circle andintercepting
thestraight
line with anangular discontinuity
when the radii of the ton becomelarger
than the circle radius. Thegeneral ellipse-hyperbola
focal conic structure can beeasily
denvedby
continuous deformation from theprevious
case, i-e the Sm-Alayers
take thegeneral shape
of the so-calledDupm's cycfides corresponding
to ton-like surfaces whose« radii » increase in the direction of the
ellipse
focus notoccupied by
thehyperbola
A difficult
problem, already
discussedby
many authors[2, 3, 5, 8, 9],
concems thefilling of
space with focal conic defects. The
pnncipal problem
is to avoid strains betweenneighbouring
focal comics The main results can be summanzed as follows one can define conical domains
as the focal conic texture limited inside a cone whose apex O lies on the
hyperbola
and whose base is theellipse (Fig. 5a)
It is a stronggeometncal property
of « confocal » conics that suchcones are
always
cones of revolution. Since the molecules areparallel
to the cone generatnceseverywhere
on the cone, no disclination strains anse if the cones are associatedtangentially along
theirgeneratrices [8] (Fig 5b)
Such cones define a radial distnbution around theircommon apex O and the interstices between them can be
filled,
without strains, withspherical
layers [9]
also centered on O. The furtherfilling
associationsdepend
on theparticular boundary
conditions andboundary shapes.
Let us come back to the energetics of focal comics. Since the curvature
diverges
near thedisclination
lines,
it is now nolonger
obvious that a focal conic domain of sizeL
(size
of theellipse) corresponds
to an energy KL, Thelength f (the
smectic coherencelength)
of the cores around disclination lines appear as a natural cut-off for the curvatureH
I'
E
~
a) b)
Fig
5.Space filling
with Sm-A pure curvature defects a) Focal conic limited to a revolution cone ofaxJs OC The
oblique
base of the cone is anellipse (El
of center C Thehyperbola (Hl
goes from the focus F to the asymptote OC b) Focal conic texture between twoglass plates (from
YBouligand
[8])The cones are tangent
along
their comon generatnces OO~ The bulk interstices between neighbouringfocal conic are
probably
filled [9] withsphencal layers
centered on O and O'energy
integration. Although
theproblem
is nolonger
aone-length problem,
it has been shown[10]
that the core sizef only
appears in aslowly
varying corrective factor ln(L/f ).
The focal conic energy is the sum of three terms : the energy W~ of theintegrated
bulk curvature and the
energies ll~
and W~ of the respectiveellipse
andhyperbola
cores ofdisclination. In the case of a
degenerated
focal conic ofrevolution,
the bulk termW~,
integrated
in acylindncal
domain of revolution whose base is the circle of radius r, is written[10]
W~ Kr In(r/f) Traditionally [I],
the core dischnation of theellipse,
which istopologlcally
meltedeverywhere,
gives a contnbution of order K per unitlength (curving
anangle
unity over a distancef
must compare withmelting).
Th1s givesll~ Ki~,
in whichi~ represents
theellipse length, However,
a more precisedescription
should take into account, for vanous excentncities, thedependence
of theproportionality
coefficientalong
the line The case of thehyperbola
disclination line is moredelicate,
it has been shown[I ii
that both the core dischnation and its energy should vanish far from theellipse
since theangular discontinuity
becomes infinitesimal and can beelastically
relaxed. It is therefore a usualapproximation [5]
to countonly
thesign#icative
part of thehyperbola,
whoselength
compareswith that of the
ellipse.
The energies of the two disclinatlon lines are thenroughly proportional
The total energy,integrated
inside anoblique cylindncal
domainhaving
thehyperbola
direction and theellipse base,
can then be written as W~Kf~ (a
+p
inji~/fj)
,
(2j
theproportionality
coefficients a andp depending
on the excentncity[10].
Formula(3)
should beregarded
as valid in the l1mlt of verylong hyperbolae
If thehyperbola length
compares with the
ellipse length,
it can be convenient[4]
to treat them asindependent vanables,
I.e. to add a term~
Ki~ proportional
to thehyperbola length,
The previousgeneral
results on focal comcs will be useful to discuss the part
played by
bulk distortions in theequilibnurn shapes
of Sm-A nucleated inside itsisotropic phase
3.
Equifibdum shapes.
Surface energy
amsotropies play
animportant
role mdetermining equllibnum shapes.
Observing
Sm-Aphases,
Fnedel firstguessed [12],
from theshape
of the smectic germsN 7 FOCAL CONIC FACETING IN SMECTIC-A
LIQUID
CRYSTALS 851(«bitonnets»),
thetendency
of thelayers
to orient normal to theIsotropic/Smectic-A
interface. He also noticed thetendency
of smecticlayers
toalign parallel
to airdrop
surfaces (« gouttes figradins »)
He was howeverpuzzled,
in the first case, that a surface energymlnimurn could exist in a
non-crystalline
direction. Later on,X-ray experiments [13]
demonstrated the
tendency
of the Sm-Alayers
toalign parallel
to air interfaces Morerecently, quantitative
temperature measurements of theSm-Alair
surface energy wereperformed
onequilibnum
facets for freedrops laying
on a solid substrate[14].
TheSm-Alair parallel alignment corresponds
to theexpected crystalline
behavior.Conversely,
as wasquantitatively
shownrecently by
the texturalinstability
of reference[4],
interfaces with the tsotropicphases
of Sm-A matenals dopresent
the oppositetendency
: the smallest surfaceenergy
corresponds
to theperpendicular layerlinterface
onentation The expenment ofreference
[4]
studied the behavior of a Sm-Aplate
sandwiched between twoparallel
interfaces
Sm-Alair
on one side andSm-A/Isotropic
on the other. Above a thickness threshold of the Sm-Aplate,
a texturalinstability
occurs,creating
freefloating hexagonal
networks of focal conics, whose bulk curvature is induced to fulfil the two
antagonistic
interfacialanisotropies
In the absence of any air
interface,
afrustration
persists[15]
: a closed Sm-A volume,completely
immersed inside the isotropicphase,
cannot have both thepreferred
ideal bulkground
state~parallel planar equidistant layers)
and thepreferred perpendicular layers/inter-
face onentation
everywhere along
theboundary.
It is then of some interest to examine whichcompromise would be chosen in this frustrated situation In
particular,
we wonder whetherintnnsic focal conics should be present or not at
equilibnum
what would be theequilibrium
«
shape
» of a Sm-A closed volumehaving
nucleated inside theisotropic phase
?We first recall some well-known
simple
results oncrystal equilibnum shapes
Theamsotropic
surface energyy(0, WI
ofcrystals,
function of the relativebulk/surface
onentation
usually
definedby
the zenithal and azimuthalangles
0 and q, leads toequilibnum
shapes
withfacets and,
moregenerally, elongations,
which differstrongly
from thesphencal shapes corresponding
to y isotropic. In thesimplest
model, to determine theequilibnum shapes,
one must minimize the surface energy for a given fixed totalvolume,
with respect to the surfaceshape,
i-e solve Wulrsproblem
:iyds+aV=mln. (3)
The
corresponding
vanational formulation leads to the well-knownWufs
construction[16]
In such a
description,
for3D-crystals,
the bulk isstnctly
assumed to be «ideal », i e. theeventuality
of bulk elasticdistortions,
which involve toohigh
energies, is not consideredTherefore,
since y is theonly physical quantity
in theproblem,
no charactensticlength
appears and Wulrs solutions are homothetic
(the
solution for a given volume V~ is deduced from the onecorresponding
to a volume Vby
asimple homothetie,
i.e. has the same«shape»). Usually,
in the case of3D-crystals,
the functiony(0, WI
presents denvative discontinuities near the onentations close tocrystalline planes.
These discontinuities areresponsible
for the existence offacets
inequilibrium shapes However,
realcrystal
facets do notcorrespond
toequilibnum
but are rather due todynamic
effects[17],
except in very fewcases as in solid helium
[18]
To discuss the case of
Sm-A,
let us first establish thecorresponding
Wulrs solution In agreement with reference[4],
we assume y to be anisotropic, the minimal value(y~
corresponding
tolayers perpendicular
to theSm-A/Isotropic interface,
and the maximal value(yjj corresponding
tolayers parallel
to it In addition(and
alsoby
lack ofinfonnation),
weassume
y(0
to be a smooth function of theangle
0 between the normal to the Sm-Alayers
and the normal to the interface. From uniaxial symmetry, y is
independent
of q. Wulrssolution must then be a defined homothetical
shape
ofrevolution,
the normal to themonocrystalhne layers' piling being parallel
to the axis ofelongation
in order to increase thelengths
of the lowenergetical
surfaceparts (Fig. 6a)
Let us call L thelength
of thelong axisj
I-e- the
scaling length.
Due to the homothetical property, the total surface of the solution is S=
aL~,
wherea
[y]
is a pure constant(a
~
l
).
The total energyW~
of Wulrs solutioncontains
only
a surface term.Integrating
the interfacial energyyields
W~
= afL~ (4)
where
f
is a constantangular
mean value of y. Wulrs solutionexplores
the functiony
(0 by locally changing
the surface orientations withrespect
to the fixed bulk axis. Infact,
the
interfacia1energy
is a function of thesurface/volume
respective onentation which can also be modifiedby locally changing
the bulk axis directions with respect to thesurface,
i.e.introducing
bulk distortions. In the case of3D-crystals
which are very «stiff»,
it is a verygood
approximation toneglect
thesedegrees
of freedomHowever,
Smectics which areonly ID-crystals (and 2D-liquids)
are much « softer and can exhibit a very different behavior.,
C~
~
R
a) bj
Fig
6 -a)Wulrs solutioncorresponding
to an assumed «ideal »strictly
undistorted Sm-A bulkb)
Previousconfiguration elastically
relaxed ~6@ As soon as L is macroscopic, 8@ is foundinfinitesimal
Solving
thegeneral problem including
bulkdistortions,
i-eiyds+ fddv+aV=min (5)
is a difficult
problem,
the solutions of which are unknown Inpnnciple, fd
must describe all thepossible discrepancies
with respect to the ideal bulkequilibrium ground
stateiii,
i e.fd(r j
=
fel (r j
+f j (r j weq1 (61
The first term is the elastic free energy
density
associated with curvature and dilation of theN 7 FOCAL CONIC FACETING IN SMECTIC-A
LIQUID
CRYSTALS 853Sm-A
layers (see
Part2)
and the second one descnbes an eventualme1tlng
of the Sm-A order(e.g
near discfination lines since we are not concerned with dislocations which aremicroscopic
defects)
Although
the solutions of equation(5)
areunknown,
it ispossible
to make a semi- quantitat1ve discussion. Let us see how Wulrssolution,
whichstnctly
assumedrigid layers,
now
adapts
if we reintroduce the finite Sm-Aelasticity.
as the smecticlayers
are noteverywhere perpendicular
to theinterface,
a surface torque bends thelayers symmetrically
and dnves the system towards an
elastically
relaxedconfiguration (Fig. 6b)
Let us call R=
~IL
(~1 ~ l the revolution radius of Wulrssolution,
Ho a meanangle
at the surface and &0 the « mean »bending angle
An elastic relaxation &@ creates both curvature ofmean » radius p
R/&0
and dilation of « meanamplitude
eR(&0)/L.
The correspon-ding
energies,integrated
in the volume V=
ply L~,
withp l,
scale then asW~~
2~K(
~~R)~pL~~KL(&0)~ (7)
W~
B ~~~ ~p
L~ EL ~(&0 )~
(8)
2 L
As L is
always
muchlarger
than A, theleading
term is W~W~
«W~) Assumlng
y to haveroughly
the formy(0 )
y~ +by cos~ 0,
theenergy of Wulrs solution is lowered
by
anamount
Aw
«L2 by jcos2
Ho + &oj cos2 ooj
+~
(
EL 3(&o11 (9j
~1
Minimization of
equation (9)
withrespect
to &0yields
:~~~2 ~2 ~2
~~
4
p
~~~ ~~° Gl Gl
~~~~in which we have introduced both A
(K/B)"~
andlo K/Ay
The constant A is known tocompare to a few molecular
lengths
far from second-orderphase
transitions and the order ofmagnitude
ofto
is known as a result of theinstability
studied in reference[4],
1-e-to
01-1 ~m for usual Sm-Aphases,
withK~10~~
cgs andby 01cgs
It follows thatabove microscopic molecular sizes, &0 is
infinitesimal
and this relaxation irrelevant as m thecase of
3D-crystals.
This is due to the fact that this symmetnc solution which can be obtainedcontinuously
from Wulrs one must involve dilation of thelD-crystal.
Dilation energy which scalesL~
must be of infinitesimalamplitude
to compare with interfacial energiesscaling
~L~
To findconfigurations definitely
lessenergetical
than Wulrssolution,
one must introduceonly
non-dilative bulk distortions This is indeedpossible,
as we show now, in thecase of low-dimensional
crystals
like smectics andcorresponds
to the pure curvature of focalconic defects.
We shall now exhibit a
particular configuration
with focal conic bulk distortions of energyW~c
lower than the energyWw
of Wulrs solution. We choose aparticular configuration
which has the same homothetic extemal surface than Wulrs solutionand,
inaddition,
weplace
arevolution focal conic
(circle
on the surface andconjugated straJght
line on the revolutionaxis)
inside thebulk, according
tofigure
7a Note that the symmetncup-side
down focal conicis not introduced as will be discussed in
part
5W~c
contains a surface termlI~
and a volume term W~ As the extemalshape
is chosenhomothetically
identical to Wulrs one, the surface energy isll~
= a y~c
L~ ll~
is nowsignyicatively
lower than Wulis surface energy since thelayer
onentation fits better theextremity
near the circle and isquite unchanged everywhere
C~
,
, E
i
i
u i i
aj b)
Fig
7 -Modelconfigurations
based on Wulrs solution with one revolution focal conic included.a)
Perspectlve
view of the dischnatlon lines b) Cross sectionthrough
the revolution axis The Sm-A layers are now quasiperpendicular
to theSm-A/Isotropic
interface near the circle E. H should be tilted to allow for another focal conic to relax the other end.else
(Fig 7b),
1-e- y~c~f stnctly. Therefore,
since the focal conic energy W~ isnegligible compared
toL~
for Llarge enough,
i-e- W~e(L~),
there exists a charactensticlength to
above which the solutionincluding
the focal conic isenergetically
lower To deternuneto,
let us introduceexplicitly
the focal conic energy W~ of order(Cte)
KRln(R/f)
+(Cte) KR,
aspreviously
discussed in part 2. The total energy can then be written asWFC~ «y~cL~+ (vi
+v~in (L/fij
KL(iii
where vi and
v~~l
are dimensionless numbers.Therefore,
L»to yields WFC~ Ww,
to being
givenby
to
~
j
~°(121
Y YFC
where v~ = vi +
v21n ((off) l;
And again, we find back thetypical
sizelo ~K/Ay,
oforder
01-1~m,
companng the amsotropy of the surface energy with the Sm-Alayer
curvature constant. Note that in other contexts with fixed
boundary shapes,
such acharacteristic
length
due to thecompetition
between surface and bulk energies was first mentioned in reference[9]
and thendeveloped
in reference[3]
The main difference here is that we discuss the intnnsic case ofnucleation,
in which both surface and bulk texture are freeparameters.
We have therefore found a
particular configuration
containing one focal conic, which isenergetically
lower than Wulrs solution. This indeed isenough
to ensure thatequilibnum shapes
must contain focal comics above thetypical
sizeto. However,
thegeneral equllibnum shape
solution isprobably
much different from thissimple
one, Infact,
because ofto,
the homotheticalproperty disappears,
and one should expect, for each volumeV,
oneparticular
solution characterized bothby
its extemal surfaceshape
and its bulk focalconic
texture. One should then also
expect
first-order transitions between different classes ofbt 7 FOCAL CONIC FACETING IN SMECTIC-A
LIQUID
CRYSTALS 855solutions
involving
different focal conic arrangements, and allcorresponding hysteresis phenomena.
For instance, in the vicinity oflo,
aninstability
s1mllar to that of reference[4]
should occur to create the first focal conic from Wulrs solution.
Unfortunately,
the valuelo
0.I-I ~mprevents
fromobserving
itdirectly
underoptical
microscopy Note that in the geometry of reference[4],
it is because of the presence of the air interface that theinstability
threshold is raised up to a macroscopic value
However,
as known since1910,
focal conics are indeedalways
observed inside nucleatedshapes
We nowpresent
anexperiment
demonstra-ting
theirstab1llty
4.
Experimental study
ofshape
and texturestability.
Nucleation of Sm-A inside the
isotropic phase
of theliquid crystalline
material gives rise to the so-called Sm-A « bdtonnets »[2]
Infigure
8 we havereproduced
theoriginal
« bitonnet »drawings by
Friedel andGrandjean.
From thesedrawings,
it does not seem at once obvious that these bitonnetscorrespond
to theequilibrium shapes
that could beexpected
from ourmodel. To discuss in more detail the agreement with our
model,
it is convenient to« separate the
stability
of thesurface shape
itself from thestability
of the bulk texture for a given surfaceshape.
Tins will be indeedpossible, provided
the results of thefollowing experimental study
of the « bitonnetstability
Because Sm-A are stillID-crystals,
it is notobvious, by analogy
with3D-crystals,
that the observedshapes correspond
toequihbnum.
Itis well known for instance that actual
crystal
facets in nucleatedshapes
are due todynamical
processes
~growth instabilities)
thancorrespond
to the onesexpected
forequilibrium shapes
One cannot either exclude a
possible dynamical
ongin for the focal comics.Moreover,
as focalconic textures could be metastable systems, their persistance in stabilized «bitonnets » of
finite life-time is not a
proof
of theirstability.
We nowpresent
anexpenment
which studies the bitonnet »stability using
an AC electrical field E to act on the bulk focal conic texture of the bitonnetsSpatial
fieldgradients
VE alsoplay
an important part incontrolling
the« bitonnet » locations
~/ ~~~'
,
~
'
)) )/ j ll~
'~ ~
a) '~i c) oh e)
Fig
8Typical
bfitonnetshapes
with their focal conic texturescorresponding
to the nucleation of Sm-A inside its Isotropic phase (from G Fnedel and F.Grandjean
[2])The
experimental set-up
is thefollowing.
we use thecompound
10CB(4-n-decyl- 4~-cyano-biphenyl)
whichundergoes
a first-order Sm-A~Isotropic phase
transition at50.5 °C Our cell consists in two honzontal
glass plates
between which two nickel wires of50 ~m diameter are
placed
one in front of theother,
the extremitiesbeing separated by
200 ~m. No other spacers than the wires are used. The wires are connected to a
frequency
generator dehvenng
a sinusoidal tension m the range 0-200 V andfrequency fin
the range 0-l0kHz The cell, filled with the
liquid crystal material,
isplaced
inside a temperature controlled oven with 10-2 °Ctemperature
resolution We observe the preparation with avideo camera attached to a
polarizing
microscope We start, at zerovoltage, by observing
the isotropicphase.
Then wecarefully
decrease the temperature below the Sm-A ~Isotropic
transition. We observe the appearance of the Sm-A bitonnetsnucleating
very often on theglass substrates, probably
because of the occasional presence ofimpunties favoring
the Sm-Agermination
We now follow thisprocedure
: weapply
avoltage
V ~100 V and vanablefrequency f
For lowfrequencies f
~ 500 Hz or DCfrequencies,
we observe an electro-hydrodynamical
flowprobably
due to ionic convection To cancel sucheffects,
we fixf
~10 kHz well above thecharge
relaxationfrequency.
We first observe that the « biton-nets » are more or less attracted towards the nearest electrode This
phenomenon, probably
caused
by
the fieldgradients,
appears as a convenient way to dnve the « bitonnets out of theglass
substrate toward theisotropic liquid. Switching
off the electricalfield,
freefloating
«bitonnets » are now
easily recognized
sincethey
dnftslowly
inside theisotropic liquid.
They closely correspond
to thedescription
givenby
Friedel andGrandjean [2] they
presentvarious external
shapes
decorated with bulkfocal
conicshaving
their disclination lines more or less virtual(out
of thephysical
Sm-Avolume). They
areelongated
in a direction which isparallel
to the averagelayer piling
direction inside the bulk. This iseasily
verifiedby searching
for the maximum
birefnngence darkening
between crossed nicols. Due to thelayer
curvatureof the focal comics, there is no total extinction. The extemal « bitonnet
»
shapes
have more or less the revolutionsymmetry
around theelongation axis,
butthey
oftenpresent
lateralirregulanties,
the so-called «sailfies»[2], corresponding
to localrapid
vanations of thesurfacelaxls
distance. The extemalshape strongly depends
on the « bitonnet»
history
those which unstuck from theglass plates
have a freefloating shape
somehow related to their initialshape
Now,raising
the temperature, it ispossible
to decrease their size down to a few microns and then to let them grow again. In this case, their extemalshape
is moreregular
and strong « saillies are absent.However,
it oftenhappens
that a small bitonnetcollapses
inside a
bigger
one,creating
a saillie localized at the impact level.Usually,
such saillies » take more or less a revolution symmetry after a bulk texture rearrangement It thereforeappears, as will be discussed
later,
that the extemalshape
is mostprobably
out ofequilibnum
We now isolate a 50 ~m
large
and 100 ~mlong
« bitonnet », containingclearly
visible focal comics, between the two electrodes(Fig. 9a)
andapply
variousvoltages
at afrequency f
10 kHz We observe that the bitonnet » is onentedby
the electncal field in such a way that itslong
axis becomesparallel
to the field lines.However,
the main effect of the electrical field is to suppress the focal conic domains For low tensions, in the range 10-30V, only
thelarge
focal conic domains(with
sizes 50 ~Lm)compared
with the «bitonnet» size aresuppressed Increasing
the tension, smaller domainsdisappear
and for a 200 Vvoltage,
all focal comcsdiseappear (Fig. 9b).
The bitonnet presents now auniformly
onented ideal undistorted bulk~perfect
extinction between crossednicols),
the normal conunon to thelayers
beenparallel
both to the field lines and the «bitonnet» axis In presence of the electricalfield,
the external surface of the« bitonnet » is not modified
(the
surface « saillies » do notrelax). However,
if the « bitonnet » had notexactly
a revolution symmetry, the latteris «
instantly
»obtained,
i-e- within one video frame(~
20ms).
Then,
to achieve the experiment, wesuddenly
switch-off the electrical field The focalcomics reappear
«instantly
», I-e also within one video frame(~20ms),
inside the bulk(Fig. 9c) According
to ouroptical resolution,
the focal conic texturereproduces
a pattern very similar to the previous oneBefore
discussing
the effect of the electrical field on the bulk texture, which is the importantpoint
of theexpenment,
we first come back to the «saillies» of the «bitonnets» tobt 7 FOCAL CONIC FACETING IN SMECTIC-A
LIQUID
CRYSTALS 857h
~
,j
jc
It
S_ ~ '
~/r
,~
/.~
[
~
_i
aj bi ci
Fig
9.Vanishing
of tile focal conic texture inside an Sm-A « bitonnet » loo +nilong,
using a HF electrical field E. The blackshapes
are the Z 50 ~m nickel vnre electrodesal
Beforeapplyrng
E.b)
Eis
applied,
tile focal comics all vanish.cl
E is switchedoff, they
«instantly
» reappearquantitatively
discuss theirpersistance.
In a true3D-liquid,
a sinular sailhe of curvature radius~
R would induce a
Laplace
pressure&p y/R
between the inside volume and the rest of the bulk. This pressure &p would then create areacting
flowre1axlng
the «sailhe»(Fig, 10a).
The relaxation life thne~ r~D is defined
by
the balance between the viscous forces and the pressure forces.Calling
~ the viscosity, the flowvelocity
vR/r3D
is thengiven by
~Av~Vp
Thespatial
denvativestaking place
on the samelength ~R,
thisgives
v
y/~,
and thenr~D
~'~ (13)
Y
t j ,
'
t t
'
, t
i ,
,
, ,
a) b)
Fig
lo. -« Saiflie » relaxation via theLaplace
pressure induced flow(arrows) a) Simple 3D-liquid
case