III.
-SOWS
AND PIGLETS FEEDINGFeed restriction during late lactation in the
sowP. H.
DUÉE,
M.ÉTIENNE J.
LEBOSTStation de Recherches sur
l’Elevage
des Porcs, J. N.R. A.,
C. N. R. Z., 78350Jouy
en,Josas
This
experiment
was made on3 6 Lavge
White sows after 1St or 2ndfarrowing ( 75
and zg p. fOOrespectively)
with the aim ofdetermining
the effects of a severe feed restriction( 50
p.roo) during
the last two weeks of a lactation
period
of 35days.
At the moment when the sows were divided into groups
(gz
groups of IS sowseach) they
exhibited
comparable performances
withrespect
toweight (gestation
netweight + lactation weight variation,
i.e. !- 33kg,
on anaverage)
and number of suckledpiglets (8. 1
on anaverage).
The diet
containing
IS.5 p. 100crudeprotein
and 295o kcaldigestible
energy perkg
was offeredto the animals either at a level close to ad libitum
feeding ( 5 kg/day)
or restricted( 2 . 5 kg/day).
Reduction of the
feeding
levelsignificantly
increased theweight
loss of the sowsduring
thelast two weeks of lactation
( 20 . 2
versus m.3kg)
andmainly during
the first week of theexperi-
ment. Parallel to that the
growth
of thepiglets
decreased : 16 p. ioo decrease of the litterweight
from 21 to 35
days
in the restricted group and this decrease was also more markedduring
thefirst week of the
experiment ( 23
p.too).
The effects of this feed restriction did not seem to have any
repercussion
on theperformances
of the sows
during
thesubsequent reproductive cycle (weight
variation of the sows ; number ofpiglets
atfarrowing). However,
it was observed that the number or animalsreturning
in ocstrusafter the
mating following weaning
waslarger.
Effect of fasting multiparous sows the day
of weaning on their reproductive performances
J. LEBOST, M. BONNEAU, J.
RETTAGLIATI A. AUMAITRE Station de Recherches surl’Élevage
desPorcs,
I. N. R.A.,
C. N. R. Z.,78350
Jouy
enJosas
Fourty Large
White sows were distributedinto
1 groupstaking
into account the meanweight
andparity
of the animals in order tostudy
the eventual influence of feed and water star- vation on theday
ofweaning,
after a lactationperiod
of 35days.
The treatments involved sup-pression
of wateronly (group i), suppression
of feedonly (group 2 ), suppression
of water andfeed
(group 3 ), suppression
of feed and administration of 50 g sodiumsulphate
per animal. Theweaning-oestrus
interval varied little from one group to another(group
i :7 .6 days,
group 2 :7.6 days,
group 3 : 9.3days,
group 4 : m.9days).
Theweaning-conception
interval( 12 . 7 - 7 .6- 1 6. 0
and 21.8
days)
did notsignificantly
differ because of alarge
intra-treatmentvariability ( 73
to130
p.
100 ). However,
it was in the group where feed wassuppressed
and not water on theday
ofweaning
that no return to heat was noted versus 20to 30 p. 100in the other groups.But,
neitherweight gain performances during subsequent gestation
norprolificacy
of the animals at nextfarrowing
were affectedby
either of these treatments.Influence of the feeding level between weaning
and mating on the reproductive performances of multiparous sows
M. ÉTIENNE P. H. DUÉE J.
LEBOSTStation de Recherches suy
l’Élevage
des Porcs, I. N. R. A., C. N.R. Z.,
78350
Jouy
enJosas
This
study
was made with the aim ofsearching
for eventual effects ofoverfeeding
beforemating
on thereproductive performances
ofmultiparous
sows.3 6
adultLarge
White sows weredivided into 3 groups
according
to litter order andweight
atweaning.
Oneonly
feed was offeredat three different levels which were
kept
constant in each group between theday
afterweaning
and the
day
ofmating.
The amounts allotted were 1.5, 2.5 and 3.5kg
perday, respectively
ingroups 1,2 and 3.
During gestation,
all sows received 2.5kg
feed perday.
The results did not show any difference between the three groups of animals. The
weight
variations of the sows were
comparable ; however,
betweenweaning
andmating
theweight
losstended to decrease when the
feeding
level was enhancedduring
thisperiod.
911 the sowspartu- riated,
95 p. 100having
been fertilized at the 1st oestrus. The duration of theweaning-oestrus
interval
( 7 . 9 ,
m.4 and8. 3 days, respectively
for groups 1, 2and3 )
and theweaning-conception
interval
( 7 . 9 ,
13.5 and9 .8 days)
was short and did not differ between the groups. This was also the case for the number ofpiglets
born( 9 . 9
on anaverage)
and born alive per litter( 9 .6
on anaverage).
According
to thisstudy,
therelationship
between thereproductive performances
and thenutritional state of the sows at
mating
seemed to be low. Enhancement of thefeeding
level betweenweaning
andmating
ofmultiparous
sows did not affect theirfertility
and did not lead toimprove-
ment of their
prolificacy
even when the latter was poor. Furtherknowledge
of thephysiological
mechanisms involved should lead to a more accurate determination of the consequences