• Aucun résultat trouvé

Chinese Evaluation Group

N/A
N/A
Info
Télécharger
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Chinese Evaluation Group"

Copied!
5
0
0

Chargement.... (Voir le texte intégral maintenant)

Texte intégral

(1)

ChEG

Chinese Evaluation Group

Chinese Evaluation Group Work

17 May 2010

2nd IEEE 802.16 IMT-Advanced Evaluation Group

IEEE L802.16-10/0063

(2)

On ITU-R WP5D #7 meeting

• 11 IEGs submitted 12 evaluation reports and one status report

• ChEG submitted two contributions

– Preliminary evaluation report on 3GPP LTE RELEASE 10 & beyond (5D/650)

• Including TDD and FDD RITs

• Focus on compliance template for technical performance

– Further Clarification on antenna pattern and sector pattern for correlated beam-forming antenna system (5D/645 )

• as additional evaluation method

(3)

Recent work

• Face to face meetings and email discussion were

performed to facilitate evaluation work among members

• Intercommunication with other IEGs

• Evaluation work on LTE-Advanced and IEEE 802.16m technologies

• Discussion and evaluation work on Open Area Rural Model proposed by TCOE India

– Questions and suggestion have been submitted to Forum 3 of the Correspondence Group

– Evaluation is being done according to clarified assumption

(4)

Evaluation work

• Calibrate according to calibration procedure and results provided by IEEE

– Geometry calibration

– System level calibration with DL SU-MIMO 4 x 2 configuration

ÎCalibration results show good alignment with information provided by IEEE

• Evaluation work on IEEE technology

– Focus on downlink cell spectral efficiency and cell edge user spectral efficiency

– Final evaluation results are still in process

(5)

Thanks!

Références

Télécharger maintenant ( PDF - 5 Page - 787.59 KB )

Documents relatifs

IEEE 802.16m Evaluation byRussian Evaluation Group

• REG has capabilities to provide a complete set of the required simulations results for the IEEE 802.16m technology including link level and system level results compliant to the

REPORT OF CFD LAB 4 Number of Students Total 23 Submitted 23 Not Submitted 0

However, since we are projecting the force vector into (1,0,0) vector to get the drag for other parts too, we shouldn’t change the sign of force for that specific part.. Some

REPORT OF CFD LAB 1 Number of Students Total 43 Submitted 41 Not Submitted 2

Analysis and Discussion, can fix the mistakes and resubmit for full credit by (10/7). This is only allowed of CFD Lab 1, no future leniency will be granted. o Many students did

REPORT OF CFD LAB 4 Number of Students Total 41 Submitted 41 Not Submitted 0

 All students understood the CFD process and were successful running the simulations.  Many students were satisfied with the lab and felt they benefitted from the lab. Negative.

HW 1 REPORT Number of Students Total 39 Submitted 36 Not Submitted 3

 Some students used wrong units on speed of sound in air, units did not cancel correctly for Mach

HW 2 REPORT Number of Students Total 39 Submitted 34 Not Submitted 5

 Students did not find the center of mass of the gate properly Problem 2.119 – Buoyancy.  Students had trouble finding the center of buoyancy of the displace water since the

HW 3 REPORT Number of Students Total 39 Submitted 36 Not Submitted 3

 Students are still forgetting that pressure also acts on the control volume when attempting to use momentum equations.  Students forgot hydrostatic pressure when solving

HW 4 REPORT Number of Students Total 37 Submitted 33 Not Submitted 4

 Undergraduate students are not completing comprehensive problems for extra credit.  No major recurring errors in